How accurate is this? 2018 would be rdr 2 btw

how accurate is this? 2018 would be rdr 2 btw

Attached: goty.jpg (1504x1341, 659K)

cringe

This list is all types of wrong

It's somebody's favorite game list. Nothing more.

i bet you love nintendo

>2000
>diablo ii
>baldurgate 2
>ff9

and you choose tony hawk pro skater

I've seen wor-
>2018 would be rdr2
Nope. This is the worst.

I wouldn't even know which game was released what year of the games I played on release

Vice city, RE4 and BB can stay. Everyone else - fuck off!

>Trials
wut

damn.. 2005 really was that shitty, wasn't it?

Snoy/10

thats why wikipedia exists

>i hate it cus it's popular

Still in denial lil fella?

Attached: 1520914382225.jpg (1200x675, 114K)

>kotor
>stick of truth
>persona 5
Of all the rpgs to pick, you went with the three shittiest ones?

Also, cinematic/cover-based shooter garbage like Gears 3 and Metro

Attached: 12344889445.jpg (2000x1797, 853K)

>2004
>HL2
>VTM
>Doom 3

Some shitty racing game instead lmao

awful taste

Is your brain actual pudding?
What the hell is all this garbage?
RDR2? Really? You really fucking hate video games, don't you...

I dont hate it.. it's just a normie filter and that was a super dry year. I'd just leave the year blank

BF2?

RE4 is a great game. The hell is wrong with you? Lemme guess
>ITS DIFFERENT THAN 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fuck off.

2005 was not a dry year

This is one of the stupidest charts I've ever seen in my life.

>Gears of War 3

U wot m8?

Gears 3 was trash, and I loved the first two

pretty par for the rest of the rest but decent contender
has little to do with it being an RE game

All those games are faggot shit next to the almighty Birdman.

pick a game for 2005, then pretend the game doesn't exist. do this until you have 5 games that deserve to be on a "chart"

>2005
>dry year

>Lego Star Wars
>Prince of Persia: The Two Thrones
>DMC3
>Battlefront II
>Republic Commando
>Ultimate Spiderman
>God of War
>Shadow the Hedgehog

2005 was a fantastic year for video games

what?

I think it's actually very reflective of average taste around here, considering the mass Halo cocksucking fests and all the other shit that is taking over this board.

>2005 was a fantastic year for video games

>lists a bunch of games, most of which are mediocre at best (e.g. god of war is basically DMC for the lowest common denominator)

>physconauts
>bf2
>cod2 (not the same as modern cod)
>re4
>fear
>battlefront 2
>dmc3
>jade empire
>shadow of the colossus
>god of war

Now out of my face

tony hawks? to much xbox games

could apply this to only and without exceptions to a few ameritards

are you listing the most mediocre releases each year?

PoP:TT was dissapointing tho

>peesona 5
yikes

DMC3 is the only passable one I could see being on a list if we got really drunk. were seriously arguing who should win the retard olympics though

two forza games, LMAO

This must be bait. 2005 was one of the strongest years in vidya. The last time we had a year as good as 2005, was literally in 2005.

its not bait, but I feel retarded for forgetting SotC was 2005. That was easily the only saving factor for such a shitty year

there's like a handful of games there that deserve their spot

FEAR
King Kong
Shadow of the Colossus
God of War
Lego Star Wars
Battlefront 2
Republic Commando
Empire at War
Psychonauts
Call of Cthulhu Dark Corners of the Earth
Haunting Ground
Brothers in Arms
Forbidden Siren 2
Gun
Quake 4
Resident Evil 4
TimeSplitters Future Perfect
COD2
COD Big Red One
Destroy All Humans
Battlefield 2
Ratchet Gladiator
Mercenaries Playground of Destruction
Dead or Alive 4
Jak X
The Warriors
Civilization IV
Devil May Cry 3
Splinter Cell Chaos Theory
Conker Live and Reloaded

Plus more stuff I probably haven't played. 2005 is literally one of the best years in video games. Gives 1998 a run for it's run. No way it isn't at least top 3.

>forza over doom goty 2016
it's flat out wrong

>Gives 1998 a run for it's run. No way it isn't at least top 3.

it was a good year but slow down there buddy

If 2005 was a shitty year, we've never had a good year for vidya.

Name a good year then, and don't say something ultra safe like 1998.

>Plus more stuff I probably haven't played. 2005 is literally one of the best years in video games. Gives 1998 a run for it's run. No way it isn't at least top 3
Most of the games you listed are garbage. Are you seriously praising shit like Cod2, one of the worst things to happen to fps, as good games?

There are a handful of good games in there (e.g. DMC3, FEAR), but that's iit.

