I've read through every major western philosopher, most islamic and eastern philosophies, political philosophies...

I've read through every major western philosopher, most islamic and eastern philosophies, political philosophies, and alot of theology. And the only person that makes zero sense is this guy. He is literally just playing language tricks, none of it is coherent, and the only reason he is popular is because totalitarian ideologies of the 20th century needed a "philosopher"

Attached: 0_kGI2PFO6U-3Nphvf_.jpg (300x225, 17.49K)

the only philosophy I need is iron, meat and milk.

damn nigga like get a job

also raw eggs

>I've read through every major western philosopher, most islamic and eastern philosophies, political philosophies, and alot of theology.
No you haven’t

Could you maybe make a roadmap or a guide? The one on the wiki is incomplete (no eastern, barely any Islamic philosophers, few important western influences missing (for example Stirner on Nietzsche).
I know there’s multiple people here (me included) just starting to take philosophy seriously, desperately in need of something like that.

I know it’d be a Labour of love. Please do it.

Attached: 2A3F15D0-6335-4B0D-A46A-BECC9F61F271.jpg (1200x948, 1.56M)

Wow. Unless you are closing in on 60, I very much doubt you read all that. How old are you?

I thought so too until it clicked. He's a great philosopher. One of the top 5 of the 20th century for sure.

I don't recognise most philosophers from their looks. Who is this?

I think the only philosophers I could name from a photo alone are Sartre, Marx and possible Nietzsche.

You tell me you couldn’t recognize Camus?

Attached: FEDB4068-671A-4315-BE5F-48AEEE193A2F.jpg (474x395, 28.01K)

Heidegger is the only one you needed

He destroyed all of the philosophy and theology you read as metaphysics of presence and onto-theology

That's not philosophy at all. just some high-brow word salad which was promoted by academic nepotism and contrarian edgelords.

>I've read through every major western philosopher, most islamic and eastern philosophies, political philosophies, and alot of theology
Thats a lie and we all know it, also, read being and time, its really simple to understand
>and the only reason he is popular is because totalitarian ideologies of the 20th century needed a "philosopher"
shit take form le reddit, completely untrue at the end of the day, proving that you actually didn't read shit

Congratulations on getting filtered then, looks like that some people clearly are just born as midwits and no amount of reading will make them intelligent
>literally just playing language trick
OP has been using language his whole thinking its real LMAO

Kinda unnecessary dude. It's a personal journey, just start with the presocratics/Socratics and read some commentaries on them, go where they lead you

Metaphysics leads to technocratical life. He wants a return to the greek polis. Fascism was the way for him to achieve it but it failed.
Things donr come form nothing and go back, they have temporality in them.

German philosophy is trash. Heidegger is just another German who thinks he's smarter than everyone. Turns out he was a manlet cuckold who more or less realized his philosophy was a mistake at the end of his life by becoming Catholic again.

based

As I said in the previous thread on Husserl, Heidegger is the most Jewish non-Jew author, if by this we understand the term as meaning deviously degenerative.

Have you read Henry Corbin? He was a Heidegger scholar who then specialized in Islamic philosophy.

Heidegger is the most atheistic non-christian philosopher, that makes him least jewish of them all

> cheats on his fervently Nazi Aryan wife with Jewish women
> his most famous students are Jewish liberals (Arendt, Derrida, whom Heidegger had a deep respect for)

Bravo, German anti-semites, bravo!

This man knows.

Leave it to Germans to try to create a pure Aryan philosophy and it ends up 100% taken up by Jewish liberals who use it to promote neo-liberal technocracy.

>liberalism
made up by germans (luther)
>technology
made up by heidegger (the retroctive refutations)
>aryan
made up by germans with jewish surnames that are german (rosenberg)
kneel to the goths medboi

What’s with all the Heidegger threads recently? There’s been like 4 semi in a row. One thread is just dick sucking him like he’s a god and this one is sayings he makes no sense whatsoever. What’s with the lack of consensus?

