Why do white incels worship this guy?

>authoritarianism, racism, poverty and war
Biden in a nutshell

>reddit

What are—

>spacing

Trying to say?

>reddit

Liberals support Nazis, security states and cultivate race wars

Liberals enact embargoes to impoverish rouge socialist states. You’re not a deep thinker.

He also funded Nazis so the US can take over Russia. Putin is a level headed conservative. Rightwing, but not as bad as Biden. Just because they oppose each other doesn’t mean one is left and the other right.

>Why do white incels worship this guy?
They’re chuds who worship an Uncle Tom... day of the rope for all Wh*toids, conservatives, and Nazis soon. We’re gonna bash the fash out of them. In the future, statues of George Floyd everywhere. Mandated lessons about George Floyd from K-12, undergraduate universities, and graduate seminars. Revenge for slavery. No justice, no peace. Whites are the cause of all evil ... yellow star saying “White oppressor” on it for conservatives. Throw bricks into the windows of White stores. Kristallnacht 2.0 — for Whites now. Coming soon to a family neighborhood near you!

my point is the left want all those things how can you not figure that out

They are not the left. The left oppose them. The left can’t even get the so-called progressive caucus to get medicare for all. They slow-walked us into this Roe v. Wade thing on purpose. They could codify it into law right now since they have control but they won’t, they want you to vote first. Wait till they lose big. They’re not stupid. They’re rightwingers for cash. Figure it out someday. Hell, George Carlin did.

got it, libs arent left because you, random redditor, determine the political spectrum. cope and seethe.

Because he's smart and knows what he's talking about?

Attached: 1650207775171.png (488x439, 313.17K)

none of those things are wing specific you can be left or right and still be authoritarian, racist, poor and pro war

Big cock

it doesnt matter how much you cope and seethe babykiller, libs are left wing

>It doesn’t matter if the frog can sprint after a gazelle and snap it’s neck. It’s still a frog. Ignore the spotted fur! It’s green ITS GREEN!

So are you, babykiller Azov battalion backer.

Attached: Ford11[1].jpg (900x599, 43.58K)

Tell that to everyone who got their bank accounts frozen because they were in DC in January 2021

This is all just my interpretation, but:

The essence of being right-wing, as of now, is disdain for, and denial of wrongdoing towards, historical victim groups. You can see this in anti-immigration sentiment, anti-gay sentiment, anti-feminism, and so on. This is "evil" with respect to the historical Christian tradition of the West because one of the things that makes Christianity unique is its concern for victims (drawing on Girard here) and on the realities of sin and repentance. As of now, being right-wing is saying "No!" to sin, "No!" to repentance, "No!" to reparation, and "No!" to concern for victims. Left-wingers, even though they think Christianity is false, are in reality carrying on the Christian tradition, and in their view, perhaps even superceding it, even though they see it as disappointing due to its frequent failure to take the side of the victim (and of course, lack of evidence etc. but that's really beside the point for them).

The Holocaust in particular has called us to go further in our concern for victims, which was instrumental in spurring events like the Civil Rights Movement and Decolonization, feminism, gay rights, trans rights, and more. For example, its widely known that Soviets claimed moral authority in criticizing Segregation in the US, which played a big role in the SCOTUS basically making shit up in Brown v. Board because it was making them look bad in the Third World.

This is why right-wing politics always comes down to repealing the moral revolution(s) of the '60s and revising claims of historical guilt in WW2. They are "evil" wrt. Western tradition. This will become clear as the 21st Century continues, Christian churches will baptize left-wing politics and change doctrines on gay/trans/whatever and right-wing politics will more openly embrace Nietzsche and Hitler and attack morality.

It’s actually a valid critique and analysis to point out that “leftist” parties in the West — like the Democratic Party of the US, to take the example regarded as the touchstone (since this place can be very Americano-centric), can basically act like the GOP in blackface. It’s the same principle of rich douchebags handpicking Goldman Sachs CEOs to their cabinet, bailing out Wall Street, wars for Raytheon and tax cuts for Monsanto, and generally screwing you over, except more “progressively” and with a diversified crew in power fucking you over, this time. Cornel West, socialist philosopher, called Obama “a Rockefeller Republican in blackface.” It’s like the worst aspects of the Chinese Cultural Revolution/Stalinist takeover of the USSR but without even the balls to turn into balls-to-the-wall Marxists. They’re still monopoly capitalists in suits-and-ties with the Rockefellers’ and Rothschilds’ hands up their asses. But they’re “Woke” now so the proles can keep up the infighting.

