Untitled

it really, really isn't

>nvidias absolute basic bitch product is now just as powerful as AMDs best.

>low end shit
who cares, I want some high end shit that doesn't cost 1k so I can hit 144 fps at 1440p consistently

I got a 1060 6GB ram.

How good is it? I do not think I need more for the time being

Meanwhile 1080 master race here haven't had to upgrade for 3 years

Awesome

I hope the 1050ti prices can drop a little lower so a poorfag like me can finally afford one

it's not going to beat the 1060. this is a budget power saving card. it'll be an improvement over the 1050 ti which it's replacing, probably a big one because the 1050 ti is garbage.

if you're tight on money then don't buy any GPU this year. horrible value. wait until nvidia and AMD have accepted that bitcoin isn't coming back any time soon and price their hardware like they used to before the bubble.

>How good is it?
Reaching the point where it can't do 1080p 60fps on new games

I have a 970 I am looking to upgrade and was think about looking at the 1660. Worth? My goal is 1080p with above 75 or 144mhz refresh rate.

that's a minor upgrade, not worth it. imo never replace a GPU with one that doesn't give twice the performance. also don't upgrade unless there's already a game out where your old GPU's performance bothers you.

Friend of mine just made that exact upgrade, pretty sure it's gonna give you what you're aiming for.

>Reaching the point where it can't do 1080p 60fps on new games
only if you're an Ultra settings idort that doesn't know how to manage your resources

I wouldn't count on it being that much of improvement over the 1050ti the only thing new is the gddr5. With the same tdp and core count it'll probably be like 10 percent faster

>Retards not realizing this is an April Fools Joke

Literally why

It is not an April Fool's joke, fuck off

twitter.com/TUM_APISAK/status/1111637203170541568

>AS FAST AS AYYMD HOUSEFIRES RX 580 2048SP/RX 570 WITH NO EXTERNAL POWER CONNECTOR NEEDED

THIS KILLS THE AYYMD HOUSEFIRES

Attached: D21T8v2X0AA8TUA.png (817x606, 43K)

>buying xx50 cards
Yikes!

>also don't upgrade unless there's already a game out where your old GPU's performance bothers you

This is a fair point. Maybe I am just being self conscious because I can't have all the bells and whistles turned on anymore even though most games still look great.

>overperformed by my gtx 970M
lmao

>still running games maxed out at 60+FPS

Yeah if you're playing at 720p.

>Buyng a card slower than consoles
>replying to news bot threads

Upgrade to at least 1660 ti. 1660 is basically a sidegrade. A real upgrade would be 2060 but that shits expensive.

Which consoles do 60FPS gaming?

Xbonex, PS4 Pro? Those shits have been proven to be nothing more than 30FPS garbage

as it should be considering its a 50 series

intelligent sachiko poster

Attached: 40d1dcef715b38cd5a154ec7e1c0ed90.jpg (809x1000, 403K)

Imagine getting hyped for a budget card that's only good for casual streamshitter games, which Nvidia will undoubtedly demand $140-170 for.

Thoughts on AMD Vega 56?

it's propaby as fast as your 1060
yeah i know, ironic

the 1660ti is around as fast as a 1070, so i guess...yes it's equivalent to 1060

man is this dumb
just buy our crap (again), even if it has the same performace

but don't worry...AMD is the same team.
Their Radeon VII could have been a real challenger if they wanted to, but it comes witha....1000mhz baseclock....LOOOOL my R9 290 several years ago already had 950mhz

AMD=Intel ...they have just other consumergroups
AMD=poorfags
Intel=wasting loads of money for best performace but don't care

If I'm just trying to get out of integrated graphics hell, is there much of a point waiting for this, or should I just get 1050 ti?

I made the upgrade from a 970 to a 1660ti to get 1080p 144hz and it works really well.

If you're not going to wait for Navi, you might as well get the 1050 Ti. Same shit.

techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1650.c3366

phahahahaahahhahahhahhahahh...
*breathes*
...hahahahhahhahahhahah

that piece of garbage will be slower than my old R9 290

I bought a 750 for my second pc because my old gpu died and I needed some outputs for my monitors that my motherboard didn't have

>buy AMD CPU because I like red more than blue

Attached: 1553217470111.png (141x311, 95K)

if you are playing mainly old games and/or are a poorfag, it's not THAT bad.
But yes, in any other case, the xx60 would fit better

>8% faster than HD 7970
Lmao

Was great in mid 2017. Beats GTX 1080 / RTX 2060 if you overclock it a little.
In 2019? Wait for 7nm. The GPUs that will be in the next console gen will release this summer. They will make all of the current midrange cards including the shit in OP obsolete.

