Is this even legal? How will it affect the industry?

Im still waiting for them to scan a bunch of children and make AI generated legal cp.

dios mios

Are you, user?

It'll be illegal, you know it.

Attached: E702A6D5-CF1B-409F-B98D-8AB45627703D.jpg (528x704, 54K)

That's most definitely not how it'll work. It'll still be illegal in the same way photos would be illegal.

> subtle foot posting

Attached: 1550588197587.gif (385x243, 2.44M)

MODELED

>taken care of properly
Exactly, they're open sourcing it.

PUSSY

what is then the difference between a real scan vs a 3D model with near-exact proportions?

Konami killed:
YGH
MGS
and CV with pachinko and the awful netfux show

Kojima killed MGS.
Every MGS after 3 was fucking garbage and he was bleeding the company dry with his bullshit.

CP made from a real-life model is already illegal.

These are the laws that retards point to when they say loli is illegal in the US (it isn't.) These are rotoscoping laws. They exist because child rape gangs would get their rape videos rotoscoped, then trade them freely since they were "just drawings" at that point.

A model would have to sign something agreeing that anything done with the model is ok and any use of it outside of whoever made it isn't responsible for anything bad. Perfectly legal.

This however would be illegal. I've got no personal issues against 2D but these would be scans of real children thus crossing a line.

a 3dscan is just a photo

Attached: rule34.webm (1280x720, 2.8M)

Based bnn

source video?

fake

it's a 3D model generated from photos

exactly

youtube.com/watch?v=1gUaWSN7wUQ&t=390s

She looks like she's 40 now.

>3 years ago
>"she's almost 30 but she looks 20"
>now
>"she's only 30 but she looks 40"
what happened?

Attached: 1552093904070.jpg (1024x1024, 45K)

usual brandead amerimutts finding a way to be offended.

ameritrash cant stop being victimz

Surviving on a diet of nip semen does that to you

Botox and insecurity, anime faggot.

Moved back in with her parents in Limburg. Limburg is some heavy shit.

>she's okay with it
kek

just because it is from a photo it is/would be illegal?
again, what is the difference between a real scan from a photo vs a 3D model with near-exact proportions from the same photo?
you would be arguing about model generation from a program or algorithm vs model generation from a human modeler
that's a stupid argument as the algorithm was created by a human and 3D scan models are always touched up after scanning

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornography_depicting_minors#2003_-_PROTECT_Act
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003#Convictions

Wait how the hell do those laws work?

wee amerimutts iz victimz n sheeeit

ambiguously

The current system is paypal bans stuff that enough people report.

She's so cute

That guy wasn't convicted on a child pornography law, he was convicted on an "obscenity law", a law under which ALL pornography is technically illegal.

The guy had real CP, so they just threw the book at him. By the way, since that case, the standard they used to "judge" the age of the loli (the miller test) was struck down as unconstutituonal, so they couldn't do that again.

bayarea-attorney.com/can-you-be-charged-with-child-pornography-for-looking-at-animation

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition

Who is this woman besides the model for Quiet? Has she actually accomplished anything or is she only praised because she's a cute face associated with video games?

Ah, yes. Konami the video games developer.

Attached: 1550677902278.jpg (1448x1080, 301K)

Nah, that's it. MGSV was pretty big.

She’s a streamer who hasn’t streamed since 2017. She’s trying to get a mainstream acting career going, but in the meantime she’s a 30 year old fujo who lives with her parents. Also allegedly she’s extremely religious.

Attached: 165A0789-1F50-4276-8EB3-96ECCC31424E.jpg (1242x1020, 841K)

You don't know what actual 40 y/o women look like

Based fujo

Attached: 1454730838339.jpg (800x532, 32K)

At least she got to travel the world a little before turning into a depressed shutin who is an embarassment for her parents.

I guess we just need congress to change cp to be federally legal.

Oh we actually have those for sale, just hand over your location and personal information to your local Friendly Bois Incorporated and we’ll send 30 of our people to deliver what you deserve

Don't ask that user. He clearly has no idea what he's talking about. Read . The short answer is that loli is illegal in the united states. The law is not even ambiguous, it is perfectly clear, read the text yourself. However the law is almost never applied. It's the same situation in nearly all other countries: loli is illegal on paper but its mere possession not actively persecuted in practice. The rare exception is Japan who goes through efforts to make explicitly clear in their text of law that loli is legal.

She still gets to travel the world going to cons. Her stepdad just always accompanies her. It’ll take 5-10 years before she’ll turn into one of those sad “I do public appearances for food” celebrities.

A little too close to home

Attached: 16l9ost2vhl21.png (565x535, 248K)

It is legal, it's just that porn in general is technically not legal because of an 1873 obscenity law.

The "fictional drawing" part of the PROTECT act was struck down in 2008 in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Handley

The only law against CP is an ancient obscenity law that makes all porn illegal, but it's extremely, EXTREMELY hard to get a conviction for it, and it's only a matter of time until obscenity laws are struck down.

joost has the highest cuteness to purity ratio ive ever seen

What about Rose

>soiled by hundreds of jap dicks and their sick fetishes
>pure

you could have saved her

I saw Emma at a train station the other day

I think you're thinking of a different case. Or maybe you're repeating urban myths. Read the articles. Dwight Whorley and Christopher Handley were both charged for possession of drawn pornography according to US rules which makes drawn pornography illegal.
>By its own terms, the law does not make all simulated child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. The mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier, such as the mail or the interne
Yes, several lawmen and judge consider the law to be unconstitutional. It's not because these individual people are protesting that the law isn't currently active. It's just not actively applied. The law has not been struct out of any books. The PROTECT Act of 2003 is in effect.