>The essence of being right-wing, as of now, is disdain for, and denial of wrongdoing towards, historical victim groups.

lol fucking hell

if you actually want to know the essence of left and right wing there is a book for you

Attached: 0465081428[1].jpg (333x500, 25.09K)

Also here authoritarianism isn't necessarily bad. What will also become obvious this century is that anti-democratic politics will become necessary to protect historical victim groups, as the masses really are hopelessly stupid and reactionary. Once Christianity makes a left turn this sort of thinking will be embraced to ensure that immigration continues, ethnic and sexual minorities are protected, etc.

So is this guy just le based black guy who criticizes his own culture or does he have something profound?

Attached: direction-brain.png (1160x770, 156.84K)

What always confuses me is that people calling others incels are often incels themselves, and from my experiences from real life the vast majority of actual incels are leftists.
It's crazy that some people take this name calling seriously enough to make it's way to it's politicians mouthpieces as truth.

There use to be a square political spectrum chart, but apparently you've never seen it.
Sometimes I am astounded to the blatant hypocrisy and ignorance of the left.
It's like they are jealous the right is superior at what they want to do.

Attached: Torus Political Spectrum.png (1406x767, 16.28K)

I don't read affirmative action cutouts like Sowell. He's a collaborator against his own people.

>The essence of being right-wing, as of now, is disdain for, and denial of wrongdoing towards, historical victim groups. You can see this in anti-immigration sentiment, anti-gay sentiment, anti-feminism, and so on. This is "evil" with respect to the historical Christian tradition of the West because one of the things that makes Christianity unique is its concern for victims (drawing on Girard here) and on the realities of sin and repentance. As of now, being right-wing is saying "No!" to sin, "No!" to repentance, "No!" to reparation, and "No!" to concern for victims. Left-wingers, even though they think Christianity is false, are in reality carrying on the Christian tradition, and in their view, perhaps even superceding it, even though they see it as disappointing due to its frequent failure to take the side of the victim (and of course, lack of evidence etc. but that's really beside the point for them).
Reddit is that way. Modern leftism is in fact one of the most awful perversions ever created. In Christian terminology, it’s the ideology of the Pharisees. It ascribes unique essences and historical guilt to a specific class — White males — and constantly hammers you with, “White males are the cause of all evil! Only Whites can be evil and White culture can be criticized, all other groups are always the victim!” In fact, your obsession with the victim and belief that people in “victim” classes are ALWAYS the good ones paints you as a neo-Bolshevik. But there’s no use arguing with someone with your programming.

>They are not the left. The left oppose them
That might be true if the left hadn't changed. If it weren't for the rogue socialist states already mentioned ITT the old left already would've largely died out, which is to say that by its own definition it might have already been progressed past and been termed reactionary.

ok ill just post it then

>The most sweeping attempt to survey the underlying dimension is Thomas Sowell’sA Conflict of Visions. Sowell explains two “visions” of the nature of human beings that were expressed in their purest forms by Edmund Burke (1729–1797), the patron of secular conservatism, and William Godwin (1756–1836), the British counterpart to Rousseau. In earlier times they might have been referred to as different visions of the perfectibility of man.

>In the Tragic Vision, humans are inherently limited in knowledge, wisdom, and virtue, and all social arrangements must acknowledge those limits. “Mortal things suit mortals best,” wrote Pindar; “from the crooked timber of humanity no truly straight thing can be made,” wrote Kant. The Tragic Vision isassociated with Hobbes, Burke, Smith, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, the jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., the economists Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, the philosophers Isaiah Berlin and Karl Popper, and the legal scholar Richard Posner.

>In the Utopian Vision, psychological limitations are artifacts thatcome fromour social arrangements, and we should not allow them to restrict ourgaze from what is possible in a better world. Its creed might be “Some people see things as they are and ask ‘why?’; I dream things that never were and ask ‘why not?’” The quotation is often attributed to the icon of 1960s liberalism, Robert F. Kennedy, but it was originally penned by the Fabian socialist GeorgeBernard Shaw (who also wrote, “There is nothing that can be changed more completelythan human nature when the job is taken in hand early enough”).The Utopian Vision is also associated with Rousseau, Godwin, Condorcet, Thomas Paine, the jurist Earl Warren, the economist John Kenneth Galbraith, and to a lesser extent the political philosopher Ronald Dworkin.

if you dont read blacks who haet tokenism then you dont read most of the 20th century's best black writers

>Modern leftism is in fact one of the most awful perversions ever created. In Christian terminology, it’s the ideology of the Pharisees.
By 2200 most Christian churches will be blessing gay marriages and reminding white people of their historical sins.

