This is a switch game in 2019!
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
i hate sony but fuck gamefreak
where are muh grafix
>graphics
Nintendo should have made a real console instead of a weak tablet.
Looks like it has soul
Both of those are on Switch.
Gamefreak are fucking hacks, but people love their shit. So whatever. Doesn't bother me.
pokemon has always been intended to be played handheld
the different modes are intended as a socialization bonus, meaning you play the game on the move and inbetween meeting real people
so the lower res graphics matter almost zero, because you are largely playing for shorter periods of time at once and usually on a smaller, lower resolution, screen
in the context of the game and its intended use, its an almost non-issue
>reposting the 1280 pixel picture that doesn't represent the games actual resolutions
It's like a disease or something
>the atmosphere in Pokébritain is purple for some reason
oi guvna what da fok
do you enjoy your detergent braindead zoomer?
>circles those little things out of view and not the horrible billboard trees and 2004-tier rendering in the distance
I guess you didn't notice those because they're in all consoleshit
Xbox game from 2013
>1280 pixel picture that doesn't represent the games actual resolutions
did you ever check the switchs reolutions brainlet?
hollys crap
fuck gamefreak
how do they shitup so bad eversy time?
I'd rather play Rorona than any recent Pokémon tbqh
>you can already see the aggressive LODding in the statues even in this relatively closed scene
god I hate consoles so much
Why are you expecting amazing graphics from a Nintendo title on the Switch?
Its pretty fucking insane how a niche as fuck jrpg that barely sell 20k look better than a 100+ billion company that sell 15 millions copy
One of them spends 99% of the game budget on marketing.
what insane about it is that degenerates still buy it
i want gf to be boycotted so damn much
Does bottom have 1000+ monsters? Yeah, didn't think so.
Remember when Yea Forums hated graphics fags
A good portion of GameFreak's profit goes towards merchandising and the anime. The games are more of an afterthought.
No pokemon game should have more than 200 pokemons, where ~150 are new mons, and ~50 are fan favorites returning.
They'll never be able to make a good game if they keep the mentality of connecting all games
the worst part is this hasn't been downgraded yet
The classic "The Switch is a handheld except when it has good graphics" defence.
This is a PS3 game from 2012
No, because Yea Forums has never been a single entity. There are thousands of people that roll through here every hour, lots of them with differing opinions.
You do know that, don't you?
>that sell 15 millions copy
Exactly. No reason to try hard if it sells anyway.
It's why animation in some of the most popular anime like Dragon Ball (Super) and One Piece is so terrible. No incentive to do better.
On the Wii with Pokemon Battle Revolution.
>this is a switch game in 2019
>becomes of one the biggest selling games of the year
Yup you might be right OP.
Th-the Switch is gonna flop!
M-Mark my words! Nintendo are finished!
Sales are all that matters.
im saying the argument that a game is bad because graphics is a meaningless one, when you consider the context that a game is made in that leads to that decision
super fine detail is far less important in a game that is played from a 3/4ths perspective on a smaller screen while on a bus
to an engineer, it would be silly to tell someone the walls should have more texture when the games design prevents you from seeing it most of the time
and while the switch is a dual console
Pokemon has always been primarily meant to be played on the go, docked performance would not be of much concern because that's not the way to play it as standard
You do realise that you're arguing with mindless retard shitters, don't you?
Pokemon died when it went 3d.
That not not to say 3d is bad just that it has always been ugly in pokemon games
>because graphics is a meaningless one
Not when the first HD Pokemon game has shitter battle animations than a decade old Wii game.
That's ironic coming from a Gamefreak drone.
It does when it clearly makes graphics niggers seethe
There are much more ambitious games on the Switch, Vesperia shits on this new Pokémon and is a 10 year old game with 1/5th of the budget
but this game was like 5 hours long lol
Nice new games
>Comparable graphics on comparable hardware
Whoa...
Nah, they should have made a full handheld
both look like crap
Thanks for confirming Switch owners have little to no standards. You guys make actual Nintendo fans look bad.
OMG STAIRS
>This class is full of blonde people
>Uhhh, no? Of the 50 people in this class 2 have brown hair instead of blonde, you can't just say such things.
What does Sony have to do with things? Why bring up them all of a sudden?