One of us

> Dwight Whorley and Christopher Handley were both charged for possession of drawn pornography according to US rules which makes drawn pornography illegal.
They were not charged with any law that applies specifically to drawn porn. The law is an 1873 obscenity law that applies to all pornography. They were not convicted, they took a plea deal. I won't respond to any more gish gallop.

>The PROTECT Act of 2003 is in effect.
Yes, but the parts that apply to drawn depictions of children were struck down. See

Google is connected to pedogate

Google hosts child porn

Pure nude hism is the code word

PN =

Prepubescent nude

>The "fictional drawing" part of the PROTECT act was struck down in 2008 in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Handley
False. Read your own link. It says a district judge ruled that the law was unconstitutional. I agree with the fellow, of course, but this is a very different outcome than saying the Protect Act was struct down. Here's an easy way to tell the difference: If the law was struct down, it would be removed from law books. You can read the law yourself and see it's there.
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A#a_2

She's clearly not as brainwashed as other girls in America. I like how she say's she likes Tomb Raider even is she was sexualized. Female characters today are not badass and don,t have any attractive traits as character, they all feel flat in case you hurt someone.

It is not directly a censorship, but clearly designers are building games/movies, etc. for a grand public and so politically correct it is insultringly boring.

Remember a few years ago how many female character we see on magazine and websites, they had a good style and you still remember them.

Post more sperg Joost

Attached: 00286E19-6C60-410E-8BE8-EE79DFC42E86.jpg (900x953, 158K)

>They were not charged with any law that applies specifically to drawn porn
They were.
>The law is an 1873 obscenity law that applies to all pornography.
It wasn't. I don't understand why you keep repeating this misconception. Read the law.
>They were not convicted
I agree. That means judges can individually disagree and claim the law is constitutional. That doesn't mean there is no law. You can read the law. Google it. There is a difference between "there is no law" and "there is a law but judges disagree with it". I see no reason to lie or give false information.

>They were.
No

Hold this helps.

shes in death stranding

hm

Attached: DGZGO_FXgAAMMyM.jpg (1538x2048, 371K)

Is it one of those "oh, like you're doing now?" stories?

hope this helps
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A#a_2
LII U.S. Code Title 18. CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Part I. CRIMES Chapter 71. OBSCENITY Section 1466A. Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
(b)Additional Offenses.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly possesses a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and is obscene; or lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value

>roaste friend gets triggered when people think joost is pretty
lmao at "female friendship"

She looks like a French teacher in high school

Pornography is illegal. Art is not. Video games typically fall under artful protections.

Here are all loli/shota cases

>2005 Virginia case
Dwight Whorley, who downloaded both real CP (14 pictures) and loli/shota (20 pictures) to a government-owned computer.

animenewsnetwork.com/news/2006-03-11/virginia-man-gets-20-years-for-anime-child-porn

He was the first person convicted for loli/shota under the PROTECT act, but that wasn't what he was solely convicted for. He was also a repeat offender with regards to real CP. He tried to appeal the conviction under the PROTECT act all the way to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court refused to hear his case.

>2008 Iowa case
The last case where someone was convicted solely of loli/shota. A U.S. district court ruled the relevant parts of the PROTECT act were unconstitutional, but still hit Christopher Handley with an obscenity charge. The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (CBLDF) was defending Handley, but he was worried a jury might not acquit, and he faced a maximum 15-year sentence. So he took a plea bargain for 6 months, and the case never went to Supreme Court.

>2010 Idaho case
The guy had real CP in addition to loli/shota, and took a plea deal for 15 months. He admitted that he had knowingly received real CP for at least eight years.

cbldf.org/2010/11/link-analysis-of-steve-kutzner-protect-act-case/

>2011 Maine case
The guy had real CP in addition to loli/shota. He was charged for both, but the loli/shota charges were later dropped at both the state and federal level.

>2012 Missouri case
The guy had real CP in addition to loli/shota, and took a plea deal. Part of the negotiations of that deal were that the real CP charges be dropped, and that he be charged solely for loli/shota.

The bottom line: unless you're caught with real child porn you're not getting charged with having cartoon cunny, and if you get charged with cartoon cunny you won't be convicted if you actually bother to go to trial for it.

>and is obscene

Here is the part that depends on an 1873 legal definition and makes it all but impossible to get a conviction.

So does she have the same opinion on "Breaking the Quiet"?

[Visible discomfort]

It must be hard being a Stacy, being envied by all your friends

they already do that

can you read this word

Attached: or.jpg (1905x535, 213K)

>New female employee
>Clearly more attractive than previously most attractive female employee
>Previously most attractive female employee crashes and burns, ends up on burnout medical leave

Attached: brutal.jpg (448x311, 19K)

the last part makes it completely arbitrary
who decides whether it has serious artistic/literary/political/whatever value

white women age like milk

A good summary, although Christopher Handley was charged without having any real CP.
>While not convicted by a jury, he was the first person charged under the PROTECT Act for the lone act of possessing art deemed obscene, in the form of seven manga graphic novels ordered from Japan.
He got 6 months and 15 years probation for nothing but an manga/anime collection. But you're right that in general nothing happens unless someone also has real cp, with Handley being a rare exception. When someone tries to be zealous and apply the PROTECT Act of 2003, judges will generally rule it unconstitutional and not apply it. A good thing, but distinctively different that if there were no laws. Most would agree it would be preferable if there was no laws.

