What are Yea Forums 's thoughts on Oda, Kubo and Kishi's evolution as artists? I feel like Kubo evolved his style the most while continuing to make it look appealing the most. It's quiet baffling how ahead he is from Oda and Kishi as an artist.
What are Yea Forums 's thoughts on Oda, Kubo and Kishi's evolution as artists...
Joseph Martinez
Connor Thompson
Improved Ichigo looks so sexy. Luffy still looks like shit. Naruto is alright.
Andrew Fisher
Same
Better
Worse
Jack Ramirez
Kubo is the only one that improved. Oda's didn't improve at all since both are shit, and Kishi's is meh
Nicholas Smith
>t's quiet baffling how ahead he is from Oda and Kishi as an artist.
I find it baffling that you think no back grounds has anything on oda but sleek dark design. Oda puts effort in everything from the foreground to background and makes sure that its meaningful. It maybe cartoonish I will admit but if you ever seen oda's other works outside the manga you would find a lot of his work varies on style. You want to talk about art take incount what else they made. Not just a bias view on how you want your final fantasy shonen to look like.
Lincoln Howard
Oda draws more stuff.
Kubo had no backgrounds.
Kishi was in the middle.
Jeremiah Hughes
Can we see one for Miura, Tetsuo Hara and Araki?
Jacob Peterson
>Minimalism isn't a part of art
Isaiah Walker
are pissards actually this delusional or is this ESL pretending
Nathaniel Jackson
but to call into the question who does better when obviously the most hardest worker is Oda and it shows. While Kubo just makes his character stand then slobbers ink on the page.