It was a different time

It is literally their only reason for existance

Hardly. If average intelligence is 5, he was only one standard deviation below that which can easily be explained with lack of modern education (if he was on the NCR side, he would've received at least some of that and he'd have INT 5).

This is the power of a man who has risen above the 3D menace. Women are the niggers of the genders and you literally can't prove me wrong.

Lol i bet he voted trump

ok beta orbiter

Well, the average woman is smarter than the average man.
While the smartest/dumbest (extremes) are more prevalent in males

>jerks off to anime
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

No one said they did though

but we do owe them more than half of our earnings while they sit around being useless, right? fuck off

Remember to pay that alimony before the end of the month nigga!

and yet, they weren't so unrealistic

Attached: ZxNLbz6.jpg (1023x651, 142K)

>evil character says something
>retards take this as the game endorsing that viewpoint
>probably turn around and complain when there aren't a variety of viewpoints in other games

But in fallout INT of 4 or lower actually makes the player character a retard who can't string a coherent sentence together. Fallout INT works like vidya reviews. Pic is a good example of an INT 5 in the FO universe

Attached: FATS IN GAMES.png (1238x1850, 2.05M)

INT is not changed by education. Regardless of whether he recieved education, he'll still be a knucklehead regardless, based on the ingame logic.
He's literally more retarded than most of the people he's insulting, he's the literal embodiment of a retard who thinks he's better solely because he was born into a certain category.

>only experience of irl relationships is watching his parents get divorced
hahahahahaahahahahahaha

But that's a factual statement, women have smaller brains and obviously lower iqs, they're less capable of thinking abstractly and in the modes required to push humanity forward and are physically weaker.
All they have to do is have children to keep society going but in the west and other industrialized countries they're not even doing that and they are all slowly dying.
Just one necessary role and they're failing at it.
Not true, that bs came from one study where they measured at the time where the girls had hit puberty and the boys had to catch up, all other studies of IQ show that the average man is more intelligent than the average woman on top of having the geniuses and you see proof of it all around in the accomplishments.

Nature doesn't care about biology.

Now you're just projecting son, I ain't gonna blogpost for your slave ass

Attached: 1512564820209.jpg (516x417, 68K)

when do we get the word filter?

>fat
>meanwhile has enough muscles to benchpress a goddamn car
Excuse me, what?

they do though. That's their entire purpose and role

>seething

Yes they do

Attached: 1553350811862.jpg (789x750, 94K)

lol

He makes a valid point.

lol

Average intelligence between men and women is about the same. The main noticable difference is that the normal distribution of IQ for men is slightly flatter, which means there are more women with average intelligence while there are slightly more geniuses/utter retards among men.

lol

Attached: 16fbbdf6-534d-448f-a3ff-70beb81b53f2.png (692x599, 102K)

Japs love this shit because Sumos are like this. They might have guts and wear diapers, but those guys are buff as fuck too. Look at this man's titties then look at his delts. he's a fatboi but he's probably stronger than most of /fit/
I should probably address this is how fat fucks in america view themselves because they're delusional

Attached: sumo.jpg (400x533, 20K)

Fat people wish they looked that good.

Damn, roasties absolutely suck at everything

lol

Yes, your muscles are proportional to your body weight. That's not particularly shocking. Most fatties who do anything more than lay around on the couch all day are inherently going to have some muscle merely from having to carry their fat asses around.

He's right you know.

How are they two dimensional?
The Legion is literally no different than /pol/fags

Based

they only seemed two dimensional in NV because Obsidian didn't have time to finish all the planned Legion content
also if you get to know the games lore a bit better you start to realise that living in towns on Legions territory is much easier and safer than living in NCR.

Safer until one day a Legionaire thinks you looked at him wrong and you and your whole family are up on the cross.

>fat
>meanwhile has enough muscles to benchpress a goddamn car
Excuse me, what?

If a woman has a job and can financially support herself, does she still owe us sex

He's right, but at the same time he looks like the kind of faggot who posts on Yea Forums.
If they gave Caesar that line it would have more impact.

The characters' in game stats aren't supposed to reflect their in-lore aptitude in any way. For instance, Caesar also has 4 INT while The King and Mr. House both have 5. All of these are supposed to be smarter than average.

Not to mention that both House and The King have 5 CHR, which obviously can't be true.

Obviously what the Legionnaire is saying is supposed to be a kind of shocking statement from a guy belonging to the obviously "evil" faction. Saying something about his intelligence in this context is just retardation.

>everyone assumes the Legion is a comically evil faction and joining them is a retard choice
>even the devs put most effort into NCR
>turns out that the Legion is the true best faction
Fug. Someday society will understand...

no one "owes" sex, but sex is a very important part of a healthy relationship.

>Byamba
>Buff

Byamba didn't even make it to the paid divisions

Attached: Chiyonofuji+he+was+a+legendary+sumo+wrestler+rip+_0dd99cc89066e4465d1c6fa439e831b4.jpg (600x672, 51K)

No, you don't. That's what communists do.

