"Our game is not shit, its the other games' fault for being too good!"

>"Our game is not shit, its the other games' fault for being too good!"
Yikes. What will they blame the Anthem flop on?

Attached: twitter screencap.png (1002x694, 458K)

That's a bioware dev btw

>a flawed game
>$59.99+tax+(((microtransactions)+tip

they blamed bf5 failure on rdr2 also. I think women are running the marketing department, because they tend to say everything is other's fault and never theirs.

>What will they blame the Anthem flop on?
They wont. I'm getting the feeling this game is about to get buried. Even by Yea Forums standard shitposting the thing is being massively ignored.
ME:A had dozens of threads and went on for quite a while. With Anthem there are 2-3 at a time. Barely

The subreddit is useless as well since they've been caught astroturfing multiple threads.

Does a 72 to 78 really matter?

>yikes
Reddit.

if the new vegas story has any truth in it, a 74 to 75 certainly does

new to 4channel, whats astroturfing?

Bioware is going the way of Westwood and other EA victims. Ruined by their bullshit, put in the ground by their failure. I hope they don't rest easy, and none of the inane women who think they can make good games get jobs again.

thats twitter faglord it literally says in the title
They can round off a 78 to 80 and feel good about themselves in the shareholders meeting.

Deport yourself back.

What's the New Vegas story?

Shareholders can't care about metacritic scores, at least I hope so.

You misinterpreted it, ya dumb dumb.

He's saying that critics skew their ratings because of the influence of other games with certain similarities or draw them when they aren't very tangible.

He's saying the critics are not objective and even then he says that their scores are only marginally influenced.

That never fails to piss me off.

Attached: 87e56dca71e31c0dbaf7cc4df3216aec7c18f961fba11f50c80cb3f536c9f356.jpg (599x600, 73K)

Technicwlly no, but if it changes the ten set like a 64 to a 70 then it might affect people's perception when deciding to by it.

bethesda promised bonuses to obsidian if nv got a 85 on metacritic. It got 84.

Well if you release half life today it will get a shit score. But its still the dev's fault for not keeping up with the times.

You forgot to mention that the review score was brought down by how buggy the game was which was entirely Bethesda's fault as they were the ones who did QA and also rushed Obsidian.

It was pretty much sabotaged.

Attached: anthem62.jpg (554x1200, 115K)

>ITS THE REVIEWERS FAULT!!!

>It was pretty much sabotaged.
The rumour was that they sabotaged it because they wanted to buy out Obsidian

Which is dumb considering the fact that before 76 there was barely any criticisms from major outlets on other Bethesda games bugs because it was a "Bethesda" thing and could easily be modes out.

>the score was already lower by the time they were made

Attached: dying.gif (400x282, 1.91M)