Do you agree there’s no such thing as a “gaming guilty pleasure” and that a good game is always a good game no...

Do you agree there’s no such thing as a “gaming guilty pleasure” and that a good game is always a good game no matter if it’s just about blowing space aliens or telling a personal story?

Attached: 38BA679C-229B-412F-B02E-FFA29C73A5E2.jpg (1314x880, 735K)

Who cares

The reason the term "guilty pleasure" exists is because the user is being honest in admitting whatever it is is objectively mediocre to shit, but they still enjoy it. Unfortunately people have a problem with admitting they enjoy something that is not of the highest quality, for some fucking reason.

>a good game is always a good game no matter if it’s just about blowing space aliens or telling a personal story?

That isn't the contention. The contention being made is that you don't need to feel guilty or justify why YOU like something, whereas calling it "guilty pleasure" implies you like it despite feeling like you shouldn't.

That doesn't mean a game is good because someone likes it.

the game is good if you like it, there’s no such thing as an objectively good game

Does this apply to shit they call problematic?

Yeah, nah, go fuck yourself. There is a reason why the words subjective and objective exist, and, yeah, your subjective opinion can be in conflict with objective reality.

You are the reason why modern day critics are shit.

>twitter screencap thread
>of kotaku of all people
You legitimately should be permanently banned.

fuck off retard

this
I can enjoy something while understanding by objective metrics it's not good. The problem is intersectionalists don't believe objectivity exists