This Legionaire would be instantly punished with death for doing this (Anyways regular legionaire has no rights to orded crucifiction of anyone). Legion army is supposed to be cruel only to their enemies and are obligated to protect towns on their territory (as well as protecting main caravan routes). Legionaries use brutal force only when dealing with enemy tribes not willing to join the Legion. Surviving male tribals later become new legionaries - 99% of the members of the army are basically slaves coming from conquered tribes. The civilised towns have nothing to worry about, their men are not forced to join the army and they only have to pay small taxes (which are stated to be MUCH smaller than the mandatory taxes in NCR).

t. saw his dick once before the rolls got in the way and never once set his selfworth on anything else

reminder

Attached: the memetic gender.png (1850x663, 303K)

Imagine defending an African tribe tier nation of burgers LARPing as Romans with a wacko as their leader

samefag incest

I wonder how they got that

>firebreathing means oral fixation, thus fat shaming
I swear, these guys are grasping at straws for the outrage points.

House > Legion >>> Nu Cuck Republic >>>>>>>>>>>>> yesfag

lol

He's not wrong. If Wahmen are so powerful and great then why haven't they made their own civilizations or technology? Men are the ones that have created Rome, The United States and invented life changing devices and methods like the wheel, advanced farming, harnessing electricity, aircraft, submarines, concrete, modern plumbing, automobiles, radio etc.

Attached: 1552189316150.gif (171x172, 962K)

>different time
No it wasn't. Legion is clearly portrait as an evil faction, so this means this train of thought is evil as well.

He's not wrong

Legion as a faction was barebones as hell due to time constrains. Caesar's dialogue is literally only thing related to Legion which brings some depth to it beyond being just edgy baddies but it does not display in entire faction in any other ways. The typical legionnaires will act like comic book hoodlums all the time and even if player himself wants to be sympathetic to the Legion they keep calling you a degenerate.

Within Fallout universe the character who made NCR great was a woman, and even Caesar speaks positively of Tandi who was president for life while trashing her successors.
Legion's misogyny makes no sense in-universe, and it's there solely to make them more villainous.

But user my goal was to find a picture of a fat guy that's as close to roadhog as you can get. The sumo you posted is a beefcake

Yeah Tandi sure did create tbe NCR by herself, not like the Vault Dweller did all the legwork before who was a man.

It makes sense because that's what they believe in, they are the typical medievalist anti-degenerate faction.

Vault Dweller can be a woman too, and if you bring canon here then we can just declare all female protagonists as null and void as player choices.

>typical medievalist anti-degenerate
people in medieval times were not like the legion
even romans were not like the legion
the legion are like the barbarians the romans tried to keep out

Exactly, female protagonist is fucking retarded and suspension of disbelief killing as fuck just like femshep. A man pulling the shit off as the protagonist in Fallout is way more believable.

VD is canon man
he has the memoirs in the FO bible and has a fucking statue in NCR

"Oh fuck sake here comes ahmed with his fuckin weeb mobile."
"Wish that guy would get drone striked already, if I have to listen to any more of that fucking music im going to sign up for a suicide bombing.

All Fallout protagonist are canon men. Female option is a non-canon option for faggots.

IQ doesn't have anything to do with intelligence you big dingus, IQ is the ability to recognise patterns while some can do it faster than others it doesn't mean someone is smarter than other

By medievalist I meant that they hold similar views to those of medieval times, and the Roman Empire did most things that the Legion does in-game. The Roman Empire and medieval societies were all quite uncivilized, and were a bad place to live in.

lol

>IQ doesn't have anything to do with intelligence
It literally stands for Intelligence Quotient

You mean the standard deviation is larger for men.

Were they bad places to live because you didn't have sandniggers or other thirdworlders shitting up your capital?

Most civilizations didn't 'hate' women and most civilizations weren't built entirely around war
The legion are raiders or barbarians

Lots of things are mislabeled. The term IQ is from a time when the concept of intelligence was misunderstood.

Depends what your criteria are for "physical inferiority".

Women aren't smarter, they just don't masturbate that regulary giving them a edge of focus, dominance and "coolness" in this age.

Hell, why do you think christianity prohibits it?

So is the second

>they just don't masturbate that regulary giving them a edge of focus, dominance and "coolness" in this age.
you're fucking retarded

You haven't talked to one didn't you

Not really, women have a crucial role in social structures of the tribe as well as picking berries.

But they don't. Not even close. No one from either of those cultures would empathize with a roving band of nomadic pillagers. They'd be as reprehensible and feared as the huns or Mongolians.

and i don't own them tax money to pay for their condoms, abortions and social security

>dont let people do something
>why havent they done this thing?

why did they got subjugated? is it another case of "we wuz kangz till the whiteys showed up"?

