Are you a "real gamer" Yea Forums?
Are you a "real gamer" Yea Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
nejm.org
google.com
sciencedirect.com
journals.sagepub.com
telegraph.co.uk
nature.com
files.osf.io
articles.latimes.com
archive.is
en.wikipedia.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
tandfonline.com
psycnet.apa.org
thesun.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
us.mensa.org
twitter.com
>not playing FIFA makes you a real gamer
Then I'm already one I guess
Reminder that Notch is a certified member of MENSA and has a higher IQ than you.
damn, notch really is based
mensa is just a scam for people who like to think they are smart
you can see it on the picture you posted
>JOIN MENSA NOW
>start up fee
>annual fee
>the majority of Yea Forums doggedly defended this man for years
>Paper has to explicitly state "start-up fee" is something you just have to pay once
>Organization for geniuses
This "guy" is a total gamma male.
>mensa is just a scam for people who like to think they are smart
/thread
>unironically identifying as a "gamer"
you guys don't actually do this right?
t.brainlets who have not been keeping up with their daily binges of rick & morty re-rurns.
still do.
he didnt say anything wrong.
thats why he's so based.
I dont care if he makes trannies, femnazis or Yea Forums mad, thats the definition of based
>obtain $1.5 billion dollars
>proceed to sit at your computer shitposting all day
According to his logic 99% of the world populations are real gamer then.
We'd all the do the fucking same. It's a hard habit to break.
MENSA is a meme and a scam though
living the dream
He's still a fat fuck living alone in self loathing and wasting his life away doing nothing.
Notch is such a passive people-pleasing soulless fuck even after becoming a billionaire, all his twitter posts are like some typical reddit poster trying and failing to be funny
So was Jimmy Saville, an infamously notorious British paedophile who worked in TV entertainment
Notch is literally flying around the world fucking billionaires' escorts all day every day. He is much happier than you working your retail 9-5, I can promise that. Lol.
Ironically FIFA is more of a game (since it mostly simulates a sport and remains slightly gamey where it fails in replicating that) than Minecraft since the latter doesn't even simulate a game, it simulates creative building blocks aka Lego. By the logic that Minecraft is a game, all those MS Paint ripoffs that used to be sold as "games" are in fact games too.
Hypocrisy at its finest.
What's wrong with Broken Sword
Yeah but at least he has a nice house to do o in unlike you.
So ... he's like all geniuses.
Wait, does his third post refer to FIFA only or also to those games in the first post? English is not my native language so please bear with me.
He already did something for a long time, now it's time to take a decade long vacation and play anime games on the Switch while shitposting on Twitter I guess.
It's not explicit either way but it would make more sense referring to the last statement. It would make less sense if he wrote a ton of shit and joked about needing someone to send him food for survival, and then meant all that was a joke too.
>notch is slightly less unhappy than the most unhappy people on earth
what a bar
Just FIFA. A boomer dork like him is not going to talk shit about Broken Sword or pixel platformers like Alwa.
He's said before he doesn't like JRPGs, so he could well be throwing shade at Coven.
If I was as rich as him I would pay for a personal trainer + borderline food rehab therapy so that I could maximise my health while still being able to do hardcore gaming (and even maximise the enjoyment that way).
yeah, sure you would...
Yeah I'm a gamer!
My friend is an ed.psyche and said that Mensa uses outdated tests that massively inflate the results and overly prioritise mathematical ability over linguistic.
It's a massive scam that most of the population could join if they crammed high school maths for a month
>poor people think money can make you thin and overrride the psychological machanisms that make you overeat
I dunno about the contents of the MENSA test, but I do know their results are "inflated" or anyway on a different curve. 150 on the MENSA test is like 130 on the WAIS-IV
Why not? Nothing to lose, everything to gain. I can only imagine perhaps his previous impoverished life has given him too many delusions and self-hatred to even be motivated towards such a chance. But really that's the whole point of rehab, when you know on some level you must be delusional so you need professionals to sort your issue for you.
You mean ultra woke?
I'm not poor. Also you're wrong, read
only retards like you care about IQ
mensa is full of retarded autists and brain dead normalfags
>Why not?
because you're a little fuckwit who is imagining situations you'll never be in
Notch is possibly the only billionaire with a soul.
Lifting weights isn't fun.
Personal chef(s) and some dietician is a given though.
>high school maths
I have a hard time believing that mensa's shit is on the level of teenagers, but at the same time I wouldn't be surprised.
Then you're an idiot, because money can't make you thin, personal trainers aren't magic
>money can't make you thin
>surgery
Aspies don't have souls.
ok apart from that
Money absolutely can make you thin. It can also make you muscular.
(You)
>surgery is a perfect long term solution
nejm.org
>Steroid users without exercise gained more muscle than non-steroid users with regular exercise.
>Retail 9-5
>Most unhappy people on earth
Dude try a little harder if you're baiting. If you're not, holy fuck lmao
Mensafag here. How does it feel to be a coping brainlet? Keep crying about it being a scam, it is amusing
>Intelligence
>Not prioritizing linguistic ability which is primarily knowledge based
Hmmm
>t. not wagecuck
you don't know what the life does to you
>linguistic ability which is primarily knowledge based
it isnt
Oh right I remember now I speak whatever languages fluently because I'm just that smart :^)
He's a cuck and defends cucking, is that 'based'?
Did You Know?
- There is a service where rich people get their blood replaced with 15-year-olds' blood every month. This has an anti aging effect.
- There is a service where rich people get their blood injected with mesenchymal stem cells only found in human placentas and human infants' bodies. There are illegal farms in China which harvest stem cells from infants enmasse for sale on the black market. You can find videos of these if you look!
- There is a service where rich people get their faces microneedled with a solution of ground-up homogenized infant foreskins (the only legal way to obtain infant skin.) This is called the "penis facial" and is extremely popular in Hollywood. The same illegal Chinese farms that harvest aforementioned stem cells also harvest the skin of the infants for use in "penis facials".
you dont know what linguistic ability is you retard
and yet rich old people still look old
I hate Fifa as much as the next guy for reasons everyone knows but calling yourself a "real gamer" because you are above some videogames is some 14 year old shit.
proofs
>You think linguistic ability is something else than what I think it is and I'm obviously not wrong so you must be, and believe me just for saying so!
Imagine being this retarded.
Also hilarious how you want to talk retarded shit about what words mean, when you clearly don't even understand the word "primarily"
To be fair, anything made by EA is not a game anyway
i'll give you a hint, it's not knowing words or languages
The WAIS-IV, near-universally considered the best intelligence test, certainly the most highly developed one, uses a simple vocabulary test (test giver: "Define to me") as its largest section. The results of the vocabulary test are found to correspond nearly 1:1 with what's called "total intelligence" or IQ.
