>Less content
>Worse framerate
>Forced motion blur
>Full of visual and auditory noise
>Worse music
>Worse level design
>Worse enemy design
>Worse mechanics
>Gold bolts are now useless
>Garbage writing
Why is it that game developers struggle to even meet the standards of PS2 games?
tfw the TGB video convinced me to play the original game and I ended up loving it.
Seriously, it's brimming with soul and personality. It's also amazing how well it looks and runs, like the Gadgetron level has like a billion spaceships flying in the background just for immersion to show that it's a big hub, yet the framerate is a steady 60.
I got the 2016 remake for "free" through PS Plus and I still feel like I was ripped off. What a goddamn blunder
>no tesla claw
I wonder what a v5 tesla claw would have been like.
I'm still mad about the music.
BUY YOURSELF A PIXELIZER
CUM INSIDE ME
The 2016 game was a budget release to tie into the movie, though. It launched at $40, and was selling for $20 less than a year later.
This, the original ps2 games and ToD had fantastic memorable music and I don't know why they don't bring back Bergeaud
That justifies the reduction in content, but not everything else.
Because it's a game based off a movie user. Also it was sold at 40$ at launch instead of the usual 60$ so less content isn't as big of a deal in my opinion.
Also I don't feel like finding it but Insomniac put out some big blog post on their website at some point about why they don't make 60fps games anymore. Kinda bullshit honestly,and after playing through most of the previous games (again) before this one launched the difference in framerate was extremely noticeable. They went for a much more PG approach than they did with the first few games as well.
Ratchet and Clank are pretty much buddies right from the start,where as there was some bickering and Ratchet was kind of an ass at certain points in the original.
I thought it was fun overall honestly,even got the platinum trophy cause it was pretty easy.,but 2 and 3 are still my favorites.