MGS

2>1>3>trash

Attached: faceapp-Raiden-Flower-Crown.jpg (600x600, 45K)

almost
2>3>1

Attached: 1538332254286.gif (400x389, 186K)

MGS > MGS3 > MGSV > PW > MG2 > MGS2 > MG > MGS4

retard

Quit talking about yourself.

nah those shitty portable games ruined the canon retroactively, and the series only piledrived itself further by canonizing that garbage with V.
only the first three matter.

3 is the only one that does everything right

>2>1
False
>1>3
Also false

Attached: 1550763678238.png (1167x800, 1020K)

like what, run at 22fps?

MG1, MG2, and MGS?

Bruh....come on now. You know MGS3 is good.

Alita is fucking shit and 3 is the worst one of the original trilogy by far. It was a by the numbers apology to plebs that didn't get 2 and needed a re-release with a revamped camera to be playable.

Nice eyes, cunt.

we're talking about solid, dumbass.

im not the one who put the phantom game in his top3

>to plebs that didn't get 2
It's funny how 2tards always pretend it's some SUPER 2DEEP4U MOST PHILOSOPHICAL GAME EVER!!1! when the actual complaints people had with MGS2 were things like the janky gameplay and how it was filled with gimmick sections (escort missions, C4 missions, shooting the targets, finding the pacemaker, etc.)
>inb4 "YOU DON'T GET IT IT'S SHIT ON PURPOSE!!!!"
No.

Attached: 1527014445682.png (403x346, 249K)

bruh are you serious? 2 was as tight as the series' gameplay gets. 3 was a janky ass menu scroller

I actually agree with that.

>Keira Metz
I agree but only because 2 has cleaner graphics and gameplay.

feetfu

Attached: KeiraMetz.jpg (480x480, 41K)

They are within the same franchise and are referenced. MG S or not

not even close
V > 3 > 2> 4 > 1

if you're game is literally 75% cutscenes it's automatic trash, which i guess makes the entire mgs series trash as a result

No you are not, that is me. I was mainly concerned that you were talking about yourself in your initial post.