>gggmanlives makes Anthem review under gamechangers >EA demands it is taken down as the review is actually paid and hasn't been properly disclosed >gggmanlives reuploads video without any disclosure on the review being paid >EA does nothing and leaves video up
If the video were really paid, shouldn't this piss off EA even more and encourage them to have the video taken down a 2nd time until he gets the disclosure right?
Nobody cares about this literal who faggot. Hell, You're probably him. Die.
Tyler Hall
This is why I love this board. This and the really interesting discussions about old classics. user never disappoints.
Noah Morales
Go shill contrarian sonny jim shill somewhere else.
Eli Lee
I'm just saying EA's actions are not lining up with their reasoning. Seems really fishy.
Caleb Cook
>I'm just saying EA's actions are not lining up with their reasoning. No real surprise there.
Aiden Cook
>Yea Forums suddenly likes Australians
What went wrong?
Cooper Parker
So shouldn't this mean there is reason to believe EA is lying and gggmanlives is being honest?
Carson Gutierrez
Australians have subsumed this board. I'm Australian, you're Australian - we're all Australian now.
Jack Hughes
Legends has it that Australians were the ones that finally broke moot.
Easton Long
>>EA does nothing and leaves video up >a month later paid shill GGG receives a lawsuit in his mail from EA for deliberately breaking the law and contract >hes based af guys! xD
Jose Green
He did everything wrong. This will bite him in the ass forever.
Andrew Ramirez
...
Jeremiah Cruz
No one on here thinks he's based, what the fuck are you talking about
Sebastian Bell
That's the thing, why even sign up with EA? It would have been clear at the start with a wink and a nudge they'd expect positive coverage. And they don't even offer cash, just a one night stay in some hired mansion for a stupid video game party.
Jacob Cook
fuck off GGG you already had your 15 minutes of fame
Nathaniel Rodriguez
>I chose to re-upload the video as I'd spent the last week working on it, with the disclaimer at the beginning mentioning why the other video was pulled down. It was a "sponsored" video, but I have not been paid, nor probably will as a result of the events of the last couple days. Nah they WERE going to pay him. Unless they did and he's lying again.
Jaxson Gonzalez
Oh, I don't know anything about the particulars of this situation. I'm just saying you shouldn't expect EA to make rational, or even consistent decisions about even the simplest of things.
Probably a hope that the game would turn out to be at least decent, and thus you'd get paid for no downside.
Chase Barnes
Go fuck a Dingo, GayGayGayman And make more reviews of bad classic FPS, I enjoy those the most
>FALLOUT76 GOOD >ANTHEM BAD What did he mean by this?
Hunter Nguyen
Sponsored without disclosure is a big problem for corps. I used to work as a Sony rep and it was required that we disclose our affiliation in all scenarios.
Charles Johnson
>I am, you are, we are Australian
Jeremiah White
Day 1: >Gggmanlives declined to share the contract he signed related to the videos or his correspondence with an EA PR representative in which he says that he was told to remove the video for its contents. Today: twitter.com/SkillUpYT/status/1099520905137385472 >As an update, GGG just posted a section of the contract which supports his claim that there was no requirement for a 'Sponsored' watermark. He also says that the 'blacklist' pressure was delivered over a phone call, so it isn't possible provide evidence. >the contract image is just a zoomed in sentence showing nothing that proves it's real >he deletes it shortly after
during demo >guise its good, i travelled way back to japan to look at full game, its really good guise im having fun give it a try buy on release
after the release, when everyone shitting on the game >quick i need to jump on ea hate bandwagon, but i did positive paid review for ea and having a contract with them >i know, im gonna play a victim card!
>If a Game Changer posts a negative review or content about the company or one of our games that is honest and constructive – they will have our thanks and full support. We demand that our Game Changers act with honesty with us, with our dev teams, and with the community. Sometimes this can make things uncomfortable! EA is committed to being player first and earning the trust of our community. We make mistakes and get things wrong all the time. For our teams to improve and get better, we need our Game Changers to keep it real.
Andrew Mitchell
Didn't he fucking lie and say it was because it was a negative review? I recall seeing something along those lines on his twitter If he did say that then he's a faggot who can go fuck himself oh wait >EA (((((gamechangers))))) yeah he's fucking trash and his opinions now mean jack shit
What if EA lied and it really was about a bad review?
