Why are dominate girls so rare in anime compared to servile-types?

Most people are straight

No because soibois/betas are insecure and want a submissive waifu

God I wish this would get a second season. I'm reading the novels but to me they don't have the same magic the anime did which is a surprise since LNs are usually better

New volume should be out in a few months

Attached: commission.png (1158x1637, 1.05M)

I'm a switch. I like being sexually dominated by an attractive woman but I also like the idea of sometimes turning the tables and dominating her.

Because domination is garbage. A woman who doesnt love you uses you as a rag, only a fag gets off to that

Attached: 1562098538057 (1).png (1046x1500, 410K)

Because is already the reality. When a salary men marries, the wife cut his balls.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16201977

because REAL MEN want their sons to inherit submissive, frail genetics

Yeah haha, what kind of fag would want a rude woman to spit on him and call him trash haha how strange haha

Froylatia melts like nothing the moment Dr. C4 shows even a bit of spine when dealing with her so I don't really think she counts as a proper dom. Still a great girl, also top boss because she'll literally keep looping people from death to life to keep torturing them if anyone even touches her subordinates.

>she'll literally keep looping people from death to life to keep torturing them if anyone even touches her subordinates.
I think that's why she's still a good dom even if she has weak nipples

Attached: splits.png (6521x3343, 2M)

Because dominate girls are shit and for man babies with mommy issues
Weak men like getting dominated, you make no sense.

It's a fantasy.
You don't like having fantasies about stuff that happen in your daily life.

You wanna talk about rare?

Patrician fetish is dominant girls who are loving.

I wanna know why all femdom is fucking pleb-tier humiliation.

Attached: 1485139104397.jpg (7043x5001, 2.64M)

Attached: 587cd1075ca11416a430ea77afceb373.jpg (1200x841, 365K)

Based.

Attached: 14e1e094e634bedb653853413329.jpg (1717x1042, 230K)

Attached: curtis.png (800x1135, 681K)

Or have a fetish for violence

This. Variety is the spice of life.

Leads to compensating power fantasies.

Agreed

I will dominate Beatrix and force her to be a loving housewife.

Attached: 1508711282638.png (360x878, 208K)

Also agreed

Good luck

Attached: Beatrix_In_Lingerie_Clean_and_Smooth.jpg (1043x2000, 675K)

The bigger problem is keeping her from self-destructing.

Just need to keep a firm grip on her and never let her go. Also staying a part of her life forever to keep her safe.

Attached: 1472849635656.png (720x742, 609K)

The fact that weak jap men like submissive women disproves you completely

And what will Irisdina do when she learns about this?

Attached: 1477638486045.jpg (1078x1500, 247K)

That's just a mommy gf

Invite her. I'm sure all three of us will be happy with this situation. Just the three of us.

Attached: 1560735182829.png (1000x1394, 1.25M)

Be brave user

Attached: 1456313063111.png (2400x1200, 1.54M)

>Mommy gf
Well people seem to think any vanilla is maledom.

Japs are weak, herbivore women as well :’(

Sometimes you just need to tenderly dominate a dominate woman to make her happy.

Attached: 1476323769075.jpg (2992x4204, 1.98M)

Attached: 019.png (1080x1920, 1.29M)

Shit taste
Femdom and only femdom is kino

>implying this isn't anything but equally rough lovemaking

Attached: a7a3bada21e13cf54492f2e3ceff6cf3.jpg (1280x1051, 114K)

Attached: 1481953097123.jpg (1280x720, 112K)

Attached: 1561103095473.webm (1280x720, 1.65M)

the hottest thing in the series next to those three girls getting enslaved and raped

Attached: 1454703369776.jpg (1280x720, 172K)

Attached: 1552621351469.png (857x1200, 1.55M)

Attached: 004.jpg (1280x1807, 814K)

>ctrl+f "legs 16"
>0/0
you are slacking off I see

I'm sorry

Attached: legs 16.png (2060x1282, 3.69M)

Attached: 69755394_p27.jpg (600x461, 161K)

Attached: 1478673438491.jpg (580x819, 450K)

They're not rare at all.

I want to be tenderly dominated by a gentle onee-san type!

Attached: 1525958109090.jpg (850x1189, 262K)

I want Frolaytia to bully me with her thighs.

Are...Are you seriously this retarded?

Attached: 1485037608311.jpg (2560x2920, 577K)

Attached: 1453062513598.jpg (1557x1333, 994K)

This.