The actual term for this portion of the test isn't "vocabulary", it's called "crystallization". Crystallization is the process by which humans absorb, store, and later recall/put to use information. So in essence it tests three different kinds of information manipulation (input, storage/memory, usage)
>He's still a fat fuck living alone in self loathing and wasting his life away doing nothing.
He already finished what he was supposed to do, unlike you, who will never even find something to do that anyone cares about.
google.com
*cuts off your baby's foreskin*
*spreads it on Christina Aguilera's face for $30,000*
that'll be $800 for the procedure sir
I think the joke is the switch, not the games themselves
Dude I worked retail for 2 years full time on-top of part time through college, it was fine. Just get transferred to a new department if you're that miserable. You're literally saying homeless people would be less happy if they got a job in retail lmao.
hey that was quick
I come back and someone is spurging that their sanctuary of mathematics isn't the sole determining factor in intelligence. Go back to /g/
all lies bud, never once was he charged with anything. just money grabbing whores
>linguistic ability is controlled by the part of the brain literally named after a bible demon
Imagine believing this shit.
I'll give you a hint:
Primarily; for the most part; mainly.
We're not merely talking about linguistics, we're talking about linguistic ability. Something you seem to be lacking to a rather extreme degree as you seem to think you can ignore half the meaningful words in a sentence and still retain the actual message.
That's because you can't charge a dead man
This, thank you
He's correct but you don't say thing like that out loud unironically. You make 80% of normies your enemies
Yeah, they are. They might not all be good games, but they are games.
>Crystallization is the process by which humans absorb, store, and later recall/put to use information. So in essence it tests three different kinds of information manipulation (input, storage/memory, usage)
But is vocabulary really the best way to test for this?
you just typed out an entire post that doesn't make any sense
>Mad that Notch insulted fifa
Lmao sperg
>tfw when you realize your normfags friends play games more often than you
How do I stop coming to this place, bros?
According to the hundreds of Ph.D experts who developed, and continue to develop the WAIS test, it is
Yes, because it can express more complex ideas than mathematics, is easier to scale, and uses more parts of the brain.
Intelligence however, is for the most part the rate and accuracy at which this process occurs, and not the scale of it. While WAIS-IV gives the most consistent results, the counterargument is that those same results are largely made of up irrelevant filler to achieve it.
Vocabulary for example is strongly related to exposure, someone in a low income family with poor education and no access to books or media will have a very limited vocabulary, but could still have a very high intelligence which this test would struggle to catch. There is a reason knowledge-based tests are highly criticized as being "elitist"
>No argument
>Just unironically sperging about /g/ and some "sanctuary of mathematics" nonsense
Hypocrisy is rarely convincing user.
>Doesn't make any sense
It makes no sense to you because you lack the linguistic ability to interpret it, or because you refuse to acknowledge it due to you getting utterly BTFO by it.
i think people in mensa are smarter than average but specifically the whole scheme targets people with superiority complexes and such
>Vocabulary for example is strongly related to exposure
It really isn't. There is no such thing as having "no access to books or media" after libraries were invented.
The fact that vocab-based crystallization tests correlate more strongly with other measures of IQ than any other particular test sort of kills your argument. You're making hypothetical arguments, but they went a step further and took the proof out of the pudding.
I know what you're trying to say, but you're doing a terrible job of it, and you're still wrong
Huh, so that's why my friend's doc keeps giving him steroids.
I remember seeing a study a few years back which said that children who believe they are more intelligent than others have a tendency to actually be more intelligent
> There is no such thing as having "no access to books or media" after libraries were invented.
Oh you sweet summer child. How innocent. How naive.
>The fact that vocab-based crystallization tests correlate more strongly with other measures of IQ
I've already accounted for this, though, and while it's certainly clever smoke and mirrors to produce "reliable" numbers, those numbers are without much merit.
>I've already accounted for this, though, and while it's certainly clever smoke and mirrors to produce "reliable" numbers, those numbers are without much merit.
What?
You're right user, you've totally convinced my by just saying "nuh uh you're wrong!" and I now see the error of my ways :^)
Fucking brainlets man...
Rich people are dumbasses who don't want to spend their money on research on how to look younger and get a bigger dick. Jews
>misogynistic language aimed toward men
itt: insecure Yea Forums brainlets
so i actually am smart??? yay, i knew my mom would never lie to me :D
How are you struggling to keep up? Ask specific questions rather than vague "durrrr wha?" posts.
If you want an explaination of what linguistic intelligence is there's another poster in this thread explaining it
I'm saying what you said didn't make any sense
It's actually the opposite unless you're Asian, user. It's called the Dunning-Kruger effect.
It's funny how the person trying to discredit intelligence in the use of language doesn't have any
Dunning-kruger has nothing to do with IQ
Right, and what do you hope to achieve by proclaiming your failure to make sense of the obvious?
What on earth gives you the impression that I'd want that, user? Are you just making excuses to run away now?
i can't speak for why exactly that is, but i've definitely noticed i've become more adept at dealing with problems once i started convincing myself i'm actually smart as fuck, but i think that's because i would give up more easily when i thought i was just average. also the threat of looking like a dumbass pushes me to try a bit harder
my college GPA equivalent went from around 3 to like 3.9 since i started tricking myself into thinking im smart
That's only when dumb people think they're smart
Smart people can also think they're smart, except they're right
It really doesn't have any correlation to how smart you actually are
You sound like a 14 year old pseudointellectual trying to fake it till he makes it, lol.
Actually read up about the damn thing, it's almost exclusively about intelligence.
>What on earth gives you the impression that I'd want that, user? Are you just making excuses to run away now?
What? You wanted me to explain why you're wrong? The other guy is explaining it. What the fuck are you talking about?
No it isn't
Go find a study indicating that dumber people think they're smarter and smarter people think they're dumber. You won't find any.
It's about skill
Although people will low IQ are more suspectable to overestimate themselves, high IQ people do it too
Everyone in this thread is hankering for a slapping. You silly sods better be talking about vidya and e-celebs when I get back or you'll get it!
Having over confidence in your intelligence doesn't make you smarter. Just makes you appear smarter to retards.
Dunning kruger effect is about "knowledge/expertise/tradecraft", not intelligence (mental processing ability)
Dunning's words, not mine.
sciencedirect.com
I imagine I sound like whatever you want to hear, user. I fail to see how that makes any difference here.
No, it also suggests that people who are actually intelligent will generally believe themselves to be "dumb". As I said before, actually read up about the damn thing rather than just parroting what someone else or some dumb article told you about it.
Stop LARPing and go eat your chicken tendies.
a smart dude can think he's smart but he knows it doesn't guarantee that he's going to be right or that he will automatically succeed at anything he tries
meanwhile a dumbass with dunning krueger will think he's right and also assume he's always right about anything because he "knows" he's smart and that he will always succeed at anything he tries for the same reason, and if he doesn't then it's someone else's fault
>actually read up about the damn thing
If you read up on the thing you'd know it was about skill and not intelligence
Based Notch putting soccerfags to their places.