Attached: 1552471961527.png (1000x432, 165K)

1998 is great but I think it's an overrated as fuck safe reddit tier choice. 2004 is the best year in video games. 2005 is not far behind.

I can tell you haven't played any of the games there.

You must be a weebshitter mad that no shity JRPG's came out that year. COD2 isn't bad by the way. Hating on pre-2007 COD games is basically admitting you are a bandwagoning faggot who doesn't know what he's talking about.

Alan wake was forgotten. No one ever talks about it.

>1998 is great but I think it's an overrated as fuck safe reddit tier choice. 2004 is the best year in video games. 2005 is not far behind.

>reddit tier choice
Most of Reddit would dismiss most games from 1998 as too dated. 2004/2005 would be more in line with reddit's preferences.

2004 was better than 2005

Thanks for updating me on what reddit thinks, reddit ambassador user.

I agree here, but 2004 is basically the only year I'd flat out agree was better than 2005.

List all the great games from 2004 NOW

Attached: 1552222119232.jpg (495x362, 19K)

>great
never said great, but Katamari

>list consists mainly of console fps and uninspired movie tie-in games
>best year in all of gaming.

Attached: 1543789219554.gif (323x221, 208K)

+defjam and san andreas

i unironically dont like any of those games. re4 is great though

what the fuck are these

2004 > 2005 = 2003 > 2002 = 2001 > 2006 > 1999 = 2000 > 2007 = 1997 > 2008 = 1998 > 2009 > 1996 > 2010 = 2011 =2012 > 1995 > 2013 = 2014 > 1994 > 1993 > 1992 > 1991 > 1990 > 2015 > 2016 > 2017 > 2018

>console FPS
>fear
>republic commando
>brothers in arms
>quake 4
>COD2

If you played the console ports you got a gimped version. These are PC games.

>uninspired movie tie ins
>king kong
>uninspired
KYS
>any of the Lucasarts classics
>uninspired
Just fucking KYS already nigger

These games are great and they are better than games you like.

>no mention of swat 4
bros

shut the fuck up, virgin boomer.

>he likes quake 4
this is so embarrassing LMFAO.

2004 is mgs3
2007 is cod4
2008 is gta4
2009 is uncharted 2
2010 is black ops
2011 is infamous 2
2012 is the walking dead
2013 is gta5
2014 is infamous second son
2016 is uncharted iv
2017 is RE7
/thread

>this is the taste of the average Yea Forumsirgin today
This place isn't even reddit anymore, it's edgy 9gag

It's a good game, but it probably should not have been called Quake.

Quake 2 should have been called something else. I really like the Strogg Trilogy of Quake 2, Quake 4 and ET Quake Wars, Q2's expansion packs are also god tier. I liked that Quake 3 had some Strogg shit thrown into the lovecrafitan mix too.

Quake 1 is good but overrated as fuck and the fanbase is annoying. Literally every Quake game is different, no too play alike. Stop shitting on 4 because it went full atmospheric story FPS.

Lol wtf is that weeb pokemon shit in 2017 LMAO

It's baby's first jrpg, it's right at home with the rest of his list

Just saying, most of the users weren't even born in 98. A user born in 99 will be 20 already with the Xbox 360 being their first console.

what was the first console of someone born in 88 or 89?

Yeah but they all jerk off over overrated 1998 titles like Ocarina of Time and other Nincel favorite titles.

>A user born in 99 will be 20 already with the Xbox 360

But my first console was the ps2

Attached: white-parrot-cockatoo-1.jpg (1200x2330, 497K)

People who were born in 99 or 00 don't have the XBox 360 as their first console. I was born in 00 and my first console was the GameBoy Color, followed by the GameCube.

Might as well throw mine in the ring I guess.

DMC5 is obviously provisional but there's not much I can see having a real shot to beat it this year for me.

Attached: 2000s.jpg (2352x2248, 1.38M)

>2014: Bayonetta 2
>2015: Witcher 3
>2016: Doom
>2017: Breath of the Wild
>2018: Spider-man
I do

Attached: Best Games Since 2000.png (1280x805, 1.16M)

>but there's not much I can see having a real shot to beat it this year
Ahem.

Attached: firefox_2019-03-11_18-12-08.png (282x588, 123K)

I don't have high expectations for it, I've not particularly liked a FromSoft game since For Answer - Bloodborne is by far the one I like the most and I'd give it a 7.5/10.

Everything I've seen of Sekiro doesn't make me think it'll be the one to buck the trend. There's some good changes like the added mobility/combos actually existing and I was stoked when I heard it cut most of the """""""""RPG"""""""""" mechanics that held back Dark Souls for me but it just doesn't look like something I'm gonna love the way I do DMC5.