>poorfags continue to hold back video games
le sigh

Im having hard time justifying an upgrade from 970, since there really havent been any good games out lately.

Attached: 1534587530942.jpg (976x704, 36K)

NVIDIA FUUUUCK!
GIVE US A FUCKING BEAST LIKE A FEW YEARS AGO NOW!!!YOU GAVE US A 4K 60 FPS CARD NOW WE WANT A 4K 144FPS CAAAAAAAARD

Attached: maxresdefault42.jpg (1920x1080, 152K)

>LOL VRAM DOESN'T MATTER MEME
I hate that poorfags turn down all settings to medium and lie in Taiwanese basket weaving forums that they run it on high as a cope.

I had problems with maxing out some games in 2016. You don't max out everything with that card. Just be honest about it
>inb4 "lol name some games"
>"but those games don't count!" meme
It's the same in and out with nvidia shills. Look, I prefer nvidia too but just fucking admit that they fucked up on that one.

Attached: 1553230557588.jpg (527x500, 75K)

still playing on max with a 980ti lol

>128-bit memory
top kek

where's 1660 ti on that list

How much would I be expecting to pay for those, do you reckon? Price is a consideration.

>GTX 970 tier performance
>Real 4 GiB RAM
>75W TDP
This is literally the perfect 1080p card.

NO

We won't make one, because we suck as much as AMD
You can't really wanting us to do progress.

HERE, A CARD WITH THE SAME PERFORMACE THAN CARDS LIKE 7 YEARS AGO
JUST BUY IT, IT'S NNNEEEWWW

please someone instantly kill everyone that will buy this crap

Attached: 1468839528339.gif (350x233, 2.11M)

not maxed out but with some stuff at medium/low yea

$200-$250 is the rumor.

faggot
based honest poster.

there is nothing fucking wrong with dropping settings, especially when there are some settings that do jack shit and visually make it worse even, just BE HONEST about it

and it's gonna cost the same as RX 580

not him, BUT:

I have a GTX1080 and i could easily buy SEVERAL 2080TIs if i wanted to...BUT....it IS a meme

I couldn't see any performace difference between my R9 290 and my GTX1080 in case of VRAM...
I say with 6Gigs, you will be fine even in 2-3 years

fight me

only game that stumped my shit build so far was RE2, and that's just because of super sampling.

Really? Well that changes things, if there's any reason to think it's true. If you'll tolerate my ignorant questions, what's supposed to be so great about these cards? Also, are they AMD or Nvidia or both or what? t. knows nothing about GPUs

Its incredible technology really seems frozen, lets see if Intel shakes up the competition next year

>vramlets

Attached: King-Homer.gif (375x375, 179K)

Yay a 1060 remake, just what we needed.

When are these faggot prices coming down?

A regular 1050 is still around $200 CAD. Tf

>Intel
>AMD
competition

that's the problem...they are literally the same team, that's the reason they make the NPCs out there buy new, but years-old GPUs (in performace)

do you need a 1660(to) or 1650 ?
Are there no equivalent cards on the market?

there is no competition at all.
It's a mafia

Amd is good now, it's not 2008

Depends on what you mean by equivalent.
A 570 beats the 1650 and it's a year and a half old now.

I'd take a faster more powerful card over a card with 12 GIGABYTES OF VRAM OMG MORE NUMBERS MEANS IT'LL RUN MINECRAFT BETTER any day.

what does her butthole smell like

Nope, that was the RX 480

vram is a meme

doesn't the 1660 already cost as much as a rx 580? If so then it's guaranteed cheaper.

RTX is a meme. 2080 cant even beat 1080TI and has only 8GB VRAM so I bought a used 1080TI for 420€ a few weeks ago.
gonna last me a long time like my 970gtx did

Attached: 1506806324001.jpg (2340x4160, 1.56M)

you know what my point is, right?

the 1650 is a better example.