>who decides whether it has serious artistic/literary/political/whatever value
The usual bunch. The lawyers, judges and jury.

Not him, but a judge striking it down as unconstitutional means that it was essentially struck down. It's a VERY common tactic for a lawyer to bring up a previous court case and say "It was ruled this way when it happened, that means it should be ruled this way again", and it typically works. It becomes a snowball effect too, because the more court cases that win with that tactic, the more court cases you have under your belt to say "nah bro".

So it's not officially struck down, but it's basically struck down.

No I just saw her.

You wouldn't download a girl.

Attached: Patty_Fleur_(ToLink).png (320x480, 124K)

GRANNY MILKIES
R
A
N
N
Y

This war is already lost, most boorus don't allow 3D rendering of children.

Dont want to start a race war but for some reason i don't understand really white people, european whites i mean age really bad, maybe i'm wrong though, but those swedes, germans, dutchs, etc reach late 20s and look in their 40s

If it's not officially struck down then it's not struck down at all. When an individual judge rules a law unconstitutional and "strikes it down", it is an unfortunate and a misleading figure of speech. It means they are striking down for that trial only. We use the same figure of speech when a law is removed from law books, we say it has been struct down, but that doesn't mean it's the same process. A single judge can't hit a table with a hammer and send massive shockwave that changes the whole country. A judge presides over individual cases. A law is struct down when it's removed from all law books. If someone asks if the current US law books contains a sentence which says loli is illegal, the answer is strictly yes. The answer becomes no when the sentence is removed.

This gen is going to end without a proper Tales of, we still have bad models from the PS3 era since Berseria was crossgen

>If it's not officially struck down then it's not struck down at all.
You literally didn't read my post at all, did you? You just reiterated the basic part that we both agreed with, then ignored the rest of what I said about how this WILL affect other court cases. Yes, a judge resides over individual cases, but judges try to be consistent with one another the best they can.

source?

Attached: 1515183630036.jpg (240x193, 11K)

hm

Attached: 1546522916259.jpg (901x1200, 240K)

not that one
but this one

Attached: 1548740799.png (1920x1080, 1.78M)

I read your post.
>So it's not officially struck down, but it's basically struck down.
This is false. It's not officially struct down and it's not basically struct down either. The only argument you have is a word play. We say a law is "struct down" when a judge ignores it once for one trial. We say a law is "struct down" when it is permanently removed from law books. You mention the first to claim the second happened. It's a mistake. You're not the only one. Many other people keep making that mistake. You're not misunderstood, you're not talking to someone who didn't read your post, you're just plain wrong. I hope I helped.

Hope they ban russia from the internet.

I'm legitimately not speaking in law terms, I'm helping your autistic ass learn what other people mean when they say shit like struct down outside the context of a court room. If you respond again, I'll assume you're baiting and I'll just hide the post.

Attached: Good job HD.png (760x386, 156K)

Based

you could also take model created traditionally, not "completely 3d scanned", and do whatever you want with it. whats his point?

I'm not speaking in law terms. I am not trying to bamboozle you with professional jargon. I am using common words. "Striking down a law" is a popular expression. It's a visual metaphor used in vastly different contexts, for example when one judges ignore one law for one trial, or when an entire country permanently removes one law from its lawbooks. That's two different things, and they can be described with the same popular expression because these decisions are typically punctuated by striking a gavel, so the decision is essentially "struck down". It's a common mistake for people read the sentence "a judge struck down X law as unconstitutional" and assume that means the law was removed. This a common mistake and I am telling you this to help you. If you're undecided and want to know whether the law is still there, look it up and you'll see it's there.

Attached: B4A3D214-411C-428F-B13D-2FB24D3DBC23.jpg (1024x1024, 100K)

Those cheekbones must be a result of surgery.

I didn't give a shit about this girl before watching this video. Now I love her.

She doesn't have much cheekbones at all, that is all filler, she was so prefect before. She didn't need to do that shit.

She always looked like that

Attached: FE6AD278-BC9A-4E10-8417-83602CF0E150.jpg (800x600, 48K)

wew

Oh no no no.

Attached: 1535937132760.png (1087x843, 1.03M)

Me on the right

I bet her farts smell amazing

>Japan who goes through efforts to make explicitly clear in their text of law that loli is legal.
Why is Japan so based?

>Real scan of literal children used to make porn
illegal because it's child porn
>A near exact 3d model used to make porn
illegal because it's child porn

This is not a hard concept, basically everyone agrees that child porn is wrong in all forms and should be illegal. Myself included.

The Wall isn't just a sick ass album.

>A near exact 3d model used to make porn
>illegal because it's child porn
It doesn't harm anyone, why should it be illegal?

Hi!

You better arrest everyone who ever watched D.va porn, she was designed to be underage.

As always Japan is ahead of you guys.

Also if loli is illegal in USA you might have want to ask Fakku about that, since they're publishing the adult version of Maitetsu which is one of the most prominent lolige in Japan, on US soil. They also have a checkbox on their manga site to show loli content (and yes they distribute it in their official capacity).

Oh, they're also part of the CBLDF, which will readily fight for loli to be legal on the states.

Attached: 1552759286198.webm (400x400, 2.11M)

If it's not real, it's not real. It doesn't matter if it's done with crayons or paint, sculpted with clay or bronze, or shaped like a 2 year old or a 20 year old. It's NOT REAL. And the United States legally recognizes that you can not commit a crime against something that is NOT REAL. Something that is NOT REAL can not be victim, can not press charges, and can not suffer. This is the LAW. It is written. Period. You can't argue otherwise.

