I finally deleted it

At this point they might as well just announce it to give the handful of people still playing something to hold onto. I just can't see them not fucking it up no matter what they do though.
>tfw all you wanted was to storm the beach at normandy and kill some japs in the pacific theater

You're part of the problem. Even with all the knowledge you still bought it. Like my brother, told him about all it's problems, bad/small content. He bought it, played it for 2hrs then never touched it again. Can't cure stupid.

Honestly thinking about going back. I'm tired of the BR meme.

I bought it and liked it so maybe you're just a preachy faggot
If you can't cure stupid then leave

How long have you been playing? I enjoyed it at first, but it got stale pretty quick.

weapon balance is really, really retarded. assault sars shit on everything it's fucking stupid.

here's your roadmap bro

Attached: vgdzrp9grg211.png (960x720, 411K)

Oh nevermind it's actually this one, sorry about that bro :DD

Attached: BFVRodmap-1024x576.jpg (1024x576, 91K)

my in-match timer

It is pretty stale, BF1 was stale as fuck at this point too. As soon as I max out my archer I'll probably play something else for a little while

Attached: ss+(2019-02-23+at+08.43.23).jpg (442x38, 5K)

Problem is that the game will be dead before then

Maybe next time you'll be ahead of the curve and not bother playing games in series that have been shit for 8 fucking years.

You purchased an EA game thus allowing them to continue to get away with this. This is what they always do, this is what they'll do next time. You are part of the problem. Do not buy unfinished games EVER. Do not buy EA games EVER.

Why can't I buy the damn weapons locked behind their weekly grind? Yeah, I wasn't able to play one week, so now I'm locked out of a certain rifle? That's stupid. I like the game for what it is, a solid battlefield shooter geared toward larger scale combat. It's fun in it's own way. I just wish they would have had a hardcore mode, it always makes the game more fun.

Imagine being so new that you think you're "woke" for buying and playing an obviously terrible casual game for months and then quitting it eventually because you got bored of it.

Jesus you sound like a crybaby

>Pearl Harbor
will it just be planes and ships?

>I'm still playing my Basedfield Vagina.

it's just a fan-made concept.
is the real roadmap

I hope you realize you approved of it never getting better by buying it when it was at its worst.

This is such a stupid comparison. They cover totally different timespans and are presented in a different format. The official format, for example, didn't list new cosmetics, weapons, and vehicles that we got anyways.
Also roadmaps never work like this. BF1's DLC maps weren't revealed until shortly before they released.

it took you roughly a quarter of a year to finally realize what a lot of people knew straight away from looking at the first gameplay trailer. congrats.

>gosh I did it, I deleted the game
>I'm now only going to buy the next game to see if they fixed anything, if it isn't better then I'll think twice about the next after
>am I based and redpilled yet?

Can't you buy those with CC now?

Naivete thread?

One time I bought an early access game and I actually thought it wouldn't ruin my experience of the full game launch! lmao!

How? I can't find them to buy.

Apparently you can buy them directly in the armory by switching to an unowned weapon

hello EA shill

Will try, thanks.

I cant believe ive gone 3 years without playing a battlefield game. Fuck ww1, fuck ww2 the most boring setting. Modern or futuristic battlefield fucking when

>I cant believe ive gone 3 years without playing a battlefield game
been 13 years since I've bought one.

Considering buying it since it was on sale on PSN with BF1. Guess I should spend my money elsewhere? It was listed as a bundle for $35.

Woah 3 years??? Based BF4 oldfag!

>I ignored the hate train
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahha that's what you get retard

giving EA money is a solid investment into worse, more expensive video games in future so yes, elsewhere

BF1 was a tech demo for BFV. BFV is going to be a tech demo for the next modern/ future. I was thinking a 2021 release date, but BFV tanked so hard they may need to rush something similar to stay afloat. A game that looks like BFV with the depth a gun play of BF4 would be pretty good.

underated

Any games you can suggest? Divinity Original Sin 2 is on sale too.

Was planning to get the bundle since the BF1 revolution edition is with the BFV and they said that BF1 is more polished and has a good multiplayer base.

Already have Rainbow Six Siege too, what are you playing rn?

Even Treyarch has done the same with Black Ops 4. Why do these devs try to do these "Games as a service" launches when it feels like they're putting out less content than during the 360 era of BF3/regular CoD?

I will probably buy it on sale or at least renew origin sub service later this year once I've built my new PC.

I've been playing Apex for my FPS fix but desu it's getting pretty stale fast.

