FPS game in 2019

Go back to resetera, fag.

>turn v-sync off
>game still feels like its on

Games are made for consoles and the PC port is an afterthought.

>whats a discussion

if your a game dev and you dont add a simple FOV setting in your options maybe you shouldn't be a game dev

>tfw legit get motion sickness when playing on default
>feels like im moving in mud
>turn FOV up to 90 or 100
>feels like im moving fast
>i can actually see

>Modern games doesn't run in borderless window by default
Why? There's literally no point in fullscreen mode.

Try ultrawide display.

goddamnit trailer park boys is one of the most depressing low vibration shows I've ever binge watched. I hope I never go back to that life ever again.

didnt bad company 2 have 55 as default?

If you believe that women are to blame for everything wrong in video games, I don't think you value objectivity enough to be able to hold a decent discussion.
You could blame lazy devs, greedy publishers or console limitations, but no, it's the "women" bogeyman.

>FPS game
>has mouse acceleration on by default

Attached: trash.jpg (474x773, 62K)

Metro Exodus

this is true and i dont understand why
couldnt play this shit game because of it

FoV is the best for immersion. There can be no denying this.

Attached: 1552625325202.webm (640x356, 1.27M)

Plenty of games lack .ini options now.

Borderless window has input lag dumbass

what game?

Fortnite and Spyro 3

Not in the W10 after creation update. I tested this with recording slow motion video.

>he didn't edit ini files in the 90's
>he didn't write autoexec files so he wouldn't have to manually type console commands to get rhw best graphics settings
Sad.

Man the new Battlefield looks so good

Nah it still does, it's basically artificial vsync. I can definitely tell the input lag is there on certain games

>why?
because the guy youre playing as doesnt have a full model and the hovering arms arent rendered much farther than the edge of the screen. if you increase fov you also need to have a bigger model

I mostly remember doing that shit in older games though

>max out FOV
>guns and animations look like shit
How do people put up with this?

It's down to priorities, and those priorities being dicated by the people running the show that aren't actually in it for the game they're making or personally PC gamers.
That's just all it comes down to - the people calling the shots on the game never gave enough of a shit.

In short: find better games / studios.

Attached: 1521091342193.jpg (300x168, 9K)

>Play DMC5
>immediately notice the low Fov
>almost no one else seems to notice
I hate it. They practically ruined the game. Thanks fuck you can hack and fix it but consolet are out of luck.

Attached: proper fov DMC5.jpg (1920x1080, 325K)

There is an option already included in the settings to fix that though?

That option doesn't change the FOV itself, it only push the camera back. That's something else I told Yea Forums a hundred time already. Setting the FOV to 75+ and actually getting the camera closer is the far better experience.

So with the original FOV, you can't see shit as it's too narrow, and people are forced to max out the camera distance, which still retain the narrow fov but also fucks with the camera distances as soon you run from narrow areas to larger one, which is especially bad in corridors because the camera can't reach it's max distance most of the time.
It's just horrible.

Sure, boy. Slow motion can't see difference, but you can.

That's why I like ultrawide

Attached: Devil May Cry 5 Screenshot 2019.03.09 - 02.08.59.95.jpg (2560x1080, 524K)

>play is fullscreen
>gpu 50c
>set borderless window
>gpu 85c+

Attached: 1509829343467.png (450x443, 102K)

>Pushes the camera back
>Then push camera forward with hack
Doesn't that just push the camera back where it started from?

>no trailer park boys game besides mobile
fuck

I don't care about FOV but for the love of god just bring back the 90's UIs

Attached: 1552732025904.jpg (400x300, 24K)

Attached: 51545839_405608463544888_6440704382664179712_n.png (929x523, 621K)

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (943x531, 54K)

>46 health
>against unarmed low IQ mobs
LMAO

Exactly

>Social discourse is a turn-based game and you can't use the same move I did!!!
Gamifying politics and moral humanism was a very serious mistake and we're only just starting to see the consequences of it.

I'd rather deal with models that aren't fully there than playing like my character is looking through a telescope.

No, not at all. Learn what fov actually is. Stuff on screen would start to look naturally smaller the more depth they have. A good fov with the camera too far makes the characters way too small (pic related).
Basically with higher FOV you can see much more even with the characters at equal distances.

Attached: 1536477917950.jpg (1916x1053, 431K)

>this infectios seems to have induced an immune response in the form of a fever
>STOP PUSHING YOUR FEVER AGENDA!
Discord trannies are really dumb.

I don't know how to feel about this.
It looks sureal to me.
I definetely don't condone this shit, but it makes me wonder where the fuck we are heading in a curious and morbid way.

Yes it did, and it looked fucking horrible. I got about 100 hours in before I realized the ini file could be abused

>No Windowed Mode Option In Game
>3440x1440 Ultrawide, I like to allocate half the screen to chrome and half to something else

That's garbage tier ultrawide though, true ultrawide is 3440x1440

>one monitor pleb uses chrome
Sasuga

If his agenda is making videogames better from the technical standpoint it's an agenda I will wholeheartedly support because I want videogames where having graphics options beyond "graphics on/graphics off" is something I have a vested interest in. Anyone that cares about videogames should as well.

>2019
>ini editing

If you're lucky.

Attached: 1549221317117.jpg (800x430, 41K)

Holy shit, what a retarded post.

Even Ut had fov options in ui in the 90s

They have same fov, just different pixel density.

Developers don't give a shit about PC. That's why.

>You can't adjust the FOV because it would cause glitches.
The supposed glitches are that you are able to see into the character arms into an invsibile backside with a high FOV, which could be fixed by adding more bits to the first person player model.

We need to ban memes

Now you miss Total Biscuit, eh?

>EU's article 13 was right all along

Attached: 5ca.jpg (570x558, 260K)

A better comparison would be
>the women is the reason why we get the common cold! We must sneeze on each other to scare them away!

His agenda is keeping videogames for himself and other people he deem "worthy", i.e. not women, despite the fact that if women (and more people in general) started playing more (good) video games and get inspired to make their own, there'll be more videogames for the rest of us to play.
Unless the only good thing about video games are that " women don't play them", there's no reason to be hostile towards them.