NHL is the real gamer's sports game.
Did you not read it? I quote; "I describe the Dunning–Kruger effect, in which poor performers in many social and intellectual domains seem largely unaware of just how deficient their expertise is."
expertise isn't intelligence
That's not how logical statements work.
A -->B
is not the same as B -->A
A: Being a real gamer
B: Not playing FIFA
The arrow stands for "implies".
Imagine being so full of yourself you think your projecting will accomplish anything.
journals.sagepub.com
>SEI (Self-Estimated Intelligence) was found to be predictive of intelligence scores on all three IQ tests.
This is about as accurate of a summary of the Dunning-Kruger effect as saying "the easiest answer is always right" is what Occam's Razor is all about, or suggesting Schrodinger's cat is about uncertainty and unpredictability.
user... Fucking read the actual quote in full rather than being so absurdly desperate you cherrypick to such an extreme degree you just make yourself look utterly bumfuck retarded.
why thank you
you're a complete moron
I'm not involved with this argument but I'd like to say you're a dumbass.
Regards,
knower of dumbasses
>mensa is just a scam for people who like to think they are smart
This.
>become billionaire
>still be a huge loser
how is even possible
>tfw just thought to myself "I'm a genius"
>now I'm actually a genius
it's that easy
what do i tell my psychiatrist to get an IQ test?
>i'm feeling very retarded doc
take one online
there are no real IQ tests online, the weschler test is licensed only to psychiatrists
Oh fuck some random fuckwit on the internet called me names, whatever do I do with myself?!
I'm asking you seriously here, not joking or trying to insult you
Do you have autism or some kind of social disorder like that?
it's all the same meaningless bullshit
try not being retarded
>it's all the same meaningless bullshit
no it isn't, IQ is the most studied thing in all of anthropology, it correlates 80%+ with genetic heritage, it correlates 40%+ with reaction time, etc
Human intelligence up to 75% inheritible
telegraph.co.uk
Human intelligence is highly heritable.
nature.com
IQ is 75% heritable among whites.
files.osf.io
Intelligence has at least a 40-50% genetic basis.
articles.latimes.com
IQ is about 80% heritable.
archive.is
>become billionaire
>keep integrity intact
He is just a man too honest to generally earn so much money.
oh and it's correlated strongly with work success too
so yeah, any of you dudes banking on IQ being fake, this ain't it hoss
fuck off notch
and? what effect does that have on your life?
makes sense that lardball hates videogames showing people who work out
en.wikipedia.org
>Researchers have reported medium-sized correlations between reaction time and measures of intelligence: There is thus a tendency for individuals with higher IQ to be faster on reaction time tests
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>Reaction times are so easy to do that 9- to 12-year-old children can perform them in less than 1 s. On these simple tests, children with higher GMA scores perform faster than do children with lower scores, perhaps because reaction time measures the neurophysiological efficiency of the brain's capacity to process information accurately—the same ability measured by intelligence tests (Deary, 2000; Jensen, 2006). Children are not trained to perform well on reaction time tasks (as they are on certain paper-and-pencil tests), so the advantage of those with higher GMA scores on these tasks cannot arise from practice, familiarity, education, or training. Simple reaction time (SRT) measures correlate with IQ ~ 0.20, while more complex choice reaction time (CRT) measures correlate ~0.40. In aggregate, RTs can correlate 0.70 with IQ (Jensen, 2006).
unrelated fun fact: part of the testing process to become a fighter pilot is an IQ test. it's made by the same people who make the weschler test. it's called the
pilot aptitude test"
>not joking or trying to insult you
I'll give you the benefit of doubt and assume you're genuine, but when you ask people questions like this and insist you do so for inoffensive reasons you should probably include your actual reason for asking.
What on earth makes you believe it is a valid question to ask in the first place?
don't reply to me if you're not going to do it in good faith. stew in your own denial, don't try to impose it on others
Great, now I gotta go.look up puppy videos.
Not him but you keep responding to arguments with illogical nonsense and you're way too sure of yourself
You type like you're trying unsuccessfully to sound smart.
Yeah, uhh, it's ya boy Vee Dongle here. Uhh. Yeah. I got da I-Q. You got da Q_Q. I go take names, you play vidya-games. Uh. Yeah. You lay in bed, imma sage your thread. Damn right. Peace out.
I'm not denying the measurement of IQ, I'm denying the idea that your IQ has an meaningful effect on your life
this sounds like something coming from a kid who just discovered Yea Forums
>Reminder that Notch is a certified member of MENSA
Considering MENSA literally means idiot (female) in taco, I don't think it's anything to be proud of.
Nobody said it's fake, but knowing your IQ is hardly going to change a person's life. If anything it may cause a person to decide that they are either too dumb to improve themselves, or too smart to listen to other people.
Fun fact; Unintelligent people will usually believe that things that exceed their own ability are "illogical" or "nonsensical". Now, that might not be the case here, but when you merely make such proclamations without making any attempt to correct or elaborate on your rationale you just make yourself look like a moron that failed to keep up. I'd much rather actually stand corrected that have someone sperg out about things not making sense and having that be their entire post.
>and you're way too sure of yourself
Hah, you do realize overconfidence is probably one of the last traits you'd find in someone autistic, right? It's also not confidence you're seeing, it's being totally unaffected by unconvincing drivel like "it's nonsense" which has no actual rationale by which it can be judged.
I've tried to explain things to you but you aren't interested in listening, and you're making replies that are completely nonsensical so they're impossible to argue with. And autistic people are overconfident all the fucking time
>I'm denying the idea that your IQ has an meaningful effect on your life
Are you honestly denying that being more intelligent will improve your life?
Well, it turns out we've done quite some research on that.
tandfonline.com
>Our analysis shows that the early measured IQ is a relatively good predictor of life success in terms of objective indicators.
psycnet.apa.org
>I've tried to explain things to you but you aren't interested in listening,
Remind me where you did this. There are several people in this thread and there has been a lack of what you claim to have done here. A claim such as "you aren't interested in listening" when I have generally addressed every point raised, just comes off as "you disagree with me, how dare you!"
>and you're making replies that are completely nonsensical so they're impossible to argue with.
You mean literally like this claim? This claim is completely devoid of rationale, sense or argumentation. How on earth do you expect anyone to respond to this? "oh some random fuckwit told me I made no sense guess that changes... something?"
>And autistic people are overconfident all the fucking time
I have no idea where this claim comes from or what it's based on, but it has nothing to do with any of the diagnostic criteria for autism (many of which render overconfidence highly unlikely if not impossible) This just sounds like you made your own special definition of autism that can aptly be summarized as "people with traits I don't like"
It also lowers the standards for games user
Your post proved you're a LARPing retard.
