Seven mainline entry series

>seven mainline entry series
>only one is bad
What other series have done this?

Attached: 220px-Resident_Evil_1_cover.png (220x331, 144K)

Which one is the bad one?

Attached: RE2_Sept_Ada_png_jpgcopy-1.jpg (2505x1469, 236K)

Zelda (BOTW is bad)
Metroid (Other M is Bad)
FF6-FF10 (FF8 is Bad)
Super Mario (Bros 2 is bad)

6. 5 gets shit on for having even more over the top action than 4 while taking itself too serious but I honestly find the gameplay just as satisfying as 4's. 6 is an absolute chore. QTEs in all three can suck a dick, however.

Which games is bad? 5 or 6?
Ds zeldas are terrible and so is the second game and maybe skyward sword.

>FF6-FF10 (FF8 is Bad)

FF8 is the game you pick out of this lineup as being bad? hoo boy

6. 5 is retarded but fun. 6 is just retarded except it's merc mode which is the only reason I still have it installed

Skyward Sword isn't bad it's just not that great for a Zelda game

Yeah, it's okay. Characters are very fun though.

Meh, RE6 was pretty fun too.

What's bad about 6? It played just like 5.

RE6 was better than RE5

Attached: repe.jpg (719x719, 62K)

>Zelda (BOTW is bad)
Disagree. Didn't think Spirit Tracks was good at all and I found SS was mediocre, but I thought BoTW was pretty good.
>Super Mario (Bros 2 is bad)
USA or Japan?

Sounds like botw if you ask me

>it played just like 5
Fucking how

I think the only objectively bad ones are 6 and Survivor

Attached: 1530084734806.gif (250x250, 15K)

It's played the same, end of the story. And both of the games play like 3, except mate characters being introduced.

>both games played like 3
Now I've heard everything.

Attached: Thom-Yorke-and-Yoda.jpg (300x400, 19K)

I meant 4, i fucked up.

Code: Veronica is mainline and if you say otherwise I will fuck your asshole so raw you'll beg me to marry you.

-Zelda (Skyward is bad)
-Metroid (other M)
-MGS (peace walker)
-Xeno (xenosaga II)
-God of War (ascension)

in terms of FPS, I'd say
Quake, only 4 is bad honestly, i don't think Champions or Live count
Wolfenstein, if one is bad, then it's 2009, which was ok for me
Call of Duty, I'd say Ghost is the lowest point or maybe Blops 4, but the first ones even up to Blops are highly competent FPS games, sure, nothing that pushed the genre, but they are mediocre to good at what they do. And 3 was great for it's time, I'd say it has one of the best singleplayers
I would say Halo, but the last 2 dropped the ball, I think Reach was actually good desu

>MGS
PW was great, or maybe mediocre at worst if you really don't like it. Not bad whatsoever. V is what was really godawful though and what I entered this thread to say.

>4 - tanky 3rd person shooter where you fight a sparce amount of meticulously placed enemies in wide open areas
>5 - same thing but a more restrictive inventory system and more vertical level design.
>6 - 3rd person run and gun horde shooter as leon, GOW if you're Chris, mix of the the previous two as Jake
I guess Ada is the closest to 4

hell no, PW is fucking awful. It's everything about V but way, way worse (except empty open world)

>implying RE4 isn't overhyped dogshit
I was genuinely offended when I played this after seeing all the good reviews. Sure it was "pioneering" the third person shooter but aside from that it was just shit.
>Brown hallway after brown hallway
>no interesting areas to explore
>tank controls in a fucking 6th gen game
>Ashley's segment is just a glorified escort mission
fuck this game.

>Brown hallway after brown hallway
You did not play this game