Why hasn’t Nintendo bought the Pokémon brand from gamefreak and given it to a developer who knows what they’re doing?
Why hasn’t Nintendo bought the Pokémon brand from gamefreak and given it to a developer who knows what they’re doing?
Other urls found in this thread:
eurogamer.net
en.wikipedia.org
nintendolife.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
because Nintenfags and Pokefags will buy the games regardless
Can't tell if retarded and serious, or trolling.
There is no world where the bottom image represents something more interesting than the top. Both companies are a match made in heaven cause both suck absolute ass at evolving their games.
Theres like enough things wrong with your post that you ought to have known at least one of the answers before you wasted a thread.
Based retard
Top is a place you can see but not go
Bottom is a place you can see and go
Stop buying the games if you want change, as long as people keeping buying this copy/paste formula they will keep making it.
Landmarks are important.
Reasons to go somewhere are important.
Bottom lacks both.
You BotW fans are absolute troglodyte mongoloids. Never seen a bigger community of assholes with fucking shit taste and zero understanding of game design than BotW autisms.
>Why hasn't Nintendo bought the Pokemon brand from gamefreak
Top looks better because it doesn't have an ugly green filter.
i think top looks nicer
What's with this sudden autism demanding that Pokemon be BOTW?