>. If Wahmen are so powerful and great then why haven't they made their own civilizations
why would there be a civilization comprised of only one gender?

Would you want to live as a peasant half enslaved to some noble working off your days in the sun while disease runs rampant in your town?
I agree that the Legion are a bunch of uncivilized barbarians, but you have to understand that the ancient and medieval times weren't the best to live in and women were treated during those eras in a middle ground between how they're treated by the Legion in-game and how they are treated in modern times.
The Romans did crucifixions and other such punishments just like the Legion in-game, they we're a bunch of slavers that sacked the tribes they invaded, they are similar to the Legion in many aspects, but they are more civilized than they are.

That's because they were suckling off Man made civilizations, nothing was stopping them from leaving and making something of their own. Most likely because they can't because of the island survival experiment.

How can you relate your entire perception on women just on whether or not they masturbate?
I genuinely just do not understand your post or the point your trying to make.

Women were below men but they weren't just treated as breeding cattle, marriage existed in most societies

extreme projection due to abstaining from sexual release

Please go outside.

No stupid I mean something where women make their own laws and are in control. Never seen in all of history.

You're making medieval peasant life seem way worse than what it actually was. It was actually pretty chill working in the fields then having free time in the tavern drinking with friends and playing dice. Also there were many bathouses so it's not like they were living like pigs.

I don't think you understand what does "intellectually" mean.

A culture isn't defined by what form of corporal punishment they use. That's like saying it makes you American if you waterboard someone, or everyone who uses a Guillotine must be French.

> they we're a bunch of slavers that sacked the tribes they invaded
Literally who the fuck are you talking about here? Because it's not the Romans or any European kingdoms.

Show us a better way of measuring intelligence then.

That's like judging a woman based on the length of her penis
Men and women do different things

> It was actually pretty chill working in the fields then having free time in the tavern drinking with friends and playing dice
You're a moron, incidentally

>its a stealth pol thread episode

Attached: e09.jpg (648x484, 131K)

Exactly. Women priced themselves right out of the market with all of their equal rights & MeToo bullshit. If they want to breed, let them.

There's no incentives anymore for men to get into the Breeding Scam and men have finally come around to that. Women want kids so badly, there's artificial insemination or adoption. Take your pick.

Meanwhile, I'll be pouring money into my retirement fund well onto my way to retirement before their brats are even into their teens.

>Their own laws and in control
What, like a woman president? Those exist if you can spend 10 seconds looking in Google

what are you going to do when you retire if you're an incel
watch anime about girls all day and pretend you don't like them

idk look it up yourself if you are interested

people still use iq tests
nothing better has been discovered

If you think Earthquake and Roadhog aren't based then you need to get the fuck out. Fatty here needs to grow some balls and lose some weight.

Seems like it will be that way, one side of the civilization will thrive while the other watches anime

I think there's something wrong with my game. I have no graphics- or character model mods installed and I found a non-ugly gamebryo NPC

Attached: fiend.jpg (512x1080, 243K)

>Itasha ISIS toyota truck

NOW I've seen everything.

Yeah coupled with other kind of tests because would you look at that intelligence is still an abstract concept that can't be determined with 5 random questions

lol

>Yeah coupled with other kind of tests
no theres literally just an iq test and thats it

Dude, I tried the dating game. It's a scam. When they don't like you, nothing can salvage that situation. All you can do is leave as soon as possible.

As I wrote, they priced themselves right out of the market. Guys have porn & prostitutes for those times when they need to get their rocks off. Everything else, the private market can provide or you can just do yourself.

Women forgot one of the essential rules of business: The other side can always walk away. Guys are, they have been and will continue to do so until women come back to the table with an offer that's halfway reasonable.

yes but any modern tech is forbidden in legion society, while if you have the money for it you could get your cancer treated in vault city in the NCR

There are a few. The followers girl you asks you to spy on mr house is cute.

One that it's outdated and unreliable

>that thread is 5 years old
I...I need a moment

>were treated during those eras in a middle ground between how they're treated by the Legion in-game and how they are treated in modern times.
Which is how they should be treated. We need to dial the fucking femninist horseshit way back. Women are fucking protected and favored on an institutional level and this is paraded around as 'equality'. Women are wives and child bearers, men are providers and protectors, that is the balance between the sexes. Gender roles and the family unit is the fucking backbone of civilization.

Yes, that is what I said in my post. Women weren't treated as badly as they are in the Legion but they weren't treated as good as they are in modern times.
Because it was that bad. You're most likely talking about the middle upper-class life of feudal society, which was very rare, most people then were illiterate peasants who died very young. And peasants wouldn't be able to afford such things, they'd spend them on bare necessities, times were harsh back then.
It is actually, crucifixion was more a form of torture than anything, waiting to die all those days from starvation while being nailed on a cross was quite painful and barbaric and says a lot about a civilization, and the Romans had more grotesque punishments such as this one.