Instead of releasing better GPUs, they "downgrade".
There are alot of GPUs already on the marked with similar performace of your 570

Just got a 1660
How fucked am I?
I had a GTX 760 before

>RTX is a meme.
Everyone who says this buzzword has without fail low IQ.

probably somewhere above the 980 considering it's better than the 1060

what's wrong with nvidia drivers? why are they worse with each new release?
I'm currently downloading old drivers

Well calling it the same card is dishonest. It pulls 75 watts instead of 120 making it technically more powerful, just intentionally held back for lower power overhead.

you're ok
at least you don't have a 1060 3gb

You're fine just that you overpaid for what it should cost.

not him but I have a 1060 3gb
what's wrong with it

You I have no idea why, I swear every update to the Linux drivers makes them more buggy pushing me to want to get an AMD card.

not him, but:

>woooh, these waterreflections looks great and dropping my performace by 30fps.
Oh boy...RTX might be good, but ATM, the performace of most RTX-crads doesn't seem to be good enough to make it enjoyable

I have a 1060 3gb.

i have a 1060 3gb

what wrong fag

some games are just fucked

Attached: re7_2018_07_25.png (1920x1080, 1.71M)

That's a different argument to shooting it down outright.

Yes upgrade your card goy it's much fasterer we promise.

Not the same user, but to rephrase, buying an RTX card now is like buying an electric car in the early 2000s, why would you do that?

yes, there might be advantages, but come on...

95% of gamers wanting better GPUs to affordable prices
Intel goes into the exact other direction: more GPUs, less performace....but HEY...the price might be a bit better than AMD cards....IF you are lucky...VERY lucky

Indie shit maybe. I'm on a 1070 and it's really starting to struggle beyond medium-high. Ultra is completely out of the question on recent big AAA releases.

Attached: 1551387715056.jpg (344x344, 39K)

Oh shit did I fuck up bros?

Attached: IMG_20190310_232848853.jpg (4032x3024, 2.77M)

I'm waiting for Ampere myself, but I still don't have a hostile attitude towards the technology.

>water
you're fine

>tfw just bought a 1060 in December

"Just build already", they said. "There's never a good time", they said.

I actually got a Optiplex last year that im meaning to install a gpu so glad I don't have to settle for the 1050 ti.

Not just indie games
Y'all are just playing the wrong games. The 970 is still running new releases of non-indie titles maxed out 60fps at higher than 1080p even

Attached: 20181215011919_1.jpg (2560x1440, 578K)

Quite a few options make very little to no visual difference and have quite a big impact on GPU usage.

I seriously doubt a 1070 is struggling to run ultra at 1080p 60, 4k I'll believe but not 1080p.

Depends how much you paid, 1060 is still ok provided it cost 150-170

>Posts generic anime game that would run flawlessly on an RX560

Did you want to play games in 4K? You fucked up.
Did you want to play games in 1080p? You're gold. As long as you have a decent CPU to go with it.

>I seriously doubt a 1070 is struggling to run ultra at 1080p 60
The Division 2 runs like fucking ass on a 1070 if it's above medium-high. Hell, the 1070 can't even run Fallout 4 on max settings without frame drops.

I just bought it as a stop-gap measure because my 760 wasn't cutting it anymore. My CPU is shit, but considering I built it 6 years ago I'm surprised things are running as smoothly as they are.

Name 3 recent releases it struggled to push through @1080p.

it took nvidia 3 years to make a card that can actually compete with a 570 at its pricepoint, I still cant believe people were retarded enough to buy 1050s.

What said, but to add on that most of the time it's not your video card bottlenecking a lot of modern games, especially indie or AA titles. My 960 is just fine for just about everything out right now, now that I've finally upgraded my CPU and RAM.

Literally 0 has happened in the PC parts world that isn't a gimmick or a meme in 5 years now

underrated post

Attached: ScreenShot003.jpg (505x381, 32K)

Look at all these fags buying shit cards before the new consoles drop.
Once we get to know if the new machines are indeed above 11TF we're all gonna have to go for at least a 2070-2080 to play at max at 1440p, and all those new low end cards will be dead with no value.

>generic
Still new releases nerds

Attached: 20190208024217_1.jpg (1920x1080, 340K)

You sure there isn't something wrong with your PC.
I have 1080 and had everything with high fps on ultra

Imagine not buying a 580 when they're literally $100 after you sell the games it comes with LOL

Arms hairier than mine

Are you fucking retarded?