>play FIFA with dad
>have to let him win so he doesn't scream
As a generalization over everyone IQ is a predictor of life success
For you personally? No, it's about the decisions you make and what you chose to do
As another poster pointed out, learning your IQ is more likely to make you think fatalistically which isn't going to make you any more successful
Except that's exactly the case with the homeless. Many don't even want to go to shelters because of how restricting they are, yet alone find 9-5 work that comes with a dress code, responsibilities and mandatory sobriety.
>For you personally?
NAXALT. Yes, I know there are such things as exceptions, outliers, etc.
>No, it's about the decisions you make and what you chose to do
There are no decisions. Better to say "it's all about your luck"
It's okay guys, user has proven that one of the most hotly debated topics in genetics is over.
Most homeless people are severely mentally ill. My country has extremely generous programs for them, they choose to not to use them because they're batshit insane.
This post makes absolutely no logical sense, you're replying to a correct assertion with nonsense. Either you don't know what you're talking about or you can't think properly. Most of your other posts in this thread are the same. High functioning autists are often full of themselves
>As another poster pointed out, learning your IQ is more likely to make you think fatalistically which isn't going to make you any more successful
Being delusional because you think knowing the truth will harm you is pathetic.
There is no debate over the heritability of IQ, I have never found a single study finding that IQ isn't heritable.
>Be Notch
>Make too many dollars to count
>Spend all your time tweeting about obscure music, programming challenges that dont amount to anything and math
Found a studio and make another game already you cunt. You have the cash and you obviously like coding.
>There are no decisions
So essentially you are fatalist
High IQ underachievers are extremely common
It means nothing unless you use it
And people who are "gifted" don't always have the highest IQs
>Being delusional because you think knowing the truth will harm you is pathetic.
Knowing the facts doesn't harm you, it's your interpretation of the facts that does
The post where I actually insisted that you failed to listen, you mean? How exactly does that prove that I was not interested in listening?
I made the claim earlier that vocabulary-based testing generally produces statistically reliable numbers, but the numbers are not representative of intelligence. To make this a majority of an intelligence test makes the test look more consistent and reliable, but the actual data is less about intelligence itself, and more about baseline retention and exposure. Both are relevant to intelligence, but not entirely reflective of it.
You completely ignored this, and insisted on what you had said before, showing you had no intention of actually listening and addressing the arguments made against you, instead preferring to just proclaim anything contrary to your views as "nonsense".
>There is no debate over the heritability of IQ, I have never found a single study finding that IQ isn't heritable.
I scholar'd it and within the first page I found at least 2 papers saying that they thought the concept was weak and other ideas should be better explored, 1 that doubted the entire model of heritability we use, etc.
Maybe try not being an academialet?
notch is a perfect example of what those buddhists faggots were rambling on about, it doesn't matter how much material wealth you have if you can't even find inner peace. imagine, literally imagine being notch. I will never have a fraction of his money but have a better life than he will ever have because I'm not braincucked
>So essentially you are fatalist
No, there doesn't need to be destiny for there to be no such thing as a human decision.
It's very plain to see that there are no decisions. There isn't an ideological point-of-view issue on this, just think about it logically for half a second.
Your "decision" is not an event that takes place within your inviolate soul. Your "decision" is an electron migrating across a synapse. We can trace the path of that electron back to the first thing that happened. There can freely be "true random" events along that path, like electron shell valence randomness, and that doesn't give you a decision. You have no decision whether events are predestined or not.
What you found were not "studies" or even "meta-studies", they were 'papers' - aka "We are going to spitball and talk about how IQ is racist or something, but we have no objective facts."
>There isn't an ideological point-of-view issue on this, just think about it logically for half a second.
The argument you're making is entirely philosophical, not logical, you're arguing in favour of fatalism or determinism
>Makes no logical sense
Why not? Surely if you are so sure of this fact you can provide the reasons for you believing so.
Allow me to rephrase, just for you;
-Read the actual quote in full rather than emphasizing one particular term, context is important
-Don't just pick out one word and act like it is more meaningful than all the others, context is important
-You are too focused on being "right" that you've stopped taking in new information entirely
>High functioning autists are often full of themselves
Another empty claim with no substance. Is this something you know to be true? Why? Or is it simply something you wish to believe because you can use it to call people names when you think they're being full of themselves?
>www.thesun.co.uk
>proof
I just explained to you in practical, non-philosophical, physical terms how I'm right, and how my argument is not related to either fatalism or determinism.
SEETHING FIFAMONKEYS
Making a statement about free-will or decision making using terms like soul is a completely philosophical statement to make and has nothing to do with logic. If you don't understand how you're being fatalistic you need to think about what you're saying some more
>get absolutely destroyed in a logical debate by objective facts
>steer conversation to meaningless philosophical drivel
>declare that the other guy can't be a winner because muh philosophy
The absolute state of IQ deniers
I said that it DOESN'T have anything to do with a soul. Why do you argue like this?
>Your "decision" is not an event that takes place within your inviolate soul. Your "decision" is an electron migrating across a synapse.
So then why is he so fucking stupid?
True test of intelligence is not to join MENSA if you could. Literally the place for insecure nerds that siphons your money like scientology.
>Why not?
How the fuck can I logically explain your own lack of logic? I don't know what the fuck is going on in your head. Your replies make no sense.
>not playing FIFA
>not wanting the chance to insult your favourite players when you want and not just during games
yikes
I didn't deny IQ
>I said that it DOESN'T have anything to do with a soul
Which is making a claim about a soul, ie. you don't make decisions, you don't have free will, we live in a fatalistic universe
Maybe you are the stupid one. Have you ever asked yourself that question?
I understand why people spit on mobile game, but why are competitive sport games considered lesser games?
Is it just because they're mainstream?
You're retarded. I might as well be discussing the Internet to a kenyan tribesman.
PES 2019 > FIFA 2019
You're as bad as the dark matter fanatics I work with who still can't muster up even the most basic prediction despite insisting for decades that it's totally there.
Where's your falsifiability bro?
It has nothing to do with fatalism whatsoever. I don't know why you keep mindlessly repeating that word, like a teddy bear you're clinging to for comfort in dark times.
There is very little going on in a sports game.
You're repeating the essential philsophy of determinism without even understanding you're doing so. If you're interested in it you might want to read up on it
>if you don't believe Q-user you're stupid
lol
>Where's your falsifiability bro?
The claim "IQ is genetically heritable" can EASILY be falsified simply be commissioning studies and those studies finding that IQ is not linked to heritage.
Unfortunately, we did commission those studies, they all found that it IS in fact linked. (see )
Did you just learn about falsifiability and think you could throw it out in any scientific argument for a default win?