>Literally who the fuck are you talking about here? Because it's not the Romans or any European kingdoms.
The Roman Empire is who I was talking about, they weren't a beacon of civilization, it was a giant shithole where the people where treated just like feudal peasants, they sacked the tribes they invaded then procedeed to either genocide them or enslave them, a famous example of this is the Sacking of Carthage. Medieval societies also did this so a lesser extent (serfdom).

>in vault city in the NCR
I don't believe Vault City was ever officially incorporated into the Republic. None of those northern City States from Fallout 2 were. I can't imagine what they'd demand in exchange for a cure to cancer in Wasteland.

Nobel prize winners. Also, you can just compare olympic records and easily tell who's physically inferior. Women are not engaged as much in natural selection as men, that why they're lacking behind physically and intellectually.

yes it is. it's also changed by poverty.

they update it all the time
not sure why you hate IQ tests so much you're making up a long list of bullshit about them

>doesn't understand nip culture.
It litteraly is a thing in nip myths that a guy had a huge sack of oil put in his stomach and two teeth of flint so he could breath fire, and because of the oil sack he was portrayed fat.
earthquake is litteraly based on ancient nip culture, someone should tell this guy he's being racist towards nips.

>Gender roles and the family unit is the fucking backbone of civilization.
Until they start to become oppressive and people want to change them
zoomers say stupid shit like this because they haven't learnt from the past, they just look at the present and say "waah things are bad, we should time travel back to 50 years ago where everthing was perfect" when it wasn't

I don't believe women should be treated lesser than men just because they were born women, but neither get any special privileges because they were born women.

>raven
>actually believing pattern recognition is an absolute gauge of intelligence

depending on the actions the chosen one takes.
fallout bible is also extremely vague on vault's city place in ncr.

From Fallout Bible:
"In the elections that occurred after the destruction of the remnants of the United States government, Senior Council Member McClure was appointed First Citizen. Under his rule Vault City joined the NCR. "

Kys tranny, I've never met a woman that didn't think with emotion first and I'm not going to find one

Based. Reminder that almost all women are not net taxpayers.

thinking with emotion isnt bad

>Women don't owe you sex you unfuckable incels
This, have sex my dudes

Actually I want to know, what's the thing with fat guys and chains?

>Until they start to become oppressive and people want to change them
And then when people tipped the balance in the 60s with all that free love hippie bullshit, the problems started. The divorce rate began climbing steadily, STDs were rampant, the single mother population exploded, and the slippery slope slipped and slid into the degenerate society we see today. Women's 'liberation' has only caused more and more social problems and solved none of them.

It is when they're allowed to vote.

Sharing a method of execution doesn't make a culture synonymous with all others that share that method of execution. Unless you want to argue that Japan in the 1500s was the exact same as the Republic of Rome.

Even more retarded is saying that because one culture conquered another it is synonymous with all cultures who also conquered. The sole fact that Rome had a Rome that all of it's culture was centered around makes it inherently massively different from Caesars Legion. Romans had refined methods of construction and architecture, complex social institutions, an intricate hierarchy of government, both civil and military. The Legion lacks all these things.

I'm to dumb to get laid desu

>the problems started
there were problems before the 1960s my poorly educated friend

The thing with Caesar is that he doesn't believe all the things he teaches to his Legion. He's pragmatic and does some things to get an edge over his enemies

>we should time travel back to 50 years ago where everthing was perfect

Shit wasn't perfect 50 years ago but I do want to go back to around 2004 and laugh in everyone's face when they said that digital distribution was going to make all video games cheap forever. Hah! Games cost as much as they did back when they were in big cardboard boxes on a shelf!

Ideally, a person should be primarily logical in thought with their logic being tempered by a healthy empathy.

Women are the opposite. They are blindly empathetic and follow only a half-baked logic shoved down their throats by Hollywood and the MSM.

the fact that you can get good at taking IQ tests and steadily increase your score should tell you they are useless at gauging any sort of innate level of intelligence

>the Roman Empire was uncivilized
user, they were the very light of civilization itself. When Rome died, so too did civilization die in the West for nearly a thousand years.

Congratulations, you've said absolutely nothing.

Problems started when women were given the right to vote.

Nobody is logical at all, when it comes down to it, they're driven by completely irrational desires, women just don't pretend it's logically justifable

>Roman Empire
>Talking about Peasants
>Dude Rome was such a bad place to live, just look at this example of a City being destroyed in WAR TIME after two WARS that almost destroyed the Roman Republic where 20% of the Adult Male Roman population were killed in one battle

Shut the fuck up you retard. Stop talking about shit you have zero idea about. You're a fucking idiot.

I was pointing out how stupid you were for thinking problems started in the 1960s in the same century that there were two world wars where millions of people died

why do they need to update them? if there such an accurate measurement that wouldn't be the case. you know those eye charts they use to determine if you need glasses? they don need updates. they been the same for over a century.

so if I take a 50 year old IQ test and score 200 but score 100 on a modern one what does that shit tell you?

