I come with a leak regarding the next Dark Souls. This will be announcement closer to summer. At the latest it will be revealed at E3. Everything I'm about to type is 100% true:
>It's not Dark Souls 4, it's going to be a "spin off" Dark Souls entry that will be built around multiplayer.
>It's going to be marketed along side Xbox, although it will be on PS4 and PC.
>There's no subtitle for it yet.
>Hub world is going to be like Demon Souls. Worlds are broken up individually.
>There will be other players sharing the hub with you, like in Destiny. Here, you can interact with other players, make parties, or trade items
>Covenants will be playing a central role, you start the game selecting which covenant you're in, classes will also be determined by which covenant you pick
>The levelling up system has been retooled, and there will probably be a lot of fans angry about it. However, the weapon upgrading system has remained pretty much the same
>Gone is levelling up stats. Now, there are unique classes which will be assigned to by depending on which covenant you join, (like pyromancer, warriors, etc)
>the "covenant rewards" from DS3 has been heavily retooled to work as a indepth talent tree system that can be players can invest souls and pale tongues, etc in, so not every pyromancer or warrior will be the same or have the same moves. In essence, they've kept the same formula as 3 but simplified it
>invading people/summing phantoms/putting down white signs has been retooled for convenience to function like the covenant system did in DS3. However, you can only summon phantoms/be summoned as a phantom from people as the same covenant as you.
>worlds can now have 4 invaders, 3 phantoms has remained untouched
>The core game is designed as a co-op adventure but there will be levels detected exclusively to pvp.
I come with a leak regarding the next Dark Souls. This will be announcement closer to summer...
Nice
Big if true
Is this about Dark Souls TV? Yeah it's debuting next week!!
youtu.be
Give us Sekiro for the singleplayer fags, and this for the multiplayer fags. I can get down with this.
you better not be sucking your own dick in yur mamas basement and actually hacking into pizza huts mainframe
>It's not Dark Souls 4, it's going to be a "spin off" Dark Souls entry that will be built around multiplayer.
I can believe this
i fucking love ds1, des, bb and ds3 a little, i'm waiting for sekiro like nothing else, ds1 is my favourite game of all time
but this shit better not be true
i want armored core b4 another dark souls
fuck you faggot op
Radda, radda radda radda.
fuck you schnitzel
so each class has 3 unique talent trees, sorta like wow?
>Gone is levelling up stats. Now, there are unique classes which will be assigned to by depending on which covenant you join, (like pyromancer, warriors, etc)
The way you typed this like it was some kind of prophecy makes me think you're full of shit.
But I always thought the covenant based multiplayer from DS was amazing and they were far from fully explored. Instead of multiplayer being thrown at some points in a single player adventure, it'd be interesting to at least see how a MP-only souls game would be.
This sounds exactly like what would happen if Bamco decided to make a Souls game without From Software, discounting the existing phone abomination.
Dark Souls 4 isn't happening. Before Miyazaki became president of From Software, Bandai Namco secured a contract for a Dark Souls trilogy. Now that contract has ended, the whole of From Software including Miyazaki want to do other things. Miyazaki has said that he's done with the series but if anyone from From Software wanted to do a Dark Souls 4 then he wouldn't stop them.
TL;DR
Dark Souls 4 isn't around the corner and there's no guarantee there will ever be one but another game might come 10 years in the future.
>announcing it in the next three months
>it has no subtitle yet
Fake and gay
Lol, explain THIS then.
>yesterday miyazaki article says he wouldn't mind a battle royale type game
>muh dad works for from
Fuck outta here with your gay larp
Four in Roman numerals is IV not IIII brainlet.
??? thats plain wrong
No it's not dummy, it's basic knowledge globally.
Don't forget, Bamco owns the IP. They can make some garbage spin-off without From.
>built around multiplayer.
dropped
They have publishing rights outside of Japan, From Software owns the IP.
This is a fake leak, but its almost 95% certain that the multiplayer game Miyazaki has said he's going to make is going to be very similar to dark souls.
>giant black areolas
Yes YES YES
Incorrect. Bamco does own the IP.
>Miyazaki added that since the Souls series and Bloodborne IPs are not owned by From Software, it’s possible that remastered versions of Dark Souls games or Bloodborne will be released, depending on what the publishers decide
kotaku.com
miyazaki said in an interview there will be something fans would naturally expect
i dont give a shit if this leak is fake and it most likely is, but the basic idea i can believe.
They said they WILL return to make a "Fromsoft-esque" game, after sekiro. Take that as you will.
>t. Brainlet
Devs are always saying shit like that though. How many of the metal gear games were meant to be the last?
Sekiro is a "Fromsoft-esque" game though. You know they made adventure games, survival horror, ninja stealth games and mecha games before Dark Souls took off
We've known about three games From has been making.
>A Dark Fantasy RPG that is similar to Dark Souls, but different.
>A game that is a reboot of a series they worked on in the past. (Initially thought to be Armored Core, it turns out this was Sekiro, having begun life as a Tenchu game)
>Something weird. (Deracine)
This is the company president saying it though.
When people hear "Fromsoft" what do you think comes to mind? Adventures of Cookie and Cream? Armored Core? King's Field?
medium.com
Miyazaki has said he would like to make a new Dark Souls game at least once before he retires.
Those are edited.
>About DARK SOULS, I haven’t thought much about developing sequels or spin-offs of it, but, for example, if someone in the future asked me to make DARK SOULS, and they showed me new technology… if it’s attractive enough, I wouldn’t dare to deny to myself that I’d like to make a new DARK SOULS before retiring. The possibility of it is not 0%. I don’t want to be called a liar when that happens. (laughs)
The context makes it a bit more complex than that. He said he may want to make a new Dark Souls if there's some attractive new technology he could use for it.
>designed around multiplayer
yikes
>destiny souls
Shittiest larp I've ever seen.
>>A game that is a reboot of a series they worked on in the past. (Initially thought to be Armored Core, it turns out this was Sekiro, having begun life as a Tenchu game)
This was disproven in the GI interviews
Link them.
>based fairweather green ranger
They've said that Tenchu at least served as the inspiration for it. With how loose translations from Japanese can be, I doubt worrying about it being literally a reboot or not matters when it's very obvious it's the game he was referring to here. He's specifically said Sekiro isn't an RPG, so it can't be the first, and Deracine was explicitly the third, so there's really no other option.
>romans used IIII when they felt like it
>2000 years later some faggot on a tranny image sharing board larping as vidya says they were wrong
every fucking time
You're so shit at bullshit.
He said Deracine was a .5 game and so it didn't count as one of the 3 games IIRC.