Discuss
Other urls found in this thread:
Both shit
I saw a fox try to hunt a bunny the other day.
One got downgraded, the other one didn't.
the absolute state of western developers bros, wtf happened to them?
bork
>Bottom
>Already looks like shit because it is trying to replicate a realistic art style and real foxes look nothing like that
>Also jaggies
>top
>Will forever look fine because it doesn't do the above
BAD GRAPHICS GOOD
GOOD GRAPHICS BAD
When you spend all day reading people defend their platform with nothing other than "other platform is worse" people who are just observing and don't own either just believe both platforms suck and can't understand why someone might like both.
Idorts win as always.
Carmelita looks really weird on PS4.
Top is an adventure videogame. Bottom is a west videogame
the delusion is real
top looks awful
Who won, the hunter or the agile prey?
what
i prefer top because heavy realism in games is a meme
>the delusion is real
I agree, your delusional is tangible.
*yip...yip*
>Shuffles through some snow to try and find a rabbit.
*Yaaaaaawn*
>Find a comfortable hole and sleps.
Foxes are a cute and they're even romantic during mating season the male fox will find food for his mate to eat while she's pregnant.
>GRAPHICS = FUN
Just go watch nat geo
at least i can see some nipples on nat geo
What's an East video game then?
SOUL
VS
SOULLESS
>A gritty and realistic game about cowboys shouldn't look realistic
???
I think both have merits because I'm not an extremist child.
Videogame from the eastern region of this earth
>wild west
>real
What a brainlet
NINTENDO
Are you also able to quantify those merits and decide which one is better than the other?
There's no excuse for BotW's bad graphics. Making a game cartoony doesn't mean the textures can look like from 2006
cute foxes
How do you decide which region of the earth is East though? If the world is round then if you keep going east you'll end up West
97
>If the world is round
It's flat
>those hill graphics
Yikes, glad I emulated this with increased fidelity. Couldn't imagine how much eye cancer you'd get trying to play this on a tablet connected to a tv running at like 576p
Soul
Soulless
Actually there is an excuse. Some places have the game's performance dropped and those places look beautiful to look at. I want to see the world like it's shown in the reveal but it's not possible unless the Switch got better hardware.
>cherrypicking this much
>Bad graphics
In ten years BOTW will still look good while RDR2 will look like "last generation trash".
>hill graphics
Use your words
Two whole years user
TORYAH
BLIP BLIP
Switch isn't very powerful.
By todays standards neither are XB1/PS4 really but they're still a hell of a lot stronger than the Switch.
Nothing much to discuss really.
>comparing Cell shading vs photorealism
You must be dumb
Imagine still being upset about a game from 2 years ago
What's the bottom game? If it's a fox based game (I'm guessing it isn't) then I'd like to play it.
Thing is cell shading can look good if done right. BotW isn't and uses copious amounts of light bloom to hide it.
Do you know where you are?
Nah it looks great
RDR2
SOUL
>It can look good if done right! It's just so happens that this game I am currently shitposting isn't done right! Huehuehue
Saw it coming
Discuss.
One is clearly stylized while the other is going for realism
>BOTW
>missions or plot
RDR2 is another movie game.
OwO what are those two cuties?
all 4 story missions in BotW consist of
>go to village
>talk to important person
>beat cinematic pre-dungeon boss
>go through dungeon that consists of only 5 puzzles and the same 2 enemies
>beat copy/pasted ganon boss
the rest of the game is bad fetch quests, copy/pasted guardian shrines, 1 room puzzle shrines, and 900 copy/pasted collectables
I'll take old-looking graphics over uninteresting gameplay every day of the week of the month of the year of the decade of the century of the millenium.
I don't really give a shit about either game but RDR 2, lack of gameplay aside, looked pretty fucking incredible. It'll be a long time before it even looks dated. Botw on the other hand, also disregarding whether or not it's a good game, looks kinda crap already in a lot of places.
This user is correct.
If you make a game too non linear then it loses it's artisic and cinematic value.
The only time I felt anything was taking down the elephant with my Zora bro
They both suck. RDR is the epitome of a brainless moviegame and BOTW is the epitome of brainless nuNintendo dreck.
Yea it's strange that people post things that guarantee 300 replies. Must be because it's the greatest game ever made.
Crysis still looks fine though
Damn straight. What the hell is that, Ghen War?
Turok 2
>In ten years BOTW will still look good
It already looks worse than it did in 2014...
youtube.com
SOUL VS SOULLESS
the 2014 reveal looked bad though
>If you make a game too non linear then it loses it's artisic and cinematic value.
Cute foxes I want to pet them
This, quiet franky. Its the reason BotW is still fawned over more than two years later while barely anyone gives a fuck about RDR2 just months after release.
You know by the same reason you know what you call West
i wana pet a fox so badly and ruffle its ears
The top is a shit looking fox. The bottom is a shit looking fox. What are we supposed to discuss?
Open world game + limited vram
the textures have to be as limited as possible. You have a very tight budget to meet. But I wouldn't expect Yea Forums to understand the technicalities. BotW, while a terrible game is technically impressive for what it's running on.
top has soul bottom looks like a fucking taxidermy
Or maybe it's because the people who played RDR2 enjoyed the game and moved on to other games available to them, while the only thing Switch owners have to look forward to in the immediate future is more Yoshi shovelware.
low def fox vs high def dog pretending to be a fox
Or that it's still the only quality game on Switch.
>Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
>Still being talked about after 2 years since release
>G-GAME IS BAD
>Horizon Zero Dawn
>literally who game that disappeared into obscurity
>T-THAT GAME SHOULD'VE KILLED ZELDA!
the amount of winning i have gotten sure feels lonely
It's a WiiU game
>only good game on switch
>G-GAME IS BAD!
come on user! does Yea Forums like or hate Breath of the Wild!? make up your mind!
they cost like $6,000. Domesticated foxes were the product of some soviet era study on the domestication process. They sell them now. Watch a youtube video on it. Its pretty interesting.
you can just steal one from the wild
>6000
:( but im a poor retarded neet
I don't know why people praise games like RDR2, they're basically the completely wrong direction for an interactive medium to go towards, restrictive, narrow, predetermined and so on.
It's regressing games not progressing them.
Actually I do know, the average gamer is a retard that doesn't care about gameplay but prefers graphics and presentation before anything else.
I prefer playing a good games with fun things to do over a something like BotW where you run around in a shitty empty open world
YEEEEEP
Both are fine, one is stylized and the other is realistic. You can't make a strong argument for either without revealing any allegiances you have.
t. Didn't play either game.
RULES OF NATURE
I agree
t. played both
Both are fine in their own context.
>fun things
>RDR2
this why do retards keep comparing anime style to realistic
For real though I fucking hate that shit. If nintendo can make a game that's suitable for kids and still respect the intelligence of the player to make decisions on their own why the fuck can't an adult game do it too? I know RDR2 is far more narrative focused but it still doesn't excuse it. Especially when you stray slightly off the intended path to do some exploring or looting or whatever and whoever they have to hold your hand at the time is just constantly calling out to you to follow them.
>Figure out how to collect those Y X's yourself
Truly revolutionary
>There's no excuse for BotW's bad graphics
Except there is, it was made on very weak hardware.