TECHNOLOGY!

post some more

Based

You ever watch Star Trek TNG, son? That's how it will work out.

Attached: geordi holo.jpg (750x563, 71K)

>gets scouted at 14 by an agent for a modeling agency
>spends best years of her life prostituting herself across the world
>20 years later she is all used up, the shine is gone, looks as if she is ten years older

I would imagine that they would use the existing legal definitions for photo-replication. If the direct source of the image was taken from a living model that was physically present, then laws would apply. You're making a duplicate of a living person, a duplicate that is photo-realistic. 2D or 3D doesn't have anything to do with it. The Supreme Court already made the decision on this.

Bear in mind that laws against child nudity don't exist outside the context of sexual situations. So make a 3D model of a nude child would be perfectly legal as long as it wasn't sexually charged (and nudity =/= sex).

god I wish that were me

You have issues, my friend.

>doesn't model the butthole
Fucking casuals

Attached: 439188BE-8559-4CC1-8FBD-2D7F35C4D1DE.jpg (800x600, 39K)

wft is going on there? kek

Yeah, that seems pretty straightfoward to me, you are using a person's image without their consent (and children can't consent to that), but if it's a original model, then I see no reason for it to be illegal.

this is great. more!

But why?
It's not hurting anybody, so why exactly should it be illegal?

Maitetsu was a good game..

Attached: 1552760988325.jpg (2560x1821, 1.5M)

You would have to get a child naked and in a room to scan them, which is exploitation of a minor, and any resulting product from that would be made illegal by extension of supporting said exploitation. I could see an argument for a handmade 3D model, but a 3D scan is just as exploitative and wrong as photos and videos.

how would it be illegal to make AI generated porn of a scanned 3d model of a child?
Nothing happened to them

Just dont reply to obvious trolls.
>hurr its wrong because its illegal

That's just how women age, user.

I believe incels refer to it as "the wall"

If you have to scan a naked child to make the model then you're exploiting that child and that's who it's hurting, you fucking autistic psycho.

If it's from a real child I think there would be some issues due to using a person's likeness without their consent.

whites age fast

More like what biology calls the wall.

who said they would have to be scanned naked?

so all rule 34 of actual humans is illegal?
all those emma watson fakes etc. are illegal?

holy shit, is that fucking Hard Gay?

Is every photograph of a person exploiting them?

Better than Quantic Dream

>letting a kid make some extra cash by modelling is now considered "exploitation"
I'll never understand westerners desu

youtube.com/watch?v=GDEQcqmX7HI

OOKKAAAY WOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Neck thine self, paedo.

>sculpture
did the greeks ever make sculptures depicting actual penetration? would they be illegal now, despite having clear scientific and historical value?

you're victimizing them by using their likeness without consent. imagine you're surfing your favorite board, /hm/, and you come across a video of yourself getting trainfucked in your twink boipucci and taking huge loads all over your smiling gay face. you never made this video. you're not even gay. but now it's out there. your friends find it, your potential employers find it, and you're labeled for life. welcome to the future if this kind of production is publicly acceptable and perfectly legal.

Real CP is easier and cheaper to make.

"the wall" is not a scientific term in any respect. it's an incel buzzword that originated from PUA communities and was spread by r9k types.

why would they have to be naked?

Hello roastie, hear that? The clock is ticking.

Attached: 220px-PinkFloydWallCoverOriginalNoText.jpg (220x220, 10K)

Nudity isn't exploitation by itself, retard, there are plenty of legal pictures of nude children around.

>roasties reeeeeee
Back to your incel containment board, froggo.

>"the wall has no basis in reality"
ever seen a woman? there are literally billions of them, it's not that hard. "anecdotal evidence" is acceptable evidence even if it's not scientifically studied when the matching sample size is 3.75 billion.

it's 2019 dude :^)
I'd honestly be extremely impressed if I found a video of myself getting trainfucked in my twink boipucci if it didn't look fake as fuck since that'd be an extremely hard thing to do and I can't imagine anyone I know who'd have the ability to do something like that

the wall is what happens when you abuse your body, and make your hormones sperg out with constant sex. if it's UNIRONICALLY bad for a man to constantly masturbate;which it is,then it's no surprise that constant dick riding, along with whatever vices the person has picked up will make them hit "the wall" also bad genetics do play a role. the wall is very real, and only roasties are afraid of it since they only have their looks, and pussies.

Didn't some shit happen with this a long time ago? Some shitty game used Ellen Page for mocap the the nude model was somehow datamined from the game. A far cry from actually seeing Ellen Page naked but it must have been embarrassing.

Holy shit the replies to this post lmao. /r9k/ virgin squad out in full force today.

>"the wall" is not a scientific term in any respect
baked and fruitcaked

Attached: expectations vs age.jpg (636x382, 24K)

Attached: Screenshot_20190314-180303.png (1920x1080, 2.18M)

Aren't those nudist videos completely legal because of some retarded law since they're not sexual in nature?

Except you can literally see women age faster than men in the looks department -- likely due to the shorter reproductive window than men.

Repeating "incel" ad nauseum doesn't change this.

the point is that the tech to make something like this easily producible and very realistic via AI/algorithms is fast approaching.

Attached: 1524082638555.webm (1920x1080, 2.46M)

Just handmade the model. Hiring real person just to make 3d model is retarded.

True. Incels out in full force, my bro.