Determinism isn’t so much a philosophy as the most evidenced theory for human action there is. Dualism has only gotten less and less probable the more scientific discoveries we amass.
i thought he managed some projects.
With billions i either made my dream game or expressed myself other way or did nothing and enjoyed life.
It has nothing to do with determinism. Determinism does not allow for things like true randomness. This will be my last reply, sorry.
>It's very plain to see that there are no decisions
>Fatalism generally refers to any of the following ideas:
>The view that we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do.
because nerds generally don't like sports and people who play sports games usually only play sports games
Everyone browsing Yea Forums has above average IQ. This is why we are so autistic. No matter if you are a /pol/bro or discord tranny bro we all should spit on the low IQ subhumans below (aka normies).
Notch is a racist incel
Id pay Instagram thots to let me poop on them and shitpost on my computer all day. That’s about it.
If it pisses people off then yes
Broken Sword is one of the best adventure-games out there what the fuck?
>How the fuck can I logically explain your own lack of logic?
Is this a genuine question or are you just pretending to be retarded? Here's what you do; You read the text in front of you. You interpret the text. Something in the text causes it to make no sense to you, this is usually a contradiction or lack of substance. Now, you determine the text makes no sense, you make the claim and include the fact that there was, for example, a contradiction or whatever other problem you found. The idea that "nonsense" or a "lack of logic" exists in such a way that it cannot logically be explained is retarded, and only demonstrates that it is not a lack of logic in the text, but a lack of intelligence by the reader, that causes the problem.
>Your replies make no sense.
Repeatedly making empty claims despite being corrected on this very act repeatedly is what truly makes no sense here. What on earth do you hope to achieve by repeatedly doing something you know is at best pointless?
I also appreciate how you just picked out that one part of the post and ignored the rest. Adorable, but all you're doing is proving you're an idiot.
>people who play sports games usually only play sports games
Source?
I googled fatalism just now and here's what popped up.
>fa·tal·ism
>noun
>the belief that all events are predetermined and therefore inevitable.
This is not my argument at all. Never once did I say "all events are predetermined and inevitable". If you go re-read my post () you'll see that I specifically said they do not necessarily need to be predetermined, specifically because retards like you think I'm talking about determinism.
>Your "decision" is an electron migrating across a synapse. We can trace the path of that electron back to the first thing that happened. >>>>>>>>>>>>>There can freely be (determinism-destroying) "true random" events along that path, like electron shell valence randomness
He has more money than you will ever have and also higher IQ.
but babies age fast, shouldnt this have opposite effect or something? I mean its not logical.
i'll literally just invest in property, rent them out to yuppies and live a vacation life fueled by their rent money
>It's not a philsophy because I believe it's true
>Determinism does not allow for things like true randomness
Strong determinism isn't the only classification of determinism
my ass obviously
anyway I know lots of people who don't play a lot, they have a PS4 with FIFA, NBA and maybe a racing game
He might be celibate but there’s no way thousands of sluts and roasties haven’t thrown themselves at him by now. Nothing involuntary about it.
If you are going to put forth something evidenced as “only a philosophy”, then we will also refer to mathematics as a philosophy, as it technically is. Are you going to dismiss mathematics?
>Strong determinism isn't the only classification of determinism
I really don't care about the semantics. Determinism is the belief that the universe follows a rigid, pre-determined course. Trying to say "oh, but if there are constant random events at the subatomic level that change the predetermined course, t-that's still WEAK determinism" is just retarded.
So the people who don’t like sports games are all fatfucks right?
Then I would say you were being fatalistic but not deterministic
>the belief that all events are predetermined and therefore inevitable.
is determinism
>The view that we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do.
Is fatalism
>>The view that we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do.
Is fatalism
But that isn't the definition of fatalism. You made that up just now, to avoid being wrong. Lol.
Google says:
>fa·tal·ism
>noun
>the belief that all events are predetermined and therefore inevitable.
Wikipedia says:
>Fatalism is a philosophical doctrine that stresses the subjugation of all events or actions to destiny.
you'd be surprised at how many fat soccer nerds stream FIFA in europe
I mean if you are determined to follow a set path, you ARE powerless to do otherwise. I suppose there’s an argument to be made that “powerlessness” is more an emotional state than a physical one, but at that point the distinction between determinism and fatalism is a feeling you carry when looking at the facts.
I guess so. I don’t see how sports games aren’t real games though
I can't believe I just spent like ten posts explaining to a guy why he's a retard and he still doesn't get it and will walk away thinking he was correct.
The peasants should never have been given the gift of literacy.
>You made that up just now, to avoid being wrong
It was the first sentence from Wikipedia. The Google definition you're posting is more akin to determinism, of which they are very similar. You should research the subject before discussing it
Math is provable, the way humans make decisions isn't
Yes, just like being a sports fan inherently makes you skinny. Any time I see a fat person I think "Why not just like football, you'd be skinnier".
well they are
sadly licensing basically imposes yearly releases and prohibits competition
I literally posted the first sentence from Wikipedia, which is:
>>Fatalism is a philosophical doctrine that stresses the subjugation of all events or actions to destiny.
Source: en.wikipedia.org
So, you're a fucking liar. Stop posting.
>Dimash Adilet
this reads like a fanfic wtf
Played FIFA once a few years ago, it was the most boring shit on the planet
>Fatalism is a philosophical doctrine that stresses the subjugation of all events or actions to destiny.
>Fatalism generally refers to any of the following ideas:
>The view that we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do.[1] Included in this is that humans have no power to influence the future, or indeed, their own actions.[2] This belief is very similar to predeterminism.
alright, third sentence
what are you trying to prove here?
>sadly licensing basically imposes yearly releases
Why? I thought it was the publishers greed that imposed yearly releases.
>Math is provable, the way humans make decisions isn't
of course it is. the human brain can be deconstructed and all processes within it can be mathematically quantified and "proven". we can observe the electrical signal that is passed between neurons when you make a `````decision''''
```decisions''' are not magic, you retard, they're physics. you have no magical soul
>what are you trying to prove here?
That you just tried to lie, I called you on it, and then you admitted that you lied?
Go lie somewhere else, I'm done talking to you.
What the fuck do you mean “the way humans make decisions isn’t provable”, as far as any study that has ever been done into human brains is concerned, making decisions is a purely physical process, and if it’s a ohysical process it can be traced and studied. Sure, theoretically, it can be found in the future that the electrical spark that is a “decision” emerges from nowhere to follow a seemingly random path, but I don’t think that’ll be the case.
licenses are expensive and if they miss a year someone may take an exclusive contract in their place
>the human brain can be deconstructed and all processes within it can be mathematically quantified and "proven"
unproven
>```decisions''' are not magic, you retard, they're physics. you have no magical soul
a loaded sentence obviously but also unproven
you need to learn to seperate facts from theories
u mad bro?
