SO COMRADES COME RALLY

Why should I give a shit about people having "good sex"?

OP is only here to rattle your cage.

>Nagging: Volume 3,792,626

Attached: 31634930.jpg (1280x720, 44.74K)

Women would have better sex if they learned to communicate properly and took some responsibility. Unfortunately they're drunk on their victim complexes.

>socialism
>economic independence
literal exact opposites. why are lefitsts so fucking stupid?

Attached: usefulIdiots.jpg (864x960, 184.24K)

>Men think of sex 24/7
That's a social engineering meme.

>Unfortunately they're drunk on their victim complexes.
that's what makes sex enjoyable to them.

SEX SEX SEX SEX SEX SEX
SEX SEX SEX SEX SEX SEX
I AM A WOMAN SEX SEX SEX
SEX SEX SEX SEX SEX
PENIS IN MY VAGINA
SEX
SEX
SEX
S
E
X

I love threads about books no one in the thread has read

You’re not reading about socialism

PS: they dont
I live in a former socialist country

>former
So you haven’t had sex with any women in a socialist country then

Most boomer couples hate each other, their children are miserable, need more ?
please shut up if you are a previliged westerner who had the luxary to have fun or too ugly to seize it (we still dont, the state cuts any room for sex outside marraige)

youtube.com/watch?v=gmQqpPwxfoA

Attached: confused_don.jpg (300x300, 12.22K)

It's true for east vs. west germany at least.

>dude REAL socialism is when everybody gets along and shares all their stuff and they agree on everything and they don't need a government
Fuck your "theory".

No. FUCK YOU. If you're going to critique something, obtain an understanding of you're critiquing, fucking kike worshipper.

I love threads where retards don't the song reference in the OP.

there was a WaPo article with the same title back in 2017 iirc, where the basic premise that women just had more orgasms in the eastern bloc than ones in the western bloc due to to the formers lower living standards. i imagine the book is exactly the same, and that is to say,bullshit.

>Of all the residents of the former Soviet bloc, it is East German women’s sex lives that have been the most robustly researched, and informatively contrasted with those of their less fortunate West German counterparts, who lived under capitalism (plus religiosity, an additional libidinal drag). In addition to policies like universal child care and female employment, the government did strong feminist ideological work, promoting gender equality and women’s independence as specific benefits of socialism, even propagandizing on the importance of men sharing domestic labor. Because East German women became economically independent of men, men were more sexually attentive and generous than men in the West. By contrast, with women depending on them for survival, West German men had little incentive to improve their bedroom game. In addition, life in the GDR was more relaxing than in the West, with little economic stress and an abundance of leisure time.

>This difference had clear and measurable results. Researchers found much higher rates of sexual satisfaction among women in the East than in the West. One survey found that 80 percent of East German women always experienced orgasm, compared to 63 percent in the West. In a particularly poignant divide, 82 percent of East German women in one study felt “happy” after sex, compared to just a little over half in the West. These statistics were (charmingly) used by the East German state to argue for the superiority of communism, and were received with defensive skepticism by the West German media.

Attached: 1636269631399-4.jpg (691x728, 83.81K)

*Why women fuck Chads under Socialism and call it equality

>Men think of sex 24/7
The reverse is true, actually. Women have always been more sexual than men

>Chad pumps and dumps Gretchen
>Gretchen seethes and spends the next three months informing the Stassi about every petty thing Chad does

The more I read up the commiebloc, the more I start to realize that women enjoyed communism, not because of sexual liberation, but because the totalitarian system combined with a veneer of feminism meant they could be vindictive gossiping cunts. When you hear stats like "1/10 people were stassi informants", who do you think they were talking about? For the most part busybody old ladies and gossiping Karens. The Eastern Bloc was absolutely filled with petty Karens with too much power. I watched old documentaries on Ceausescu's Romania and they talked about how the ruling elite men were not so bad, but how you better watch out for their wives. Like the time Ceausescu's wife had a fit of jealousy over some famous actress on TV and got her fired, does that sound healthy sexual liberation? Or what about the time in Maoist China, when Jiang Qing got the wife of some disgraced official and organized for her to get gangraped repetitively and told the wardens to "not go easy on her" as they raped her.

Sexy, the fairer sex. And who says this? The males.
The normal males. You people are having a hard time believing this because you’re stunted

Sex isn't what sells. Making someone FEEL something is what sells

He's right, women don't actually care about sex, they just enjoy power dynamics. Think of a single female fetish that doesn't involve some form of rape or rough sex. They're simply the way they are because men desire them to be so.

>Think of a single female fetish that doesn't involve some form of rape or rough sex
Gaining.