>It ascribes unique essences and historical guilt to a specific class — White males — and constantly hammers you with, “White males are the cause of all evil! Only Whites can be evil and White culture can be criticized, all other groups are always the victim!”
Historical guilt applies to other ethnic groups as well, but the finer points of who is guilty of what in India or wherever isn't really relevant to us in the West. Since whites really did invade and colonize everyone, it is basically true that all other groups exist in a state of relative victimization to them.

>In fact, your obsession with the victim and belief that people in “victim” classes are ALWAYS the good ones paints you as a neo-Bolshevik.
Victims aren't inherently good, again, you're just engaging in whataboutism to deny the realities of historical sin.

You highly confuse what Christianity is.
While it is forgiving it also is about ceasing sins.
Leftism, or liberalism, is like taking the story of "he who has not sinned cast the first stone" and ignoring the following passages, "go and LEAVE your life of sin".
The act of forgiving does not mean it is also an act of acceptance of sin.

Soviets were killing Homos and Christians by the millions, and it is now well known that their aims of claiming that "moral authority" in their criticism of segregation was all part of their psyop cold war efforts.
You must acknowledge that most people today on the left are the ones pushing for a new segregation in the USA.

The right is about repealing moral decadence and restoring morality in whole.

The whole premise of most leftist arguments is that their moral degradation should be embraced despite history showing it always leads to failure.
It's simply a form of madness, insanity.

To be left is to be mentally ill.

Thomas Sowell is the king of token blacks. He has no published papers as an economist and basically just took a job at the Hoover Institution as the token black, he's a house nigger like any black conservative.

>In the Tragic Vision, moreover, human nature has not changed. Traditions such as religion, the family, social customs, sexual mores, and political institutions are a distillation of time-tested techniques that let us work around the shortcomings of human nature. They are as applicable to humans today as they were when they developed, even if no one today can explain their rationale. However imperfect society may be, we should measure it against the cruelty and deprivation of the actual past, not the harmony and affluence of an imagined future. We are fortunate enough to live in a society that more or less works, and our first priority should be not to screw it up, because human nature always leaves us teetering on the brink of barbarism. And since no one is smart enough to predict the behavior of a single human being, let alone millions of them interacting in a society, we should distrust any formula for changing society from the top down, because it is likely to have unintended consequences that are worse than the problems it was designed to fix. The best we can hope for are incremental changes that are continuously adjusted according to feedback about the sum of their good and bad consequences. It also follows that we should not aim to solve social problems like crime or poverty, because in a world of competing individuals one person’s gain may be another person’s loss. The best we can do is trade off one cost against another.

>In the Utopian Vision, human nature changes with social circumstances, so traditional institutions have no inherent value. That was then, this is now. Traditions are the dead hand of the past, the attempt to rule from the grave. They must be stated explicitly so their rationale can be scrutinized and their moral status evaluated. And by that test, many traditions fail: the confinement of women to the home, the stigma against homosexuality and premarital sex, the superstitions of religion, the injustice of apartheid and segregation, the dangers of patriotism as exemplified in the mindless slogan “My country, right or wrong.” Practices such as absolute monarchy, slavery, war, and patriarchy once seemed inevitable but have disappeared or faded from many parts of the world through changes in institutions that were once thought to be rooted in human nature. Moreover, the existence of suffering and injustice presents us with an undeniable moral imperative. We don’t know what we can achieve until we try, and the alternative, resigning ourselves to these evils as the way of the world, is unconscionable.

im glad you can recognize the evils of tokenism, but then i wonder why you support a system that inscribes it into law

He's like their black father.

>They are still evil for being right-wing btw.
people like you are the problem with American politics -- and not because you see things only in black and white, but because you've been manipulated into seeing things in only black and white.

>While it is forgiving it also is about ceasing sins.
Right-wing politics is about denying that a sin ever happened and trying to go back to sinning as soon as possible.

>The right is about repealing moral decadence and restoring morality in whole.
The entire point I was making is that the historical realities of WW2 and moral revolutions in the '60s forced us to re-evaluate what "morality" really was. As it turns out, a lot of what right-wingers claim to be acts of "restoring moral order" is rooted in hatred.

