DMC 3 > DMC 5

I think overall, we can agree that DMC 3 is still the best.

DMC 3
>13 unique bosses
>The three repeats of a boss all amazing and very different
>5 unique weapons for Dante
>Style Switcher mod on PC puts it on the same level as DMC4 and 5
>Cool environments and only minimal/moderate reuse of areas
>Cool mission concepts like the all Devil Trigger one

DMC5
>6 unique bosses
>The 4 repeats of a boss are all the exact same
>4 unqiue weapons for Dante (ok, these are mostly better than DMC3's)
>Style Switching can be done in DMC3
>Shit environments
>Bland mission concepts and the stupid timeline thing that means the actual story is super short

Attached: dmc.png (1000x432, 1019K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=lVtVkmTQbxY
youtube.com/watch?v=rhWrmko8cIE&t=69s
youtube.com/watch?v=GJ_Itr8UzMM
youtube.com/watch?v=cj7oRNCld4s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Those are some nice opinions

DMC5 has the superior gameplay. Especially when you play as Dante or NG+ Nero. But I still liked DMC3 more. The overall package was better presented.

Attached: dmc3.jpg (1280x720, 35K)

>Bosses
>weapons
>story
>Music
The only things I would give to DMC3 over DMC5.

Attached: 15436547548568.jpg (357x357, 39K)

Don't forget

>DMC3 has superior music
>DMC3 has vastly superior storytelling focusing on diving deep with just a few characters instead of fan service

DMC1 BTFOs BOTH

Attached: Devil-May-Cry.jpg (1024x768, 51K)

Adding style switcher mod is cheating

3 has better music I'll give you that, but 3 also had some pretty bland environments at times and it had backtracking

>muh ebul badass twin brother
>cuhrayzee pizza eating wacky badass teenager
>not fanservice
lmao OK

>DMC5
unique bosses

>Chicken boss
>Bullet hell Lady boss
>Cerberus
>Horse boss
>Plant boss with tentacles, Nidhogg
>Virgil
>Urizen
>Gilgamesh (Which sucks but still counts)
>Voltic Knight (Unique enough from his horse counterpart)
>Goliath
>Those roots in Neros first level with the boss health bar.

If you want to really speak about Environments, DmC is king.

Don't (You) me, you know it's true.

Agreed. DMC5 is the second best one, but there were too many little things (QUIT FORCING NERO ON ME!) that make it inferior to 3.

Fan service is when you include a dozen characters and half of them do nothing but just stand there so fat fans can clap their hands and be happy seeing their favorite dudes.

DMC3 was ballsy as fuck by focusing on just four characters and exploring their characters.

Fuck you, Nero is awesome

3 had some horrible levels and bosses, puzzles in action games are trash no matter how coated with nostalgia your vision is
meanwhile, 5 doesnt have a single bad boss or shitty puzzles since it focuses on the one thing that matters, the combat

5 > 3, if you disagree you're blinded with nostalgia or are a contrarian, simple as that

is DMC 3 the Melee of the DMC franchise?

that's 4

DMC3 is the MGS3 of DMC games. Think about it, you know I'm right.

>Gilgamesh
It's amazing how the only boss besides Urizen/Vergil that has a whole mission dedicated to it is the worst boss in the game. (Except for maybe the plant thing in mission 1.)

its also funny how despite being the worst boss in the game it still managed to be fun
can't say the same thing about the bad bosses in 3 or 4....

It's funny how you ignore the fact that you're forced to play a literal walking fujoshit bore for hours in DMC5.

>5 doesnt have a single bad boss

I think 5 is better than 3 too, but your gonna tell me Gilgamesh is a good boss?
Its just shoot the leg and hit the weak spot, it can barley defend itself.

Attached: 1382558107252.gif (500x230, 984K)

>the actual story is super short
This happens in all DMCs, dante is just too strong

Nero is boring and will always be Dante-lite. However I could change my stance if he actually got more devil arms and mechanics beyond press and hold square, tap L2 during combos. Character wise he’s still a big fat nothing that has to cuss to show any personality at all.