Attached: 1539570858986.jpg (1280x1856, 672K)

It is not the truth at all. I cannot stand women with submissive personalities. They're fucking insufferable.
Same goes for men.
Every relationship should be made of too people that are able to make decisions and be strong on their own.

Neither man nor woman were made to be the 'boss'.

People with submissive personalities make the perfect toys, though. The strong need slaves for when there are no other strong people.

Get real, she broke that guy like a horse.

>thread full of faggots talking mad shit
>about Japanese guys
>online
>anonymously
>because of cartoons for children
Yes, yes you are all truly the biggest alpha males and everyone else weak betas! All women want your cocks, especially Japanese women!

Attached: 2.jpg (637x480, 149K)

Incorrect and retarded
Women being the boss is hot and based as fuck

The weak should live their lives in the name of self improvement to become strong, and the strong should help lift the weak to their level.
Life is all about getting better and helping society.

I cannot understand why someone would want to be in a relationship with a person who isn't autonomous and self-directed. Nothing sounds more draining and exhausting and degrading. Both partners need to be able to succeed on their own before they can get into a relationship with another - otherwise they are a selfish drain on the other.

If you seek out some weak person to 'dominate' or a strong person to be 'dominated' by you have some mental issue. During sex is one thing, but outside of it is pathetic.

If you want a woman to boss you around in sex that is fine, but letting another person do it 24/7 is disgraceful. And the opposite is true as well.

>The weak should live their lives in the name of self improvement to become strong, and the strong should help lift the weak to their level.
You sound weak.

I'll love to hear you try to talk like that after I'm done with your body.

People fantasize about that which they can not get.
Weak little soiboi japs get dominated all day everyday, espeicially the wageslave office workers, they have 0 input and their only purpose in life is to do as told.
So it is only natural that when they come home from their 20 hour shift they generally don;t want to spend their escapism on watching females dominate the self insert MC.

After you break me down with your hopefully feminine powers, then it is your duty as a fellow human to build me up to your level. And I will be grateful for your assistance. You will have done your duty to improve the world and you will feel pride from it.
A man or woman is nothing if they don't have something to be prideful over.

The Yin and the Yang; balance in all things. A man should not strive to be dominant 100% of the time, as both women and men have different fluctuations of dominant and submissive moods and tendencies. I would say men are generally 70/30 dominant/submissive, and women 30/70. Dominant women can be very hot, but not all the time, just sometimes. The perfect woman is a woman who can accommodate your moods, or rather, flows with your moods, being dominant when you need to be submissive and submissive when you need to be dominant.

100% "alpha" absolutist "dominant all the time" "chads" who "don't submit to women ev4r" are teenage incels trying to act like men; they're so obvious to spot. All men want to submit to a woman eventually -It's our core sexual desire, and we all inevitably do, but it's not so cut and dry. Submission is a two way street, and women do submit to men in many ways, but we submit to them in others, mutually and rightfully so.

Attached: 1536295016324.png (1857x1400, 1.13M)

>After you break me down with your hopefully feminine powers
Gender won't matter by the time I'm done with you.
>then it is your duty as a fellow human to build me up to your level. And I will be grateful for your assistance.
Hahahahaha!
>A man or woman is nothing if they don't have something to be prideful over.
That's right except I'll feel pride whenever I see your adorable broken slave face.

24/7 femdom is especially kino

No one cares about your fake deep paragraphs you retard
100% submission to a 100% dominant woman is kino

t. fag

t. projector

But people aren't 100% submissive or dominant all the time, so that's just a warped fantasy of yours, unfortunately. Even the most dommest of doms occasionally want to be dommed, and even the most subbest of subs occasionally want to lead.

I already addressed this, I cannot understand wanting a slave in a relationship sense.
I hate people that are weak in personality and do not change that. I equally cannot stand people that seek out those with weak personalities because they are weak.

>But people aren't 100% submissive or dominant all the time
In terms of sex/kink a lot of people are
>Even the most dommest of doms occasionally want to be dommed, and even the most subbest of subs occasionally want to lead.
This is especially bullshit, plenty dom/mes never want to be dommed
Plenty of subs never want to lead
I can personally vouch for the second one, I never want to lead

You'll never be happy because you're always just chasing lust and not love. All that is just your perversion talking.

