Can you name one philosophical concept that does not appear in ancient Greek works?

Can you name one philosophical concept that does not appear in ancient Greek works?

Attached: 1652033161511.jpg (495x619, 60.11K)

重玄

noumenon

being-without-pussy, an ontic-existentiel state that for many young men has superimposed itself on the more primordial being-in-the-world.

Accelerationism

天下

Hegemony comes close

I love birches so fucking much. Best tree by far

Yes.

I've only ever seen the word 天下 in manga about empires expanding, but I reckon it means something like οἰκουμένη, which is also used whenever people talk about conquering the world (like in the case of Alexander the Great's conquests or the expansion of the Roman Empire).

Me too. I've only ever seen them on Minecraft, however.

天下 treats the physical world as a realm of heaven and the difference between subjective and objective is blurry

The Red Pill. Calling it a philosophy is really stretching it though.

Isn't that the allegory of the cave?

Zero (0)

Couldn't "all under heaven" be said to be the cosmos, which includes Earth? Tian might not necessarily mean the Heaven that pagan Greeks or Christians have in mind, but rather just the space covering, and including the world known to man?

value-form

Cosmos maybe, but they went as far as claiming that 天子 is the ruler of the universe appointed by the heaven, every legitimacy comes from 中国的皇帝 and link natural disasters and calamities to the state

Yeah... You're actually right.
What about feminism? (Again, stretching the confines of what a philosophy is)
>inb4 universal suffrage = Democracy
No
>inb4 egalitarianism
Fucking kek.

>that 天子 is the ruler of the universe appointed by the heaven, every legitimacy comes from 中国的皇帝 and link natural disasters and calamities to the state
I know it's not the same, but it's analogous to the Greeks and the Romans connecting disease outbreaks and years of bad crops to the corruption of rulers (see for example in the opening scene of Oedipus Rex) and to poorly conduced religious rituals, and to the Romans bestowing sacred duties to government officials, including raising deceased emperors into the pantheon.

Tian Xia is literally a based name for China

>feminism
Aristophanes' Lysistrata? It's a comedy play, so it wasn't meant to be taken seriously, but it at least demonstrates that ancient Greek people did at some point entertain the idea that women could be the rulers of a society too. Socrates didn't have too bad of an opinion on women, either.

No, the current 天下 would be American hegemony

>women could be the rulers of a society
Feminism, as defined as feminists, encompasses a lot more than political ambition, but I'll give that to you.
It's also interesting that the only place in Greek literature where the thought of women having any agency over themselves would be a comedy.

Women are also equals in Plato's republic. But again that fact really serves the interpretation that the republic was meant as an exercise in comedic, absurdist political philosophy

pretty much this. nonexistent in ancient times. that's why I took this matter upon myself to solve.

Monotheïsm?

Aristotle's prime mover.

occasionalism, mind body problem, pure categories of experience, Russell's paradox, Godhead/trinity, immaterialism, utilitarianism, monads, world spirit, si fallor sum/cogito ergo sum, evolutionist morality, the scientific method

Silent writing.

Attached: 2560px-Eye_of_Horus.svg.png (2560x1813, 104.03K)

>What about feminism
The Assembly Women by Aristophanes.

The word "monad" originally came from Pythagorean philosophy, and the cogito ergo sum argument was first stated by Aristotle. The matter-mind debate was addressed by Plato, and Parmenidean monism was one of the first immaterialist philosophical world conceptions. Hegel's world spirit is loosely inspired by the Platonist conception of the archon as the creator of the cosmos.

Now this guy knows his greeks

No

Transcendental unity of apperception

What should I read to really understand the greeks? Where do I start?

Cunny

Read The Pre-Socratics. Everything after them is a response to them or references them.

Not really

Are you stupid?

The Body without Organs.

Also a lot of political economy, if you consider that philosophical. The Greeks didn't have a great idea of economy. I mean the kind of quasi-metaphysical stuff, first 6 chapters of Das Kapital sort of stuff.

Dorko’s Basilisk

You have to demonstrate each point by providing reasoning why they're the same not just namedrop. Where did Aristotle state cogito? What does it matter that you can trace back the etymology of monads to Pythagoras? Where did Plato address body mind? Being inspired by the Greeks is trivial not an amswer. Pseud post.

For India and China there's at least a few dozen, and when given ideas overlap with Greek ones it's a toss up who came up with it first

unrelated, but someone should seriously look into why so-called logical fallacies are nothing more than dogmatic moral sentiments that impede the discovery of knowledge

The Body without Organs

Enlighten me, is this substantially different from the Buddhist concept of emptiness ?

>cogito ergo sum
Isn't something extremely similar to this found in Aristotle's works? It isn't used for the same purpose as Descartes' expression, but I think it is there.

Body without organs

Church without organs

well, the physical world is heaven for some people, for example communists

emergence

We fuck between the shards

Does the pipe through which the water travels impede the water?

Perspectivism in painting

Where?

>Parmenidean monism was one of the first immaterialist philosophical world conceptions
It was pantheism/naturalism

don't speak to communists and we will all profit

Retard, Deleuze wasn't s communist, he was a free markets guy. Guattari was a Green towards the end, also avowedly anticommunist and antisocialist.

Guattari was a militant commie who bailed gramsci out of prison and drove to Italy to pick him up from jail in the 80’s you dipshit

>so-called logical fallacies
kek, they only impede knowledge if youre a midwit, in which case they arent useful anyways

What the fuck? Gramsci died in 1937. This is the historical calibre of people who call everybody they dislike on the internet a communist.

Admittedly Guattari had left Autonomist leanings but that mostly went away after 1968, like it did for every other Frenchman of the period. You might as well pretend everyone who was in the CP for fifteen minutes in 1932 was a lifelong communist.