V is fun though

its not amazing but its nothing as bad as any of the bad bosses in 3

*Ahem*

Attached: Best game.jpg (550x220, 49K)

He's not. And the fact that you're forced to play his turdy missions whenever replaying brings the game down by a bunch. Compared to Nero and Dante, he sucks ass.

>will always be Dante-lite.
He's nothing like Dante though.

DMC 3 is the RE4 of DMC

he's fine, you just suck ass

>nothing as bad as any of the bad bosses in 3

Maybe not, but even so that docent make it good itself either.
Worst mission and worst boss.

>hold square
He didn't rebind gun.

>DMC V: we revive vergil the game.

He's not fun. His stages are also piss easy to beat. He just sucks. He plays nothing like a DMC character. He's just there to please the shitters who can't into mobility of Dante and Nero. Fuck that character. I'd rather take DMC3's backtracking with Dante over playing V.

Yeah he’s basic as shit. One gun one devil arm and a basic bitch press O to use gimmick arm. Whereas Dante has multiple weapons, guns, entire play style changes on the fly and actual complexity. So yeah, he’s nothing like Dante because Dante isn’t on training wheels journalist mode like Nero was designed from the ground up.

he's the worst boss in 5 but he isnt a "bad" boss the same way gigapede, arkham, or leviathan core were

that's like, your opinion man

>here's your bloody palace bro!

Attached: cancer.png (1403x1341, 1.44M)

oh yeah, 5 also doesnt any real bad enemies, man how fucking deluded do you have to be to think 3 is better

unique bosses
the "unique" bosses in DMC3 aren't that good when you account for shit like Arkham, Hell Vanguard (though he is a good introduction), Gigapede, Jester 3 times,Leviathan heart, Doppelganger; those are mediocre at best while in DMC5 the only bad bosses are the Root & Gilgamesh.
>Style Switcher mod on PC puts it on the same level as DMC4 and 5
Style switcher isn't a really pertinent argument as it's a mod, it's better to compare the game in their vanilla state

Otherwise, fair point, I'd say they are on par regarding their quality, DMC5 really needed something more regarding it's setting, the city sections are nice but I really didn't like how a big part of the game is inside the tree and how 4 mission are just bosses

How can they even compete?

Attached: Best DMC.jpg (1024x768, 80K)

>press and hold square
For the gun?

That actually explains why you think he plays like Dante-lite.

Both games enviroments are pretty boring

You forgot story and music

Attached: 124215121.jpg (1318x976, 529K)

>Get into DMC 2 weeks ago.
>get to DMD in DMC3
>Can't even take on the hells or the hell vanguard in mission 2
>can't even imagine how cancerous those fuckera must be in DMD
YAMEROOO

Attached: 1541445743182.png (540x437, 201K)

ok, now try taking away tour nostalgia goggles and post that shit again with a drop of sincerity, you can't

I dropped dmd when it made me fight DTed enigmas

>Complains about Nero being Dante Lite
>Wants him to have more weapons and mechanics, which is Dante's schtick
Nice cognitive dissonance there, user. Why don't you just admit that you're forcing yourself to dislike the character to hop on a bandwagon that broke down 10 years ago.

>have to fight DTd Soul Eaters and DTd Enigmas
>if I fight Enigmas they'll just run like hell and soul eaters will come rushing at me
>if I fight soul eaters I have to make them appear first by facing at the opposite direction
>but then the enigmas will fucking shoot and spam their retarded arrows
dmc 3 has got to have the most cancerous enemies

Your list is flawed and you're being disingenuous. If you weighed DMC3 against DMC5 fairly, pound-for-pound, as 5 is right now, without lying (there are not 13 unique bosses in 3 for a start and 3's style switcher mod doesn't suddenly include 5's style improvements) I think 3 would still have the edge. But that's right now, including Special Edition and with mods. When 5 is definitively complete (Bloody Palace, more characters, turbo, with potential boss, enemy, weapon, and campaign extras down the line) it easily has the potential to surpass it. I'd say Bloody Palace alone would do it if it's as expansive as rumours suggest..

