Offline

>Steam is a service and not DRM!

Attached: SteamOffline.png (358x306, 7K)

👌

Who said it's not DRM?

literally just start a game retard

You can still play your games offline, if that's what you were getting at.

physical chads in the house tonight

Attached: 070.png (633x874, 56K)

LMAO
BUYCU CKS
LITERALLY
CU CKED

Attached: pirate master race.jpg (2636x1992, 3.24M)

Attached: 1507077056766.jpg (1810x1040, 656K)

Epic seems to be up.

>valve won't take your game-

Attached: 1546306237225.png (536x114, 71K)

Ahem...

Attached: Shogun.png (905x521, 65K)

>You are so addicted you cant wait 12 fucking minutes to get your dose.
Now is on junkie, remove yourself.

Who are you quoting?

I have Shogun2 and play it offline all the time. TRY AGAIN EPIC STORE SHILL

Update your mac os dipshit.

mediocre bait

>why would you want to play games you own you entitled 12yearold!

>Windows 7, a 10 year old OS, is still supported by Microsoft and Valve
>Mavericks, a 6 year old OS, is already being dropped

Attached: WHAT IN THE GODDAMN.gif (500x283, 1.54M)

>game i paid for doesnt work
>omg you EPIC shill!

I don't even have an account for EPIC store. I will gladly shill for GoG though

day in life of an applefag

It will make my computer run slower.
>computer plays game fine one day
>not allowed to play next
They also dropped Yosemite which is 4 years old.
It's so they could embed chrome to run the new social features.

>Not having other games to play
>Having only multiplayer only\always online games
>Having the mental deficiency to post a stupid shit like this
>Not having something better to do
>Not having other things to do

Yes i believe you are a 12 yr old for sure. As i said, the dope is on so remove yourself, shoo.

>It will make my computer run slower.
have you considered using a product not from a company who are known to throttle their older products whenever a new one is released

Attached: 1552081186423.jpg (1024x903, 70K)

>1 weapon skin has been deposited into your Steam inventory

Attached: CHAGE and ASKA - On Your Mark. I'd say Perturbator - Assault or The Cult of 2112 is a better fi (720x400, 2.96M)

I have 842 games on my steam account and none of them has weapon skins, try harder kid.

Works on my machine

>I have 842 games on my steam
How does it feel knowing that all of them can become inaccessible at any point?

Attached: 1537871825591.jpg (704x904, 193K)

There is more % of a global thermonuclear war. I dont care of shit that will never happen.

Attached: 1554113430842.gif (487x560, 898K)

not him but you retarded

>shitty third worlder with bad internet couldnt finish a game download

I think at that point I'd have bigger things to worry about then videogames.

I do find it annoying steam doesn't let you play more then one game at a time, even on different machines. Though, assuming one is a singleplayer game with no required online component, you can get around that.

>what if you were incredibly paranoid like me

I remember when Big Picture mode on Steam didn't work on WinXP because they didn't want to write a different font renderer for it. Good thing no one gives a shit about that mode other than to setup their controller.

Supporting legacy OS is a non-issue, and Chromium is a cancer that 'has' to be updated regularly, and you're at the whim of another company's min requirements as a result.

"pirated copy of the game". Bullshit. It would have said illegal copy or some other nuanced bullshit. There is no way that is a message from Steam. It is either a deliberate dud or edited image.

That's not true at all on single machines. If you're library sharing you can also play on different machines at the same time just not the same game.

Attached: Capture.jpg (288x355, 18K)

Few years ago steam changed how they do offline mode. You have to launch the game at least once online, and then if you change something in your system, even date/time, you will have to repeat the online part again, before being able to play offline.

>Tomoko

Attached: Really now.png (264x382, 79K)

>all of them can become inaccessible at any point?
I know this is bait but there are some people who unironically argue this, without taking into account that steam
1) will never shut down as long as csgo, dota2 and tf2 exist
2) will never shut down without notice
3) most (like 95%) of games are either drm-free or use steamworks which can be turned off by valve if the client was ever in danger of doing offline

Never really looked into library sharing, maybe I'll take a glance instead of doing my janky workaround.

Yeah just after you update for the next hour lmoa

Do you know how to read?
For a few hours, it wasn't possible to start games not even -offline.

Valve cant logistically fail. The worst scenario possibile is the merging with an equivalent or superior economical powerful store and you will still have your games (since licenses can be transfered by law) and the name of the store will be Epic Game Store.

>I choose not to believe it

*downloads 132gb "update"*

>For a few hours, it wasn't possible to start games not even -offline.
20 minutes and you can play any game not always online or with online check. I kept playing Pathfinder Kingmaker without even notice it.

>1) will never shut down as long as csgo, dota2 and tf2 exist
They don't even need to exist anymore. Steam is the biggest PC videogame market place in the world.

You mean 10 minutes. And yes it was possible to play drm-free games offline

it works on my machine

>Do you know how to read?
>For a few hours, it wasn't possible to start games not even -offline.
How does one anecdote define what will happen in the future? I've never had issues with games offline. Why would you even be offline in the first place?

Any games that do not use Steamworks can always be played from the exe directly

>steamworks which can be turned off by valve if the client was ever in danger of doing offline

Developers have to patch it out and they have no obligation to do it

>They don't even need to exist anymore. Steam is the biggest PC videogame market place in the world.
>Too big to fail

>Developers have to patch it out and they have no obligation to do it
When their games are for sale. But if the client goes under they're no longer in sale are they

>Developers have to patch it out and they have no obligation to do it
Developers are also trying to sell their games to as many people as possible so why they not?
Do you have any formal education outside of highschool? Go sign up at your local community college for a basic ECON class.