Game's story is difficult if not impossible to understand

No it's equal to one.

Attached: 1537837137691.jpg (300x300, 14K)

>Analytic extension

Attached: retardcompassion.jpg (1066x600, 77K)

xD Osetia and xD Ausetia war with Oceania
cuz space elevator n sheet asteroid lol Oceania was so good they ackthually bad xD le Osetia attacked cuz honor n sheet xD

Attached: images.jpg (251x201, 7K)

No, however it can describe reality very accurately.

You sit down and do it over and over and over again like you're some fucking retarded ape.
Worked for me, and I was without a doubt one of the worst math students at my school.

Conjecture: 0.99999... = 1 (*)
Proof:
Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that 0.99999.... != 1. Observe the following:
0.33333.. can be written as 1/3. Thus, it follows that 1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3 = 0.33333... + 0.33333... = 0.66666.... Adding 1/3 again to 2/3 gives
1/3 + 2/3 = 1 = 0.6666... + 0.3333... = 0.9999... which is a contradiction to our original assumption. Therefore, (*) must hold true. QED.

>0.33333.. can be written as 1/3
nah lol

please never post again

Math is for fags.

Attached: 1546311939859.jpg (960x960, 87K)

That's not even how you do it numbnuts
x = 0.999...
10x = 9.999...
9x = 9
x = 1

brainlette lmao

10x = 9.999...990

lmapo

>Claims Conjecture
>Posts Proof

do you know what a conjecture is? holy shit you're fucking retarded

this is the textbook proof

Attached: IMG_20190310_144741006.jpg (3120x4160, 3.08M)

Integration says you're right.

great job omitting half of the steps

Attached: file.png (454x148, 19K)

x = .999999
10x = 9.99999
10x - x = 9
9x = 9
x = 1

ez.

0.11111111... = 1/9
0.2222222... = 2/9
0.3333333... = 3/9
.
.
.
0.9999999... = 9/9 = 1

learn to understand abstract value separate from physical things and git gud at keeping track of them in your head

>thinking 0.9...99 != 0.9...990

nice.

x1 = .99999
x2 = 1

x1=/= x2
:)

You've multiplied it by 10. You need to carry the 0. This is 1st grade level.

wtf are all those bandaid answers
OP is solved with a geometric series

you forgot those
10x = 9 + 0.999...
10x = 9 + x
its the same but clearer

Are you illiterate or just bad at math?

wrong. kys. delete your post.

this is the only good proof itt

No, but it's a great tool to make reality easier to understand for our primate brains.
There are no numbers between 0,999... and 1 since the 9s are infinite, so by definition they are the same.

>x = 0.999...
>10x = 9.000...
fixed

user. stop embarrassing yourself.
0.9 == 0.90
Figure out why that statement is true and then neck yourself.

Reminder: everyone confused by basic math is a republican.

>Are you illiterate or just bad at math?
If by "you" you mean Wkipedia, I wouldn't think so.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999...

0.11111111... = 11111111.../100000000...
0.2222222... = 2222222.../100000000...
0.3333333... = 3333333.../100000000...
0.9999999... = 9999999.../100000000...

get fucked nerds

Alright hotshots try this one instead

Attached: 8efbb96.jpg (320x319, 13K)

What a complete mindfuck

Attached: 5c9.jpg (526x300, 31K)

How is that different from what posted? You're retarded as shit.

x = .999999
10x = 9.99999
10x - x = 8.999991
9x=8.999991
x=0.999999

fucking dunce

Meant to quote:

Integration of what?

Holy fuck this thread

Attached: 1537447835973.jpg (799x315, 60K)

Daily reminder that if you're not getting a math degree you're a brainlet, no ifs or buts.

5π/2

Attached: 1552482824396.jpg (480x360, 46K)

5pi/2

Can't be solved, we don't know if hot dog can be integrated.

>implying math isn't just elaborate Jewish mind tricks

Forgot to say, if you're on your first or second year you're a brainlet too. Understanding pic related is the minimum requirement to not be considered a brainlet.

Attached: QPU Alignment Full.png (1594x1312, 371K)

>still getting baited in Yea Forums math threads

I'm supposed to assume hotdog is a variable, right?

I felt like that with Silver Case

Nice
Retard

Brainlet here, if you multiplied 0.999... by ten, doesn't the original value of 0.999...change? Even if it was originally infinite, you've changed the value to a different value of infinite? It's not the same infinite, right?

Also, 9(0.999..) = 9
So it's acceptable to say 8.999.. = 9?
pls no bully

5pi/2
This really isnt as hard as you think it is.
Are you retarded?

are you retarded?

He's right you know. We can't know if hot dog is even continuous variable

>Even if it was originally infinite
The expression to represent the number 0.999... may be infinite, but its value is not infinity.
>So it's acceptable to say 8.999.. = 9?
Yes.

Attached: 1546538768442.png (1280x720, 490K)

>9/9 = 1
What sorcery is this? Next you'll be telling me 18/9 = 2.

Mathbros care to explain what happens when you divide by 0?

1/3 = 0.333...
2/3 = 0.666...
3/3 = 0.999...