Attached: 1529911386552.png (512x576, 388K)

Seeth some more

Attached: DMC1_Title_Screen.jpg (560x418, 44K)

Kino
youtube.com/watch?v=lVtVkmTQbxY

based DMC1 poster.

Attached: 337744748.jpg (1440x1920, 473K)

5 IS TRASH, DUDE, DON'T LET THIS Yea Forums FAGS TELL YOU OTHERWISE. 4 > ALL.

OP will not respond to this.

now, why did you have to do that?

Honestly, this. As much as I love DMC3, it definitely has more bullshit enemies than DMC5. The spiders are a little tanky but not too bad and the archers are just annoying, but those other three are straight fucking cancer. For DMC5, only the Furies and Judecca are major problems, but they're still totally doable. Riots are a severe issue when they're in big groups on DMD but that's typical DMD for you.

I fucking love DMC3 and 4 intros
What went so wrong
youtube.com/watch?v=rhWrmko8cIE&t=69s

Attached: 23141251.jpg (1254x795, 505K)

Nah, fuck you buddy

Attached: N.png (500x484, 272K)

Are the bosses atleast fun.
Only reason why I would want to plow through that garbage is to fight vergil and to lesser extend Nevan, cerberus and beowulf at their peak.

Attached: 1552005823631.gif (334x251, 2.24M)

I want Bloody Palace in 5 to work like a gallery of every enemy in the series, but that's asking for too much.

uizen fight is bullshit
i finally beat the crystal and he just heals it

I still maintain Furies are fun to fight and nowhere near as bad as any of 3/4's worst enemies. Judeccas can eat shit and die, though.

Attached: Fury.webm (900x506, 2.88M)

I think Root is a good introductory boss and Gilgamesh is a fun set piece. The only boss I'd say is bad is Elder Greyon, and that's because he never stops moving around, which is a problem for V. Artemis in V's boss rush is a similar issue but at least she has low health. It's one of the clear indications that V was put into a game meant for Nero and Dante. But that said, yeah, there's no Dopelganger or Arkham boss, there's no Agnus' Sword Room from DMC4, and there's no rail shooter segment from DMC1. Overall, DMC5 does have a good roster of bosses.

Based
People who like 5 are just zoomies who rushed the first 4 due to hype

Bandwagon is still going strong apologist. He’s less interesting to play. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

All of the urizen fights suck imo it's just shitty projectile spam and teleporting away

>early Zoomer thinks DMC3 is the best one and not DMC1
This damn kids of today

Attached: Boomer dante.png (380x349, 97K)

DMC4's intro goes on for way too long. I swear a big reason for it was to show off the scene transitions they put together but it's better done during the musical segment later in the game. That said, DMC5's introduction goes on for pretty long too but I think it's still better than DMC4. I think 3 had the best intro and it gets you into the action the fastest and most fun.

I don't like that an enemy is based entirely around countering and dodging, or if it's going to be that way then they should die in a single easy combo instead of teleporting away and requiring two really damaging combos. It's cool when it's an additional layer, like with Death Scissors, but I don't like that there's only one good way to deal with them. DMD is especially sadistic when you're dealing with multiple Furies, or a Fury in addition to other enemies. But I'll tell you what, I'll take a Fury over a Judecca, holy shit those fucking guys.

based

>DMC3fags BTFO
>DMC5fags BTFO
>Even Bayofags BTFO

Do i need to say more?

