.
Untitled
Well, you're half right
Well yeah. Games with soul usually are better.
Careful op, the boomies will start crying and want their Monster® Zero Ultra™
Top half yes
Bottom half no
What is this? A fact thread?
Ocarina of Time with randomizer is objectively the best zelda though. besides, Twilight Princess is more fun than either of those two anyway
>"Banjo wannabe better than 3D Mario"
Don't care about Zelda
64 > Odyssey for me, don't like the constant stream of moons, diminishes any reward and makes it feel like i'm hardly doing a succession of platforming challenges, but just freeroaming. If freeroaming's your thing, good for you, but I don't dig it.
Fixed, retard zoomer
this is correct
> Donkey Kong 64
> F Zero X
Kirby Star Allies > Kirby and The Crystal Shard's
Wave Race Switch > Wave Race 64
Yoshi crafted world > Yoshi Story
Super Smash Bros Ultimate > Super Smash Bros
OoT >>> BotW
Odyssey = 64
Odyssey is objectively better than 64. Take off those nostalgia goggles.
other way around faggot
Odyssey is just more sungalaxy3Dworld. Its still a completely different style of game from SM64.
Not that user but no, it's definitely a refinement of the 64/Sunshine style, trimming the fat where it always needed to be trimmed in the process. Damn shame it's just easier than 64 is.
more =/= better
Havent played botw, but odissey is shit, even for a 2D mario standard
Bullshit, it aint half the variety of 64. And the platforming is bland as shit.
SM64 is better
64 wasn't platforming intensive either, it was always more of a sandbox ordeal. Galaxy and the 3D titles are much purer platforming experiences, Odyssey is just the 64 style finally catching up to Banjo-Kazooie tier progression.
Both images state the exact same thing.
NEW GOOD
OLD BAD
based
And they're all shit
>lets do something dumb to get (you)'s
>Banjo even as remotely good as any 3D Mario
kek
When in Rome
entirely wrong