Can we all agree on this?

Can we all agree on this?

Attached: IQ Skill.png (800x600, 34K)

...

fighting games need to be way further to the right

you need to add bullet hells and put them past rhythm games.

Cool trick:
>Put animal in options field
>Post until you get llama (1/300 chance)
>Freely use any animal, not just random🐂

MGS2 is way harder to get the best rank in the highest difficulty to b low skill tier.
You can be a brainlet to play stealth games they just need lots of memorization, for patrols, item locations and strats.

Fighting games need to move up in skill and hack and slash back. Ninja Gaiden black was a generation or two ago.

>third person shooter
>higher IQ than first person shooter
lmao you wish

Attached: Untitled.png (800x600, 38K)

How about this?

Attached: IQ Skill.png (800x600, 36K)

>rougelikes
How do so many fucking people make this typo

>4x requires skill and not metagaming and luck
>GSG require the highest IQ and not puzzle games

Rogue the bat is my favorite Sonic character

Attached: 141324135431.png (1789x2634, 1.01M)

Point at someone's head and clicking does not require nearly as much skill as playing a fighting game. A shitty player can get lucky and hit some sick shots in a shooter. They can't get lucky and accidentally bang out 1-frame combos like this

IQ is arguable in terms of tactics and positioning and stuff but the execution skill is not

good shit

Attached: Daigo.webm (640x360, 2.79M)

Looks good

>MMORPG
>low IQ
>low skill

lol maybe in your post-WoW clown world.
UO was near unplayable without massive amounts of planning and lighting fast team coordination. Internet speed back in the day didn't make it any easier, but even with broad band this game is still hard as shit.

Attached: uosa3.jpg (884x668, 691K)

Just accept it as an indicator of low IQ and move on. We'll never fix it.

Attached: 1511154326767.jpg (670x501, 46K)

and kaizo mario is some of the hardest high skill shit ever but this chart is based on the averages and not the exceptions

RTS should be further to the right. The skill ceiling in an rts is incredibly high. Microing each unit individually and using them to their full potential when you have 20+ on the screen, while managing your economy, and expanding is incredibly skill intensive. I would argue the most skill intensive.

>MMO RPG least of both
whoever made this only played Guild Wars 2 and FXIV

Attached: 1515265302776.jpg (225x225, 7K)

Even then it shouldn't be where it is. Unless you honestly consider korea grinders as representative of the genre.

But in that case simulation games would be low iq as well because of all the german variations of "street sweeping simulator 2021".

SF5 is a fucking joke you noob

Attached: 1401210128951.png (706x412, 278K)

>SF5 is a fucking joke
I agree user, I agree

Attached: BeforeAndAfterSFV.png (613x805, 826K)

Delete "rougelikes"
Add roguelites to the top left of platformers
Add roguelikes a bit to the left of 4X games

Forgot fighting games

Attached: Chart2.png (1094x759, 28K)

>Can we all agree on ____?
No

No

>Fightan
>Fighting Games
I don't think you did forget them user

I posted some other chart but deleted the post, this is why there is "2" in the filename

im saying fighting games are in there twice, look at your chart

Attached: 1550738703907.jpg (750x850, 78K)

Your list is fucked dude.

Here

Attached: 3.png (1094x759, 38K)

Why are racing games so low? Dirt rally, Iracing and assetto corsa are some of the most challenging in depth games around

What genre would you say is easier than racing games

Attached: ftfy.png (1094x759, 12K)

Thanks user, you actually fixed it

arcade racing games and sim racing should be separate categories.