James Bennett
this is all a clusterfuck probably fueled by gggmanlives autism the guy uploaded a video with a stupid watermark, and that was not permitted by EA, because it implies it is a shill review they just told him to remove that watermark, and keep the review, because they accept bad criticism in the EA shills program the thing about the program is that they pay the dudes to cover the game, and provide keys, but the response NEEDS to be legit that is the thing about that EA program thing stupid fucks on twitter create an outrage out of nothing, to fuel more click ad revenue ggg doesn't even fuels it any further EA response inmediately about it the insectoid and the bearded fuck blown it out of proportion BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THEIR BUSINESS IS ALL ABOUT: STUPID OUTRAGE FROM THE /POL/ WORLD INTO VIDYA people believe the shit as always, and keep posting about it fucking journos and commentators, man
Mason Torres
ULTIMATE CATCH UP
>ggg shills Anthem a few weeks back, gets paid trip, party invites etc >people call him out on his shilling >takes a break from the internet due to "toxic gamer culture" >makes "anthem review" again, this time everyone is shitting on it so him shilling would be obvious >says it's bad >uses the watermark he used from previous shilling video >EA has a completely different "sponsored by EA" message and mark needed for paid videos, as unlike the previous shilling this time he was directly getting a check for his video >ggg decides to delete the video and reupload it with no marks >this would make it blatantly obvious he was being paid >to save face, decides to lie and say that "EA TOLD ME TO TAKE IT DOWN FOR BEING TOO NEGATIVE I'M BLACKLISTED" >he thinks this will allow him to keep his video up, no one will know he's shilling, and he can get gamer cred for EA BAD >doesn't understand he's fucking implicating EA in near criminal conduct >articles fucking everywhere >EA says they don't know what he's talking about and that he was paid >shits bricks >admits to the press he was paid for the video >refuses to disclose the "contract" that says he had to take the video down for negative content >pressure mounts >claims the blacklisting/content threats weren't mailed at all, but now during a phone call which can't be proven >SkillUp and various other press onto his shit >currently radio silence from him, EA possibly about to rape his ass into oblivion for blatantly lying about them blacklisting him for negative content and also reuploading sponsored content with ZERO attempts at disclosure this time
The funniest part is him claiming he wasn't a shill after all the shill videos and his desperation to not be a shill but get money anyways led him to this shitpile
>>EA has a completely different "sponsored by EA" message and mark needed for paid videos, as unlike the previous shilling this time he was directly getting a check for his video I don't understand. So if he's getting a direct payment then he's not supposed to put a watermark on his video? Why?
Brayden Reyes
>people unironically shilled REUBEN SANDWICH meme man over the true /ourguys/
he probably over-reacted to EA's call, because this situation paints the picture bad for both
Mason Powell
I mean the only people who've said the review was paid are either EA or game urnalists.
Robert Robinson
Previous video was "GameChangers" basically an affiliated group, not one that pays him directly for a video but has other perks. His second video was being paid for directly with money by EA, so he needed to disclose it. He decided not to and lie about it.
Justin Cruz
My point exactly EA should be losing their shit at the new upload too.
Every review of his are the same >here's this old shooter nobody cares about, anyway it's like 7/10, it's competent He has absolutely nothing interesting to say about anything. It's like reviewing a cheese sandwich and saying it tastes like cheese
still more based than any soituber going full blown politics commentary on vidya, or worse, going full blown snob by uploading 3 hour reviews, and over analyzing every stupid detail
Dominic Murphy
wow look e-celebs!
Kayden Roberts
He said paid. Paid as in paid money. He admitted this to the press before since he's realizing he's in trouble, but is avoiding tweeting any statements because he's trying to save his fanbase from finding out. He's also watching the comments on his video like a hawk and removing any pointing out his shilling while leaving hearts on the EA BAD ones to boost them to the top.
Owen Mitchell
That fucking guy holy shit. If he just held his stupid mouth shut nobody would've noticed a reupload from some not-that-popular youtuber but now he's possibly showing a contract thus proving that he was a payed shill.
Honest question. If he just reuploaded the video with the right watermarks, do you think he would've gotten away with paid shilling? Was him lying and calling for gamers to rise up his fatal flaw?
the tweet about the blacklist (already removed) is his second google result if you search for his name it is honestly PR done for him, sadly I still don't understand why americans follow the political game to every other medium like, who gives a fuck about this trash in vidya? I understand how a political career can be ruined by this shit, but a vidya reviewer? wtf guys, stop clicking on this garbage content, fellas, and stop watching the insect and the soibeard
Sseth doesn't even play the games that he covers in his videos, fuck off m8
Eli Lopez
I am literally dissing this type of channels, lad I find vidya commentarists as cancerous as snob game critics everybody is taking vidya too seriously, both in terms of politics (like wtf) and what games mean.... and in reality all these people are just unemployed art and journo majors trying to find a job
>SkillUp and various other press onto his shit Show me, I am rooting for this guy to burn. His fanboys are still oblivious on his vid.