It's cool to see two major pure-action games release this year though, gives me hope the genre isn't dead and we won't be stuck with shallow shit bogged down with worthless stats and loot like the new God of War.

>Metacritics

Attached: NPC Head.png (416x435, 108K)

Sekiro is almost guaranteed to have a higher score than dmc 5. No FROM game has got lower scores than 88% in the past 10 years.

Yes, and? We're not talking about metacritic scores here.

1990 - Secret of Monkey Island
1991 - Monkey Island 2
1992 - Indiana Jones & the Fate of Atlantis
1993 - Doom
1994 - Doom 2
1995 - Star Wars Dark Forces
1996 - Resident Evil
1997 - Star Wars Jedi Knight/Fallout
1998 - Fallout 2/Abe's Exoddus
1999 - System Shock 2/Resident Evil 3/Phantom Menace Official Game
2000 - Dues Ex/Spyro 3/No One Lives Forever
2001 - MGS2/Return to Castle Wolfenstein/SSX Tricky/Silent Hill 2
2002 - REmake/Medal of Honor Allied Assault/Ratchet & Clank/Jedi Outcast
2003 - Ratchet & Clank 2/Jak 2/RE Outbreak/KOTOR
2004 - MGS3/VTMB/KOTOR 2/San Andreas
2005 - God of War/Battlefront 2/FEAR/Republic Commando
2006 - Dark Messiah/Company of Heroes/Destroy All Humans 2
2007 - God of War 2/STALKER SoC/Lego Star Wars Complete Saga
2008 - Dead Space/World at War
2009 - Demon's Souls/Men of War
2010 - God of War 3/Bioshock 2
2011 - Lego Star Wars Clone Wars/Red Orchestra 2
2012 - Hard Reset
2013 - Rising Storm
2014 - Men of War Assault Squad 2
2015 - Dead or Alive 5 Last Round

Didn't play anything after that.

Also you're wrong anyway, AC5 and Verdict Day were major games for them that both scored in the 60s and they had plenty of smaller (e.g. Deracine) or licensed projects (e.g. their Gundam games) that did shit too.

Souls and Bloodborne is their only consistently high scoring series this decade.

>2014, 15, and 16 better than 2017

Change 2001 to MGS2

>stopped playing games in 2015
Why? It's not even like every series you listed is dead, there's quite a few of them that have had new games worth playing.

>Verdict Da
I'm talking about A team faggot. Those who made ds 1, 3 Bloodborne.

>Best game of 2015
>Dead or Alive 5
In the trash it goes

Holy shit how old are you. Literal boomer.

I didn't stop playing games. I stopped playing new games. DOA5 was also the only game released in 2015 I played, and it was a re-release, I was stretching for the last few years, Rising Storm is an expansion pack to RO2. I was really stretching for those last few years except 2014 because MOWAS2 is an easy 10/10 game. Amazing it was released this decade and not last.

Well first of all you should specify that then instead of making broad, sweeping generalizations.

Secondly you're pathetic for resorting to memes lmao

>all that Western shit

>1990
>Late year to be rating

Lad if you're not literally a teenager you should have played plenty of games from the early 90s by now via emulation at a minimum. You've no excuse not to, there's fantastic titles from back then and it's easy as piss to play them all for free.

I'm 26.

To be honest. I played barely anything from those years, I didn't really know where to put them. It was a long and convoluted rating.

RDR2 is pretty boring, is well made but all you do is ride horses and talk like 80% of the time, maybe I got to "wait until it gets good" but it really seems to be the case here

Old games cant hold my attention for long. Even new games don't nowadays.

>muh a team meme applied to the early 10s now too
Fuck off. Most of the staff who made Souls also worked on AC5 and their other shit games too.

>Kid Icarus
>Ghost Trick
>Breath of Fire IV
Best list ITT shame you ruined it with valveshit

New games don't hold your attention because they are shit. That's why I quit playing new titles. With a few exceptions, I've mainly stopped playing new releases and I only go back and play old titles now. I've played shit released before I was born. Played stuff I never heard of before that was really popular when I was a toddler that didn't know what a video game was. Old games are better. They hold your attention better than most new games. Go back and play some old games. Though DO NOT listen to the Nincel faggots who will get you to play Zelda and other N64 trash. That is the only retro console I've gone back to play where everything was just as shit as today. Do not play Nintendo trash, and be aware that NES shit is gimmicky simplistic as fuck.

Mid to late 90's, to late 00's is the peak of gaming. Play stuff from that period. Then venture into early 90's to see how it all started if you want. 80's crap is overrated for the most part.

>2011
>choosing anything else than dark souls

Bing bing wahoo

How many times did your mom drop you on your head? you're a fucking onion.

>EDF 5
Based