The essence of modern leftism lies in a vision of reality which is fundamentally wrong-headed and inverted. In fact, strangely enough, before having even read this post I was just about to talk about something like this dichotomy.

In the modern monstrous pseudo-leftist worldview, historical guilt is ascribed to a massive class of people (Whites). This ascribing of a new form of original sin to them — White privilege, oppressor class, colonialist, got all their wealth at the expense of the poorer other oppressed races — already is inverted and wrong off the bat by making an itself monstrously racist conflation between historical elites tied to the pushing of colonialism and slavery and oppression — the Morgans, the Rockefellers, Cecil Rhodes, and Rothschild-types — to the average bumfuck poor or middle-class White, simply by a coincidence of skin color. “Since these wealthy industrial barons, bankers, colonial Southern slave-owners and mining magnates of yore were White, and were tied to causing so much suffering, and you’re White — you need to be held accountable for this, too! You’re a racist and not acknowledging your privilege!” This is already a massively un-Christian worldview, with its obsession with revenge, holding accountable — not just that we need to uplift the poor and suffering and needy (an OK idea in itself) but that we need to PUNISH, hold accountable — even people who had no direct role in causing it. Even if these people are nice, law-abiding, well-integrated and contributing citizens, they’re “bigoted” if they disagree with you politically. Furthermore, you can then NEVER criticize aspects of cultures that are not part of this “White oppressor culture” — even if they have hugely negative aspects.

Thomas Sowell points this out perfectly, saying, “There is no greater idiocy than holding some people strongly accountable for the actions of their ancestors while not holding others accountable for what they themselves are doing today.”

Your black and white of course is very essentialistic, reductionistic, malevolent and destructive in yet another way — only focusing on the evils of a certain class you’ve deemed to be the oppressors and not on any of the goods or contributions they’ve made to the world — painting you as a massive asshole and a racist who sees reality invertedly, and could benefit from living in a third-world country for a while, or some Islamo-tyranny where you can get stoned to death for adultery or homosexuality.

Attached: 2B79229F-5990-40AF-B156-C125337AD42C.jpg (588x309, 73.9K)

>He's a collaborator against his own people.

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/25/most-americans-say-colleges-should-not-consider-race-or-ethnicity-in-admissions/

62% of blacks in america say race should not be considered in college admissions

anti-AA blacks are not collaborators against their own people, they are collaborators against the democrat slave plantation mentality

You should be posting this to the guy I’m talking to. He’s just sure of the left/right dichotomy. If you’re on team blue you have to be leftwing, right?
WRONG

“The left” is a general position. People stand for something about it or they THEY change.
> If it weren't for the rogue socialist states already mentioned ITT the old left already would've largely died out,
We exist! We just don’t take power of states! And the statist variety largely can’t because of this thing called neoliberalism. This is rightwing

atlanteans are literally oppressed retard read a fucking book that isn't about sodomy

This single issue doesn’t change the fact of what he is to the black community at large.

>We exist!
Hardly, their voices have been but barely a whimper under that by which they had been replaced.

Left-wing politics is about denying that a sin ever happened and trying to go back to sinning as soon as possible.
>ftfy

>historical realities of WW2 and moral revolutions in the '60s forced us to re-evaluate what "morality" really was
>historical realities
This is probably something that will never ever get settled with words and only with war, but the way we did the Germans while ignoring everything that was going on during that time is immoral.
Most if not all of the hard chargers, the men on the front, did not approve of what was happening in the 60s in regards to civil rights.
It wasn't a re-evaluation of morality but a carefully tailored instigation of power changes using deception.

>a lot of what right-wingers claim to be acts of "restoring moral order" is rooted in hatred.
Anything that goes against the left's narrative is called hatred when in reality everything the left is about is hatred.
Again, this is one of those things that cannot ever be peacefully resolved with words alone.

It's like someone living in filth think it's okay and others have to live with it as well, and that anyone telling them to stop living in filth, or forcing them to stop, is an act of hatred.
It's a very simple minded anger and an actual hatred.

The pendulum always swings though, I don't think this dynamic will ever end.

I'll humble myself and use an analogy to hopefully get thru to you, a single soul.
> Right wingers are like school janitors.
> Left are like (non-Japanese) school children.
> The right is constantly trying to clean the mess of such children, and trying to make rules, or enforce old rules so that things stay orderly and good.
> The left is constantly trying ruin the school, purposely trying to advocate for the removal of rules and claim that the janitors are just hating their childish happiness.
> eventually over time, the janitor gets his way, and over time the children get theirs.
> it never ends.
> years from now, there will be new janitors, and new children.
> with the same arguments time immemorial.

