All shitposting and console war stuff aside, what are you honestly expecting from Google Yeti?

All shitposting and console war stuff aside, what are you honestly expecting from Google Yeti?

Attached: 1551204032528m.jpg (1024x1023, 76K)

A box that connects to the play store.

a small hipster userbase with no games

spyware

played the project stream beta for the free copy of ass creed, it was alright

too bad I have a data cap like the other 75% of americans

Attached: howonliveworks1.png (596x600, 871K)

Same thing as the OUYA

D E A D O N A R R I V A L
also

>google set top hardware that's not chromecast
dropped by google in 12 months

what the fuck is wrong with american ISPs?

in my country in the west of the EU we havn't had providers with datacaps since 1998 or something, not even exaggerating.

internet is cheap, extremely fast and reliable, and no data cap.

American ISP's tend to have complete monopolies over entire states.

>smaller countries
>socialism
>people not complaining if companies want to dig up their front lawn to place fiber
>ISP monopolies where they collude with other ISPs to avoid competition

Basically the Ouya but with more spyware in it. Also it's not really an expectation so much as it is a fact, but the controller for it does not look comfortable to use at all.

This

It's a streaming console with big games though, not ouya. The AC test went off pretty well

Sit your ass down

Attached: 1550875847873.jpg (830x821, 76K)

>In my postage stamp sized country
Cool, good for you.

BEST Yea Forums thread

Vaporware

Nice.

We have 350 million people and a country that spans thousands of miles

>muh bumfuck nowhere needs good cable therefore internet is poor everywhere
Not an argument

Attached: Us-population-density-map-from-ecpmlangues-1.png (2468x1564, 1.42M)

A box that spies on me 24/7.

>Y-yeah maybe it’s better, but it’s SMALL!

Damn son I’m ‘murrican and this was a really shitty diss

It's easy to give internet to 1 million people in a 200 mile area

It's better because it's small because you have much smaller areas to cover with infrastructure. If you have a high population density then laying down a line of fibre will increase speed for more people then low population density. Add to this the fact that the US also has higher population and low density means that to get a similar level of service, you've got to lay down far more cable.

And actually many European countries, especially in the West suffer from bad internet speeds, regional slow zones and so on, because of the existing infrastructure which normally has to be replaced in order to get it to work. It's one of the reasons why the railways are so shit in Britain, and in France rural internet is still at 90s speed in a good few places.

Sell worst than the OUYA, no joke.