IQ tests are fairly bullshit, but you making up bullshit about them to prove that isn't any smarter

>DUDE SEMANTICS LMAO
>WHAT IS CONTEXT, LOL DUNNO
The rift between genders we see today is obviously the 'problems' which I was referring to. Ah, but I forgot what board this was. I am dealing with spergs and teenagers, I need to spell everything out.

>why do they need to update them
Because the average IQ changes over time. People have been getting smarter as conditions and diet improve.

real /incel/ hours

semantics?
the rift between genders is as old as society itself, it's both gotten better and gotten worse, you're just a zoomer without any contextual knowledge at all talking about a time you weren't even alive

>Nobody is logical at all
I disagree. There exists an acceptable consensus on what constitutes logic and reasoning until you start dealing with postmodern faglords. Not all desires are rational, but neither are all of them categorically irrational.

fuck you and fuck your whole family. you've said nothing. go take an iq test from several decades ago and compare your score to a modern one faggott. see if im wrong that your score will be different by a large margin, and explain how that doesn't instantly invalidate them

In your other post you said that a culture is not defined by its methods of punishment and this is not true. The Romans used barbaric punishments on their prisoners that could be classified as torture and this provides an outlook on what sort of civilization one is.

The Legion is significantly less civilized than Rome, but I was talking about the military aspects. Both Rome's and the Legion's military were raiders looting and enslaving everywhere they went, although Rome's military was more disciplined.
Compared to barbarians they were "civilized", but they were barbaric in their own way. Compare Rome to modern civilization and you will see just how barbaric they were.
What I meant by peasants is that the common man in Rome was treated similarly to a peasant, in a bad way. Rome didn't just conquer Carthage and defeated their military, they killed the civilians, enslaved them, and not to mention they did this to every tribe and barbarian they encountered, not just Carthage.

even now, with all the special treatment and shit, they don't seem to contribute much
every field that requires some brainpower is dominated by men even though the majority of college graduates are females

IQ is a relative number where 100 is always defined as the average, so if people get smarter overall the result has to be bought down

>talking about a time you weren't even alive
Yes, because CLEARLY recent history has no bearing WHATSOEVER on the present. I don't know why we even study it at all.

In seriousness, the sexual liberation of last century has done nothing to offset the aforementioned crippling divorce rate, STDs, and single-parent households.

>Have to press ~ to open the console window
>Press ~
>Nothing happens

???

there have always been STDs and their spread was much worse in the past than it is now. There are more divorces now because it's legal/socially acceptable. In the past you just stayed with your partner even if you didn't like them. Is that any better?

oh really? you need to change the entire test and not just adjust the scores? if 130 is the new average than you adjust the fucking score to 100. but no. that's not what is done. because they're shit innacurate and total arbitrary tests that need to be thrown out every decade

If you're on Windows you need to go Device Manager, Human Interface Devices and uninstall Microsoft Infrared Transceiver for it to work.

Much appreciated user.

fucking based

>What I meant by peasants is that the common man in Rome was treated similarly to a peasant, in a bad way
No, they weren't. Roman citizens weren't bound to their land, Roman citizens weren't owned by anyone. Roman Citizens had representation in politics and generally weren't't surviving off subsistence farming.

>Rome didn't just conquer Carthage and defeated their military, they killed the civilians, enslaved them, and not to mention they did this to every tribe and barbarian they encountered, not just Carthage
Carthage was only destroyed after the Third Punic War. Carthage was an existential threat to Rome and had came close to taking Rome in the Second Punic War. The complete destruction of Carthage is a rarity in Roman History.
>they killed the civilians, enslaved them, and not to mention they did this to every tribe and barbarian they encountered
Every civilization did it at the time, but the Slavery wasn't like American slavery where they were forced to do work and had no chance at freedom. Many slaves could buy their freedom. And again, Rome didn't often go about sacking cities out of bloodlust. The closest thing to that was the Gallic Wars, which was criticised at the time by Romans for Caesar being so brutal.

>wanting to be loved is met with mockery
we truly do live in a society

Almost every civilization has made use of torture to punish and degrade enemies and criminals. Almost every military has made use of their resources to raid and take wealth away from their enemies. Torture methods do not come close to defining culture, they can only add a scant characteristic. French culture is not defined by the Guillotine, even if you can argue that the Guilottine is archetypically French.

Every quality your using to define culture are irrelevant, as each one is just a massively sweeping general trends that almost every culture has performed at some point or another. "Barbarism" is not a metric of culture. It's not a metric of anything. The Romans were as Barbaric to the Carthaginians as the Carthaginians were to the Romans, as they both are to our modern sensibilities.