Either toss a coin and face rands at the start or wait 30 minutes to fight no one and then toss a coin on whether u get ambushed or not. It is fun for a game or two but unsustainable.

BFV is good for just old timey team strat FPS. Spawn points, respawn timers, weapon kits etc.

I honestly liked the game when I played at release and hope ppl will still be playing in a few months.

It's basically early access for AAA games, with them releasing a gimped game and and making the rest of the content "free" over a period of time to seem cool and keep player attention.

because they can charge the same amount of money as they always have but then when their game collapses on itself if it's shit then they can just bail on it without having wasted time and money on making content that's not going to get used very much

Titanfall 2 promised free DLC and it was all recycled or tiny shit tdm maps.

Same thing for Battlefront 2; it only got 2 proper assault maps since it released.

If an EA game promises free DLC, it's a trap. Good maps only get funded by players who pay out the ass for microtransactions or map packs.

Attached: 1549902532132.gif (607x609, 514K)

I've been playing Bloodborne, Team Fortress 2, Dwarf Fortress, and Smash. Is it specifically PS4 FPS multiplayer you're after recs for?

> and keep player attention.

Exactly this, but they do a poor job of it since everyone knows they're going to release the next entry in the series within a year, so there's no reason to invest in AAA titles when you can get something feature complete like BF4 for $10.

EA and other FPS publishers fucked themselves.

PS4 is my only option rn. not finished building my PC yet. Got tired of playing Black ops 4 and trying to get into the BF series, got to saw a cheap deal $35 for both BF1 and BFV which made me consider picking it up.

Basically the same, I've tried the beta and didn't like it, I got mine free from buying a 1070 last year, and as much as I do care about the sjw bullshit it was free so who cares, I'll play anyway

cheaters were almost making me stop, but now realizing I just can't stand the same maps anymore I've just stopped it a few weeks ago, (even more so when I just really like arras and steel broken bridge one) and in all this time all they did on the content front was to release a ass boring gigantic flat tank map, I don't think I'm coming back even if they do release new map packs

just finished my second run on metro, did 2 runs on RE2:remake, will just get on with assassin's creed odyssey and way for anno 1800 and rage 2 for the next 6 months, fuck battlefield 5, fuck ea, fuck dice, not only I'm not buying nothing from them anymore but I'll avoid EVEN FREE GAME IN BUNDLES...

Damn if you only have PS4 and already have Siege, I can't recommend much in the way of multiplayer FPS that isn't bad, quickly dying, or giving money to EA. There are plenty of good singleplayer games for it though.
Overwatch isn't something I like but I guess would be tolerable as a console FPS,
If you absolutely must play a Battlefield title, BF4 has most of its bugs fixed now (though the campaign is atrocious) and is fairly feature complete and quite cheap. Don't touch Battlefield Hardline whatever you do.
Otherwise, get cracking on that PC dude.

just play apex legends

i hare BRs (and Brazilians lol) but it's free and the gunplay is like cod4/mw2 which is pretty neat

bf1 seemed like fun, but making a disgusting nigger the cover for the FUCKING GREAT EUROPEAN WAR already showed me how much of the pandering to sjw cuckolds dice was going to do, never again they'll have 1 cent of mine

Attached: 1468266421267.jpg (1920x1080, 224K)

Single biggest issue for me is how utterly retarded the player base is. The majority of players are completely incapable of understanding objectives, and its really common for a team to devolve into zerging one or two points in conquest while the enemy farms them and a single squad just follows behind instantly recapping the point. On Hamada whenever I get on British if I can grab a mosquito (or anything really, its just faster) I fly straight to g, bail, and watch as the Germans lose all but 2 points in less than 3 minutes because looking at a direction other than the uncap is too high a concept for them.

Its still telling that TF1's reused maps are still better than the maps TF2 had at launch.

I would play apex but theyd have to change some things. Make it based on 2 teams. Add weapon loadouts. Respawning after death and who ever gets 100 kills first wins! Sounds neat right?

killing floor 2
Shadow Warrior 2

Hang on, 2fort and Well suck while Granary and Badlands are great. I bet you're an Engie or Sniper main.

I dont fucking care about politics i just wanted a fun battlefield game to play with customizable guns and neat gadgets.

this, fuck BR

>tfw all i wanted was for them to show the Japanese advance in China, and their brutality, or at least something that hasn't already been touched on by the previous era of WW2 games

why do you play conquest?
do you enjoy just doing nothing for an hour until tickets go down all the while you nonsensically get shot from wherever and dying doesnt change anything and you dont even care about it?

lol

I totally agree. If you could bring back any past FPS of your choice to its former glory with a healthy player base, what would you bring back?

for me, it is CoD4 or BF2

>Titanfall 2 promised free DLC and it was all recycled or tiny shit tdm maps.

