Dark Souls 3 PvP is peak online multiplayer. Prove me wrong.
Dark Souls 3 PvP is peak online multiplayer. Prove me wrong
>this are the people complaining about Sekiro
Nah, that's Halo 3 or TF2.
>chugging estus the game is good PvP
>soulschad
>complaining about sekiro
Dark Souls 2 always had better pvp. It was the best in the series because everything was viable and nothing was completely OP and overshadowed everything else until you got to a very high SL (which is inevitable)
It's just that people didn't like the game in general as much as 1 and the matchmaking sucked because of soul memory.
>Dark Souls 2 always had better pvp
Soul Memory
>Absolute dogshit is peak multiplayer
DS2 had PvP that was a thousand times better than the straight sword spam meta garbage that was DS3
DaS 2 had none existent world PvP. I literally had to mule to be able to invade anyone who wasn't PvP geared. Why do arenas even exist if you can only invade people who are essentially arena players? DaS 3 is even worse, you can invade at low levels, but it's always 4vs1 reverse ganks. DeS and DaS are the only ones who got invasions right. They're not meant to be fair, or even winnable. Not a single game after DeS had to the balls to bring Scraping Spear tier invasions back.
>baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawww PvP isnt good unless im fighting someone clearly at a disadvantage
Why not just play a fighting game
>DaS3 invasions allow you to fight someone at a disadvantage
Hmmmmm
Because it's a unique asymmetric multiplayer mode where you're at a disadvantage but you can win by being an absolute dick by exploiting terrain, surprise and the stupidity of the host to win.
1v1 is trash. Invasions are where it's at.
it's too hard for me, and it make my finger hurty :(
Agape Ring
I really enjoy pvp in dark souls but it's shit. Latency, shitty hitboxes, the fact that is a game made for pve with those long i-frames rolls...
They're called INVASIONS, not DUELS. DaS had both ARENAS, and world PvP. Why do carebears want ONLY arenas to exist? I got invaded more than I invaded in the game with the harshest invasions (DeS) and I still enjoyed it more than anything PVP related in 2. Even 3's reverse ganks were more fun, because you could still out play the inexperienced retards who will get themselves killed even with 3 bodyguards. 1vs1 PvP with a ruleset is shit when the game has awful latency, hitboxes, and balance. I play fighting games, if I wanted an actually balanced and nuanced 1vs1 experience, I wouldn't be playing shit like souls to begin with.
Can you explore in fighting games? No. You just fight until you're bored.
It's boring and a fucking chore like the rest of the soul series. I cannot understand why people think the pvp is fun
It's fun to invade people, most of the time I don't even try to kill them, I just follow them around and throw prism stones everywhere. Or I'll just sit by their bonfire or the boss door.
Stealth is fun. I love to equip slumbering, untrue dark, cat and obscuring rings
They’re being dicks.
Your idea of exploration is primitive
The Souls series has superior controls.
It keeps me coming back, that's for sure. Nothing like invading a host and his phantom, maybe a blue, and then killing the host while the other guys look on in failure.
diablo 2