Oh look, they made a new game for the PS2

NINTENDO IS SHUTTING DOWN TONIGHT AND SONY IS BUYING THEM UPPPP WE SONY ROCK

looks like your typical consoleshit game (yes I'm including pee ass four)

How do they get away with it?

PS2 didnt look that good, fuck off with "le PS2 graphix" maymay.

Those graphics are great especially for handheld.
If you want to cry about it, cry that it looks like a phone game

>handheld
Switch is a home console too, retard.

also, go see PS2 JRPG games like DQ 8, they have the same graphics if not better than Pokemon SS.

brand name. same reason why apple can get away with small batteries and dongles that wear out your charging port

kill yourself waifufag

But it has cute, generic anime girls.

youtu.be/mAR-8JTdcVw

youtu.be/3bUYx8h8TwA

youtu.be/6wrsbh-0fMA [Embed

Attached: House.jpg (480x360, 41K)

i like the graphics

Yeah, and PS2 wasn't in HD you dumb nigger.
If you're going to shitpost, at least use a couple of brain cells you dumb fuck.

>t. never played any game except Pokemon

cringe

>that aa
>those textures
>the whole muddiness in general
can't wait til you retarded switch owners make a shitpost image like that BOTW zelda one when your game isn't getting attention, a literally phone game lookin ass! sad.

I didn't say PS2 was HD, retard.

I guess people will just keep saying "ps2 graphics" until the end of time

Attached: 28744-dynasty-warriors-3-playstation-2-screenshot-escort-duty-a-few.jpg (640x480, 58K)

Post better examples, stupid.
Final Fantasy games looked much better than this 2019 game. also DQ8

Attached: 1551390021178.jpg (1939x1090, 444K)

>Can't enjoy a good meme without being called a waifufag
Stick'it up yer arse.

Attached: 1551371682642.png (1411x1529, 1.27M)

is this supposed to look good or bad
I can't tell with you consoleshit graphics posters

It really does look worse than some PS2 games.

Attached: 1546692652021.png (1291x668, 1.44M)

>pokemon
>good games

Attached: 1551326882213.jpg (250x240, 6K)

It's meant to look comparable to the new Pokemon game

Fix your eyes, then tell me.

nice water

Pokemon SS looks way better than this, I think you need to get your eyes checked

Can't wait for people to buy this then pretend they like so they can justify their buyers remorse: the console. Cope!

Reminder that there are people who think this looks good and who will happily pay $60 so GF can continue making garbage.

That looks like it's from an emulator. PS2 was jaggy central. Not denying DQ8 had a charming art style though.

user he said meme not game

SEETHING

I'm not even one of the tards saying pokeshit looks good but you're a moron if you use an emulator pic with heavy texture filtering and rendered at a much higher resolution than the PS2 could handle to use as an example of "PS2 graphics".
That pic doesn't even look technically impressive, it's just low poly stuff in a small scene.

Attached: dragon-quest-viii-5-2.jpg (640x384, 89K)

your pic doesn't help either

Yes I'm showing what an actual PS2 game looks like, it's not impressive.

>PS2
Eh, I'd put it at least around the graphical quality of the Atelier PS3 games.

>It's a "Yea Forums gets foiled by its own expectations" episode

Shitposting aside, is there an indie game scene etc. for PS2 at all? I know niggas were still releasing games on Dreamcast years ago.

It doesn't look that fucking pixely dude, it looks like you went into MS paint and resized it then stretched it backed.

>looked for the worst picture of said game on google and used it as an argument
legit dumb and seething pokemonfag
here's a better picture that isn't from emulator.

Attached: 11scrmax4.jpg (936x562, 74K)

Why do people get mad at Game Freak/Nintendo for putting gameplay first? Stop ruining this hobby, you neanderthals.

Switch games are meant to be played in handheld mode.

That's upscaled with some nearest neighbor shit, the actual PS2 resolution is 480p.

>gameplay

Attached: pokemon then pokemon now.webm (640x360, 2.48M)

>posting emulated footage
that aint it, chief

>he doesn't know about the crt smear

Damn zoomers talking shit like I wouldn't find out

>Why do people get mad at Game Freak/Nintendo for putting gameplay first?
You mean the same gameplay since 1996 Red/Green? lmao

>jrpg
>putting gameplay first

Attached: 1547638071488.jpg (800x999, 92K)

>posting a literal launch title
lmao, you are the same as OP

That's the 3DS version

You should be saying the art direction is garbage and it looks like Unity amateur hour, saying it's a PS2 game is flattering and excuses the dev's incompetence on a supposed hardware weakness.

Both look like shit, what's the point?

