Has Miyazaki lost it Yea Forumsbros? How did the same guy who directed Dark Souls 1 and BB...

Has Miyazaki lost it Yea Forumsbros? How did the same guy who directed Dark Souls 1 and BB, make Dark Souls 3 and Sekiro? What a fucking downgrade.

Attached: lostit.jpg (1696x2452, 2.28M)

i just finished sekiro

really disappointed, only liked one boss in the game and it was o'rin

the whole game just felt empty and bland

Attached: 121242.jpg (1012x1044, 189K)

O’rin isn’t even the best mini boss. Your taste is shit

she is though, amazing atmosphere and fun fight
who else is there?

Dark Souls 3 is objectively the best

Sekiro is just L1 and X spam to break posture and one R1 to execute. Nothing really changed except the lack of weapons, fashion and online.

It's was a neat experiment, but not something I want in future core souls games. Maybe have certain weapons with similar play styles, but don't force the whole game to be parryspam and dexfaggotry.

In regards to Sekiro, at least BB, and the Souls games have weapon and/or build variety. What does Sekiro have, one sword and an arm that doesn't have all that much use.

DS3 is literally bloodborne with shields though

NOOOOO MOMMY I CAN'T PLAY AS A WOMAN ANYMORE

Attached: 2Q==.jpg (225x225, 14K)

Sekiro was better than bloodborne

Attached: 1553566800944.jpg (831x1024, 68K)

They’re all amazing and Miyazaki is a genius. You’re just a shitter who can’t adapt to a new play style. Also DS3 is fucking immaculate and plays like a dream. Seethe harder

The Dark Souls sequels should have never been made. Their existence even soils the greatness of the other games a bit due to being redundant and unnecessary. Had Demon's Souls, Dark Souls and Bloodborne been the three From games they would all be looked at a lot more fondly and eventually people would look back on them much more positively than they might later in the future. As it stands now, there have been way too much of these games. They were milked and the genre got whored out all over to almost always lesser developers.

Just imagine how much better it could have been if all that dev time on DaS2 was spent on instead further improving Bloodborne and DaS3 time went instead to Sekiro.

t. never played the game

Why does BB get it's dick sucked so much? I prefer DaS1 over it. A friend of my brother who doesn't like Dark Souls trilogy or Sekiro, thinks BB is the game of the generation.

Cuz muh exclusives, bruh

Attached: 15434142456450.jpg (986x832, 126K)

Because zoomers love Lovecraft

Is that really all it is? There must be something it did right that can even make people who don't like the majority of Miyazaki games slather over BB.

literally this.

Sekiro is the worst Miyazaki game.

Dark souls is just rolling and r1 spam though

Sekiro is shit. Change my mind protip: you can't

Nice bait

Dark Souls III is better than Dark Souls.
Bloodborne is good but has no replay value.

>waste my time trying to convince some delusional faggot

Attached: 15075634526.jpg (400x400, 30K)

Oh look, another contrarian kiddie that's mad because Sekiro's too hard for him. :(

>Bloodborne is good but has no replay value.

Then why does everyone suck its dick so much and do multiple runs?

>If you didn't like a game I did you're delusional.

Attached: 1514189203481.jpg (625x790, 68K)

To get the alternate ending cheevos.

When I hear "multiple playthroughs" I think entirely new character using an entirely different weapon that looks entirely different and subscribes to entirely different mechanics such as different covenants, different boss order and different endgame.

>friend... thinks BB is the game of the generation.
Dark Souls 1 was last gen. So that makes perfect sense.

it has the cheesy gothic setting and lovecraft shit so nerds jizz over it

It’s fun

Yes, but with different weapons, not just 1 weapon

How about taking time from BB to make DaS2 a better game and time from Sekiro to make DaS3 a better game?

But i can spam r2 with a heavy weapon. Or i can not roll at all by using heavy armor. Sekiro playstyle is just 1 and only.

Sekiro has the best qualities of Dark Souls and Bloodborne. It has Dark Souls-type world design and healing and Bloodborne-type faster combat and strong level design. On top of that it adds a ton of mobility to the mix.

The only way its world design isn't quite as good as Dark Souls is that it has warping from minute 1, so the world being interconnected is more of an "oh, that's neat" thing instead of something pragmatic. But Dark Souls' world design isn't perfect either, some of the early-game dead-ends are tedious (Tomb of the Giants, Ash Lake), and there are areas that are clearly unfinished.

Sekiro is an upgrade over Bloodborne in every way. The posture system is a lot better than the rally system, and the game actually runs at a good framerate. Sekiro's base-game bosses are generally better than Bloodborne's base-game bosses.

DaS sequels should have never been made in the first place.

>future core souls games
It's not really a souls game though, is it?

Idiots keep fucking up. No amount of bullshit turns bad gamers into good gamers. If u can't pick up a fighting game ur just pretending. I dont differentiate between overwatch and soullss gamees.

Same reason DeS still gets praise while being inferior to future DS games in every way.
Sony exclusive.

We already lost comfy MH thread, now can't have comfy threads for Soulsbornekiro too, thanks to falseflagging Nintenretards trying to instigate civil war in a fanbase by creating bait threads like this daily.

Attached: 1552948792089.png (1024x683, 1.11M)

>and there are areas that are clearly unfinished.

Such as what?

>inb4 Lost Izalith

>wah wah buzzword blah buzzword and buzzword blah buzzword
Good post, buddy.