>there have always been STDs and their spread was much worse in the past than it is now
Because we did not have such medical advances as in the past. Logically, STD spread should being going down, right? Wrong. It is increasing despite better quality healthcare, and the cause is promiscuity.
>There are more divorces now because it's legal/socially acceptable.
And that's the fucking problem dipshit. It is an indicator of our generations inability to commit in relationships and the issue is amplified with children, as children in broken homes are far more susceptible to mental and developmental illnesses.
>In the past you just stayed with your partner even if you didn't like them. Is that any better?
Yes. Again, the aforementioned inability to commit is what has created the vast number of single parents and unmarried and childless men/women who grow old and die alone.

Because the system is based on the average. It's not a straight metric of intelligence, it's relative to the average, and each deviation is greater. You can't just say 130 on the old system is the new 100, because the system isn't designed for that and it would rapidly lose it's accuracy. Someone with 200 IQ isn't twice as smart as someone with 100 IQ.

Did you seriously just get a low score so now you're trying to degrade the whole system?

People are no more promiscious now than they were at any point in history. You're an absolute moron if you think otherwise. People have always tried to fuck as much as they could. Commiting to a relationship you're unhappy with isn't good and ultimately a waste of time
you're an incel because you're a fucking loser, not because of peoples inability to commit, commitment implies you had a relationship to begin with

>No, they weren't. Roman citizens weren't bound to their land, Roman citizens weren't owned by anyone. Roman Citizens had representation in politics and generally weren't't surviving off subsistence farming.
Most Romans weren't even citizens, and they all had the shitty conditions of peasants. And almost all those who lived outside of the capital city only had the bare essentials.
>Carthage was only destroyed after the Third Punic War. Carthage was an existential threat to Rome and had came close to taking Rome in the Second Punic War. The complete destruction of Carthage is a rarity in Roman History.
Which does not make it any worse. Instead of a fair war, they had to slaughter most of the people there and ravage their land. Most Roman emperors were cruel dictators who did such things.
>Every civilization did it at the time, but the Slavery wasn't like American slavery where they were forced to do work and had no chance at freedom. Many slaves could buy their freedom. And again, Rome didn't often go about sacking cities out of bloodlust. The closest thing to that was the Gallic Wars, which was criticised at the time by Romans for Caesar being so brutal.
Every civilization doing it at the time and the harshness of the slavery does not make it any worse. Slaves were treated like dogs for the most part, most of them were prisoners of war or captured civilians.
The Roman Empire's methods were barbaric and were defined by its culture. They crucified people at their leisure, and did such other things.

Barbarianism does mean something, and it is something that the Romans were. They were a bunch of uncivilized hoodlums with some aspects of order in there.

You guys hate women yet you wanna fuck them. What a cycle.

>People are no more promiscuous now than they were at any point in history
journalistsresource.org/studies/society/public-health/changes-americans-attitudes-sex-reviewing-40-years-data/

>incel isnt filtered
>s.o.y. and about 50 unicode variants are

Attached: yikes.png (256x256, 20K)

>pay women to study STEM
>give them express passes into STEM
>they still dont

Reported casual sex rising by 10% over 40 years is not a significant statistic, it's a small number over a small time period and most important of all, it's only data people are willing to reveal, not whats actually happening

I also hate living yet I get outta bed. Two meanings to "Fuck you", bitch.

You realize your original argument was that The Legion and the Roman Empire/"Medieval Europe" were similar due to being "anti-degenerate" right? Literally nothing you're talking about has any relevance.

So you admit to being wrong in saying
>People are no more promiscious now than they were at any point in history
Now you're just moving goalposts.

Based

That logic doesn't work because you could then argue they weren't strong enough to tell men to fuck off and do the thing anyway.

not really, as I said, that is reported information, not factual information, if anything I'd think less people were having sex now because of the internet
also notice the figure says 1/3rd less women are having casual sex than men, but if whiny internet incels are to be believed, it's a small male minority having sex with all the women so they won't have sex with them

not really, male IQ is higher on average but it has a much larger distribution. Half of men are dumber than the average woman and the other half are smarter.

I guess we got carried off then.

men have 60% more upper body strength on average

>And then I blew his brains out
It jut feels good proving people wrong y’now?

here let me help you having sex

Attached: 1459555736661.jpg (1320x2992, 1.58M)

Attached: 1459551684489.jpg (925x3026, 1.16M)

>that is reported information, not factual information
Then post some objective factual information you fucking faggot, anecdotes based on your perception is not evidence.

He's not telling the entire story, though. Men can become smarter than women, but women are, on average, smarter than men.
But a Legion worm wouldn't know that. They just blindly follow their leader because they're edgy.