Who do they think they are attacking the fairer sex? Keep dabbin' on 'em -- just don't come off as being too mad.

find me one person who unironically uses terms like "the wall" and "roastie" that isn't a flaming incel.

How's the law retarded? They aren't supposed to be illegal, retard.

Attached: age.png (613x572, 17K)

>doing polls on the subject of female attractiveness
>lowest available age is fucking 20
Were these niggers serious? Might as well have started at 60, the results would have been similarly retarded

Attached: 1545760416427.jpg (360x476, 18K)

cute!

Tick tock

Attached: 1449672840598.jpg (680x750, 60K)

but you read between the lines, user. good work!

Okay relax. The point still stands that they're completely legal and google isn't hosting CP.

Attached: 1474698977949.webm (1280x720, 2.74M)

>Says the nervous roastie for the 100th time this year.

Attached: you.jpg (500x281, 118K)

Am I gonna get vanned for searching this or?

You mean pachinko parlor games developer

Attached: KONAMI NEW MGS LEAK!!!!!!!!!.webm (842x480, 2.94M)

literally WHY the fuck do people worship this bitch?

she looks like she has FASD or something, her jaw and mouth are literally deformed, her eyes are small and watery, she looks like a fucking pig

>I can get better than this

Attached: 1549313570733.jpg (1080x1058, 75K)

I unironically could. She looks like that British politician with the fucked-up face, the sandwich guy. There's something off about all her facial features.

Yes. Stefanie was a mid 2000s Yea Forumstard

Attached: 90F4B5BC-9A9B-4829-8F69-2EFE947550DC.jpg (604x453, 43K)

Is that a dude?

Shut the fuck up dumbass before you get backed the fuck up. Stupid tryhard.

>all those emma watson fakes etc. are illegal?
Yes. You can find plenty of news stories of people getting busted with emma watson fakes back in the day.

Stefanie GABRIELLE Joosten is a fujo who went to anime conventions. She posted on early Yea Forums and Yea Forums. Her only hobbies were yaoi, jrpgs, and parapara.

Attached: C59EB0A8-6BCB-4AA6-98FF-36F507C7F742.jpg (182x200, 6K)

>454724268
>"find me one person that I can't call an incel"
The absolute state of roasties.

She's so pretty, my balls are killing me.

That title reveal only got progressively worse jesus

It's Joosten before transitioning

Sex isn't that big a deal in the Netherlands. Same for Germany and France.

It's just because they've had so much trouble with it in the past.
The laws in the west wouldn't be so ambiguous if it weren't for them rarely ever getting applied.

it's easier but more complicated

I honestly don't know what the appeal is, she looks incredibly mediocre. Quiet was decent fanservice but not anything special.

Oh, so it's just the "SHE'S JUST LIKE ME" fantasy.

Attached: DnayX33U0AAL9wN.jpg large.jpg (1024x696, 70K)

>find kid
>stick penor in vagoo
is a lot less complicated than 3D modeling dude

This

Yes!
She’s also an actual sperg who still lives with her folks at 30.

not against 3D scans but handmade models can also be modified to particular tastes
I'm sure handmaid 3D models exist somewhere and can be modified from that or they could be easily generated if models from eroges with character create can be extracted

Attached: 1550385293846.jpg (1491x1800, 1.17M)

>Immediately remember that her roastie friend used joost as a launchpad for her own channel with some highs chool drama video about how she's been bullied about some stupid thing

those pitch black eyes, it's like the abyss staring back at me.

I want to marry her!

holy shit, browneyes really are unblessed.
fuck this gay earth

That's a sexy little girl.

is it weird I want to pull the strap on the alarm & then rape her right there on the spot

Attached: 1487037347919.png (936x560, 59K)

>11 year olds more attractive than 30 year olds
Roasties BTFO!

That's really pathetic. Stop fixating on whores who have imaginary 'flaws'.

And 12 year olds more attractive than 21 year olds

>normal men
IT'S 2019 WHAT THE FUCK
HELLO?

Stefanie is holding out for a guy who’s 10/10 AND a virgin AND is willing to make out with hot guys. Are you that?

>8 is 0%
what the fuck I call bullshit

It's not abuse, although I guess you could argue that not taking the best care of your body is abuse, especially for females. Attractiveness is based on fertility and virility. So males are on average appear healthier as they age.

The only way to make CP legal is to sculpt it out of marble.

>sample of normal men

>normal men

Attached: 1543209919503.jpg (375x375, 128K)

two out of three can't be bad.

She looks like a fat mexican teenager.

But they were aroused by 9 and 10 year olds, 8 isn't that different.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This but unironically

PRIME TEEN PUSSY and cunny

nigga 10y is at like 12.5 & 11 is at like 40%
you can't tell me that none of these niggas would say an 8 year old is sexually attractiv e

Exactly, that's what I would expect from gay men.

I thought that drop from 14-21 was extreme, but I suppose it might be burgerland. Every year is another chance to become fat, I think that explains a lot of that chart desu

1% of them.

Not really, men normally dont get aroused by childlike body proportions.
10y olds immediately look different because of height + womanly proportions and your brain goes "fuck? Maybe".

How did they test this? Show them a bunch of nudes and see which ages the biggest "arousal" spikes caused?

>pedophilic stimuli

>HELLO?
IS THIS THING ON?

It coincides with the onset of puberty. When tits and hips happen, male arousal grown. Unless actual pedo, but that's an uncommon disorder.

Very well could be. Smart girls are married by then to spit out some brats and let them selves go.