>When you hear stats like "1/10 people were stassi informants", who do you think they were talking about? For the most part busybody old ladies and gossiping Karens. The Eastern Bloc was absolutely filled with petty Karens with too much power.
I watched a Russian film about North Korea and it looked like there were some pretty strict disciplinarian women working as pit bosses. They'll dominate you, in other words, with the same improvisational megalomania that the Moranbong band applies to their violins to dominate concert halls from Pyongyang to Chongjin.

youtu.be/fMtm0yODvgY

Attached: 437593475983475.png (1084x683, 928.22K)

>Chooses Berlin Olympics-esque physique

What did she mean by this?

>you'll get pussy if you do X, but now about economic systems of governance
This is a profoundly dumb strategy by women. The men who are already getting pussy under the current economic system see no reason to change it, the men who are not getting pussy fall into two camps: either they are already tranny commies, or they are Chud incels. Tranny commies need no convincing of the greatness of socialism, leaving the only target demographic to be Chud incels, who see that many men are already getting pussy under non-socialism, and hence conclude that the economic system of governance is incidental to pussy-getting, and identify the book as cheap whorish manipulation.

The book fails on every conception as a motor of social change. But of course, it is a presumption that that is what it is supposed to do.

>Ghodsee is going to start a revolution
Why are journos so goddamned gay?

Women are profoundly dumb.

>Some do, because yeah, sex is sometimes on the younger women’s minds. Not as often as males though.
I recall one particularly airheaded young woman I knew years ago, who insisted that men thought about sex every 7 seconds because she read it in a gossip magazine. She would quiz me when we were drinking coffee or whatever, asking me what sexual scenario I was envisioning - and she would do this perhaps every thirty seconds, as supposedly, I had been through 4 entire scenarios during that time, or so her explicitly stated reasoning went.

I know where some of your minds are going, and no, she was not flirting by a long shot, it was inquisitorial and slightly adversarial. There is a completely specific kind of female autism that they get a pass on by whiteknights, and I'm fairly sure that the idea about men constantly thinking about sex - as opposed to women - is one example of a meme that has arisen solely because of such autism being allowed to fester.

I don't think so, the book is clever and ruthless, and women are very capable of that. It is dumb if you think the purpose of it is to be a motor of social change, like the faggot journo, but as a cash-grab, it is probably highly efficient.
It will be bought by every no-pussy-getting tranny commie, as they believe displaying it on their shelf will somehow be the thing that transforms the entire gestalt of profound unfuckability of their existence, and once women see it there, they'll drop rip of their pants and mate.

>UNLIKE ME!

>long winded anecdote addressing nothing

YWNBW

>long winded anecdote addressing nothing
Yes, whereas the meme that men constantly think about sex is a short-winded anecdote.

>I don't think so, the book is clever and ruthless, and women are very capable of that.
So are niggers, and they are also profoundly dumb.

Yet capitalism can invent and mass produce — at an inexpensive price — the one tool women need to sexually satisfy themselves, curious.

Attached: Mr Hitachi.jpg (932x954, 72.76K)

The young think about it constantly. The sex starved will also think about it quite a lot.
Women are notoriously hard to please and quite often afraid of sex. Some go their whole lives without orgasm. Both men and women have their freaks, but far and wide it’s the males who get obsessed over it. Check porn fantasies out maybe. Gang bangs are always five to thirty males to a woman, rarely the other way around. All for male consumption. On and on I could go. It’s still a man’s world, though some women can feel semi emancipated, they still have to watch their backs for the crazed outcast pups of the “modern” world.
There’s another issue! How many women rapists are there to males?

how else exactly does a society with no money and communal production and distribution work?

lol you're a virgin
doesn't matter for you since you'll die in a gulag and you won't get to see it

How do women use sex toys without feeling embarrassment and shame. Like if a guy gets a flesh light he will be rightfully mocked but when a chick gets a vibrator it's considered normal.

>fleshlight
Worthless incel
>cuntstick
Independent queen

Attached: 1639550610637.jpg (839x839, 138.38K)

>Women are notoriously hard to please and quite often afraid of sex
This nigga telling on himself

I'm from a country that has been socialist for the past 20 years. No, women do in fact not perform better in bed than in other countries.

no you aren't

I remember reading afterthoughts of people after visiting Vipassanna retreat for one week and the women just said all they could think about was sex.

Sorry girls, the book is a fraud.
You will not get an orgasm in "real socialism" as there are no alpha males there.

In that case my critique is simply "your theory is impossible according to all empirical evidence"

A moid who believes in the equality of the sexes. At birth.

You don’t know what’s required of us to create actual communism yet?
You’ve been brainwashed as easily as the trannies you jack off to into believing all socialists are limp peace activists. These people and the book may be frauds, but “ “ real socialism” “ is made by strong and united men and women. So at least the title of the book is a dream quest. Though not the first thing on my mind when I dream and plan for it.

Should have attached this

Attached: EC19E3D3-95E8-47F4-B768-1B502BB98FDA.jpg (1920x1080, 657.17K)