Attached: Everyone btfo.jpg (458x318, 52K)

>Point out the contradiction in your reasoning
>w-well your fee fees are hurt h-haha...
Keep up the cope, kiddo.

only the second enemy is bad

>I think Root is a good introductory boss
Root isn't even really a boss, the actual introductory boss is Goliath.

You might be right. Also V sucks to play as and brings dmc5 down.

>this game is inferior in actual gameplay mechanics, but better solely because it has more different bosses, despite only 0.00002% of the game's play time being spent on those bosses

Attached: 1552492891652.png (800x729, 48K)

Well yeah, but DMC5 starts off super easy compared to the past games as well. Even SoS is pussy shit compared to DMC3 on Normal. So I feel like Root eases players into the game while Goliath is the first boss to require you to actually use the game's mechanics. Thankfully, DMD is just as bullshit hard as it's known for.

I think it's only the two Fury room in 12 and the Fury+scissors room in 16, I never found it that bad. The thing is if they died too easily then the way to make their encounters harder would be including more of them, and I'd rather have one beefy one even with other enemies then a load of annoying little fuckers zipping around all at once. I'm actually looking forward to the inevitable BP floor which has 3 of them at once ala the Hell Vanguards. Maybe it's just a personal thing, 'cause I really fucking love parrying.

Attached: Cav Balrog.webm (900x506, 2.96M)

t. brainlet who hasn't even binded the controls yet

DMC3 has bosses I absolutely hate and DMC5 doesn't.
I think the weapon sets for both games are flawless.
DMC3 wasn't meant for style switching and the game doesn't get any better by forcing it.
DMC3 has levels that are fucking awful while DMC5 levels aren't bad but boring.
Overall I can't decide which one's better. They're both absolutely amazing in my opinion.

>Make an action game
>make the intro a long non-interactive cutscene where your character has badass fights where he does incredibly cool shit and the player is only allowed to wait patiently before gameplay to actually begin
What manner of mongoloid made these intros?

Attached: 1551463810724.jpg (528x792, 66K)

>Gilgamesh (Which sucks but still counts)
Better than the fucking flying centipede in DMC3

>the player is only allowed to wait patiently before gameplay to actually begin
Dude, I'm right there with you man, it's fucking bullshit. I swear, I'd skip all these cutscenes if I could.

Haven't played 5 yet but 1 is better than 3, and this is coming from someone who has no nostalgic attachment to 1

based

>make a game
>add story in it
what the fuck is this shit is this a movie or something? (lol)

And I say your full of shit and this is coming from someone who played both DMC1/3 for the first time back to back this month.

I have the answer right buddy

Attached: DMC1 Dante is best Dante.jpg (898x468, 58K)

3 has a bunch of shit enemies and some missions that are really boring, as well as a number of bad boss fights. It's improvements to the core gameplay are admirable but it misses the mark in a lot of other aspects.

While I'm cool with this (really cool with it since that webm is awesome) it's mainly because you have multiple ways of approaching Cavalier, so parries and dodges are just one of many options. Granted, it's not fair to compare a normal enemy to a boss, but I just don't like being forced to rely on a single strategy, especially when it's a strategy I don't like. It reminds me of those dumb floaty enemies in DMC3 where you had to look away from before attacking. In a game that's all about constant offense and flashy combos, I don't like that this enemy simply requires his pattern to be memorized before he can be dealt with effectively. Compared to a Chaos revving up its Sonic spindash, I can do Honeycomb, Charge Shotgun, Kalina Ann, Royal Guard, or dodge it a bunch. Then, when he's open, I can rush in and do whatever I like. I feel like DMC works best when enemies have multiple options to open them up.

Based and soulfilledwithlightpilled

>story

>what the fuck is this shit is this a movie or something? (lol)
How is the narrative in DMC enriched by making those fights cutscenes instead of letting you play them?

Not to mention it's an incredible waste of development resources.

