1080p@240, 1440p@144 or 4K@60?

this but unironically

1440/144 for games
4K for productivity

4K@30fps because more frames does nothing but make things look weird and unnatural unless you're playing a competitive FPS or something.

I just plug whatever i'm playing into the nearest tv that works and play it, man.
Why do you need to overthink things so much? Are you actually more interested in digital dick measuring contests more than playing video games? Would playing a Sega or SNES game on an old CRT physically cause your heart to stop?

Grow the fuck up

Attached: 1448461879952.jpg (240x250, 16K)

Everyone thinks you're really cool about how you don't care about stuff

You are actually fucking stupid

>tfw still playing on a 1080i plasma tv
dem black levels tho

You're such an idiot..

1080p@60

Attached: smugpepe.jpg (680x680, 34K)

1440p 144hz gsync hdr would be absolutely perfect

1080p at 240fps for gaming, 4K at 60fps for non-gaming.

Same. Picked up this monitor for cheap as a temporary emergency replacement in 2012 or so when my old one died suddenly, and have been too stingy to buy a new one since.

t. nigger

Attached: nigger zapper 9000.jpg (532x658, 31K)

don't ever fucking @ me again, you hear me

Attached: Why_Fag.jpg (149x254, 6K)

>more frames is unnatural

Attached: IMG_20190304_212627.jpg (720x534, 37K)

On one monitor?

Attached: Violated.jpg (208x265, 16K)

Attached: Why_overtheline.jpg (166x229, 11K)

>resolution higher than 1440p
Why?

Attached: 1550940266431.jpg (313x286, 17K)

Attached: Big Deal.jpg (389x492, 21K)

It depends on the games you play. FPS's for example usually benefit from higher framerate. Most of the games I play don't, so I prefer 4k.

1080@60 is the patrician's choice.

Any more than that is a waste of power and money.

Marketing memes, same as why curved was a fad very briefly (or is it still?). Ultrawide may not be here to stay either. As for 4K, you'd have to put a literal TV on your desk to see a difference. Even up into the 30 inch range 1440p is entirely plentiful, and at that size it would actually allow you to run software without additional font scaling.

>1080p
>1440p
>4000K

why not 4p?

First of all it's 4K, secondly that would be 2160p, but it just doesn't have the same ring and recognizability to it as 4K.

I'm sorry you have pleb tier eyesight
I run 27" 4k without font scaling.

t. poorfag

Sure you do, Superman.

None - I chose 4k @ 120.

4K@60, but only if it has HDR.

uh oh user, looks like you made a reasonable post you know what that means

Attached: aa4.png (960x540, 666K)