Now that the dust has settled, are you ready to admit that Dark Souls 3 did certain things better than Bloodborne?
Now that the dust has settled, are you ready to admit that Dark Souls 3 did certain things better than Bloodborne?
Camden Ward
Other urls found in this thread:
Wyatt Bailey
>Now that the dust has settled
Jeremiah Jackson
The only two things it did better are multiplayer and length.
Jeremiah Butler
Agreed, Bloodborne was and IS an overrated game.
Owen Evans
>rollspam works too well
>too many swamps and cathedrals
>feels like they were running out of ideas
>level design is too linear
Outside of these complaints, I think it's still great, equal with the other games (minus DS2).
Jonathan Cooper
No
Bloodborne is literally the best game ever made, of all time.
youtube.com
Henry Stewart
Not yet, it will be when they remaster it on PS5 in 60fps
Brandon Russell
>Too many swamps
There were two swamps; the flooded basement of a subterranean ruins, a creek and some poison mist does not make a swamp.
Benjamin Green
It's funny that they had to implement magical asbestos in one of the areas of the second DLC so you wouldn't take fall damage. now that's lazy game design.
Grayson Martinez
?
Bentley Ward
I loved Dark Souls 3. Also loved Bloodborne. Fuck I love these games.
Christopher Jones
Like what? Every enemy is 2 phases?
Hudson Cooper
The first area of the ringed city where you are forced to take falls that otherwise would insta kill you.
Xavier Cooper
user, please remember that you (Can) get a ring that negates ALL falling damage.
Jeremiah Martin
>lazy game design
>a brand new mechanic (small circles that cause no fall damage)
>with a contextual in-game explanation (clearly some manner of magic rune on the ground causing this)
>so you can better appreciate some vistas and massively vertical areas, many of which are taller than anything in the previous games
>lazy game design
actually, you suffer from a condition known as "mental retardation." It can make things quite confusing, so don't feel too downs about being wrong.
Nolan Carter
Bloodborne loses for replayability because it has no class variety and chalice dungeons are a boring slog
Ian Gutierrez
>people actually defending the magical asbestos
I'm not surprised that Dark Souls 3 fans like asbestos.
Charles Thomas
Like what?
Adrian Jones
maybe?
being able to respec your character is always nice but I can't think of anything else honestly
Julian Rodriguez
>ignores argument
>just spouts "asbestos" like he just learned that word
>too cowardly to reply
Pathetic.
Kevin Wilson
you were being rude to me. I'm not here to humour you.
Hudson King
you reap what you sow, fag
Matthew Thomas
Not the same user but:
They didn't explain shit, they just let you know it is a "magic circle".
No new ability, armor or something that makes sense. Also I really liked the area and the boss
Kevin Wright
Also like one tool per unique build. There is literally no point of doing a Strength/bloodtinge build until the DLC where you can get the Bloodletter, or Arcane/Skill until you can get Amygdala arm.
Lincoln Morales
I guess Midir is a better Amygdala.
This one is a fair comparison because they both use the same laser beam attack.
But I just find it quite unsatisfying to replay because its areas are even more ehh than Bloodborne's. Dark Souls 2 is more appealing than 3.
Ryan Gonzalez
Amy has a cooler design though
Michael Hernandez
would you really want to change your armor or even your build to equip some fall spell/ability for like three falling points?
Alexander Stewart
no, DaS3 is still by far the worst entry in the series, as it's essentially BB without the polish and with a lack of creativity for the majority of the game
but it also had the biggest peak within the entire series with Gael
Mason Collins
This. DS3 was quite serviceable but fell a little flat, with Gael being a huge exception as his fight was the best one in the entire series.