SOUL v SOULLESS
SOUL v SOULLESS
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
NEW GAM BAD
OLD GUD
HURR DURR NOSTALGIA DURR HUR R
HGGGG UNNN DURRRRR
DURRRRRRR
Amazingly all this retarded diarrhea was produced by different people.
the left looks like a clown.
Take a gooooood hard look at yourself
yeah and clowns are scary as shit dude zombies are just like "bah buh bdumrum" and walk at you like they made a messies whereas clowns fucked my mom
Why did they change the zombie sounds in REmake2?
The old sounds were way more scary. Now they just sound like generic AAA cookie cutter zombies.
Zombies in the original sounded like cookie monster when they weren't just moaning like a drunk who woke up in the middle of the night
The left looks like he's in the middle of a shit and you just walked in on him taking said shit.
The right is murderous and you know you fucked up by walking near him eating the corpse.
all me
Left is way scarier for one reason: the eyes.
The zombie to the left is staring right at you, the other you can barely tell it has some very light, almost invisible iris if you squeeze your eyes.
Capcom knew where they fucked up and they fixed it.
The left is when he is in the middle of taking a shit, the right is after he has eaten all the shit.
Now compare with youtube.com
Remake was souless.
soul vs hd soul
I do prefer og mansion
Why was this even a cutscene? Having the zombie turn around without interrupting gameplay would have been much spookier
Having to look closer at the REmake zombie and realize the eyes aren't all white and are staring right at you makes it more unsettling. Even as a kid I thought the original looked kind of goofy
Re1 has fixed camera angles and seeing a zombie for the first time wouldn't be as spooky if the camera was farther away in the fixed position. Also, it wouldn't be as dramatic or feel as personal without the camera being so close.
I still find the left one creepier, but they're both good.
soulless vs soulless remastered
Technically they're both souless.