The AYYMD competitor for 1050s is the 560 and it fails miserably, that's why AYYMD is using a 200mm2 GPU to compete against the 1050 which is embarassing when the 570 gets UTTERLY DESTROYED by the 1060

Could have splurged a bit more and gotten something that would be a bit more futureproof. I'm probably only keeping my 1060 for one more year unless we're still in this shit card phase 12 months from now

>GTX 1660
>219 dollars MSRP
>go to my country's online stores
>every single 1660 is at 250+ euros
Very nice

Wat. I have a 1070 and max/nearly max out everything on 1440p. Monster Hunter world was a recent one where I had to drop a few settings.

fallout 4 didn't even stress my pc, I installed a lot of texture and graphics mods for it. do you have 4 gb of ram or a 6+ year old cpu?

YUROPOOR has 25% VAT, blame your shit country for joining shitty EU to be taxed to death

Bring back budgiebuddy and maybe I’ll thank nvidia.

x50s are garbage budget cards, it's not going to beat a 1060 6gb

1660ti is the most sensible card for VR. Once dynamic foveated rendering comes, this thing will be a beast!

I was arguing with some kid on Youtube, he insisted he must get Nvidia 1050 Ti.

Countless of people like this exist, that's why Nvidia's worst models are also outselling AMD.

Gotta pay for your free shit somehow, freeloader

What would you upgrade to and why? Just wondering because I also have a 1060 and play at 1080p, haven't yet played a game where I wish I had something better.

retard

Fallout 4 is a janky pos no matter what system you're running it on, it's like an emulator more power helps, but it's really not the answer.
Teh Division is Ubishit, and also suffers from the same problem

All GPU drivers are shit lately. AMD drivers straight up brick half the time, and you gotta do some fucky shit to even get back into safe mode with something on your monitor after.

I feel so sorry for the retards who buy 1050's.
The only people defending them are seething poorfags who were 'forced' to buy them during the mining craze, and have now realise they overpayed for a shitty card.
It's one of those feels before facts situations.

>RAM
Barely makes a difference, but if you must know I have 16. The 1070 is three-years-old and was the midranger of its lineup, it's going to start struggling for big AAA games if you want Ultra at 60fps.

Your issue does not lie in your video card

>tfw got a 1050 ti back in 2016 when they were still cheap af
>plays pretty much everything
>0 noise
>low power
>no pcie conection so less clutter inside the case

Why the hate? I'm waiting for its succesor desu.

are you some faggot fuckboi on estrogen then?

On some games it makes the entire difference. Luckily, most of those games are fucking awful and the temptation to play them isn't strong. Bethshit and PUBG are some recent examples.

what the fuck playing with these new cards

i literally see 0 game worth playing seriously wondering

This sir, please do the needful buy RX 570 8GB

>tfw GTX 670 still

Attached: 17795.gif (220x220, 832K)

Are their prices actually still affected by crypto? I feel like these prices are just the new normal, why would they drop them if people are willing to pay this much?

I went from gtx560 to gtx1050. Even with only 2Gb it feels so fucking good.

what game are these titties in?

what CPU faggot?

yeah i'm sure it's good for Tetris

Attached: 1450510155199.jpg (476x399, 69K)

Ok tell me where I'm fucking up. Why am I routinely getting a stuttery 30 FPS in KCD.
I'm running an RTX 2060 with an i7 8700 and 16 gigabytes of RAM power.
I have a 1920x1200 monitor, that's not that much more pixels than 1080p, is it?

Attached: 12993250.jpg (640x854, 88K)

You are so dumb 1060 6g is still better option next good upgrade is gonna be 3060

Is your RAM dual channel?

playing sekiro though
but yeah keep shitposting faggot
kys

So what's the most powerful Nvidia GPU?

Is it the RTX 2060 ti? Did I even get that right?

Attached: Avatar Minimal.png (334x306, 43K)

God Eater 3!
Its a decent enough game, but its better played if you have friends than alone since it can be a bit repetitive after a while since most missions are kinda short.
store.steampowered.com/app/899440/GOD_EATER_3/

Attached: 20190208184004_1.jpg (1920x1080, 313K)

news flash: getting old makes you bitter and cynical, and gaming has been going down the hill for years.

i just bought a gtx 1660

My 970 still runs everything.