James Myers
He deleted all his claims about being blacklisted.
Tyler Campbell
Mandalore just does game reviews of older games brah.
Mason Fisher
>did nothing wrong he signed up for their shill program and shilled the game already you stupid redditor fuck >EA demands >encourage them to have the video taken down a 2nd time the arrangement is quid pro quo not some official contract, >EA does nothing and leaves video up EA don't own the video, and even if they could dmca it they wouldn't because it would just be throwing more fuel on the retard drama bonfire bottom line is, EA employs shills including your favourite e-celeb streamers to shill their shit and this ggg guy is a bottom feeder youtube parasite like so many others. simple as
Oh jesus what is this lad doing, these bogans aren't bright at all. Skillup laid into him, I can't wait to see how he tries to dig himself out of this.
Cameron Ortiz
he's one of the more well informed youtubers out there that isn't a massive jew at the same time
Jonathan Rivera
He's pissed because he was lied to as well. The Aussie cunt literally used him to push a lie to save his own ass.
why does everyone on this board hate on this dude? I hated his We Happy Few review but other than that he's a chill as fuck dude, fights sjw and political bullshit and focuses on reviewing shooters instead of every big release
why does Yea Forums hate him again? He's one of my current favorite content creators just because he's content is so straight forward
Ethan Barnes
>that tweet Holy shit. Why not just upload the new video with the correct watermark instead of trying to create internet drama around it? >patreon money Oh right.
Did GGG really think he could ride off on the #FuckEA train and no would notice?
Thomas Brooks
>fights sjw and political bullshit It's videogames.
Joseph Allen
he's a paid shill, apparently.
Dominic Ramirez
nice try, jewjewjew
Caleb Russell
He used to be okay but then turned into a paid shill who hides/lies about it. See Wolfenstein, Fallout 76, Anthem, etc. Here you go.
Jace Robinson
Just because some dipshit agrees with me politically, doesn't mean I need to like him. His behavior during this shit is very unlikable and disingenuous.
Elijah Thomas
only it was a sponsored video not a game changer video.
Yes. It's working to an extent with a good portion of his viewers not knowing about what's really going on. Just skim the comments of his video thanking him for standing up to evil EA.
Ryder Williams
Read through the thread you brainlet phoneposter.
Jose Cox
^this
Hunter Price
>literal who shill thread #552177967 yawn
Owen Campbell
>Seff No >Manny Yes
David Murphy
it seems like last year Yea Forums was sucking sonny jims dick, now we hate him for some reason?
Levi Ward
>fights sjw and political bullshit I'd rather he wasn't political or trying to anger anyone.
Oh look, ggg's discord fags have discovered the thread.
Luke Harris
OK so now I think I understand the motives, after seeing the backlash the ggg fuck got paid for making a review, and he used the game changers watermark in the video to somewhat create the false sense that the video was not a shill video at the same time, the game is ass, so the situation was rather weird BUT, EA asked to remove it, but their official statement don't disclose what is the contract: instead of saying "remove the watermark" they talk about some kind of agreement shit hits the fan, GGG is outed as an official shill, that legit uploaded a negative review EA contacts and tells him that the review IS PAID, and not a game changers gig.... with the obvious motive of dissing the situation and maybe taking down a bad review BUT THEN THEY CLARIFY THAT GAMECHANGERS IS NOT A SHILL PROGRAM who gives a fuck, if this was a sponsored review? IT WAS A SHILL REVIEW THAT TURNED SOUR
Ayden Reed
Sseth does not play the games he reviews.
Liam Anderson
>trying to pull a fast one on tens of thousands of eyes and a company who was closely monitoring you How dumb is he?
Sure but he entertains, I play video games for that experience, I watch youtubers for entertainment.
David Turner
Who cares? Calling his videos reviews is pushing it anyway.