>THE SUN
LMAO
>MY BABY IS POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL
>I USED TO BE A MILLIONAIRE, BUT NOW I SUCK OFF DOGS FOR QUAVERS
I "lied" because I said it was the first sentence instead of the third sentence, like it makes a difference?
>as far as any study that has ever been done into human brains is concerned, making decisions is a purely physical process
that is completely wrong
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>Me have soul. Me decisions are not electrical processes in my brain, me decisions are magical events in me soul :)
All evidence we have currently amassed points to determinism. Sure, we haven’t done an extensive simulated test on vivisected brains, at least I don’t think we ave yet, but the writing is on the wall.
>All evidence we have currently amassed points to determinism
Most does, but quantum mechanics doesn't
>that is completely wrong
Really, someone scientifically found evidence that hints at the existence of a soul? Can I see it, that’s exciting news.
Not determinism. Behaviors of subatomic particles are "truly random" as far as we can tell. They randomly fluctuate positions, and they randomly flluctuate in and out of existence. Stop calling this determinism under any name, because it isn't-events are not predetermined. But without determinism we still have no decision.
They dont know the inverse
>notch dabbing on BR's
fucking based
>Really, someone scientifically found evidence that hints at the existence of a soul?
Did I say that? You're saying that because there's no evidence for A then B must be true.
Also, this is only a little bit related, but does anyone else find it slightly odd that many physical laws of the universe seem as though they exist to make the universe more interesting? It's as if someone is running a simulation and they kept restarting the simulation to add more laws, because previous runs were too boring.
>Stuff just floats apart and doesn't interact! Ugh! Time to make things attracted to other things. We will call it gravity
>Fuck! The first sentient civilization just flew around the universe and conquered everything within a few thousand years! Time to add a universal speed-limit. Since light automatically travels at the speed limit, they will call it the speed-of-light, but it's actually just a speed cap built to avoid instant mass colonization of the universe. This laws allows varied civilizations and forms of life to exist.
>Ah, shit! Since everything depends on physical processes, our simulation is pre-determined from the start! OK, we'll make subatomic particles truly-randomly fluctuate so that we can't see the ending of the simulation from the beginning.
>People who care about their IQ are losers
- Stephen Hawking
But we have evidence for A and no evidence for B, and you just told me that we have evidence for something other than A which must be evidence for B as B is an incredibly wide classification of possibilities that basically just mean “not A”
If "decisions" are not physical processes, electrical currents passing within the structures of your brain or otherwise mathematically quantifiable things, what are they?
What can decisions be that isn't mathematically quantifiable? You are arguing for a soul, you're just too retarded to see it. God, you're retarded. I hate you for thinking your 90 IQ thoughts matter.
I think 30 dollar DLC would do just fine instead of full 60 dollar game every year, that slightly updates the roster and adds half a feature...
Good think the only sports game I occasionally play is wrestling. Otherwise I might be unhappy with how they do things.
>just because there’s no EVIDENCE for magic doesn’t mean mathematics is true!
People who care about what Stephen Hawking said are losers.
And they also only care because they know he has a high IQ.
Kind of funny, isn't it?
- user
I said we have no evidence for A. We know absolutely fuck-all about humans make decisions, from a scientific perspective. I didn't put forth any evidence about a soul
But we have more evidence for A than any other approach. He have pbserved and catalogued our decision making processes, not entirely yet, but we have begun.
>People who care about what Stephen Hawking said are losers.
Do you know who Stephen Hawking is, user?
I'm not arguing for a soul, I'm arguing against pretending like we understand how thoughts work, because we don't. Funny how you call me stupid yet you jump to the conclusion that if it's not deterministic then we must have a "soul" (whatever your idea of a soul is)
You are retarded.
compelling argument
>Since light automatically travels at the speed limit, they will call it the speed-of-light
I wonder, can you slow light below the speed of light?
The only method I'm aware of is by gravity, but this is kind of a spacetime illusion (light is not actually getting slower, spacetime is just getting "steeper")
Also, I know light "travels slower" through many substances, ie. water refraction, but this is also an illusion, it's really just reflecting and bouncing and being obstructed in a way that makes it appear, in aggregate, to slow down - its "true" speed doesn't change
it seems like light can't be slowed below the speedcap
Jokes on him i'm in scientology and...hold on just gotta pay the viewership fee.....there we go: they told me i have an IQ of 500 and am really really great
There nothing wrong with playing Fifa. Imagine no longer being considered a gamer for liking it?
Saying it's all time great is a different story.
>Fifa 07 though
sports games are the worst shovelware
Fucking hell guys.
If I wanted to see a bunch of retards larping about intelligence I would be browsing /sci/. Fuck off.
t. brainlet
Stop buying Fifa, OP.
It's proven that console players have lower IQs.
>NOOOO MY TWITTER SCREENCAP THREAD WHY AREN'T YOU CIRCLEJERKING WITH ME
Reddit seems more your speed.
E-celebs retards can fuck off too.
Being cucked by MENSA into membership is actually proof that you're a worthless brainlet.
I bet she's pretty smart. I mean, it is an actual IQ test, probably not up to weschler standards, but it does have a bell curve so it is some level of legitimate.
Why are there so few women?
There are not a lot of female geniuses.
Chess is segregated by sex for a reason
Yeah those grapes are probably the most sour thing in the world, who would want them anyway?
Why give him attention? Fuck off and he will die, figuratively; eventually, literally.
>The Semicolon of Underagedness and Pseudointellectualism
Hi Notch
Hello brainlet and writelet.
Are we living in a dystopia?
Pynchons my fav writer for sure because my fav thing in books is goofs, gags, jokes and rambunctious behavior, and his books are full to the brim of it. Every novel is like one of those novelty snake cans, you open the book & POP you get a face fulla snakes and you fall back cackling. The mad mind, the crack genius, to do it! and then you think hmmm whats he gonna do next, this trickster, and you pick the book back up and BZZZZZZZZZZ you get a shock and Hahahahahah you've been pranked again by the old pynchmeister, that card. "Did that Pynch?" he says, laughing yukyukyukyuk. Watch him as he shoves a pair of plastic buck teeth right up into his mouth and displays em for you- left, right, center- "you like dese? Do i look handsome???" Pulls out a mirror. "Ah!" Hand to naughty mouth. And you're on your ass again laughing as he snaps his suspenders, exits stage right, and appears again hauling a huge golden gong.
BASED
He has a billion dollars and is still young, what have you done?
His writing is a little bit "convenient", or "just so". He's writing for his point, and the content of the prose is just a means to that end. Cormac believes the end is in the means.
Notch regularly goes on Yea Forums, it's pretty likely he's shitposted in this thread. He could even be here among us right now, making a post. We must live in fear of him always.
Lamb videos are better
youtube.com
Yeah, when your arbitrary number is backed up by a lifetime of achievement people tend to respect that.
