Is Nintendo worse than Activision at rehashing the same shit year after year?
Is Nintendo worse than Activision at rehashing the same shit year after year?
Nintendo makes Activision look pro-consumer but don't tell that to Yea ForumstendoGAF.
Nintendo became a Zelda-only machine after the N64
Even F-zero and starfox only exist thanks to Sega and Namco
nintendo is literally the scummiest most jewish shekel hoarding company in the industry but people don't care because "m-m-muh pure wholesome nintendo can do no wrong!"
Their cultish fanbase is so delusional. They have a literal snake oil salesman spouting blatant lies every interview and Nintenfags turn him into an object of worship.
>2005
>2009
>2012
>2012
>the last one was an expansion pack in 2013
I guess that's the same as games every year.
but their games are good
How does this excuse them? The only difference is that you wait a few years extra for the rehashed game instead of getting it annually.
Haha, yeah, who can forget the lootboxes with objectively better weapons in them in all those nintendo gam- oh wait, FUCK
>capitalism is scummy jewery
You guys got some serious cognitive dissonance
Is the DS game good?
haha no. People THINK their games are good because even suggesting that nintendo makes bad games is so unbelievably sinful that you'd have to be genuinely insane to even have the thought
I don't remember much about the DS one, but U is the best 2D Mario since World.
The only reason that hasn't happened in Nintendo games yet is because they're too technically inept in doing so. They already made a huge business ripping off kids selling Pokemon cards in the 90's. They're no strangers to this business. It's like when Nintenfags said Nintendo would never do DLC but then it was just a matter of them actually catching up with how to implement it. Or paid online.
>goalposts: moved
Reminder, the OP specifically states "YEAR AFTER YEAR", not "time and again".
Even then, you still wouldn't have a point. Acti's most famous rehash series is Call Duty which hasn't seen a formula shakeup in over 15 years. Black Ops 1 looks the exact same as Black Ops 4.
>Call of Duty (2003)
>Call of Duty 2 (2005)
>Call of Duty 3 (2006)
>Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)
>Call of Duty: World at War (2008)
>Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2009)
>Call of Duty: Black Ops (2010)
>Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (2011)
>Call of Duty: Black Ops II (2012)
>Call of Duty: Ghosts (2013)
>Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014)
>Call of Duty: Black Ops III (2015)
>Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare (2016)
>Call of Duty: WWII (2017)
>Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 (2018)
nice syllogism retard
if people want it what is there to excuse. The OP is claiming its annual, it isn't
Why are So(n)yggers so insufferably autistic? You don't see PCbros and Nintenfags going around spamming circlejerk threads about Sony censorship and they're grubby marketing tactics
NSMB was good when it came out, it's horrible now
NSMB2 was shit as it revolved around a gimmick that added nothing. Was also the first Nintendo game with DLC
NSMBW was great.
Didn't play the Wii U games
what is this post supposed to prove?
Does this somehow excuse nintendos lack of creativity?
CoD has the excuse of annual release. Nintendo doesn't even have that excuse. They're just lazy and low-budget. Like how their new Pokemon game still looks like 3DS leftovers.
shut up commie
I pay for NSO. It was worth it just to play Tetris99.
I mena, no 3D mario game has been the same. OP's image cherrypicsk 1-1 of every game and ignore the aspects that are different
>Is Nintendo worse than Activision at rehashing the same shit year after year?
The answer is no.
>no 3D mario game has been the same
hmm yes so many variations of jumping on ledges and collecting coins, so innovative!
Stop moving goalposts you literally soýniggers. Fuck the hell off. OP states "year after year". We aren't talking about quality of the game (NSMB series is dogshit btw, SMW is and always will be the best 2D Mario) you fucken retards. KYS doubletime.
Ya know those games had better sales then the bigger titles that took more work like Super Mario Galaxy, right?
what an absolutely moronic post
>year after year implies annual
It doesn't. It just means that Nintendo's trash remains the same year after year.
>NSMB 1-5 had new levels
>NSMB 6 isn't new, it's just 4 and 5 on a different console
I love how salty nintendo makes people.
yep. Like galaxy and sunshine
or botw and Skyward sword
I love how salty Nintendo people are.