> small
> ugly
> no beard
> socially maladapted
> cares about fame and money
> treacherous
> asked Jews to take care of his estate after his death.
> obsessed with hermeneutic
> perverted
> cares deeply about the Nazis, but revises his own works after the war to make them more acceptable.
Compare this with Husserl
> tall
> Chad looking, eyes that could pierce your soul
> awesome beard
> loved by all, even brainlets, knew how to have fun, threw awesome bratwurst parties
> mathematical genius, member of the tribe, childhood friend with highly placed politicians, but never once cared about money, just pure math and advancing foundational sciences.
> Vehemently opposed Freud before anyone else, did so his entire career, even said the Sexual Theory was the greatest corruption of science currently being pushed. Never once wrote about sex.
> Doesn't care about the Nazis, never really cared about politics, only ever says that he fears they will fail to restore the great German spirit of their ancestors, and that ultimately only History will judge.

>imagine thinking there is consensus in philosophy, or in anything

You make me wish I was friends with Husserl.

Cope more seething STEMoid-theoria-obsessed Jew, may Apollo destroy you

>Arendt
Nazi apologist, blamed holocaust on self-interested rabbis. Took Nazi weinerschnitzel. Next.
>Derrida
Helped torpedo Leftist movement, made Americans think that circular literary criticism was politics (crypto-Fascist).
Next.

>STEMoid
> anti-materialist transcendantal idealist
I hope one day you stop being so stupid. I really do.
>theoria-obsessed
Only a deeply degenerative mind could see this as a an actual charge.

>You make me wish I was friends with Husserl.
I recently got hired at a new job. During the interview, they asked, if I could have a wish, what would it be, and I said to resurrect Husserl so that I could have conversations with him. Really couldn't think of anything else better.

Attached: husserl.jpg (231x302, 12.65K)

lurk MOAR you degenerate retard or go back to whence you came

>t. seething anglo

>I've read through every major western philosopher, most islamic and eastern philosophies, political philosophies, and alot of theology.
yet you still have no clue what being means

neither did Manlet Highnigger

>because totalitarian ideologies of the 20th century needed a "philosopher"
You didnt read a lot at all really.

what about hegel and derrida?

you wignats are so cringe and self-unaware

Yes my brother you are right, I bet if I met Hide-egger in real life I could beat the shit out of him and rape his sister! Yeah you nazi fuck how bout I fuck your little Jewish girlfriend! Stop making me insecure!

Atleast we dont lack a sense of humour!

>start with the presocratics
ahh, eurocentrism you say

>ahh, eurocentrism you say
Yes start with the superiors.

Heidegger
*whence, not 'to whence'

>Yes start with the superiors
superiors according to eurocentrism

you're in a western website you fucking nugget

so?

top 5 philosophers:
>Plato (complete works, read exoterically and esoterically)
>Aristotle (they were in agreement, or at least in a synergistic dialectic)
>Rousseau
>Nietzsche
>Heidegger

I also like Aquinas, Laozi, Shankara, Evola, and of course Jesus Christ. I’m hesitant to call them philosophers, though they’re not quite mystics either (except Christ ofc is my Lord and Savior). I begrudgingly appreciate other philosophers, but I can’t help but feel that they’ve contributed to an erosion of the moral landscape and a degradation of the human condition. Dogmatically liberal thinkers

I forgot to finish my post:

get the bullet

>read exoterically and esoterically
Gn*stic, opinion entirely disregarded

Attached: 1648399833916.gif (498x465, 1.51M)

NTA, but that has no relation to gnosticism, but to hermeneutic.
Exoterical works were publicity works in which knowledge was multi-layered, as a way to distinguish the potential of the applicants. Esoterical works were meant for initiates.

How am I a gnostic?

He doesnt know what esoteric/exoteric means in the context of philosophy, thats all. Very few here do, actually, which is why its so fucking hilarious to see the retards constantly take Plato at face value.

Heidegger's way of thinking is a Jewish trojan horse. After all he is the student of the Jew Husserl and two of his most prominent disciples are Hannah Arendt and Derrida. So no wonder that his "philosophy" is just one big trickery.

>slurping the d*miurge's thick material semen this hard
many such cases

how is iron, meat, and milk suggestive of "white nationalism"?
>nooo you can't be healthy and self-sufficient you have to be a corporate drone that collapses in front of the tv every night :(
>if you don't it's LITERALLY fascism and LITERALLY nazism and LITERALLY racism and LITERALLY

He was an active National Socialist, so no. Besides, why is it so bad to have Jewish influences?

Mike Ma is writing two new books bro, go suck his cock now and maybe he'll send you free copies later

>I've read through every major western philosopher, most islamic and eastern philosophies, political philosophies, and alot of theology.
no you havent

that four armed girl on the left is really cute, props to siddhartha for managing to resist that

he's literally catholic wdym