>(((normal))) men

Attached: 1518184270681.jpg (666x666, 136K)

now I'd hypothetically fuck a 10 year old or two, but I think the line you're describing is at 13-14
anything under that looks like a kid to me
if you look at the difference between 8-10 there's practically nothing

Prepubescent boys and girls pretty much look the game. 9/10 is where secondary sex characteristics start to show.

>Self-reported and physiological sexual arousal to adult and pedophilic stimuli were examined among 80 men drawn from a community sample of volunteers. Over ¼ of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equalled or exceeded arousal to adult stimuli. The hypothesis that arousal to pedophilic stimuli is a function of general sexual arousability factors was supported in that pedophilic and adult heterosexual arousal were positively correlated, particularly in the physiological data. Subjects who were highly arousable, insofar as they were unable to voluntarily and completely inhibit their sexual arousal, were more sexually aroused by all stimuli than were subjects who were able to inhibit their sexual arousal. Thus, arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily correspond with pedophilic behavior.

Attached: 1511876715555.jpg (186x220, 6K)

That’s someone else.

Nope, you’ve got to have all three. By the way, “virgin willing to go gay” is really off putting unless you’re a 10/10.

You can categorize people as "kids" regardless of how many of their outwardly visual features you consider sexually attractive.

Testosterone and the make up of men and women are different, what women experience from having too much sex is far worse however, it makes it so the chemcials released regarding pair bonding is lessened and they become desensitized to it which is why purity is a virtue and those that sleep around aren't happy. So the sexual liberation of women is directly responsible for their own pain and suffering as shitty as that is for everyone involved.

Attached: porn searches by age.jpg (983x549, 52K)

How do you volunteer for those studies haha

Well, for a small percentage of men, that's difference is enough. Puberty usually starts at 10 or 11, some extreme cases might start at 9, hence the list.

>Prepubescent boys and girls pretty much look the game
Nope, I guess people just don't look at many naked kids, so that's where this myth comes from, but the differences between male and female bodies go further than genitalia and boobs.

Attached: pornhub.jpg (593x878, 216K)

as a 12 year old i would think about jizzing on the face of 12 year old girls, but not 10 year olds girls or 8 year olds

who the fuck googles sexy nude 2 year old
ALSO WHY DOES NOBODY GOOGLE SEXY NUDE 1 YEAR OLD

>that drop from 18 to 19
holy fuck no wonder every single porn video ever made has "18 years old" in the title

>Age 13
Why do shotas look for hag porn?

>I guess people just don't look at too many naked kids
Is there something you want to tell us? And there's obviously going to be facial difference but bodywise, they are almost identical.

Attached: jv9.jpg (2460x3484, 1.27M)

It's the search term age, not the age of the searcher

Hag and milf pussy is perfect for ugly bastards and shotas.

Good illustration on the difference between the various types of averages. That will be a great infographic for my stats 101 class, thanks!

this. biologically, puberty happens for a reason

This seems like bullshit, don't you get flagged by blatantly searching for cp like this?

How where these results measured? Did a scientist grip their cock and show them CP?

Attached: jv10.jpg (744x1024, 202K)

just killed off all interest i had in this dutchess

They can measure blood flow and skins electric conductivity.
So technically yes.

No
Viewing CP isn't even a crime, possessing it is. Most federal resources are put into combating distribution of CP, not some dumb Indian typing "hot 14 year old vagine" on Google.

a lot of it comes from 13 year olds themselves

>that drop from 18 to 19
I think that's just a result of how people do these searches, see how 30, 40, 50 etc... are much higher than the subsequent ages, someone looking for teens just searches for the lowest legal age, someone looking for women in their 40's just types in 40.

cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa19067
Men viewing images of teenaged girls labeled as adults rated them highly.
Men viewing images of teenaged girls labeled as teens rated them lowly and took approximately twice as long to enter their answer.

Should it be illegal to take pictures of people because someone could photoshop dicks in their mouth?

Yeah there's an instrument that is used to measure arousal, they use it on pedos to see if therapy is working and shit like that.

>16 years old

Is this child porn?

Attached: Hatsune Miku Magical Mirai.webm (854x480, 2.93M)

yeah obviously, but it seems so weird that so many people search for 18yo when almost nobody searches for anything up to 30's range again

yes, now you're thinking with statism

>remember all of the CP on limewire
>used to think this was normal stuff as a 11 year old

Attached: 1457011775776.jpg (319x320, 13K)

Someone stop them

Attached: AI contemplates its age.jpg (924x520, 126K)

but doesn't viewing on a browser download it to your computer, at least temporarily? Seems super risky just to have 3DPD when 2D is forever superior.

>took approximately twice as long to enter their answer
top kek

What's pornographic about it?

Beyond: Two Souls was the game, if I recall correctly.

Well it is normal stuff, the current legal state of affairs is whats abnormal.

based

>tfw used to constantly search for people my age at the time on limewire

fug

It was already ruled several times in courts that browser caches aren't possession, since it's involuntary and temporary.
If you want to rule that browser caches are possession, you need to also rule that simply having the image in your RAM is possession. This is not feasible, it wouldn't even be legal for federal agents to review CP.

This
You cannot abuse a fictional character. The whole legal basis for banning CP is that you're "reabusing" the child by merely possessing it and supporting that industry.

Those laws cannot be based on a "thought crime."

Comfy post sparking intelligent debate

Attached: 1523799256729.png (1264x471, 131K)

>they are almost identical.
Only if you talking about toddlers, older kids are different.