Every first party Nintendo switch game except for botw and Kirby is good.
>Galaxy and Sunshine
Mario completes simple objectives to gain an object with eyes on it. Collect enough and you can fight Bowser.
>Botw and Skyward Sword
Borderline mute man swings sword at monsters and completes simple puzzles
congratulations, you can break games down into their simplest forms
I can do that with uncharted or Halo too
>Man shoot baddies with gun to capture a macguffin
Why are ninten babbies so perpetually butthurt?
>rehashing the same shit year after year
Most of those games came out within several years of one another not back to back.
Not only that this picture is the dictionary definition of cherrypicking.
Every first world of a mario game starts with a generic grass level. You'd faggots would know this if you actually bothered to play the games.
>Every first world of a mario game starts with a generic grass level.
And then generic cave level
And then generic castle level
And then generic mountains/cloud level
LMAO SEETHING NINTENDIES! How will
nintodd EVER recover? NINTENDO
ETERNELLY BTFO LMAO COPE FAGGY COPE HARDER!! LOOK AT BOTW VS ITS TRAILER AHAHHAHA BTFO LOSER!!! AHAHAH BING FUCKING BING WAHOOOOOO
Why does Yea Forums get triggered anytime NIntendo does anything?
They are about the same as snoy. Go ahead and post the picture comparing all the Gran Turismo games, or the one comparing all the Uncharted games.
Not an argument.
Defending Jewish toy makers is hard work demanding mental gymnastics on a daily basis
More like;
>Uncharted
Developers pay homage to one of the greatest franchises of all time, Indiana Jones, with a highly-detailed adventure game that gives the Jones feeling that actual Jones games never actually provided.
>Halo
Ever wonder what the ancient Greek city-state of Sparta would be like if it existed today? Enjoy a demonstration of what it would be like if the pinnacle of human potential combined forces with the pinnacle of technological progress.
>that gives the Jones feeling that actual Jones games never actually provided.
TOMB RAIDER, YOU FUCKING SHITBAG
FUCK YOU
I don't think halo had a mcguffin
It was many years ago though.
>cherrypicsk 1-1 of every game
Did you want him to pick the Desert world, the Ice world, the Beach world, the Poison Forest world, Sky world or the Lava world instead?
Sony ponies this is your mindset
yes. Id love to see you try to make them look the same
>Indiana Jones
>incel-bait protagonist
Choose one.
fucking kill yourself, you retarded zoomer. Old lara croft was nothing like her current snowflake iteration
Old Croft was exactly like nu-Croft except with bigger boobs since incels were still in their teens at the time.
funny considering nintendo has by faar the weakest online aspect and is the closest to literally taking your money for nothing, cope seeth btfo bing bing wahoo faggot
Reminder that this was posted on Neogaf aka sonygaf, and all those posters moved over to resetera. Why snoybois refer to Yea Forums or resetera as Nintendogaf is anyone's guess.
Friendly reminder that Cuckera is a literal Nintenshill infestation site. Just lurk their Media Create threads. Exact same kind of smug posting as on Yea Forums.
Incels most often vote Democratic so that doesn't really work.
cope
>screens shows faggot on resetera is upset that people are talking about Nintendo
Thanks for proving my point.
>gets mad at Media Create threads
Now that what I call Yikes!
Its another "mentally ill Nintendo hater has to invent his own fantasy world because he can't handle Nintendo's success" thread.
What a loser lmao
While I agree with you on principal, what Nintendo has going for it is it is the primary provider of content on its own system it sells, so it literally is commanding its own supply and demand most other gaming companies are primarily just software or hardware so Nintendo is just trying to get a few smackers for its own creations, again I'm not saying its great or forward thinking just fine for them I suppose
nintendo is never at e3 dude
453063793
are you high
I mean if you compare the first call of duty to say infinite warfare it's base mechanics are similar but the games are vastly different and improved iterations of one another, Nintendo just releases the same fucking game over and over barely even improving the graphics because their such greedy lazy fuckers and they know people will buy it regardless.
>mean if you compare the first call of duty to say infinite warfare it's base mechanics are similar but the games are vastly different
And Jesus fucking Christ how they don't even put a normal controller with the console I can't believe all these other companies get scrutinized to hell with their shit but Nintendo gets a pass even though their clearly doing the same thing
And XBOX fans are too busy playing games to post
brainlet post of the day right here
if theyre different controllers every time, how is that rehashing?