>mah 4k 144 Hz
user, I am not a faggot. I can enjoy anything on 60 FPS and I am happy

yeah...pretty close to 1080p

how the hell do we know?

update drivers, shut down porn (important), shut down browers
make benchmarks (CPU, GPU) and look for flaws
Check out how many processes are open/active in the task manager.
Check out how much RAM (not VRAM) is beeing used in windows without games/browser

Thank god I bought a 1080 rather than wait for the RTX series. These new cards are a joke and ridiculously overpriced.

I'm going to impregnate my daughter!

Attached: 1540652578317.jpg (1920x1080, 183K)

nice bait faggot

Make sure she calls you Mommy while you do it!

>Same performance
>1/3 the power

Attached: 1548610770161.png (396x408, 165K)

>70/120 == 1/3
The absolute state of GPU shills

It's 2 sticks in 2 odd slots, that should take care of it, no? Or do I need to enable it in BIOS somewhere?

No, seriously.

Okay saw user's GPU graph.

So RTX 2080 Ti is _THE_ strongest gpu for Nvidia currently, right?

I can just buy one of those badboys, a top tier Intel CPU, and be good to mega-stream without any performance issues, right?

An RX 580 pulls nearly 200 W

RTX generation is so so SAD after the excitement of the GTX 1000 series, I havent bough a graphic card in years, on the opposite I actually sold 1 gtx 1080 last year because not many games are sli compatible.

Attached: pp,550x550.jpg (550x469, 42K)

fuck off retard

I was talking about the rx 580 2048 which is basically a 570 which has a tdp of 130

Navi is going to suck too you dipshits. They've already delayed it multiple times and that's not because everything is going so great.

No you can't.

Test with other games.

What's with all these brainlets who are so fixated on VRAM? The importance of it is seriously overstated. Even on my feeble 2GB card, I simply turn down texture quality if I encounter instances where it doesn't suffice.

in case of streaming, you should take at lest a 6core from intel...
4core CPUs might have problems, when streaming while gaming

...but yes...2080TI is pretty much the fastes avaible
maybe RTX Titan, but it's EXTREMELY similar...you wouldn't notice any difference except the double in price

looks cool, thanks

C'mon man I don't know what the fucking numbers and shit means I just wanna know what the top dawg part is so I can order this shit and take it to a repair shop to get assembled.

>Delayed multiple times
How do you delay something that doesn't have a release date?

Cores are these guys right?

So 8 cores should be plenty.

Attached: cores.png (303x316, 16K)

It's not going to suck *that* much, because it has to be better than what's in Xbox One X.

Check with CPU-Z to be sure.

Because it also affects things like shadows and prevents stuttering. You are poor and have a shit card so you can't understand that but at high settings it matters.

propably, idiots that have no clue at all about graphic cards.

>it has higher number, so it must be better

it's a waste of ressources and the research/performace should have been added to get a higher clockspeed/more CUDA

>Our GTX 1660 wasn't good enough, so here's a downgrade!
Wow, Nvidia innovates again!

mostly mad amdfags
>recommending fucking polaris which has less features than pascal and is fucking housefires

polaris doesn't even support DX 12_1 unlike pascal and has shittier HW video decode/encode

Games are commonly using multiple gigs of vram now. Hell even modded minecraft uses like 3 gigs because of texture stitching.

>60 fps
>1080
yeah, the galaxy s5 is "good enough" also but why the fuck would I use it when there's much better quality hardware.

DX12 is a meme because you can convert it to Vulkan for no performance penalty.

oh wow great
now if only there were some actual good games to play

an rx 580 is 189 now so no it doesnt cost the same

yeah, i guess...
as long as it's a newer Intel one
(i7, i9)

Yea Forums i’m planning my first PC build, been a consolefag all my life so far, will a 1660 be enough? I want 1080p 60fps on current gen games, and maybe 1440p on less demanding titles.

Hmm. I think that's threads actually.

According to this program an user mentioned I have "4" cores.

How's my CPU stack up to the current market? Time to upgrade or am I good for another 10 years?

Attached: cores.png (401x390, 34K)

FPBP

NVIDIA FAGS

CANT COMPETE

go away. We don't want your kind ruining PC gaming any more

If you bought any AYYMD HOUSEFIRES card, kill yourself

Attached: performance-per-watt_1920-1080.png (500x810, 44K)

>muh efficiency
What are you? in the green party?

