10/10 first games

>10/10 first games
>really shitty sequels

How did Monolith manage to do this 3 different times?

Attached: shit.jpg (659x277, 87K)

Other urls found in this thread:

blood-wiki.org/index.php/Development_of_Blood
blood-wiki.org/index.php/Monolith_Productions
youtube.com/watch?v=PxacrgNfdj8
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

the story in fear was shit but the gameplay was better, same goes for condemned

This.

At the very worst, you could accuse them of being inferior overall, but aspects of both (only played F.E.A.R series and Condemned 1+2) were decent enough to make them worth playing.

how much of Blood 1 was actually made by Monolith? Didn't 3DRealms develop most of the game and then sold it to Monolith?

First half of Condemned 2 > Condemned 1 >>>> Second half of Condemned 2

Seriously, they nearly had it in the sequel, but then explained the mystery and turned the game into magic action bullshit.

>fear 2
>good gameplay

Attached: 053911369185.jpg (530x530, 14K)

100%. It was funded by 3drealms

Condemned 1 wasn't good.
The atmosphere was nice for the first 10 minutes then it became dark messiah of screaming hobos only without all the fun mechanics and good level design.

So Shogo didn't have any sequel because it was already shit

man, that game was fucking so bad. how do you go from blood to that.

And then they made AvP 2 and now they are making Nigger of The Rings. It's a fucking rollercoaster

it was made by studio called apogee west which then was renamed q studios and finally merged with monolith
blood-wiki.org/index.php/Development_of_Blood
blood-wiki.org/index.php/Monolith_Productions

I liked Condemned 2, it was a playable Metal Song basically. Even the main char looked like some fucked up drummer from a Metal band.

Ye, the story was kinda shit but I digged the trash appeal.

>FEAR 2
>good
youtube.com/watch?v=PxacrgNfdj8

Attached: 1453524480236.png (287x351, 185K)

F.E.A.R 2 had worse gameplay and it made the already mediocre story even worse.

This video means the game isn't good?

they turned one of the greatest vidya shotguns to one of the worst. That alone should tell you about the gameplay

Nerfed weapons and removed gameplay features is better now?

Because it's worst in areas than the first game doesn't mean it can't still be a good

Attached: DcTvzjlU8AAldgs.jpg (1070x873, 91K)

F.E.A.R 2 is a bad game in its own right, even if you ignore the original.

Yeah, it's worse in such areas of little importance like gunplay, map design, AI and story presentation.