For everyone saying it's one.
So 0.9999....^2=1?
Retards.

Math is the only real thing.

Normie but brainlet-friendly answer
youtube.com/watch?v=J2z5uzqxJNU

Nothing. Division is not defined for a divisor of 0. Division is a partial function.

We /sci/ now?

Attached: 1466560531994.jpg (588x297, 18K)

He skipped the part of the proof where you establish that 9.9... =9x and subtract the x from both sides. It's a shit proof when you fly right over the entire point of it.

just assume the line over the last 9 in the decimal that denotes that it repeats forever exists, retard

>multiplication is...repeated adding
>aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh
i hate to be that guy but is this a "special" class

You just round the number to nearest thousandth, how hard can this be.

Attached: 12523442121.png (442x353, 130K)

Not defined. Lim x->0 (f/x) approaches +/- infinities depending on the sign of the function from the side you're approaching from and that's closest you can get, assuming f=/=0 at that point. If f=0 it's just not defined end of story.

best way to put it:
1/3 = .333...
3 (1/3) = 3 (.333...)
1 = .999...

>There are no numbers between 0,999... and 1 since the 9s are infinite, so by definition they are the same
Thats a brilliant explanation worded very well

Attached: 1525392226939.png (400x400, 117K)

Hotdog could be a function or a matrix, we don't know.

>itt: Common Core does not teach basics of analysis
Feels good to live in a country with real education.

You should be able to solve this.

Attached: ez.png (890x343, 366K)

why did you subtract nine from the terminating digit? you're supposed to add 1 to it, which would cascade up the chain and turn the whole number into 10 anyway.

Can't imagine how some of you brainlets will react when you find out there are as many natural numbers are there are rationals.

>1+2+3+4+5...= negative FRACTION
This is your brain on the fairytale that is maths.

Attached: physics.png (489x894, 89K)

it's literally just logic and following simple instructions. if you can follow a recipe, you can do math.

>its value is not infinity
So, how do people justify the two numbers being equal when they know the values are different?

You aren't stupid, right Yea Forums?

Attached: math problem.png (507x331, 131K)

yes.

Say you have a cake. You can't split a cake into 0s like you can split it into 2s

>There are no numbers between 0,999... and 1 since the 9s are infinite, so by definition they are the same.
Surreal numbers say you can get infinitesimally close to 1 without being 1.

Attached: 1200px-Surreal_number_tree.svg.png (1200x1516, 283K)

Literally impossible.

this is actually (according to my princeton friend) mostly constant and should be easy to prove if you know what you're doing

please don't do it.

take the singularitypill, fags

Attached: singularity_pepe.png (1200x758, 678K)

STOP this creates mustard gas.

This is extremely easy to understand when you understand fractions. Any fraction of x/9 where x is a number 1-9 is equivalent to .x repeating. 9/9 is logically equivalent to .9 repeating but at the same time any fraction x/x = 1.
But most people don't, I guess.

None of these would be complicated if the stupid jargon and symbols math used weren't made by autists and were easy to understand

Attached: wojak iq.png (645x729, 70K)

I was gonna ask, doesn't it mean it never quite reaches 1, despite being forever close? it's forever expanding but it'll never be a full 1

all of your numerators and denominators are infinity, your equations are meaningless retard

Geometric series is high school

It's defined as being infinitely close to 1 without being 1, so no.
youtube.com/watch?v=aRUABAUcTiI
This guy explains it better than I ever could. You don't need to know much about math to understand this.

Yeah feel free to remove the "stupid jargon" and "symbols math" from tensor calculus

For surreal numbers, but in the real number system, 0.999... = 1.

So to say "The number .999 ... repeating"
and "The number 1" is a misnomer because they are technically the same?

I already struggled with the idea of "real numbers" vs "imaginary" and now theres "Surreal" too? Thank god I never into maths because jesus what will they think of next?

yes, it does. retard.

I though burger education was a meme haha

Anyone have that thing that proves 1+2+3+4....= something like -1/4?

Say you have the equation a/b=c. This allows you to know the value of c by dividing a over b. This equation is also equivalent to a=b*c.
Now, allow division by zero and make b=0. That means a/0=c, or equivalently, a=0*c. But we know 0*c=0 so that means a=0. But a can have any value besides 0, (for example, 1, in which case you would have the expression 1=0, which is false), so that means the expression a/0 is generally not allowed.
I don't understand your question. Neither 0.999... nor 1 are infinite, they aren't even remotely close to it.

Imaginary numbers are easy. Have you ever seen a graph with an x and y axis? Congratulations. You're essentially doing just that.
Surreal numbers aren't that hard either.
If you want crazy numbers, look at p-adic numbers, where you are basically working with numbers that are infinitely long in the front of the decimal instead of behind the decimal. You can add two positive numbers together to get 0, among other things.

Approaching infinitely is the same thing as being there, that's the solution to Xeno's paradox

>long story I wont tell here, but never studied math beyond 6th grade
>no hs math education, not even algebra
>always terrified of math, thought I had dyscalculia, refused to ever study it
>default to humanities because of fear
>read GEB freshman year of college
>become highly interested in math and computer science
>start majoring in comsci
>terrified that all the math will be beyond my level
>tfw it all clicked into place right away
>tfw outperforming most of the class on exams, who all had formal hs math educations
>other students often come to me for help now
>don't study at all, doesn't matter for some reason
>just had my final exam for the quarter and am almost certain I pulled off a 100%

Feels good I guess??