Grayson Perry
you like his content because you're a fucking brainlet that cant handle any commentary that isnt from some jenkem heaving mental invalid that cant go more than 5 seconds without bringing up some shitty discord in-joke like "hehehe SHIEEEET rueben sandwiches amirite sunny jims xdd" and probably shits his pants at the mere thought of using a word longer than 2 syllables in a single sentence
Jonathan Jackson
>everyone likes sseth until sseth himself stupidly provides irrefutable evidence that he barely plays any of the games he reviews and just steals from smaller youtubers, Yea Forums, and /vg/ >shills have no defense but "he's funny lol who cares" Like fucking clockwork.
Henry King
neither does dunkey and people cant seem to get off his dick for some reason
Nathan Jones
Yea Forums always trying to keep a decent australian man down
Dominic Rodriguez
I don't know him, but I'll make a note never to watch any of his content.
Tyler Collins
>sseth doesn't even play the games! so? i'm not watching his vids for a lets-play or to see his skills.
I present you the normalized Youtuber quality scale it is measured in ReviewtechUSAs the bigger the number, the worst the youtuber, all normalized by the shittiest commentator/reviewer youtuber in existance, ReviewTechUSA you can't make this shit up this fuck can parrot whatever the blogs are parroting, or even Yea Forums threads like there is no tomorrow
>review old games >other guy known for reviewing old games is involved in a massive shilling scandal making you and others like you look bad by association I'm not surprised he's giggling or pissed off.
if this got overblown, wait for his Rage 2 review, that is very obviously shilled by him I still remember the backlash, and how he praised the gameplay.... when it was clearly Mad Max 2 + some kind of Wolfenstein type shootan, with that horrible purples and punks everywhere he did not acknowledged any of that
Elijah Ward
patiently waiting for him to inevitably crack and then blame Yea Forums for "forcing" him to do all this
Looks like a different guy, but I'm six minutes in and liking this guys content anyway. Blood looks crazy fun too. I'd never even heard of it and I'm big on Doom, SW & DN.
Dominic Hernandez
>Pathetic. no u
Andrew Baker
No u
Jeremiah Richardson
What a shame. I like his videos on older mods and some of his retrospectives.
Jaxon Sanders
why you fucking faggots dont just stay in your discords and jerk each other there? i dont give a damn whos who have a discord, i dont use that damn thing, fuck off
Angel James
>REEEEE FUCKING DISCORDS
Landon Thompson
Only people that use discord care about dicord faggotry.
Also Yea Forums is full of /pol/tards
Blake Lopez
>heh! today gamers are all retarded blunder culture faggots. I'm going to cry EA bad and cash in! >oooh fuuuuuuuuuuuck
Joshua Garcia
HE'S IN A PRIVATE VOICE CHANNEL RIGHT NOW SENDING SHILLS TO THIS VERY THREAD
Raycevick AccursedFarms Ahoy Mark Brown when he's not being a faggot
Jaxson Butler
You know, it takes quite a lot of work to make EA come out as "the good guy" in anything. There's being a fucking retard, and then there's being A FUCKING RETARD.
Cooper Morales
t. aussie kunt
Luke Ward
I feel like mandalore's got his own style that's different from gggman. Civvie 11's got that right kind of autism to replace gggman, though.
Eli Powell
How about Ace while at it?
Daniel Jackson
ggg you shitposted here last time then changed your twitter because you got salty when somebody said you sucked you have to go back
gggshill doesn't have any style >shieeet >sunnyjim
Eli Williams
I thought his style was boomer who loved shooters or something like that.
Nathan Carter
There's no turning back, wouldn't surprise me if he's never invited to events again and he loses a small chunk of subs. Sadly he'll still have retards following him.
Anthony Wood
>Start being a corporate shill on YT >People call you out >"oh shit mate" >Try to shit on Anthem to get some trust back >Backfires and starts snowballing worse and worse lel
Mandalore is 100 times more likeable because he actually puts in effort and cares about the games he talks about. GGG just spouts Yea Forums's favourite buzzwords, says sonny jim a couple of times and calls it a day.
Bentley Ross
Anyone is better than GGG right now since they're not paid to stealth shill.
>Seth is good Literally just compile a bunch of greentexts from here about any game he reviews and you get the exact same result as his "reviews", I still think he is ok despite that though
Mason Barnes
Then that proves EA is lying and ggg was just a game changer.
>EA demands it is taken down as the review is actually paid and hasn't been properly disclosed They did not. It was his own decision. The shill wanted to get back on the good side of EA again, but after getting BTFO'd, reaploded the vid again.