You are partaking in a literally day 1 twitter meme.

well...
As a dev I can say that some Switch specs are from two gens ago in terms of actual final results.

"lookers" like D44M run like shit at crappy resolutions and the texture and tris budgets are laughable if you want 60 fps and >720 resolutions.

Looks like every Atelier game.

I don't get pokefags, QUITE LITERALLY buying the same fucking game each time.

hmm as someone who actually still plays old games on a CRT I'm going to go ahead and say you posted the 3DS version you cheeky ass cunt

you first

3DS is 320x240, I don't know if that pic is actually 3DS but it looks particularly bad because it has some weird scaling issue with uneven pixels, the actual graphics aren't as bad as that but aren't as good as the emulator pic either.

the bigger crime is that nintendo can get away with selling handheld budget games for $60 and it's going to be a multi-million seller on day 1.

tell me one single exclusive from switch that doesn't look like a PS2 game.

Nah, they did. Vegetation in particular looked terrible in most games made during that generation with a few exceptions

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 62K)

new girls, new pokes, new comfy world

PS2 could never pull off that water and the texture detail on that house, the shadows are too crispy as well
As other anons pointed out it's on Vita level

You don't have to be a fucking dev to know that, we all knew this. Even people who like the Switch knew this.

Attached: 1551039463445.webm (1066x600, 2.8M)

only Splatoon 2 I guess

Attached: 1551290616368.webm (1280x720, 2.82M)

They gave Kabutops and Snorlax unique kick animations, where as they gave Pikachu a generic "kick" visual effect and very slightly hop in place.

The idea is they put more effort into animations before than they do now.

>It's another episode of Yea Forumsirgins posting powerpoint slideshows and pretend it's a Switch game
Now post the real gameplay you faggot

Attached: 1547486786335.jpg (228x210, 10K)

Here's the original resolution from a reverse image search

Attached: file.png (400x240, 216K)

Attached: real gameplay.webm (960x540, 193K)

Cool. Am hyped as fuck for it.

nice phone game

PS2 looked like shit
It's more like a Really Early PS3 games or Late Vita Games level of Graphics

The trees in GTA4 were considered bad looking even when the game came out.

It's shit that has always happened. Back around the PS1 gen etc. I would hear people say 'Looks just like a super nintendo/Sega genesis game' regarding 2D games. Retards gonna tard.

Attached: 1403757478565.jpg (281x261, 12K)

nah
breath of the wild bullshots have ruined switch expectations, or the best looking parts in the final game that run at 25 fps avg.
Games that run smoothly like Mario Oddisey use its cartoony aesthetics to hide their shortcomings, and imho all switch games are following that trend and they are starting to look samey

>putting gameplay first
Yes, because GameFreak is known for balancing the RPG mechanics in their games.

Attached: TCfGDzL.png (625x960, 472K)

>Competitive pokemon
Nigga the multiplayer was put there for 8 years old kids that were meant to battle using pokemon of their favourite color

Attached: RKceLp9.png (351x329, 216K)

Whom in the ever living fuck would ever play a casual children's game """competitively"""? Why does this only happen with nintendo games?

hmm i wonder

Attached: LOL WHY U TAKE GAME SERIOUS.jpg (664x492, 125K)

>Implying that's a lot
The last Hearthstone championship had a prize pool of almost 2 millions

>didnt play Gran Turismo 4 in 1080i back in the day
this maybe excepting water or moded texture
pokemon were never about graphics
emulator still gets better resolution lighting and edge markings

oh shit, that almost makes up for the travel expenses

>posting dynasty warriors 3 and not 2

That's barely above the recent Tekken World Tour iirc. Ouch.

>Gran Turismo 4
Car games are cheating, it's piss easy to make a good looking race game

thats barely pocket money lmao

>Yeah, and PS2 wasn't in HD you dumb nigger.
>If you're going to shitpost, at least use a couple of brain cells you dumb fuck.

damn btfo.

>he doesn't know
oh no no no

Attached: 49DFFA08-469C-4779-A39F-17E0933E9231.jpg (555x556, 93K)

theres a difference between "bad" but artistic and just shit low effort, user

The colors show that they at least have an artist in the team, but the meshes and textures are just horrible.
Also, the grass probably has more polygons than the rest of the level put together, no wonder they have performance issues

Where is his shadow? Or any shadows for that matter?

How many gens have had that fucking rat in them?

>why do people do things I consider absurd because I have low iq and can't fathom people enjoying things in a different way then I do?

It's too late user. It's far too late for that.

>retarded pokefag tried to LARP as pc masterrace
>can't even shitpost right
Holy fucking balls, kys my dude.

Pikachu has been there since gen 1.

>comfy
Pokefags actually buy their shitty games for $60 for this cringy meme lol?