When your arbitrary number is backed by a speshul club that you pay annually to be a member of people laugh at you.
Speak for yourself. I'd constantly be traveling nonstop.
>If you don't play nerdy JRPGs, then you don't game right!
Mensa in beaner means stupid so it's obviously for stupid people
spanish isn't a real language
it's the sissy twink boy version of English, the chad language
I'm pretty sure he's making a diss at the switch library.
Yeah well Cormac doesn't have any goofs, gags and wacky behaviour? Does Corspack Retardthy buzzz your hand like a naughty snake in the grass? NO! Does he tickle your funny bone with his serpentine tongue? NO!
>I'd constantly be traveling nonstop.
thats what poor people say
it gets boring after a while, like most things
you know what?
you're right.
cormac doesn't have that.
all he has are brook trout in the streams in the mountains. You could see them standing in the amber current where the white edges of their fins wimpled softly in the flow. They smelled of moss in your hand. Polished and muscular and torsional. On their backs were vermiculate patterns that were maps of the world in its becoming. Maps and mazes. Of a thing which could not be put back. Not be made right again. In the deep glens where they lived all things were older than man and they hummed of mystery.
and that's not enough to measure up to pynchon the gag master.
Maybe in my downtime I would, otherwise it's drugs and orgies all fucking weekend long m8
I would build my dream house, some sort of hobbit hole-esque arrangement, or maybe an underwater thing. Then I'd just chillax to the max in there. Fuck travelling. And fuck a McMansion.
you mong, scoring incredibly high on validated IQ tests makes you smart.
>On their backs were vermiculate patterns that were maps of the world in its becoming. Maps and mazes. Of a thing which could not be put back. Not be made right again.
DEPENDENT CLAUSES USED INDEPENDENTLY! LOL WHAT A SHIT WRITER
THIS GUY WOULD HAVE FAILED MY 4TH GRADE ENGLISH CLASS! EXPOSED
>“Listen to me, Defecates-with-Pigeons. Long before any of you came here, we dream'd of you. All the people, even Nations far to the South and the West, dreamt you before ever we saw you,— we believ'd that you came from some other World, or the Sky. You had Powers and we respected them. Yet you never dream'd of us, and when at last you saw us, wish'd only to destroy us. Then the killing started,— some of you, some of us,— but not nearly as many as we'd been expecting. You could not be the Giants of long ago, who would simply have wip'd us away, and for less. Instead, you sold us your Powers,— your Rifles,— as if encouraging us to shoot at you,— and so we did, tho' not hitting as many of you, as you were expecting. Now you begin to believe that we have come from elsewhere, possessing Powers you do not— Those of us who knew how, have fled into Refuge in your Dreams, at last. Tho' we now pursue real lives no different at their Hearts from yours, we are also your Dreams.”
That's EXACTLY what I would do too. Based Notch.
You arent playong Hexen so I know you arent a real gamer.
>being this retarded
us.mensa.org
$79 a year buys you the right to call yourself a member of MENSA and to attend 'gatherings' with other retail workers and starving artists who would describe themselves as "smart, but lazy"
Most members of MENSA are pretty well-off, hence why $79 a year is not much to them in exchange for connections to other geniuses.
That dead fucker could say that because he got pampered all his life, got all his shit paid for, basically lived in luxury from start to end and never had to go through any hardships by virtue of his status as a cripple.
I assume that the reason people join Mensa is for validation since it's hard to fit in when you're significantly more intelligent than the mean. I wouldn't do it myself if only because it costs money (last I checked I'm 97th percentile), but I can see why people would.
>Those of us who knew how, have fled into Refuge in your Dreams, at last. Tho' we now pursue real lives no different at their Hearts from yours, we are also your Dreams.”
wat
>Based notch btfoing nintendies
lmfao
>That dead fucker could say that because he got pampered all his life, got all his shit paid for, basically lived in luxury from start to end and never had to go through any hardships by virtue of his status as a cripple.
lol you don't know shit you jelly motherfucker
incoming shitchlets COPE
Yes, I'm sure it's full of geniuses that have lots of connections, and are great to talk to.
Of course a demographic of genisues will be filled with socially retarded people. When you're smarter than everyone around you it's impossible to make friends as a child. Being different in any way prevents that.
smart but lazy is a real thing
smart people more easily anticipate failure and thus don't try
smart people more easily realize the game is rigged and resign from it
Then why don't you use your brain to get around that, genius?
Right, it couldn't be that only social autists are retarded enough to pay to be a member of a "smart people" club. It's definitely not that anyone who's truly smart doesn't need the validation of some fraudulent group.
No, the smart people are just socially retarded because the normies can't in2 them.
>mods defending sony
pppffffff
You can't get around the mathematical fact of being different from others. I guess you can pretend to not be different, but that's no recipe for healthy social interaction, having to pretend all the time.
Nope, this is what a lot of "real gamers" actually say. They run as far away they can from games that are popular with the people that picked on them in school like they are infested with AIDS.
>still needs hookers to get laid
Oh no no no
Or maybe you're just not as smart as you think, autistic brainlet
because friendship is usually based on geniune connection and not just manipulating other people unless you're a sociopath
If you're fucking a girl, you're paying her one way or another. Whether it's food, shelter, alimony, or a one-time hooker fee, you're paying her somehow. The hooker contract is just more honest.
How does that have anything to do with what I said? I never even said anything about myself.
>difficulty expressing any personal warmth; the only emotion I ever encountered was naked aggression
So basically you don't need to join Mensa when you can just post on Yea Forums
Jesus user, channel that bullying more why don't you.
If you can only genuinely connect with people over complicated math problems you're pretty autistic and the others are not the problem.
Who said anything about connecting over math problems? You don't understand at all.
Okay, my mistake, maybe they're just not as smart as you think then.
No, you don't understand that it is not their intelligence that keeps them from connecting with others. Their social retardation is a separate issue.
Maybe you're inadequate and the adequacy of others makes you angry?
it seems you're the one that doesn't understand.
An intelligent person is more than their IQ. Anyone who was actually smart would realise how easy it is to find the lowest common denominator and use that to socialise. If they can't, then they're socially retarded and it's not because of the other people.
Their social retardation is a direct result of their intelligence. A genius child matures at a completely different rate from other children. It would be like you, a 20 year old, trying to have meaningful discussions with a 5-year-old. You would feel isolated in a society of 5 year olds, not because you are bad at socialization (in objective terms, a genius is good at everything, including socialization) but you're drastically different from those around you.
>A genius child matures at a completely different rate from other children
Yeah, normal kids tend to mature faster while "genius" kids remain emotionally infantile into their adult lives
OK, I guess you have convinced yourself you're a dumbass (which is pathetic, even if you really are dumb) and you'll live the rest of your life with a kind of political dumbass-flag-waving hatred against smart people.