They say that but if race wasn't considered there would be no blacks in top US colleges at which point they would be outraged about discrimination. Affirmative Action is needed to protect blacks from the realities of the marketplace and prevent them from being utterly destitute.

the pharisees at least believed in their own ideology. the satanic 666 cut-off-your-penis globohomo cult don't even believe their own lies

This single issue you were completely ignorant of should make you re-examine your priors about what black people want and who is a traitor to whom

Another one

pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2020/08/05/gallup-80-percent-of-blacks-want-the-same-or-more-police-in-their-neighborhood-n755799

>Over 80 percent of black Americans want the police to spend as much or more time in their neighborhoods as they currently do, new polling from Gallup conducted last month finds.

>Asked if they would prefer police spend more, less, or the same amount of time in their neighborhoods, 61 percent of black respondents told Gallup the same, while a further 20 percent said more. Just 19 percent said less. Black respondents were more likely to want more police presence than white, Asian, and all adults overall.

>threatening to murder innocent atlanteans because an obese black porn star pretended to OD

Attached: 1646942008898.png (273x141, 53.88K)

Modern leftism is like throwing out the baby with the bath water — because the West has a history of crimes like slavery, oppression, colonialism, warfare and so forth, we need to destroy Western heritage, flood the West with poorer migrants who don’t integrate as well and even lead to statistical spikes in violent crime, poverty, and unemployment, and we need to call everyone against throwing the West and its heritage into a dumpster and setting it on fire “A White supremacist.”

I find that a more common worldview amongst conservatives is that the West admittedly has a terrible history but they also see a lot of the GOOD it done, the awful things it overturned, and the good it can continue to do. The leftist worldview, on the other hand, is more like, “All of history was BIGOTED, AWFUL, RACIST and SEXIST until my gender studies professor came along to set things right. Thousands of years of tradition, the slow painful development towards more egalitarianism and a more sophisticated moral code — all WORTHLESS because they didn’t have gender-neutral bathrooms.” This neo-Bolshevik — and it really is reminiscent of Stalinism — mindset, obviously looks over all the suffering it causes in its idealistic attempts to bring about a utopia and all the paradoxes in its worldview. It doesn’t matter if it turns out that kids getting sex reassignment surgery start regretting it and thinking they were exploited due to their mental illness — this is “transphobic bigoted alt-right misinformation, and we need to censor writers like Abigail Shrier and make sure her harmful transphobic nonsense doesn’t hurt the trans community at large. It doesn’t matter if a lax immigration policy leads to spikes in violent crime, such as happened in Germany with Merkel’s refugee crisis — we need to non-person academics who talk about it, retract the studies, censor this information in the mainstream media, and condemn all people who talk about it as ‘White supremacists’. We need to lower standards for historical victim groups, and feed people massive lies about which direction Black-on-White/White-on-Black violence typically goes (not just a little lie, mind you — a MASSIVE lie with MASSIVE far-reaching implications when applied societally), to justify our little BLM revolutionaries. We need to make White kids feel guilty for segregation and slavery, while we ourselves ironically institute a new form of segregation based on vaccination status (etc.)”

I’m certain the higher-ups don’t while the proles obviously do.

Because you still betray us every chance you get. How’s China looking to you these days? They still doing zero covid policy? Ridiculous.

>Ha! You didn’t know 60% of those asked in the black community said thus and such about college
Which zip codes was this even conducted? I work with a bourgeois black who still supports Obama, on my ride home I saw a homeless black dude so strung out he looked dead. My ignorance of your little statistic means shit in the real world where the real people are.

Watch what black Americans DO not what they say. Black Americans overwhelmingly dislike police.

>Modern leftism is like throwing out the baby with the bath water — because the West has a history of crimes like slavery, oppression, colonialism, warfare and so forth, we need to destroy Western heritage, flood the West with poorer migrants who don’t integrate as well and even lead to statistical spikes in violent crime, poverty, and unemployment, and we need to call everyone against throwing the West and its heritage into a dumpster and setting it on fire “A White supremacist.”
Yes. This is called "penance" in the Christian tradition (which is embodied today by Liberalism as almost no one really believes in the historical truth of Christianity any more).