Attached: 1544127765560.gif (320x287, 982K)

DMC1 you can count on 1 hand how many mobs dmc1 had and it rehashed the same 3 bosses thrice.
And I would say that only nelo angelo is decent, not to speak of the mobs who aren't all that great either.
No DMC3 boss is as shitty as nightmare with that awful camera angle and don't pretend that DMC1 level designs were all that great with that shitty swimming and that godawful camera.

I don't agree but I respect the opinion.
Every now and then I like to take a step back from the cuhrazy and simply beat demons to death with my big ass sword using simple combos while listening to goth techno. DMC1 is a special game.

>No DMC3 boss is as shitty as nightmare
I'm not a fan of Nightmare but I'd take it over Arkham any day

Not that user but,
There's like one swimming section I believe and it didn't even control that bad and lasts a minute or two. At least that's what I remember from my play through last year.

There are two swimming sections actually, but together they only take up like five minutes of time at most

Atleast you only have to fight Arkham once.

fuck Arkham, his fiht is so much bullshit

Is Sanctus a worse fight than Arkham? Keep in mind you have to fight Sanctus twice

Attached: sanctus.jpg (1280x720, 124K)

I won't deny that, but you only have to fight him once and you're done with it.

DMC3 has a better peak than DMC5 but 5 never manages to hit the abysmal fucking lows that DMC3 hits every other level
>doesn't randomly take away half your moveset in the middle of the fight
Arkham will always be worse.

Attached: 1530562562614.png (500x376, 295K)

>Style Switcher mod on PC puts it on the same level as DMC4 and 5

I overall agree with you but stop using this fucking stupid argument.

Sanctus is way fucking better than Arkham, if only because you don't lose your style ability. If Vergil didn't take away Dante's style button in the Arkham fight then I'd be fine with it, but that utterly ruins the fight for me. And I know Nero doesn't get style actions like Dante does but the point I'm getting at is that the game doesn't arbitrarily take moves away from Nero either.

I wanna know why they moved away from the atmosphere and gothic style of the first game. I don't like the urban settings whatsoever, they're boring to look at. DMC1 had such a fantastic setting, it is the only game in the series I actually love.

Attached: devil-may-cry-hd-collection_20180313105724-640x640.jpg (640x360, 45K)

A more apt comparison would be Agnus' Sword Room against Arkham, and the sword room is still fucking better.

Not him but you shouldn't need to remap the buttons of a game for it to be fun.

5 has one puzzle

anyone else kind of despise DMC5's ranking system? It seems to be based on how long you remain in a particular rank rather than actually doing stylish things.
So like, if you get SSS easily but a fight doesn't go on for very long, you only get like 3900 style
but if you know how to royal guard and just stall for as long as possible in SSS, you get a ridiculous amount of style (like 6000 or some shit)
plus this seems to be at odds with stylish the combat lets you be. If you watch a stylebeast on YT or something do like a 40 second long combo filled with advanced tech and JC'ing and shit, they still only seem to be in SSS for a really short time, which would net very little style in non-Void situations.

Attached: 1522402590093.png (613x594, 536K)

I love the gothic style of the first game too but it was clearly established in the opening cutscene that Dante lives in an urban setting. They couldn't just have each game be set in some old castle or fortress.

what puzzle?

Why do you debate over DMC3 or DMC5 when Capcom also made MHW, MH4U or MHGU, which are all better action games?

Blood rivers

I still agree with you overall but
>using a mod in your justification

Attached: maereo.jpg (260x257, 14K)

The longer you are in SSS > hitting it briefly
I don't understand your complaint

I tried doing a dmc3 run with keyboard and my wrists can't take it anymore. W-Well at least I've beaten Vergil 1.
How the fuck do you control your camera anyway?

I love when people justify their opinion with a mod. Is there a more apparent sign to discard an opinion?

I prefer DMC3's OST, story, level design and some boss fights but after years of playing it I think I'm ready to move on and thankfully DMC5 is more than capable of filling that enjoyment I had when I first played 3.