Come on, Glitch was almost on par with TF1-maps. Fuck Tone 2.0 though

its because these games are marketted to minorities, women and fags and these people are dumbasses. This is why overwatch was bad.

>expecting fun when EA is involved
Any developer overtaken by EA is already dead inside.

>it's just a fan-made concept.

Attached: 1497097296285.jpg (720x528, 43K)

Bf2142 or 2 either is fine

So when is the next patch, and what factions will it include?

my PC at the time of 2142 was never good enough to play it so I just stuck with BF2

that said my friend played it and let me watch when I came over and I'd love to play it today

As opposed to frontlines or breakthrough where the majority of the time you're on a team either incapable of pushing the first set/point or just melt and lose everything as soon as it becomes available for the enemy to cap?
Playerbase was turning into retard shit long before they started pandering to anyone other than the "core".

>and what factions will it include
microtransaction black panther faction. pay 4.99 to do the black power salute

that makes 1 possible costumer, I make 1 lost possible costumer, but taking from sales numbers, 7 millions against 25 million on bf1, gamers in general DO CARE about forced leftist politics being forced into games

if on top of that the "fun battlefield game to play with customizable guns and neat gadgets" is not there, well, there it goes almost all the players, and with servers more empty that 6yo bf4 just a few months after launch, the next game will be a meme and only 1-2 million retarded fanboys will buy it like fallout 76, battlefield is dead, we need a new multiplayer FPS game

Because selling your game in five pieces fucked up the matchmaking and turned people off from the game. Most people just ignored Premium until it was dirt cheap or free.

What? did you read the post? the playerbase is shit because these companies pander to shit people. From the get go.

Don't cut yourself on that edge

>Playerbase was turning into retard shit long before they started pandering to anyone other than the "core".
Honestly that's just a symptom of the fact that anyone who gives EA money for re-releases of the same core video game structure every single year reskinned is just a flat out retard.

BF2 briefly came back with the Revive project. Played it constantly with friends for about a month, and it was just as fun as I remembered.

nobody gives a fuck about your political agenda bullshit, literally just don't play the single player who gives a shit.

The game is bad for other reasons

battlefield 3 looks real good to me right now I gotta say

Youre overestimating lol. Apex is full of minorities gays and women but the gameplay is good so hardly anyone cares.

>literally just don't play the single player
or the multiplayer lol?
>political agenda
wanting a historical game to look and sound like what it was isn't even political

asian women prosthetic limb soldiers screaming constantly on western front ww2 battlefields is not what anyone should accept as a ww2 game. it should definitely not even be considered political to not want that

BF1 was garbage. Its dubstep-remixed marketing campaign and Actiblizz's own fuckups did all the heavy lifting for it. Casual shitter sales figures don't matter unless you're a stockholder, they just hit rank 20 and drop the game anyways.

The gameplay of Apex is rehashed CoD mechanics in a done-to-death genre.

does it affect gameplay no? sorry I dont give a fuck and neither should you.

Also you can turn off a lot of that bullshit custom character shit for multiplayer.

t. Never played titanfall 2 good job moving goalposts since your retarded LOL POLITICS AFFECTS SALES!!1!1 argument was 100% incorrect

What?

prosthetic limbs aren't even in the final product
they cut that shit so that people would complain less and it didn't work

Thanks for the advice, my neighbor has a BF4, I'll borrow it from him and see what happens. Some of the DLC for it costs quite a few which almost totalled the amount for the bundle.

Some of the servers he said are unplayable if you don't have the DLC.

it affects immersion which is a big part of a video game. It's like if all the characters spazzed around at all times with incredible bugginess and you defended it by saying WELL DOES IT AFFECT GAMPLAY LOL DIDNT THINK SO NURD

I don't see what's so hard to understand about this: it's flat out dishonest selling a WW2 game and marketing it as a WW2 game if you're not going to make WW2. You're just being disingenuous.

I still have shit to unlock in Battlefield 3 and barely touched BF4 before realizing the series is fucked. Why would anyone keep buying this shit over and over again?

No worries vro. Don't buy the BF4 DLC up front since a lot of it doesn't get played; just buy the DLC as you need it (aka run into inaccessible populated servers) and you'll save money. Have fun!

This they are worthy of execution whoever decided that to put niggers as part of the main instead of getting to play as a nazi war hero.