I think he means 1 dimensional

you can't get factual information on how often people are having sex you fucking retard

>Most Romans weren't even citizens
Treu, but they still weren't bound to their land and forced into subsistence farming like Peasants were, nor were they owned by people and forced to do labour.
>And almost all those who lived outside of the capital city only had the bare essentials.
That's not true at all. Sure, they weren't living as well as the wealthy in Rome but it wasn't like they were constantly on the verge of starvation. Rome acted as a stabilising force generally. See pre-Roman Britain vs Roman Britain for example.
>Instead of a fair war, they had to slaughter most of the people there and ravage their land.
What the fuck do you think a "fair" war is, you blithering moron? Do you think it was "unfair" of the Gauls when they sacked Rome? Or when Hannibal was ready to sack Rome? There's no such thing as a "fair" war you idiot.
>Most Roman emperors were cruel dictators who did such things.
Why are you even commenting on Roman History if you're not aware about the Punic Wars happening during the Republican period?
>Every civilization doing it at the time and the harshness of the slavery does not make it any worse. Slaves were treated like dogs for the most part, most of them were prisoners of war or captured civilians.
You're demonising Rome for something every civilization has done since the dawn of time. Yes, the Romans had slavery but you're trying to paint it as some evil unique to Rome

>female protagonist is fucking retarded and suspension of disbelief killing as fuck just like femshep
A female protag is what kills your suspension of disbelief in a sci-fi setting with aliens and biotics? Are the Asari a shoehorned in sjw race then?

Cankn
House is only 5 Because you are not meant to engage in combat with him

So you reject any sources and say you can't gauge how often people have sex, yet you sit here ant tell me
>People are no more promiscious now than they were at any point in history
and act like it's irrefutable truth.

Based and redpilled.

All the vault dweller did was save her so she could actually establish the NCR and kill most of the Khan's who were giving them trouble. It wouldn't have existed without him but he didn't build the NCR up.

It's brave from the today's perspective though.
If it's present day most Devs will never dare to put such dialogues in their games even if it's coming villains.

Ceaser had a mcain brain so that's why his int is low

People's libidos haven't changed
The availability of porn has though, so I think less people are having sex

*coming from

Caesar is a dumb bitch who needs to pick a heir if he wants to Legion to outlive him.

Go back

I know it's an edit but if it this was real it would probably be like what happened with the A-1 Plumbing guy: some Weeb sold his truck and was told by the dealer that they will remove his wrap; they don't and send it to some surplus; said surplus sends truck to some country in Middle East for sale; and eventually it makes it's way into the hands of militants in Syria to converted into a technical.

>Treu, but they still weren't bound to their land and forced into subsistence farming like Peasants were, nor were they owned by people and forced to do labour.
The Romans weren't owned by people, but they still had it badly.
>That's not true at all. Sure, they weren't living as well as the wealthy in Rome but it wasn't like they were constantly on the verge of starvation. Rome acted as a stabilising force generally. See pre-Roman Britain vs Roman Britain for example.
Yes, Rome was more civilized than the outside tribes and did bring some order along with them but they were barbaric in their own way.
>What the fuck do you think a "fair" war is, you blithering moron? Do you think it was "unfair" of the Gauls when they sacked Rome? Or when Hannibal was ready to sack Rome? There's no such thing as a "fair" war you idiot.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Them sacking each other does not make anyone right. In fair war, towns are not burned and people aren't enslaved.
>Why are you even commenting on Roman History if you're not aware about the Punic Wars happening during the Republican period?
Fair enough, but the Emperors and the Senate were all cruel.
>You're demonising Rome for something every civilization has done since the dawn of time. Yes, the Romans had slavery but you're trying to paint it as some evil unique to Rome
No I'm not trying to do that, what I meant by what I said earlier is that if everyone enslaved, that does not make it right for Rome to enslave. But neither does it make it right for those others who enslaved to enslave.

Why do you fags always go for such shitty bait?

>In fair war, towns are not burned and people aren't enslaved.
So far wars don't exist then

Nvm. It was Mark-1 not A-1.
pri.org/stories/2015-12-15/how-texas-plumbers-truck-wound-isis-hands?amp

Attached: Plumber-678x381.jpg (678x381, 58K)

lol

FUCK YOU VERONICA! I WILL FUCK YOU!

Incel, seething, cope, etc. really need to take the bullet. Not a single good post uses those words for vidya.

lol

based & redpilled

Emily Ortal is the most underrated NV waifu

Attached: 20160906180507_1.jpg (1280x720, 161K)

this has to be a photoshop

How did you beat him guys?

Attached: giant pete.png (1280x720, 1.11M)

People actually liked her?

You're a faggot.

and people think hard pete is impossible

>Built a civilization wherein women are allowed to do whatever the fuck they want
>Also we allowed you to vote

Most of what women use are what men built. Bunch of fucking leeches.

lol

lol

Surprisingly good stuff here

Easily.

Attached: carlos.png (350x350, 138K)

the nobel committee has always been ideologically motivated
at least iq correlates to something measurable

>The Romans weren't owned by people, but they still had it badly
In comparison to modern day, yes. But yo contemporary civilizations no. Certainly not as bad as medieval serfs.