I'm just waiting for Bloody Palace, co-oping is fun when you have 2 or 3 players in the same area and not divided by some wall.

This.

Sanctus is a bit underwhelming as a final boss and he has a couple of fun interactions and the mechanics work well enough that he is a passable fight with Nero, Vergil, Lady and Dante. Arkham is just shit.

>Style Switcher mod on PC puts it on the same level as DMC4 and 5
Stopped reading here. If you need to mod the game in order to make it as interesting at the other two, then the other two win by default.

Arachne is legit a great enemy type that isn't either annoying or a punchbag.
Fuck all the rest though, especially fuck Dullahans, who the fuck thought to greenlight this shit?

Arachnes definitely feel just right in that they're aggressive but not overly gimmicky or a sandbag, the only thing that's bad about them is that the areas you fight them in are too small so the camera fucks up frequently.

Style Switcher is a neat curiosity but ultimately just a mod if you ask me, I didn't care for it because it weighs things far, FAR more heavily in Dante's favor than styles already do. Game is just not balanced around being able to Trickster dodge while charging shots on any style and then laying into them with Dance Macabre all in the span of five seconds.

Dmc3 has garbage graphics
Dmc5 does not

Dmc3 also had garbage gameplay
>b-b-but if you m-m-mod it...
Really nigger?
Dmc5 has mods too even if you wanted to go that route. But really that is just retarded.
>UMMM IF WE CHANGE DMC3 INTO DMC4, THEN DMC3 IS BETTER THAN DMC5
10 ways retarded and still wrong.

What a fucking terrible thread OP you faggot.

Attached: 1549820615745.gif (320x240, 2.64M)

1 > 4 > 5 > 3 < DmC > 2

Attached: _-Devil-May-Cry-PS2-_.jpg (226x320, 16K)

>DmC is better than 3

Dead
Weight

>Style Switcher mod on PC puts it on the same level as DMC4 and 5

Instantly disqualifies your argument. Mods are mods.

didn't play it yet, but the movement seemed slow, not laggy, but a bit unnatural. Watching it from twitch, and I'm presuming the streamers had decent systems.
Althought it lacked movement fluidity it still looked fun.

I've said this many times, but, Nero would have been a lot better as a girl. He's a Solid character in 5, but for DMC4 specifically, gender swapping Nero would have fixed basically all of his problems.

>imagine Trish getting pinned against a gray wall, that's the same color of her fucking boring bitch-ass character who imperonates moms becuase she's literally an unholy wretch with no dignity whatsoever, while at the same time the demon-whore who suckled Mundus' big red tri-balls and had so much piss-stained demon cum splurged all over her hair, it got dyed blond, is being fisted with pizza up her matrix-2000 black fetish pants ripped apart, so hard the term yeast infection gets a new meaning, and with her last whoreish, skanky, breaths she coughs up the crusty, hell-cum out her ps2-octagon mouth, leaving her dark soul unfilled, yet her ass stuffed to the brim

Attached: dante embarrassing.jpg (294x294, 19K)

DMC4 was such a terrible game I have no idea how anyone defends
>Evil Pope and and stuttering retard sidekick
>Evil Pope also happens to be a fan off giant board games
>Ice frog
>knife fish
>demon plants
>that mission impossible laser room
>Those levels with the demon dreidels
>Dante can’t even be bothered to give a shit about the story.

All due respect, user; What in the actual fuck are you talking about? Not trying to be a cunt, I would just genuinely like for you to explain what his problems were and how being a chick would fix them.