Wait for Zen 3 in a couple months and get a cheap b450 board or something if you need to upgrade.

dude pic related is a damn old one...just saying
oh and i'm out...gotta sleep

Back in the day I used Radeon cards and AMD processors and they always fried / went out / stopped working / broke after 1-2 years, ALL of them, regardless of their power.

When I switched to Intel and Nvidia they've lasted ages. My current processor I bought when Starcraft 2 was just about to come out and it's still with me to this day. Not once have I changed the thermal paste or whatever that is.

As far as GPU's, my gtx 460 lasted me until I wanted to play Overwatch and I got a 980 ti.

Attached: avatar3.png (334x306, 52K)

Wouldn't go with anything lower than 1660 Ti, but if you don't mind upgrading fairly soon then go ahead. Just make sure to sell your previous card when it's time.

2060 or 1660? Gonna stick to 1080 I think, unless I can find a decent 1440 monitor down the line

There's nothing new or surprising about this release.
There's always a xx50, xx60, xx70, and xx80.
They just chose to make versions of two cards without the raytracing cores from the RTX series.
The 1660 and 2060 are both a straight upgrade from the 1060. They're also about as powerful as a 1070 for less money than a 1070, so I don't see much of an issue here.

>Card with low TDP gets good perf per watt
Tell us something new, I'm sure if you put a ryzen APU on there it would be in 3rd place or something due to it only consuming 15 watts while performing 80% of a 1050ti. Newsflash TDP doesn't scale linearly with performance. That's why the 2080ti has a ~280 TDP compared to the 2080's 200 while only performing 15% better in most applications.

Processors never fail quickly unless you increase the voltage to retard levels.

1080 is faster than both the 2060 and the 1660

Dude, I got a 2 GB GTX 660 Ti and VRAM is never an issue.

It's what I have as well. Got it for next to nothing. Definitely have to turn down some things to hit the framerates I want, but it surprisingly runs a lot of stuff still. Probably just going to give it to a family member that plays older stuff once I upgrade.

1060 6GB Chad here, why would I buy your inferior incel card?

I always go with the faster card even if it means eating 2 months on a tight budget.

That's a fast resolution.

I'm about to replace mine. It's served me well but it's starting to show it's age

All I find when I look it up are $500+ tho. Why not just go for a 2070 at that point?

oh you mean 1080p yeah 1660 is better purchase.

You mean 3.5

AMD drones holding onto the one metric they can say their cards are better at.

Nevermind the fact a Radeon VII with 16gb VRAM and an RX 570 with 8gb VRAM are both equally fucking retarded.

>tfw 1440p 144hz with a 970
somebody save me from this hell i have created for myself

Who /AMD Master race/ here?

The Radeon VII is a killer production card though HBM is a massive improvement for things like GPU accelerated Illustrator or heavy effects in video production. For gaming it makes no sense though

>being a 144tard
Yikes, 4K60 or nothing

I'm buying a 1440p ultrawide soon.

reminder that there are paid nvidia shills on Yea Forums who have been exposed time and time again

Attached: 1530936124213.png (930x600, 515K)

dunno, my 780 3gb is doing just fine

>spent so long trying to fix error 43 because somehow I fixed it and then it broke its self again like the next day and the fix didn’t work anymore and kept trying because it was working but just gave up stupid faggot company

i paid 200 for a 1050ti

>haha guys get a PC and escape the consolewarfaggotry
>PC turns out to be a whole new can of worms featuring brand loyalty

wasn't the 1050 ti as good as the 960? Why wouldn't this be as good as the 1060?

That was me.

Bought a 970 for $300 a few months after they came out in early 2015. Spent the next almost four years waiting for a significant upgrade for $300. That upgrade never came.

Decided to just get a 1080 Ti for $600 when 2080 was coming out because ray tracing was a meme and 2080s were the same performance for $800+ at launch.

>maxed out

if you're running last gen or pre 2015 games.

shit and blood

It'll probably be as good as the 1060 3gb, which is slower than the 6gb version.

refresh rate > res
unless they wanna start putting out more affordable 4k 144hz monitors and gpus capable of running games at those specs

I didn't know gpus could work like that

then what's this?