>they were barbaric in their own way
Because they killed and conquered?
>Two wrongs don't make a right. Them sacking each other does not make anyone right. In fair war, towns are not burned and people aren't enslaved.
Point me to this "fair war" then where both armies line up and kill each other without Civilian casualties. War is bloody and brutal, there has NEVER been a War between two civilizations seeking to conquer where they abide by your rules of "fair" war.
>but the Emperors and the Senate were all cruel
You are generalizing massively here. How was Marcus Aurelius cruel?
>that does not make it right for Rome to enslave. But neither does it make it right for those others who enslaved to enslave.
What do you mean it isn't "right"?

But she's only like 15% less ugly than the Crimson Caravan cattle girl

testing
söy

Women should pay me money for being able to resist my primal urges and avoid raping them

Gold pete's even harder.

Attached: whocouldbebehindthispost.jpg (750x750, 75K)

I see no issue with this being in a modern game, It doesn't necessarily portray the views of the producers, you can imbue fictional characteristics onto a character, go figure. Heck it makes every character more interesting, fuck censorship, I hate it.

Attached: __fujiwara_no_mokou_touhou_drawn_by_shangguan_feiying__980d02f0c2e941778e580841b5c2cb6b.jpg (442x460, 125K)

>women are, on average, smarter than men
Its the same on average, men just covers the whole spectrum.

Doesn't draining your balls clear up your head and help you focus though? You'll think more clearly after having sex with a woman than you did during the build up to it

the lowtest meme isn't wholly a meme. An empty ballsack makes one lethargic.

>People's libidos haven't changed
So, how do you know when
>you can't get factual information on how often people are having sex you fucking retard

/thread

do you genuinely believe that testosterone is created and stored in the testicles? american education I swear

Pee is stored in the balls, silly

>women come back to the table with an offer that's halfway reasonable
such as?

What have you done that means they owe you some fug?

But it's still true, that won't change

Attached: 1500736516174.gif (192x144, 1.56M)

For males, Testosterone is made is the testicles and circulates the body, you pretentious dumbass.
the male body spends a lot of it during copulation. Having "empty balls" leads to low testosterone levels that leads to fatigue, low sex drive, and loss of muscle mass.

budget motel instead of a luxury hotel.

wrong, the women's bell curve is moved slightly to the left compared to men's

He's right.

Attached: 1550175957337.png (1199x617, 921K)

>Richard Lynn

Attached: 1234.png (350x227, 141K)

kek

Attached: 1541615020228.png (1318x1333, 679K)

Not that user, what's wrong with Lynn?

Attached: 1535713479758.jpg (550x481, 166K)

Tunneler invasion when?

There is no significant difference. Only the distributions look slightly different

wrong
women have lower average IQ than men

women are more concentrated on the average than men
but that's on the women's average, not overall average

very baste

Attached: 1510858278933.png (327x390, 102K)

A fraud who has had his professor emeritus title stripped from him. He's peddled shoddy science on intelligence (which is published in a handful of journals controlled by him and his pals). His work most often pops up in these circles as the global IQ map: which e.g. generalized the scores of a handful of literally retarded children to represent the average of a nation. If there was no data for a country, they simply calculated the average of neighboring countries. He's a mockery of an academic, but pol loves him due to his "work" on racial and sex differences in intelligence.

nexusmods.com/newvegas/mods/57927/

Attached: 1536022570702.png (431x400, 27K)

BASED

>which e.g. generalized the scores of a handful of literally retarded children to represent the average of a nation.
I thought he gathered his data from African schools? Is that not a valid way of measuring IQ?

They didn't gather the data, rather just picked from previous studies, which often had minuscule sample sizes. For Equatorial Guinea, the result was from a handful of mentally retarded children.

One of his crowning achievements is a study of correlation of penis size and intelligence per race.

WTF?!? I love the Legion now!

Fuck off cracker

>only one woman out of 207 have won the nobel prize in physics
ye sure

It fits the thread though. Men have a steeper normal distribution of intelligence. user has a higher chance of being stupid, and he is, and thus doesn't know the difference between steep and shallow normal distributions. Women are not intellectually inferior, there just are fewer female geniuses. Just like there are fewer female morons.

lol

But most women are retarded. Seriously compare the amount of men who will potentially ruin lives or just the day over asinine bullshit to women.

>most
name one smart woman

Nasim Aghdam

Kaitlyn Jenner

The vast majority of criminals on the planet are men. You know, humans who are too stupid to be able to properly coexist with others in society so they will revert to using force to take what they want? The majority of leaders and innovators are also men but that's just the other end of the normal distribution. It's the gender of exceptionality where as the opposite is the gender of normality.

have sex

>try holding a conversation about anything with women around my age (23-24)
>most of them never have anything interesting to say and they only like netflix, eating, doing nails and sucking cock
Brother how do I find an interesting girl brother Tinder doesn't work and it's even worse

Attached: 4093 - hulk_hogan no_way_out nwo sunglasses wwf.png (417x312, 183K)

based have sex poster haha

Its an INT of 3 that makes you a retard, retard