It's Streisand effect. If he just reuploaded it while not saying any shit, he would get away with it instead of this
Charles Wilson
He is well-spoken and makes quite a few good points in his videos, I can't deny that. But at the same time he's overrated as fuck throughout the entire industry. Jim's videos come down to the following Gameplay/first impressions >"this game is not like my favorite Nintendo games and it's not on Switch so I'm not having fun with it"
Gaming industry >"look at how companies are trying to fuck consumer's with lootboxes! I bet this problem is only going to get bigger and there will be countries that will sue said companies for breaking laws on gambling" >fast forward several weeks/months >"See? I told you it would happen! I'm an oracle! Aren't I an oracle? I surely am because I PREDICTED IT WOULD HAPPEN DIDN'T I!"
Shitty no-game Steam garbage >"Wow, look at this shitty game I'm playing for no reason other than to point out how shitty it is!"
Connor Jackson
Assuming he isnt doing this full time, 300 extra bucks a month doesn't sound half-bad.
Austin White
His reviews are complete shit. I only really subbed to him in the first case because he reviewed old fps games that I like and I was interested in hearing an alternate take on them.
Angel Smith
what if he is telling the truth, and the EA corporate fags told him to remove the review because it was paid, then did a 180 because he tweeted about it? let's be honest here: the guy is putting his career in legit jeopardy for some shit review, while EAs credibility is always on the line he is either telling the truth, and now entering the autism chamber to avoid the backlash of EA's reps lying or he is legit retarded, and tried to clear his name with the blacklist thing.... that honestly sounds very stupid taking into account that he is a nobody outside of circlejerks no disrespect to the guy, but I can't hardly believe he is pulling off a stunt for some Yea Forums points, lads, and this lie could cost him OTHER SHILL DEALS
Evan Evans
he used the wrong watermark and tried to get away with not telling people he was a paid shill
Austin Butler
>I only really subbed to him in the first case because he reviewed old fps games that I like and I was interested in hearing an alternate take on them. same. this is what he needs to stick to. old and forgotten action games. i can go anywhere for reviews about the newest aaa cashgrab.
Caleb King
Who do you think has more to gain from lying here, a multimillion dollar game company or some literally who game reviewer that people already dislike for going full shill?
Jace Reed
all this shit only shows that EA shill reviews need to be positive, and if not, they have to be in the Game Changers program HE WAS PAID so EA is asking for a refund
They didn't because they had other "paid reviewers" who also gave it bad scores. Out of ALL THE HORRIBLE REVIEWS for some MYSTERIOUS REASON they only made Gggman take down his review?
Robert Perry
I just realized that Civvie, who his videos barely broke 10k views and only made the channel recently, has more money that that cunt
>mods allow this thread >based schrier thread gets deleted anti semitism
Matthew Wilson
Shut up and sit down, dumb retard. At least get an idea of the topic at hand before posting.
Caleb Edwards
implying patreonfags don't "get paid" by their own families/relatives
Gabriel Phillips
his sub count is currently going up and will probably continue to go up until the usual outrage gaming news channels start taking turns fucking him in the ass over this
Ryan Roberts
why? I can post whatever the fuck I want, and it is probably more simpler than all this gossip garbage being posted, lad
then that sounds sad as fuck outrage culture, ladies and gentleman the review is not even that interesting I enjoyed the 7 pesos review a lot in comparison
174 $1 tier donors 2 relatives $20 1 girlfriend $10 1 dad $200 it is not rocke science, lad
Jonathan Collins
wtf, lads I have to agree this is pathetic who are this people? the reddit guys that act out of pity? the boogie audience??
Caleb Cooper
>puts a heart on the comments to push them to the top Hmm
Landon Scott
For me, it was when he said Observer was a game for psuedointellectual söibois and then praised Wolfenstein II in a preview a week later.
Parker Reyes
>Company says they will pay you for honest reviews >Make an honest review >Don't get paid EA was in the wrong here. Maybe they shouldn't have lied through their fucking teeth with their little paid review program.
Ryan Gutierrez
>pls watch muh favorite Yea Forumsceleb No thanks
Sebastian Morris
I'm amazed that people who create online content don't understand how the internet works yet. This will FOREVER be brought up against him.
Nicholas Cook
Nah man they're actually quite good.
Christopher Taylor
you guys know there is only one vidya youtuber his autism is unrivaled his opinions are out of this world his quake world modding videos are legendary he is a legit autist living the dream
Anyone else feel like Zaric works as a corporate shark or did at some point? He gets the publisher mindset and inner working way more than your average person should.