Have fun with that, I guess.
>A genius child matures at a completely different rate from other children.
I know from personal experience. But, not being completely autistic in addition to being of above average intelligence, I did learn to socialise eventually.
But it is their inadequacy we are discussing.
The envy is palpable. Sorry you were born average, kiddo.
This thread has convinced me that the janitor team doesn't actually browse Yea Forums, and only do a cursory scan of the front page.
Who cares. Height looks and charisma matter not iq. And I've got him beat in all 3.
There are only 2 janitors, the rest of them were killed by shitposts.
You have no idea how much shitposting they have to fight. There are organized shitpost-commando squads.
Poor things.
So where's your 1.5 billion dollars at the age of 32?
that´s fine i´m a spic you know
playing a game in the hardest dificulty can turn you into a gamer
I was put into all the gifted classes at school, but people who are over-developed intelligently tend to be under-developed emotionally, and that's mostly because they're autists and not because they're just different and people don't like them
>and that's mostly because they're autists and not because they're just different and people don't like them
What are you basing this on?
Could you imagine being so boring that you have to scan social media to find something to discuss on a board about video games. Yikes.
personal experience
Oh, what's wrong? Does the truth hurt?
If you think that's bullying, then you have clearly led a pretty good life and I'm proud for you on that. Just know that most of the real world isn't this happy place like the community you have lived in is.
and of course, anecdotes are what all gifted scientists base their research and claims on.
And in your personal experience as a gifted person, were you exactly the same as all other students and they liked you? I'm guessing you had great, level conversations with them? The same things interested you as interested them?
I guess so, I mainly browse /tg/ and the mods there are actually really good. Guess it comes with being a medium sized board - too large to be a one man cult of the personality, and too niche to draw in the scum. /pol/ have tried, but so far have been very successfully repelled.
And to safeguard myself - boy oh yes ok golly I like football simulation games
The last I heard of the /tg/ mod team it was one autist who literally ruled it as a dictator.
I guess dictatorship has its merits though
based
give em the pynch
>gay was going away
That rhetoric.
So this is the power of MENSA..
yeah with something that literally applies to every single human being like intelligence and the fact that I've met thousands of people I'd say it's a good sample size
I always had friends, I've felt different from other people, but so do most people in some way or another and I never felt like my intelligence seperated me from others
OK, looks like you were an outlier, because your experiences don't reflect those of other geniuses, most of whom report feeling isolated during childhood for exactly the reasons I explained. No one has ever said outliers like you don't exist, and that's why a sample size of 1 (what you're working with) is not good enough to form a conclusion.
Not that guy, but I have a nuerological condition which means I have indicators of a sub 40 IQ in mathematical areas and an 150 in linguistic. I focus so much on words that it gets tiring having long periods of social interaction and occasionally get viscerally mad at the slightest verbal slight. You don't get to get really smart without being a tard. The worst part is that there is a lot of understanding in society for a actually autist, while I, who suffers from what is essentially the inverse, have to really fight with my uni for exam concessions. You will never know the pain of being unable to do the twelve times tables within a reasonable timeframe at age 20+.
>sub 40
You perform calculations worse than some dogs?
Dude, I get it you were hurt and you want to project that pain here but just understand that
1) No one cares here
2) It's not going to make you feel better.
>genius
what the fuck is a genius? a high IQ person? High IQ doesn't mean you have no friends. Being an autist or having another emotional impairment does. That doesn't neccessarily mean you're intelligent either. Most people with high IQs have friends just like other normal people, they just have a higher tendency towards autism
I might have something like this. I've never had an IQ test, but there was some kind of vocabulary test every year where I kept testing in the top 0.01%. I also am borderline retarded at simple math and don't know my multiplication tables. At some kinds of math I'm really good though, but I honestly don't know enough about math to say what separates the kind I'm retarded at from the kind I'm good at.
Don't you need to reach a certain IQ Benchmark in order to actually join Mensa? I had a friend in school who was tested by them (for whatever reason, I can't quite remember why) and he managed to just about qualify while testing for an IQ of 150. It absolutely is a scam, of course, and he didn't join them, but the members are likely to be intelligent regardless.
>what the fuck is a genius? a high IQ person?
Yeah
>High IQ doesn't mean you have no friends.
It usually does, for reasons already explained (being drastically different from others as a child)
Hope this helps
The human brain must be specialized. If you have a wide array of expertise in one area, you have to sacrifice others. If not for constraints o space, for constraints of time.
low iq post
>For you personally? No, it's about the decisions you make and what you chose to do
And the decisions you make and what you choose to do are pretty fucking relevant to how intelligent you are.
You can also just be wicked fucking smart at everything, because your brain is just wired really, really well.
See: Von Neumann
The biggest, smarterest brain in the world is still finite, brainlet.
>It usually does, for reasons already explained (being drastically different from others as a child)
No it doesn't. Having high IQ doesn't make you drastically different either. Most people with high intelligence are just normal like everyone else, they even like stupid shit like sports. You can tell yourself you're a loner because you're smart but it's probably just because you're autistic instead
Yes - my backwards digit recall struggles beyond 3
You'd know if you have it, I wasn't joking about the tard part.
>Having high IQ doesn't make you drastically different either
haha
Is there any subject of discussion more tainted by jealousy and bitterness than the subject of human intelligence?
>1.5bil isn't enough for the rest of your life.
Dick size
Dick size, see these pathetic wh*t bois wanna diss a nigga fo havin a slug whils deys gots a worm lmao by sayin wez dum or sum shit
Current BoTW threads on Yea Forums.
They're all made by people who either hate the game or are jealous of it but can't play it.
It can, but so can low IQ. You'd be surprised how many people there are who seem totally normal who have really high IQs
Income/success in life? Thought it's correlated with intelligence anyway
DIS SO MUH DIS
BIX NOOD WHEAH MY CHECK BEEAT
BotW...?
Anyone with a PC can play it. It runs extremely well on emulator now. 240fps at 4k, if you have a new processor.
Not in Hateno Town though, tanks there
You're under the assumption that pcfags make up the majority of this board
It works everywhere, it "tanks" from maybe 240fps to 200fps? Just like on the switch.
Damn, Notch looks like that?!
Those billionaires have access to some killer plastic surgery.
Oh no I'm not saying it's bad on pc, only have two complaints
- emulation method prevents selective culling in towns vs open field, so you get slowdown and pop-in currently
- no mod to replace motion control shrines with blessing onds
but what if being trans pisses people off
does that make trans people based too
Yo notch if your reading this youre an autistic faggot who got lucky copying one of the simplest and oldest game designs in a time plagued without it. Your opinions and taste in games are trash, and you yourself come off as an absolute faggot. Hopefully all the whining about be rich and loney pays off and you neck yourself.
Nah I'm good mate