Attached: 1468975654764.png (335x278, 246K)

>competitional statecraft
goddamn the koreans finally got enough of starcraft I see

Imaginary numbers can at least be visualized easily. Quaternions on the other hand are basically 4D imaginary numbers and I always struggled to understand them intuitively.

post question catalogue

This is a myth. There is a specific way of restructuring the question to get -1/12 but the actual sum of the series is exactly what common sense says it is, divergent

It's not a proof, stop spreading this meme. It's something called an analytic continuation of a function called the Riemann zeta. Said continuation is essentially taking a function that's defined only for a certain group of numbers, and asking what would the "logical" extension be for some number that isn't in said group.

Attached: at last.png (447x378, 11K)

>who all had formal hs math educations
Is this story set in the US?
Because in that case that's probably the reason they're bad.

complex path integrals are already intuitively mindfucky

0.9999.... is a static number, it isn’t “approaching” anything.

You’re at a mental block around the concept of infinity. You’re trying to visualize the number the way you would write it with a pen and paper, which is “continually adding another 9”. All of the 9s are already there, the number isn’t growing. Each subsequent 9 would bring it closer to 1; it has INFINITELY many. It’s as close to 1 as it is possible to get—it is 1.

Congratulations, you have autism

Wow it's almost like college level math has nothing in common with the entry-level shit they teach in high school.

Thank you. Learned this shit Junior year

I don't know math past Algebra II, and I'm 21. Is it too late for me to learn up to at least Calculus?

Kind of want to do some self study and hopefully enroll in Community College.

But 1 is more 1 than .9999
It's a static number, so why is it dynamic?

you cant just subtract the x. 10x is 10 TIMES x, which is different from having ten individual xs combined

...

I would argue "0.9999....." isn't well defined and should instead be constructed with lim x-->inf and/or as a sum.

let it be user, they're beyond salvation

It’s not...? it’s another way of writing the same number. You’re trying to visualize 0.99999... as a “constantly growing string of 9s” because you can’t get your mind around the idea of “an infinitely long string of 9s”.

Math is the code of the universe.
Prove me wrong.

Also OPs pic is retarded cause any scientist is gonna use significant figures.

Look at the image again. The first thing it says is
x = .99999...
x is BY DEFINITION .9999... in that image. Therefore x - .99999... = x - x = .9999... - .9999...

>10x != x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x

What

Oh boy it's the same debate again

Attached: 1549333337226.jpg (1500x1100, 132K)

0.99999... is just a shorthand notation for sum_(n=1)^inf 9*10^-n you twat. It is not "defined" in any other way.

>10x is 10 TIMES x, which is different from having ten individual xs combined

Attached: Apustajagondola.png (612x491, 63K)

Thats ten xs. Not ten times x. It works differently because it's such a long number
Also how do you pluralize "x"? x's? xes?

>you cant just subtract the x
Why not? x is clearly defined in that equation.

>10x is 10 TIMES x, which is different from having ten individual xs combined
???

simple and elegant. i like it.

Math is gay af

>It works differently because it's such a long number
'no'

1 - lim (n -> inf) 1/10^n

This lol. If you can't understand that 1/10^(inf) is equal to 0, then you'll never grasp that 0.999... = 1.

God I fucking hate this website

Exactly and there's no reason to ever use 0.99999... except to bait retards on this site.

how the fuck is infinite nines not long? Who are you my ex-girlfriend?

10x = 9 + x
10x - x = 9
10x - 1x = 9
(10 - 1)x = 9
9x = 9
x = 1
it's like you never even took algebra in school

I'm saying it doesn't suddenly work differently you retard

define "long"

All that shit logic and the weeb is the one who posts the clean proof.

Yknow, there's some phd out there who'll hit you with an ackshually and explain why that's not a 'correct' proof.

>read GEB
based i-mode user

reminder that 1=2

CS math classes are mostly unrelated to math form highschool. Discrete math basic combinatorics and super basic number theory.

Is Yea Forums the least intelligent board on 4channel?

Attached: 1505546396485.png (865x1645, 1.26M)

I'm fucking shocked at how everyone is posting this.
Where are those people going to school?
What the fuck?

Yes, that's why it's the most popular

If you could divide by 0, that would be true, but you can't, so it isn't

Don't kid yourself, /g/ is full of retards as well who think bash scripting makes them leet hackers or whatever.

>implying literally anyone on /g/ has ever read Phenomenology of Spirit
Even on Yea Forums I'd say only 0.05% have read it, at most

mathsci.fandom.com/wiki/The_Haruhi_Problem
weebs are literally paving the path on math

It's just a quirk of using a base 10 system

>He will never know the joy of being stuck on a problem only to feel that awesome click and good feeling when you finally solve it.

Akshully its x=9/(10-1)

Attached: 1552062535759.jpg (800x600, 24K)