Is this seriously the 3D Pokemon game everyone was hyping up, or is that something else? I don't really follow Pokemon.
Graphics fags used to be mocked and and laughed out of threads. Not to meniton that they didn't tend to show up much at all.
Now it's the other way around.
I only bought handhelds for the last two gens because I was tired of graphic whores. I don't care if it's Nintendo, Sony or Indies on PC, I fucking hate these people.
cope seethe
oldfag here, that's not even true. when Crysis came out, people here couldn't shut the fuck up about it for 12 years.
People mocked Crysisfags, and only Crysisfags thought they weren't being mocked.
you have a warped view of reality friend. go check out old archived threads around the time it came out.
looks the same
>Choice between boring game with nice graphics and fun game with bad graphics
>Everyone chooses the latter
These burn your tongue
Why can't Pokemon have both?
They are a small handheld based company please understand.
That actually doesn't look too far off from Sword/Shield
Looks really comfy. I'm glad I grew out of the graphics whore phase.
and this is why you aren't making games - you won't deal with the ire of people who were fans of old mons
also, you literally are talking about a collecting game
Amazing how far some grass goes to making casuals think a game has better graphics.
Amazing how far Switch owners will go to convince themselves that Game Freak isn't lazy.
>Vesperia shits on this new Pokémon
Ahahahahahaha
Vesperia has a couple of nice looking towns where every 10 steps you have a loading screen but it looks like shit otherwise.
You fat, consumerist piece of shit. You have no idea about game development.
Please don't bully Gamefreak. They're trying their best with what they got. They aren't your regular soulless AAA team of thousands of people. They're a small team of about 100 very passionate devs creating a very passionate game. There's only so much you can do under the budget they have, and it's not like the series is that popular, nor is it one of the top grossing media franchises in the world.
en.wikipedia.org
>est. $90 billion
What do they do with all that money?
Lets get this straight, Game Freak are some of the all time laziest developers who don't spend a fraction of what they could on making Pokemon live up to it's potential. BUT if you think the games posted here like Dragon Quest, Rorona, Ni no Kuni and Vesperia aren't just using trickery like small screens with constant loading or coving and texures with foliage then you need to actually play them.
Shh, there are people too low IQ for this kind of trick
Why is every hill the same shape?
Pay people a living wage and don't force them to work weekends
i guess everyone working there needs half a billion to live
It's not necessarily about graphics, it's about GF putting no effort in their games.
>Expecting effort from gamefreak
It's going to sell millions regardless, why bother
Is it the PC or Xbox one version? Because it doesn't look very good on Xbox one.
Why are people bringing up loading screens? Most pokemon games are segmented by dozens of them for every new area
Loading to a new area is very different than loading to a cutscene. One is part of the instanced gameplay and is usually expected when going into a new area, and the other breaks up the gameplay, and intrusively forces you into them with the scenery around the character barely changing.
Koei > Gust > GameFreak
All pokemon games since the DS era have short load screen transitions between routes/towns, sometimes even within a city
and sumo was 16 hour with 8 hour of conversation press a for dialouge progression
GAMEFREAK TEAR DOWN THOSE WALLS DAMNIT LET US BE FREE!
But they didn't have loading for cutscenes. Loading in the DS era came with the reward of a new area. Loading was incentivized through exploration, where as the 3D titles have both the between area loading and the loading for cutscenes/dialog. Pokemon isn't known for it's spectacular story telling, so there's nothing in it for the player to get a loading screen for some character to walk up to the mc, say some stupid shit and walk away.
Because the last one to have them was ass in part because of them.
Every pogeman has them though
Fuck graphics(also fuck switch).
Have no problem when graphics is bad, it just should not hamper the gameplay(when you cant comprehend what the hell is going on). So almost every post mid-90s game is okay for me.
Graphics don't make the game.
Not even remotely as bad
It isn't; that's a bullshot. The actual game will have the standard overhead fixed camera view that all Pokemon games have.
Why is the bottom picture so drab and grey and brown. Top looks much brighter and better.
That isn't final and it won't look that good, as everyone knows.
Well, this is just proof that Yea Forums is full of zoomers.
Graphics, LMAO. If you want high definition high resolution go the fuck outside zoomer, I'm interested in GAMEPLAY.