>falseflagging

Yes, but 1: they didn't pander, didn't say "you either believe this lie occurred in WWII or you're stupid", "whohooo women power!!!", 2: apex is overwatch level, no one cares if the characters are lizard people from skyrim, battlefield say "based on real facts" on the opening and people actually care about it

no, I LITERALLY got 100 hours out of the game, I could not give a shit about the women or other minorities in the game.

The game has HUGE issues but this isnt one of them

Was it worth it?

>no, I LITERALLY got 100 hours out of the game
cool, thank you for telling me you have shit taste. You continue to repeat "ITS NOT AN ISSUE NOT AN ISSUE" but didn't address the point I brought up at all about immersion.
I may as well be talking to a brick wall since you're so rabidly insistent on distancing yourself from "politics" that you can't agree to the basic fact that someone might want a WW2 game to look and sound like a WW2 game.

100 hours for 80 leafbucks is justifiable for me, and that's if I never came back to it. If they could release some solid patches with Soviets in say Stalingrad or D-Day with the rest of the allies I could easily see myself pumping another 50-100 hours.

its still Battlefield gameplay at it's core, so if you have that itch it does it reasonably well.

Attached: homunculus.png (83x91, 4K)

holy fuck do people really still do this autistic larp
gamers truly are the most sensitive group of people on the planet

Then why are you looking at the battlefield franchise then you fucking idiot.

Don't feel bad user, at least you can laugh at the rest of the losers clinging to the game while they get raped by multiple blatant hackers every match.

Okay you want me to address your completely subjective argument of 'muh immersion'?

No, the things you're bitching about did not affect the immersion in anyway I experienced in the game. There was plenty of times where I was immersed, Stuka divebombs, intense cc combat, sniping, frantic fighting in the last operation phase.

Example of immersive moment: youtube.com/watch?v=jbwZ1NvQNUI

You sound like one of those people who rages in chat every time you get killed

Because up until BF1 (although even BF1 did a better job at it) the Battlefield games were good at immersing you in the setting. Why are you such a butthurt little fag about it?

I don't buy EA games, I however do follow how bad the train wreck is and enjoy laughing at the people still giving them money.

Agreed. I don't like when it's too futuristic though. Advanced Warfare was terrible. Anything after the Vietnam war is fine.

hm what game would you suggest is up to your standards? I value your opinion since you are looking for an authentic experience. Only have PS4 right now.

Just play Halo 3 on the MCC. There's a lot of people with mics and they're all white using teamwork.

it's a worse version of the same damn core game EA has been releasing biyearly for the last decade with a new coat of paint, and they didn't even get the paint right.

>these companies pander to shit people. From the get go.
Explains why Yea Forums is full of so many faggots then.

>buy Battlefield
>get Battlefield
>that isn't what I expected

Attached: apu.png (900x623, 40K)

Says the guy thats crying about MUUHH WIMMINS MUH PROSTHETICS (that arent even in the game) youtu.be/eHrnUvmr5cI as shit as the game is its about as immersive as bf1

The only issue with AW was the movement. A bf game with aaron beck art style would be great

Attached: aaron_beck_for-K3loid.jpg (900x1169, 200K)

Day of Infamy is very good (the worst it has is a couple weapon attachments being out of date and the Owen not belonging on the Western Front) although unfortunately it's not on PS4

>strawman
I said "worse version" and the fact they're rehashing so hard means it's not worth it (the question he was asking) when the older games still exist and are populated. Dumb frogposting nigger.

why the fuck did they increase the footstep volume? it was perfect before. flanking is near impossible now because the enemies can hear you coming a mile away

Rehashing except for all the new and changed features, sure. If you ignore all the change then it's exactly the same

What else are you playing rn? Yeah, sucks its not on the PS4. Does not need to be a shooter.

I wasn't that same user.

I’m in the same boat. Put 120 hours into bf1 and loved it. Played about 5 of v and had enough.

Besides all the controversy it’s just a bad game.

mmyess who could forget the new and unique HATS haven't seen that in any other FPS to date

>I don't buy the games
Then how do you know that they're full of hackers? People said this shit about BF3 years into 4's life yet I saw less then than I did in 2013.

Retard that's Titanfall 2, why didn't you fuckers play it before so it didn't die after 6 months.

You can? What is it, flat "No character customization" or something else?

not him. they did play it, they're the 3000 or so dedicated fans who actually knew of the game without it being advertised to them because EA purposefully smothered Titanfall 2's launch in the cradle by launching it alongside Battlefield and hardly advertising TF|2. they're the people who made up the playerbase for those 6 months