>games are unplayable on 2080ti with rtx
>they keep releasing subbudget shit for poorfags
Literally kek

We're not getting a big jump for a long long time it seems.

That's 1st gen i7, right?
It's not that bad, but even 2nd gen i7 2600K would BTFO of it, easily. Without those 2 extra physical cores yours has compared to matching i5, you'd already have major issues running some recent titles.

You may wanna upgrade ASAP. Luckily, anything from 4th gen of intel i-cores will still work great.

How do I check what's compatible with a Rampage 3 extreme motherboard?

I made the mistake once of thinking any DDR3 RAM would be compatible since it used DDR3 ram but nope, only certain sticks are compatible. Somehow my system still runs with incorrect RAM though it takes 7-10 restarts to finally boot up.

Attached: Alpha Male SwoleBenji.png (542x330, 41K)

Fucking Google it you tard

literally this, as well as the usual pc elite gatekeeping

>gatekeeping
back to rêddit

I tried and nothing comes up.

are you lost?
you can't compare gpus to consoles, there's no gpu manufacturer exclusive games, at most you get useless meme shit like ray tracing and physx

He can put a $50 Xeon in that system which might just BTFO the 2600k.

>Their Radeon VII could have been a real challenger if they wanted to, but it comes witha....1000mhz baseclock....LOOOOL my R9 290 several years ago already had 950mhz

no, the 7 is a bad batch of professional cards. failed high-end chips repurposed as gaming hardware to cut losses. that's why they have more memory than they can properly utilize and in turn why they cost so damn much. it's AMD seeing how far brand loyal idiots will go to buy "high end" from them. if consumers were smarter the 7 would have to be cheaper and would be a reasonable purchase. of course, if consumers were smarter every product would be a reasonable purchase.

This means older cards will get cheaper right guys?

Attached: 1522481111208.jpg (900x900, 51K)

on the same level as the 1070 and 2060.

the point is that pc elitists are worse than console fanboys when it comes to AMD or Nvidia hardware

Older cards never get cheaper outside of used market. They'll just stop producing them.

What's hilarious is that amd should thank nvidia for the high price of RTX cards or they wouldn't even be able to release 7 at that price point. Still a shit card because it loses to 2080 and the latter got a price cut at $600 and 7 is $700+

so its slower than a 1060 3gb and a gimped 580 what a joke

which 2 odd slots? it's gotta be the right slots. check your mainboard layout for slots 1 and 3. if that's the ones you put the memory in it's fine. also check if it's running at the correct clock (the highest your RAM and mainboard allow). check the memory section in your bios for "intel XMP", that's where you select the proper speed. if the option is missing you might have to update your bios but that's the worst case scenario (and not as scary as it sounds, I reluctantly did it once and it worked first try).

Let me guess you also configure your games with nvidia experience™?

Attached: 1547138498879.gif (652x562, 457K)

I just bought a 1060 literally two weeks ago and I bet I won't regret it. the 1660 Ti isn't any cheaper than the 1070 which it replaces so these other cards replacing 1000 series ones won't be either. you're fine. the price gouging isn't ending this year.

you can pay the card, hell even the whole setup with the cheaper electric bill, you retard.

wrong

One buys the 1660ti to get the Kepler architecture.

t. bitcoin miner

>He can put a $50 Xeon in that system
Which one?

Not low-end enough.
I'll just wait for the RT 2010

Attached: 1553318339174.jpg (1200x628, 124K)

if you're getting stuttering in games this is why. I just upgraded from a 920 myself so I know these old boys churn out very respectable framerates. but the frametimes can be all over the place so I finally gave in.

>Zen 3
that's assuming Zen 3 will be different from 1 or 2 because those were not worth it for gaming, no matter what the damage control / brand loyal brigade says.

Yeah I get stutter all the time.

I might as well just upgrade the whole rig I 'spose.

An user convinced me over 10 years ago to buy a big ass fukken heatsink for the current one I have. The thing is the biggest piece of hardware I have and the weight of it bends my mother board. Not sure if he was trolling but undoing that thing is too much of a bitch to just replace the cpu.

X5675, X5690? Look up compatibility. At least 980X and 990X work.

6 cores use today should pull them in the Ivy Bridge category at least.

The midrange 8 core Zen 3 part shown off match a 9900k in single threaded and bettered it in multicore.