I'll give you the story/bosses but

>DMC3
>BETTER MUSIC

Have you LISTENED to this?
youtube.com/watch?v=GJ_Itr8UzMM

Attached: tumblr_pc0j819tmY1v0eic1_540.jpg (540x596, 39K)

Sanctus is a terrible boss but still way better than Arkham

Alright boys. You seem liked good people despite your differences of opinion. I'm about to start God Hand, but I need something for afterwards so that I can start sourcing a copy if it's old. What's my next step after I've played:
DMC1-5 + DmC
Ninja Gaiden 1-3
Bayo 1-2
Vanquish
Viewtiful 1/2
God of Wars all except newest title on PS4.

the cerberus theme still goes hard af

youtube.com/watch?v=cj7oRNCld4s

3 is better, but I don't think I can ever go back it after 5.

bump

5 > 1 > 3 > 2 > DmC
Fuck anyone who disagree

Attached: 1449399504522.png (700x1010, 609K)

Yes definitely. If in DMC5 you play exclusively as Dante I might consider placing it higher but the lack of focus really hurts it.

>oh yeah, 5 also doesnt any real bad enemies
Hey what should we do about Hell Judeccas sir?
>Make it teleport lol
Okay good and how about Lusachia?
>Make it teleport lol
And the Fury?
>Teleport :)
Urizen?
>Teleport!!!!
And Malphas?
>TELEPOOOOOORT

1 > 5 > 4 > 3 > DmC > 2

Shinobi and Nightshade

I forgot 4, kek.
4 >>> 5 > 1 > 3 > 2 > DmC
Fixed. :3

What makes it better for me is the pacing. DMC3 is just so fucking intense, specially if you played the original version with the higher difficulty. DMC5 is not bad but I don't think it handles this aspect that well.

TRICK
Heh, nothin personnel, kid

Attached: 1552587357069.png (733x736, 146K)

>4 the best
Nope fuck off the game is only good when playing Bloody Palace the actual levels are abysmal and Blitz single handily docks it a lot of points

DMC3
>Great bosses
>one of the best story in gaming
>4 good weapons but no style switcher without mods and the game is balanced that way which is annoying
>Annoying style grind and balance, Royal Guard mostly useless, Gunslinger doesn't charge weapons
>Absolutely terrible garbage fire regular enemies
>Absolutely terrible garbage fire levels
>this make going through the game multiple times a chore, might as well just play the boss rush level
>DTE is bad

DMC5
>6 great bosses
>3 characters
>4 fantastic weapons for Dante
>Style Switcher balanced for the game, which is far better than DMC4's, strong styles all around, even RG
>Everything about Nero is great
>Arm switching can be done, but Nero is still great like this
>Nice city environment, much better demon environments than DMC1/3
>Straightforward missions focused on great fights against great enemies

5 win for me.

Attached: 1545661259366.jpg (283x346, 21K)

Do you read minds or what, user?

Attached: 1551134569950.jpg (399x399, 28K)

I liked this level

Attached: 1036902671.jpg (640x355, 78K)

DmC5 > DmC > DmC3 > DmC1 > DmC4 > DmC2

Oh yeah and FUCK DMC3's DMD mode. DMC5 win if only just for this.
And it's gonna get LDK eventually (the best thing about DMC4)

You have 8 arms. Arm switching would be retarded
People would ragtime and buster or tagtime and rawhide

the contrarian choise

Attached: 1536041952011.jpg (1157x940, 83K)

With that said you can suck my dick

>People would ragtime and buster or tagtime and rawhide
You can already do that though.

That's DMC1 desu. The underworld looks really cool even today

The boomer with taste choice

>3
>royal guard is useless
I agreed with so much of what you said and yet you say something so dumb.

Wtf, it was awful

The point is that 5's RG is just better. I know you can make 3's work with air block or roll block

he's a virgin waifufag

Game was so good you completely forgot about it? Come on. 5 is better than 4 in every way. 4 has decent gameplay but everything else is shit. Bosses, characters, story, levels. Everything. It's a rushed and incomplete game. No way is it the best in the series. It just isn't.

Not everything, user. Credo's boss fight was pretty fuckin' tops.

3 > 5 > 1 >> 4 >>>>> 2
So, yes.

4 actually made me feel fucking miserable playing it. Such an awful vibe to it.