Attached: 1544503640042.jpg (896x1024, 180K)

I mean, don't the FBI agents store CP anyway?
Like I have to assume they have some kind of CP database or whatever the fuck right?

do you think she ever goes to pornhub?

It's not decided by age but by physical features, a girl as young as 9 can have hips and budding breasts and that is enough to cause arousal.

It's sealed evidence, so not technically possession. They dispose of it after the investigation

Attached: miyazaki the hypocrite.jpg (1374x725, 332K)

Does anyone have some rare Joostens?

Attached: 3192060F-5D9E-4EB3-833F-4157D3B1CA51.jpg (736x552, 59K)

Yeah, they do, they get a pass to view CP legally.

I remember several years ago someone made a random page button for imgur, and 'lots' of CP was discovered.
I don't think I've ever felt fear like that; death seemed to be the only answer.

See

Attached: walt knows.png (641x651, 324K)

Its not cp if its nudism :-)
Still having fun with the swimming class collection, those 13 year olds know how to stretch

>dies admiring cunny

a based death

/ourguy/

Attached: dbe49004f21a55ed62436790d6566b7f--adventures-in-wonderland-alice-in-wonderland.jpg (500x491, 35K)

NOOOO STOP

WOMEN ARE NOT FOR REPRODUCTION THEY'RE FOR WORK

She's saying that she looks 16, not is.

According to UAB, yes. How do you even get a job like that?

At least Walt discovered delicious brown loli before he died

Nope, she's talking about her actual age. I remember that video.
She goes on to say that you're free to imagine her at whatever age you prefer though

yeah I figured as much, I assume they have work only computers and obviously can't access it anywhere outside those computers
they probably have a bunch of shit built in anyway that might make it impossible to move shit off those computers or whatever

I'm sure people have stolen the archives from them before.
The NSA had all of its hacking tools stolen and distributed on the darkweb, so I think the government is kind of a leaking sieve as far as cyber security.

you'd have an easier time getting a job as facebook's "shit content viewer"
apparently everyone that has the job hates it, since it's not only CP but also gore & shit, but a lot of you cunts are probably already used to that anyway

poor, innocent joos

The definition of a moderator is dealing with shit people dont want to see.

She looks way better. She looks like a MILF.

Attached: cutemom.jpg (299x818, 124K)

That's not true at all. The definition of a moderator is "he does it for free LMAO"

Attached: 4chan janitors turn to crime.png (970x187, 18K)

her eyes make her look literally braindead

What is it about animators

You guys act like it's treated as some sort of radioactive material, I saw in a documentary footage of soem cops going through CP files (blurred out of course) in their regular work computers, if they really wanted they could just copy it in a USB.

Not much bothers me anymore, i'd probably be perfect for a job like that

I can see Miku's thighs. Those are sixteen year old thighs. Come on now.

They have to spend lots of time thinking about how different aged bodies work in order to recreate them on the screen,
Then when youre drawing adults they're just 12y olds + worse features added on.

TLOU exists you know

kinda funny how Sarah became the big porn girl when Ellie is the focus

Attached: Sarah Source_Filmmaker The_Last_of_Us.jpg (624x452, 65K)

As long as a real child is not harmed, it should be legal
HOWEVER, for it to be realistic, a real child would likely be scanned in. That should be illegal.

>taken care of properly

What does that even mean? It's fucking data.

going by the subtitles she's talking about her apparent age, unless she actually says something different

why would you not be?
more publicity
more chances at work since males are getting friction burn from faping to your face so much.

Just think about how much high quality porn animators draw for themselves.

Attached: 1522207632684.webm (1920x1080, 2.73M)

They don't have to perform sexual acts to be scanned so it should be perfectly legal to repurpose their models for virtual sexual acts.

>going by the subtitles she's talking about her apparent age
Source?

Wew laddie

You know I'm kinda peeved there's no porn of Shinji animalistically fucking and impregnating Asuka after third impact

Laws are not made on the basis of harm.
Laws are made on the basis of if it adheres to societies moral codes.
This is why in a lot of countries, 2D loli is illegal and no one has a problem with it. In normie eyes, it is drawn cp, cp is bad, and so it should be illegal even if it lacks the reason why cp was bad in the first place.
Most humans are intellectually lazy and use loose associations like that willy nilly all throughout their lives. Similar reason is why some folks on /pol/ see no problem with random muslims getting slaughtered, because ISIS exists on the other side of the globe.

Uhh dude, there is shittons of that.
exhentai.org/g/58044/1ad83393d0/

>tfw no "breeding sow" job
>get fed, pampered and paid for 9-10 months while gestating the customers baby

Attached: 1528745559825.jpg (533x534, 12K)

re-take is pretty garbage as porn though

What garbage typesetting. How do you fap to that?

>Similar reason is why some folks on /pol/ see no problem with random muslims getting slaughtered,
>because ISIS
That's kind of a strawmen, the actual reason is that they don't like muslims in western countries.

AoC laws though are specifically made to inflate the value of older women, you can bet your ass that if a man gets a choice betweena 14 yo in her prime breeding age and a 21 yo roastbeef sandwich he will choose the former.

She looks cuter, younger and is the real daughter.

I don't see a problem with it since mudshits do this all the time to other people.

those do exist tho

and what does isis do?

you think /pol/ gives a fuck about italians?
what about frenchies?
finns? swedes?
aussies?
fucking eskimos?
no nigga, shit like isis is why /pol/ hates mudslimes
can't trust a fucking sandnigger

>見た目年齢的に
which here is nip for
>in terms of apparent age

And why don't they like muslims in western countries?
Because the actions of other muslims halfway around the globe. Which was my precise point.

pretty sure they actually hate the muslims in western countries because of the actions of other muslims in western countries but you should really just go to /pol/ and ask

>Because the actions of other muslims halfway around the globe
That's kind disingenuous, it seems that you are implying that muslims have never committed those "actions" in western countries.

