I used to be on the Witcher hate train but after giving it a go I've gotta say I'm impressed

Bonus points if it's popular

Wait, that isn't allowed?

Is it kind of like how virgin basement dwellers hate women because they never tried sex with a woman?

Literally nothing wrong with hating women and minorities
Hating and talking about games you never played on Yea Forums is bad though

> I literally did not give a fuck about any of the characters because I didn't play the other games
this is the exact way I felt about RDR2 and was why I just gave up on it, but I felt the opposite about TW3 even without having played the other games before it, dunno why that is

I didn't hate witcher 3 until I played it. Holy shit is it as shit game.

Puddle game and I can't help but dislike CDPR for ruining the perfect progression in W1 and 2 with its chapters and unique locations for each.
It did do a couple neat things, though, I guess.

Witcher 2 is a shitshow.

Name five reasons except it being made for consoles and the dialog options not always matching what is said.

the game has a 92 on metacritic yet it literally is the best game of the gen and easily within the Top 10 of the best games ever made.

Attached: 1540665499236.jpg (256x245, 9K)

>Combat is worse than the first game.
>Chapter 2 is a lot of back and forth for the first half.
>A lot of the story in Chapter 2 is "Tell, don't show" which is boring, then they show it anyway.
>QTE's
>Feels like more of a set up to Witcher 3 than its own game like Witcher 1.

Even saying all this, I liked the OVERALL story and the choices you get. It's nice seeing how much they improved since Witcher 1, but I feel like they took a step back in some areas.

Witcher 3 is all good though, apart from the combat just being "ok"

Attached: Geralt suit.jpg (400x400, 23K)

TW2 was unironically soulless. Even the OST was mainly shit aside from 1 or 2 decent pieces.

youtube.com/watch?v=7DvTVOaD4iQ

Attached: witcher 2.jpg (460x215, 43K)

>>Combat is worse than the first game.
I'd argue it's still better than the third game, though.

>>Chapter 2 is a lot of back and forth for the first half.
>>A lot of the story in Chapter 2 is "Tell, don't show" which is boring, then they show it anyway.
I'd argue it's still mor entertaining than chasing after a Mary Sue for a whole game.

>>QTE's
Entirely agree, I don't know what they were thinking.

>>Feels like more of a set up to Witcher 3 than its own game like Witcher 1.
While this is true, I'd still argue this isn't much worse than Witcher 3, which felt like its own game but was kinda uninspired.

I think the chapter structure alone makes Witcher 2 a more enjoyable game than Witcher 3, but the combat is also somehow better and the world feels more lived in. If you destroy the drowner nests in the forest outside of Flotsam, drowners won't spawn again. If you kill the bandits in the camp up the cliff, they don't magically reappear the next time you're there. It's much more controlled because of its size.

i loved women until i had sex and got involved with them. most "incels" are divorced middle aged guys ( im not btw). but youre being willfully ignorant because you want to attack people

Why do you non-saniards drink San Miguel out of all the beers we have here? drink Estrella Galicia at least you tasteless fags.