Attached: 1548664138282.jpg (320x240, 28K)

dmc is just 4 years older than dmc3, you can choose the better game and still pretend to be a boomer
the only thing 1 does better than 3 is the creepy atmosphere

Attached: 1552433199899.jpg (1280x723, 179K)

This is some huge bait.

you'll realize 5 isn't that good soon

Sell me on them, brother.

>Bosses
only good bosses in 3 were Vergil 2/3, A&R, and beowulf. Meanwhile nothing in 5 is as bad as Leviathan, Doppel, Centipede etc.

What weapons from 3 are you missing out on? Only one I can think of is Nevan, DMC5 pretty much covers all other bases

Best part is getting weapons as DLC is an option.

Nah, i found 1 way more enjoyable and less annoying that 3, i still like both but for me DMC1 is the GOAT

And you’ll keep saying that for the next 10 years

A&R. I'd also like Artemis.

>play through 3 recently
>level design isn't nearly as bad as everyone says
There's a lot of greys & browns but it doesn't look that bad to me, second best atmosphere & level design in the series in my opinion. 5's city levels are uninteresting & the tree has all the problems people say the tower in 3 has, colors aside

3=5>4>1>DmC>2

So everything? retard.

>FUCK YOUUUU

kys.

I agree user, DMC 5 is one of the biggest fuckin disappointments I've ever experienced. 10 years for this bland trash. It really makes me sad.

DMC3 is one of the best videogames ever made, IMO. Incredible story, flawless gameplay, amazing characters, hype-ass music . Of course it's better, but DMC5 comes pretty close. 5 has a worse story and characters, but the gameplay is better and the music, while not as good, is still great.

DMC3 is heavily dragged down by the PS2's hardware. Without nostalgia goggles DMC3 doesn't stand a chance.

Everyone agrees. DMC3 is one of the best games ever made.

Don't forget fucking Chess.

>DMC3 is heavily dragged down by the PS2's hardware
In what way?

true.

It was a hell of a lot better and less disappointing than 4 was.

Didn't like 4 very much either, I was hoping 5 would be the big return to greatness of 1 and 3 to me but it isn't. Not for me anyway.

Metal Gear Rising?

When I finally played and finished DMC3 I put down the controller and said "damn, this game is overrated"

Attached: a3506853587_10.jpg (1200x1200, 536K)

because I dont want an unnecessary lady fight that lasts 5 seconds when it can be taken care of in a cutscene?

based and true

Easily the best game in the franchise, before it got polluted with cringey weeb shit. The art style is so much darker and less homosexual. I can't even finish DMC5, way too lame

And 5 is better.

No style switcher and really weak enemy design

t.homo

Go play your weeb shit faggot, leave the creepy marionette rapist puppets to the real men

Spiders and the fallen are weak to Agni and Rudra and relatively easy to royalguard
Enigmas are weak to Nevan and camera placement
The floating squid fags are weak to the Spiral
That makes the saw blade jewel enemies the worst and most nonsensical enemy in the game

>Why, yes, I love sucking dicks and value dark atmosphere more than gameplay

Attached: 1465209708677.gif (675x227, 73K)

I disagree. The lack of style switching is fine because you're forced to adapt for the weaknesses of the style you choose and the enemies are pretty goddamn cool imo.

Buttmad normietranny cancer

But trickster and swordmaster had no weaknesses. No style switching is just shit and the devs said it wasn't in Dmc3 because it was a ram limitation they couldn't solve

Nothing else exists like DMC1. A billion other games exist like the other DMC games. That's a phenomenon that always takes me by surprise.

At least in DMC3 getting an S rank for a mission is the way its suppose to be

Attached: IMG_1459.jpg (1632x1224, 642K)

Ah yes C H E S S is so cool

It is. It's one of my favourite parts of the game.

Yes I'll go enjoy more videogames while you're stuck in your life with your petty insecurities bitching on a website that isn't for you.