Jackson Foster
Kek even Spoony makes more money than this faggot
AHAHAHAHAHA
Bentley Jenkins
His shtick is he's an Australian FPS reviewer who says SHIIEEET to accentuate his point. You're better off watching someone like Civvie11, for example.
It's not defending EA, it's shitting on e-celeb vermin.
Blake Garcia
AdSense was a mistake.
Ian Roberts
>is there a reason to believe that the soulless megacorporation is going to lie to varying degrees with a team of lawyers sitting down to figure out how to lie without "technically" doing it if they ever need to prove otherwise
I wonder
Josiah Barnes
FPBP
Henry Green
>you get at least sometthing from jims video I can't remember the last thing I got from any of his videos. All of them are literally AAA INDUSTRY BAD #FUCKAAAINDUSTRY. While it's hard to disagree it doesn't bring anything new to the table.
Austin Bell
A lot of youtubers and people were saying that. The demo was extremely polished and had more content front-loaded. It gave there impression that there was a lot more to the game than there really was.
Hunter Rodriguez
>Be a shill >Get paid for favorable reviews >Has done this plenty of times in the past
HEY GUYS TRUST ME I'M NOT A SHILL THEY JUST PAID ME FOR "HONEST" REVIEWS
This poofta gets the rope with all the other game tabloid journalist and streamer faggets.
Joseph Butler
Getting real tired of seeing a new eceleb getting shilled here every fucking week. Buy an ad or fuck off.
>Yea Forums now hates the based guy who reviewed the moonman mod and kept stifling laughs at the racism
wtf bros
David Lee
ahhh he was my friend all along
Ryan Johnson
normies, the fact that they announce it in the comment section makes it even more pathetic
Cooper Morgan
turns out your based guy is a faggot figures
Isaac Baker
This dude was always a faggot in my book when he talked shit about Razorfist.
Juan Wilson
Who made a bigger fuck-up? Gggmanlives or Sseth?
Levi Jenkins
Gggmanlives
but I want to Sseth get his shit right too
Tyler Cruz
even michael pachter? kek.
Luke Gonzalez
But Razorfist is a faggot too.
Angel Reyes
Stop shitting on him, he may be a shill and ultimately a lying snake who wants to save his face, but think of this as an opportunity. He's getting EA into trouble and that's all that matters, you don't have to like him, but every time EA gets hit its progress towards finally putting them down for once as a company once and for all, don't we all want to see EA come crashing down, or has Yea Forums been infected with EAshills? Stop shit talking him even if you dont like him no matter how scummy he is, this is necessary evil, a tactical maneuver towards our true goals. Apex Legends zoomers fucking ruined the chances of EA failing, this event alone wont change everything but its a step, let him be the hero for a moment, its all about seeing EA come crashing down.
Parker Morgan
^I'm on board with the goal. Fuck EA.
Liam King
As a reviewer, the moment you enter the realm of "paid reviews," your opinion is straight up worthless, regardless if it was "honest."
I keep seeing her being poster here lately. Someone redpill me on her, I'd rather not give her views so that youtube itself start shilling her videos in the recommendation section.
smart move I use incognito windows to avoid getting my cookie tainted if I open some shit youtube video from here and stuff like that
Matthew Myers
passable tranny that likes vidya. Especially Resident Evil.
Nathaniel Martin
I miss TotalBiscuit, and I don't care who knows he was a fucking mentalist, but he knew what he was about, and didn't stand for bullshit. He would make a two hour video over the most inane controversy that didn't really matter; that's the autism we need more of in this roll-over-and-die discord-using "maybe...maybe I do donate to women on twitch... and that's okay" consumer base.
This I never cared for his content, but there will never be anyone quite like him again and I didn't realize how valuable his videos were until he was dead I would give everything just to hear him tear down this aussie cunt with everything he had
I've noticed the opposite really, people seem a lot more apologetic for companies. TB wouldn't have stood for any of the shit Epic is pulling now, but you have half of Yea Forums going COMPETITION GUD
Tyler Martinez
I don't give a shit about any of the details of what's going on, who fucked up what, or how ggg is responding to it.
What matters is that a supposed consumer advocate took a sponsorship deal with EA. Fucking EA. The fucking Emperor Palpatine of the video game industry. The company we've all wanted dead for years. He lost any credibility he ever had with that move, the rest is just making it that much worse. He'd better have a sister with turbo cancer or some shit who needs an expensive surgery if he wants to justify this on any level whatsoever.