Acknowledged.

Still waiting for AMD to upgrade my GTX 980Ti unless new cards get a $200 price cut (or $500 for the 2080Ti).

>that pic
>implying favorable for AMD
meanwhile my 1060 uses only 8 pins and isn't audible during play with uncapped framerate (200-300 fps in Quake Champions). and I haven't even put proper fans in my rig yet, I'm reusing two ancient 90mm noctuas from 2010 for intake and another 90mm that came with this case for exhale. once I get proper 140mm fans my computer will be almost completely inaudible under any load. oh, on that note: LMAO at watercooling fags. complete waste of money and effort. enjoy your blowjob sound effects from shitty pumps, and your fucking fans that aren't quieter than mine.

Stop calling it "Zen 3"
Ryzen 1000 is Zen
Ryzen 2000 is Zen+
Ryzen 3000 is Zen 2

This is correct, to be honest they should just be calling them the 1000s series 2000s series etc.

you can't replace the CPU, that socket (1366) was only used for one generation.

big heatsinks are not memes btw, putting a big heatsink on your CPU is the correct choice. maybe not "bends my motherboard" big, but it should be frustrating to assemble and make you worry if it's going to infringe on space for your RAM or GPU.

>match a 9900k in single-threaded

don't say we didn't warn you when this turns out to be BS when they actually launch these things and said part is sold at an absurd price as high-end. think about it, why would AMD gift you 9900k performance for a midrange price? what's in it for them? any CPU that can keep up with the 9900k is going to be priced about 50 bucks under the 9900k and then Intel will drop the latter's price by 25 bucks, leaving you with 25 bucks savings until you factor in the higher clocked RAM Ryzen needs.

980ti (overclocked) still running most of my games near max at 60 but lately I have started to see a dip in the mid 50s (fucking Sekiro) and I will probly go for a rtx 2070 in the summer or a radeon vii (I feel like those extra memory GB will future proof me better especially with the new consoles coming out in 2 years max that will raise the bar.

You do know what moore's law is right?

What? I have a 970 and Sekiro ran at 1080p60 like 99% of the time. The only stutters I had were because of the game loading new areas I'm pretty sure.

I was reading the other day that after 5nm its going to be chaos...
not 1080p :(

We're probably not going to be using silicon past 5nm.

>why would AMD gift you 9900k performance for a midrange price
because if they price it like a 9900k they will only sell a handful. If they price it in the midrange they will sell bucketloads.

Attached: CPU-Sales-Mindfactory.jpg (1918x905, 741K)

hasn't applied to CPU single threaded performance in years.

revenue != profit
their goal isn't to sell as many CPUs as possible, it's to sell what they have in the most profitable way.

>you can't replace the CPU, that socket (1366) was only used for one generation.
Dude, a cheap ass Asus p6t SE from 2009 can use X5675.

ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/52577/intel-xeon-processor-x5675-12m-cache-3-06-ghz-6-40-gt-s-intel-qpi.html

Which with today's multicore utilization gains a lot of speed similar to Bulldozer.

>still no replacement for 1060 6gb

1660 is shit, 20% improvement at most

I get microphobia when I realize that the 10nm is smaller than a virus, or the dudes that made a semiconductor out of 3 atoms...

Attached: Comparison_semiconductor_process_nodes.png (990x765, 246K)

>one german shop
>compiled by /r/amd
lel

AMD doesn't have a shortage of production capacity unlike Intel.
If the production line is going and you have enough high binned chips you make more profit selling tons of them for cheap than keeping them in a warehouse not selling them because they are priced too high.

wow youre even in this thread? thats hilarious lmao

>Hasn't applied in years
Every gen since nehalem has provided a 6-8% jump in single threaded performance.

Attached: file.png (822x799, 266K)

wow first one to get hiv wins

?

>where I live used 1060 3gb costs as much as used 580 8gb
Not sure if that's a bad thing, but I might be able to trade mine for a 580

Have to clarify,

They may have been cheap back then but they certainly aren't now, what with 50% of the price they cost 10 years ago lol.

You should only upgrade to an old Xeon if you already have the motherboard.

Enjoy your spyware drivers.

I would rather get a used rx 590

Or buy a RX and sell the games to some chump, save money.

great now i remember that I forgot to sell all the keys that came with the vegas I bought for mining