Because they don't adapt mostly, they refuse to leave their shit barbaric religion and practices behind.

birth control, white skin going out wearing bikinis and shit in the sun, degenerate behavior etc

where the heck?
>inb4 wife

finna become the dexter of cp

Really hate how many actual pedos are on this site
>B-But muh drawings argument
You're attracted to the undeveloped bodies of children and I've seen dozens of people on here refer to real-life little girls as "lolis". You deranged fucks are a danger to society and I support anything that makes your lives harder.

baka.com.au/national/mothers-for-hire-20120906-25hi1.html

This. And their religion tells them we're inferior kafir and they're allowed to abuse us (and our women especially) as they see fit. Not all of them adhere to this, but many also do, and if our law enforcement didn't keep those in check, well..

Handley plead guilty because he didn't trust the jury to not give him a guilty verdict out of disgust if the prosecution showed them the pictures.

>baka.com
every time

Attached: laughing deko.jpg (393x393, 82K)

>You're attracted to the undeveloped bodies of children
There's nothing wrong with that, bigot.

>You deranged fucks are a danger to society
How so?

Reddit...

Pretty sure that is one of those russian trolls.

The CP database is encrypted you brainlets, they have the image hashes to find CP, agents normally don't "get" to see the database CP.

back to resetera pedofags

>If I keep saying incel that makes it true.

dang, I wanted a Scandinavian mother

Dude just read something or watch a documentary on the topic, they have to look at the material to do investigation, looking for clues, many pedos have been arrested due to leaving some minor detail that led the cops to them.

True. They have a specific couple people who have to watch every single image and every second of it, in order to recognize and cross reference any faces of both pedo's and kids, locations, even voices. That's how they link a lot of cases in order to roll of CP rings.

you can prob find whatever surrogate mother you want, those are probably on the much cheaper end
I'm fairly sure there's a lot of rich ass families that spend millions on finding the perfect surrogate mother for a child

how come it's ok if a girl shows joost this
imagine if some neckbeard youtuber was like "lol you know there's millions of pieces of porn of you right?" and showed her it on his vid
literally would've had his channel deleted and most likely had criminal charges tried to be pressed on him
but it's a girl so lol it's just silly

dude that's not even true, white women age very well. nips age like shit, they all of a sudden take a nosedive. I know 50 year old women who are sexy as hell.

This.
europol.europa.eu/stopchildabuse

CP is such a powerful weapon it surprises me no one has used it

The fuck is going on in this thread? I don't even know what the fuck the OP pic is about. There's no fucking context and the thread has devolved into shitposting.

they see CP when it's posted elsewhere by potential suspects, yes
all I'm saying is some people in this thread seem to be under the impression agents get to browse the federal child porn stash or whatever, and that is not the case

Neck yourself.

fairly sure OP is about the dude telling the girl the model can be used to make porn
which then lead to people talking about 3d scanning girls for porn
which then lead to discussions about CP & lolis
which then lead to some retard saying lolis are illegal because people relate it to CP without realizing why CP is illegal & how killing muslims is the same shit or whatever

This is a mainstream TV show that also put their stuff on youtube user.

right? all it takes is a few of the wrong kind of images and people go away for life, have their names and reputations ruined as long as they're still alive, and will most likely die at the hands of other prisoners
it's so clean and effective I'm amazed it's not the modus operandi for our government

People get framed for CP all the time. It's way easier than framing them for drugs

It's the difference between "Haha aren't dudes creepy?" and "I jack off to this every night"

It’s ok because Emma also shows her own r34 regularly. Like I don’t even watch her shows ever and I know how weird she is. Joosten knew what she was getting into.

joost had obviously seen it before from her muted reaction

makes you wonder if she's ever schlicked to her own character getting fucked

I know right.
I know someone that totally isn't me who saves the random CP they find not because they like it, but because you never know when it might come in handy. It's like a rare commodity.

She's not american.

Enjoy explaining that in court.

She has a face like a horse. How does anyone find this attractive?

why would I be in court, I said it wasn't me :^)

just add more horse

Have you guys forgotten motherfucking Tommy?

Attached: 6B300FD7-0400-4461-BD90-CFA2855F1994.jpg (480x600, 23K)

Japs don't mind horseface, they think it's exotic. They also like big noses on caucasian men for the same reason.

More like JUST

I love how the Dutch cunt keeps expecting her to have an issue with it and she keeps saying it's cool.
>yeah you should see the ones of me
kek no one's drawing porn of you, cunt

You'll still be called in when your friend gets caught with it.

I'd ride that pony bare back all night, if you get my meaning

The other chick is still a D list celebrity, so I'm sure they do.

I don't understand. Please elaborate

He is saying he's sexually attracted to her, and would engage intercourse with her without a condom throughout an entire evening.

what did Konami mean by this?

He like her, he want to put naked dick in her pussy for a long time

quick rundown?

Her 3D modeled has been heavily lewded.

oh shit a sculptor visits Yea Forums
wassup homie

but what does it mean

3DPD not even once

you love that word huh

This description isn't very clear. Please be more specific

It was her stepdad’s phone number. I called and you could hear Stefanie in the background lmao.

it's a phone number
what's the signifigance

See

you've been chosen

Why is the thread on autosage?