>First Person
First Person
Correct opinion, this is why I wrote my novella in third person
i also don't like it but i read two books in first person that didn't feel bad
the shadow of the torturer by wolfe
and white noise by delillo
It’s a sign of mental weakness and inflexibility. True literature uses free indirect discourse in the third person.
Wolfe is a good at making his characters narrow views on the world seem wider than they are
>Second Person
*First person present tense
First person retrospective is kino
whats this about?
It’s about two pilgrims going on a journey, one is a beautiful girl, the other a mishimian schizoid. It’s about his philosophic infatuations and their chaste but horny romance.
Read the description on amazon, it’s A Viennese Pilgrim And Her Guardian
You moron, don't post the cover, post pictures of choice excerpts. No one is going to buy your shit if they can't see your writing
>Book switches between first and third person randomly
(You)
>Second person epistolary novel
Excerpts, retard, excerpts. I
*don't mind me*
literally first person narratives are best suited to mentally unwell people like Notes From Underground or Lovecraft
Thanks for the advice anons, here you go
Boring as hell and cliched
>Book switches between first and second person seemingly at random, sometimes referring to the reader, sometimes referring to people in general, sometimes even referring to the narrator with varying tenses in the same paragraph
gao, I kneel....
Based
Too bad. Its philosophy not a novella
I've been writing in first person and changing it to 3rd person to give the narration a weird keen eye
>books narration cannot be trusted
>found footage transcript
>Yup, that’s me
>Third-person omniscient
>Present tense
The only narrative style that is "instantly-trashed" worthy. First and third person can be done well, but third person in the present just sounds like a movie script, and for whatever reason it curses the mind to write the most mediocre and pedestrian prose, as if it naturally makes you write sparsely, like a screenplay.
It’s called a journal, not “found footage”
>second person
>free indirect discourse
Do people like free indirect? I write that way on instinct but have been trying to stop because I worry that it seems lazy and frivolous.
>4th person
Self publishing killed literature. Should've known from the font on the cover it would be like this.
>fourth person
>
how do you achieve this level of pretentiousness?
you just figured out fiction
third person present tense is an insufferable gimmick and i refuse to read a great many books because i cannot stand that. no i will not be taking any questions, thank you.
For the most part you're right, but All Quiet On the Western Front is first person kino
Dumbfuck hive mind
The Great Gatsby is first person as well, and it's form the perspective of someone other then the protagonist at that.
The Great Gatsby is written in first person by a character so beta that it might as wel be third person
>all books are first person
some of this is good but there are definitely cliches as the other reply said
Come to think of it, what's an example of a no-person or zeroth-person book?
Non-fiction
He hasn’t read As I Lay Dying.
>He hasn't died as I lay reading
>For it be true, that God is the first person, if indeed we are all created in his image!
Abstract poetry. is wrong, non-fiction is third person, unless it's autobiographical, in which case it is often first person.
Boring, but I appreciate the effort. The second sentence is all about vivacity, but the way it's written is cliché to the point that it erodes all the energy, and it stalls.
10/10 if trolling
Do you know what a transcript is you fucking mongoloid
Do you know what a script is you fucking mongoloid
A lot of Haikus
Haikus are most beautiful when unread
i like first person because its like seeing the world through the eyes of the person. you may not understand it but its not about you understanding him/her. i think of it as a different perspective
stories told erratically between 2nd and 3rd person, and occasionally 1st.
you WILL obey
>third person but brain reads it in first person
name three.
How does that not also apply to the third person? You're literally seeing the world through the eyes of the author?
If you think any person, any tense, or any perspective cannot be pulled off, you haven't read enough to be here.
I have never been convinced by second person.
Second-person is where it's at.
Moby Dick is written in first person.
well, what have you read in second person?