Well you're right, "vastly" is an exaggeration I guess but the games do add things and at the very least the visuals are impressive enough to warrant a sequel.
the naming conventions for these are absolutely retarded
Whilst nintendo will evidently fall into lootboxes, which I think they have with their mobile games, I don't think they'll do it as blatantly idiotic and widespread as other companies like EA. That is to say, where lootboxes are implemented as a feature and not as a choice. Nintendo doesn't need lootboxes in their main title games because they can still make singleplayer games that sell well, other companies can't.
Also cross the streaming apps off the list as well as partially the voice chat peripheral thing. that one is up to the developers. Also devs are not forced to use the nintendo online paywall shit.
The stupid red and blue pieces of shit on the switch are garbage, the only controller with rumble is 70 dollars, and the rumble is shit too. Give me a break with this.
>fucking Mario rehashes
>these games look good so they deserve a sequel
that doesnt answer or address my question at all
That's one guy calling the absolute circlejerk Cuckera was having over fucking sales numbers of Nintendo games.
Super Mario Bros U is actually pretty different beyond the first world, in terms of the look of the levels. And the gameplay is great
Sony and Microsoft put a normal controller with their consoles, Nintendo can get away with forcing people to buy
A normal controller seperately because people do not call them out on their shady business practices.
they give you a console with a controller in it. They never at any point in time force you to buy another one
and that STILL isnt rehashing
>year after year
user, those 4 games over the course of 12 years on 5 different systems.
Literally this. Why do I always get some gimmicky trash controller with Nintendo when I just want a regular one? That's reason enough to hate them.
>they give you a console with a controller in it.
A subpar controller intended for casuals who like gimmicks. The real controller is $70. They don't even give you that.
>mw2 was over a decade ago
Yeah they give you a controller that is shitty, they know most people who play games will want a normal controller so they sell them separately overpriced to scum money from people.
I've been playing Mario All stars and I amazed of how differently those games feel despite being Mario games. On the other side, the other day tried to give a second chance to NSMB, which I never finished and I couldn't even finish the first ice level I left years ago because how generic andlasy it feels.
yah, and I hated my DS3 and had to buy a 3rd party one. Fuck sony, amirite?
If Sony or Microsoft tried putting some shitty third party controller with their consoles people would be calling out that immediately.
No, they're just as bad, in fact.
>Generic
but All Stars is way more generic than NSMB. NSMB is the third best 2D Mario game, people are just butthurt they didn't do corny pixelshit
This image is really outdated now with Mario Odyssey out.
Well I would say most third party controllers are poor quality.
>implying people aren't still shitting on the joycons
Do you live in a pretend world man? Yes, everyone would shit on Sony for that, just like they did and still do with Nintendo
DOHOHOHO
I disagree. Only thing wrong with it is it doesnt have that useless sixaxis shit that I only ever used in journey
bought it like 6 years ago and still works fine
Oh and Mario Odyssey is so fucking overrated holy shit, there is something so bland and boring about it. Botw is overrated too but I understand why people like it even though it's got problems.
Answer his question, you dishonest Snake!
I don't get why they ported U, this series is so derivative they could have just made a new game using the same assets they always have
because nobody bought a Wiiu
...
Their fanbase would try to think otherwise, their like a cult at this point
>4.5 games over four different consoles with one re-release
vs
>One multi-platform game a year for over a decade
How are different games with different game mechanics generic compared to ten years of the same shit with same graphics?
They couldn't even use original characters and instead used toads for 3rd and 4th players
And youll happily lap up their overpriced happy meal toys. When the shoes on the other foot you arent any better.
That's literally the opposite of breaking games down to their simplest form. I can't tell if you're genuinely retarded with this level of cognitive dissonance, or you're just a shitty troll
I don't know about that one user. Nintendo locked an entire game behind a $10 paywall.
>mobile
who gives a shit
It is. Maybe it is bit on a easy side, but it's high quality.
Literally every company locks their games behind a paywall if they're not free. That's why you generally have to pay for them.