>The leftist worldview, on the other hand, is more like, “All of history was BIGOTED, AWFUL, RACIST and SEXIST until my gender studies professor came along to set things right. Thousands of years of tradition, the slow painful development towards more egalitarianism and a more sophisticated moral code — all WORTHLESS because they didn’t have gender-neutral bathrooms.”
This is basically admitting that my claims are right while denying that repentance or any serious penance must happen.

>audited polling of representative samples bad
>anecdote about my trip home good

another progressive who doesnt know shit about most black americans

Horseshoe theory

The modern monstrous pseudo-“Left” is, finally, so disgusting and monstrous because after all this, it then has the gall to still paint itself as the “unjustly maligned victim always in danger and under threat by the crazy Nazis and White supremacist dinosaurs in the GOP. We definitely don’t have any massive social sway and predominance in the entertainment industry, academia, the K-12 education system — we’re a ragtag bunch of oppressed victims who only recently historically have succeeded in gaining the role proper to us!”

To repeat the part about the Pharisees that I brought up — a perfect analogy, since Christ used Pharisaism as an emblem of what happens when adhering to societal norms and a rigid punish-the-law-breaker/exalt-ourselves-(the-good-ones) moral code turns into an un-Christian, ungodly artifice. In their strict adherence to “the Law”, as some social code they’ve decided is the be-all end-all formulation of ethics, they actually turn into the people who would gladly crucify Christ.

Enough, anyway. We’re talking at cross-angles. As points out this type of argument can’t be resolved in words, I don’t want to SEE it happen but the way the West is going today, a Turner-Diaries-style swingback with right wing militias and revolutionaries continuing the cycle of historical political violence and getting revenge against their smug “moral superiors” is a probable part of the American and European future... the “if I’m already going to be called a Nazi simply for disagreeing about your pronouns, why not go all the way?” mindset, in other words — a dangerous one for society, but an understandable one.

>It doesn’t matter if a lax immigration policy leads to spikes in violent crime, such as happened in Germany with Merkel’s refugee crisis — we need to non-person academics who talk about it, retract the studies, censor this information in the mainstream media, and condemn all people who talk about it as ‘White supremacists’.
The reality is that almost everyone who does talk about it IS some sort of white supremacist and does so with the intent of carrying out mass deportation if not outright genocide. Just read actual RW user posters or blogs, expulsion or extermination are the goal.

>We need to lower standards for historical victim groups, and feed people massive lies about which direction Black-on-White/White-on-Black violence typically goes (not just a little lie, mind you — a MASSIVE lie with MASSIVE far-reaching implications when applied societally), to justify our little BLM revolutionaries.
This is unfortunately a noble lie needed to protect black Americans. Most right-wing claims about black Americans are As shown by history, everyone actually WILL despise them if not protected by an enlightened elite who possess some semblance of morality. See , the protection of the historically oppressed can't be left to the benighted masses' vote.

>We need to make White kids feel guilty for segregation and slavery
We dindu nuffin. "No!" to repentance, or penance, or reparation. Does this sound like Christianity or like Nietzsche?

>most RW claims about black Americans' crime rates, etc. are factually true
Fixed.

>The modern monstrous pseudo-“Left” is, finally, so disgusting and monstrous because after all this, it then has the gall to still paint itself as the “unjustly maligned victim always in danger and under threat by the crazy Nazis and White supremacist dinosaurs in the GOP
The Left = victims and their protectors. This century we will see a recognition of this fact, namely, that the Left are the guardians of moral values (at least as morality is understood post-WW2/Civil Rights).

>To repeat the part about the Pharisees that I brought up — a perfect analogy, since Christ used Pharisaism as an emblem of what happens when adhering to societal norms and a rigid punish-the-law-breaker/exalt-ourselves-(the-good-ones) moral code turns into an un-Christian, ungodly artifice.
Right but the entire point of post-WW2 leftism is that CHRISTIANITY HAS FAILED. See WW2, where the beating heart of Christendom, Germany, gave a giant middle finger to Christian morality and went on a genocide spree, towards other white people no less. At least the English or French could argue that nonwhites were too benighted to really be moral agents even if that isn't true.

>I don’t want to SEE it happen but the way the West is going today, a Turner-Diaries-style swingback with right wing militias and revolutionaries continuing the cycle of historical political violence and getting revenge against their smug “moral superiors” is a probable part of the American and European future
It will happen, the most likely path to this is Christian churches walking back their stances on sexual morality while continuing to preach against racism, thus allowing them to provide a sacral basis for post-WW2 morality while the Right will come to see the Christian tradition as the main adversary.