>he thinks dominant women mean more dominant men
>submissive women mean more submissive men
>either way they are one upping each other in the dominance and submission department
>not the other way around where the man is dominant and the wife is submissive to get them family cogs working
I hope you're ready for a lifetime of marriage issues and spending time in court for divorce you pathetic faggot

>You'll never be happy because you're always just chasing lust and not love
You can love your domme you fucking galaxy brain

Yeah i'm pathetic, please spit on me!

most people aren't into that shit

Attached: 1452628703357.png (800x1286, 1.14M)

Not everyone is like you.

Being in a master and slave relationship is appealing because of your importance in it, dominance, and gratification

Why should the male be dominate over the female in a modern society?
Physical strength is essentially pointless for the vast majority of jobs and tasks, and men and women are as smart as each other. So I cannot see why one should be dominant over the other.

Unless you are coming at this from a biased perspective influenced by your fetishes?

Like I said before, its pathetic to take gratification from dominating or being dominated outside of sex.
Take pride in the accomplishments of yourself and those you are connected too as equals, don't rely on others to fulfill you by letting you boss them around or bossing you around.

Get a pet if you want that, or stop calling yourself human if you aren't going to use your abilities as a person would.

Well... that's, like, your opinion, man.

I've not seen Heavy Object yet. Is it worth watching for this chick?

Because women are almost never dominant in real life, and the ones who are almost always do so out of insecurity? Current fiction tends to reflect the flawed qualities of the audience it panders to rather than heroical archetypes, so you see less and less outliners in behavior as main or important characters.

must people here are sick and you should read their posts with dismay only

>Because women are almost never dominant in real life, and the ones who are almost always do so out of insecurity
Here we go with this myth that is copypasted and then btfo of in every thread
The only "insecure" one is you

You are either misinformed on why they are dominant or just projecting that they are dominate because they are insecure.
They are dominate for the same reason some men are dominate. Because they like it. Would you say men that are dominant are so because of insecurities?

Shit girl, shit character, shit fetish, shit series.

Attached: 1449448403008.jpg (821x1019, 504K)

No retreat coward, we both must pick a hill and argue to the death. Doing otherwise is not befitting of this website.

I hope you packed some snacks.

Attached: 1554542727875.png (680x870, 270K)

Attached: 1533799066682.png (700x1080, 118K)

No, this isn't going to go anywhere.

"BTFO" by what, exactly? Go read any article that delves into differences in personality traits among the sexes and you'll find the same answer. There's a clear disproportion among the "Big 5" personality traits that correlate with dominant behavior among men and women, with women who're mostly dominant in the scale being far rarer tham men who are,whereas the opposite is also true (i.e. the vast majority of agreeable people even when it becomes harmful to them are women, whereas the people who never submit to authority and are completely disagreeable are men). That's likely an inherited trait from our species evolution, which is precisely why the bullshit you were spewing about modern commodities possibly superseding thousands and in some cases millions of years of evolution is completely retarded. Of course, the flipside to this is that most people are neither very dominant nor fully meek, which means the current zeitgest in fiction (particularly in Japan) will reflect that, meaning you'll see less and less extremes in personality traits over the years.

>Autistic foaming at the mouth paragraph
This doesn't even disprove me "more likely to be [x]" does not mean "will never be [y]" you fucking retard
So yes you retards get btfo every time you whine about "muh dommes don't exist"

I've seen plenty of men who are controlled by their wives. There is one friend who is the butt of jokes because it's downright comical. Even the money he makes isn't his.

It's due to testosterone vs estrogen.

Testosterone makes you more aggressive and to push your will onto others, estrogen the opposite. Men have more testosterone than estrogen versus women, so he's correct. Men are 'mostly' made to be dominant and women, submissive.

It's not a matter or like or dislike at the ethiological level, and it's very rarely the result of learned or adaptative behavior. For example, disagreeable people who border on sociopathic/are sociopaths are generally also very dominant, but by the time they reach adulthood they have been gone through a myriad of filters of adults trying to "fix" their personalities with very little results. This has been observed to hold true independently of their sociological standing, so you can't attribute it to any particular economical strata or the parent's deficient raising.

It seems to me like you're thinking of this in a very restrictive manner, as if sex or work where the only relevant dimensions where personality traits are exhibited.

Are you retarded? That still doesn't change my point

>Thot
who did this translation so I can avoid everything else they've done and ask for other people to translate those doujins?

The issues with tests like the one you are describing is that they are effected by what is acceptable in a society.
Go to Saudi Arabia and you'll find almost no women that have 'dominant' personalities, and a disproportionate number of men with 'dominant' personalities.
Does this mean that in SA the people there are genetically predisposed to that? Not at all, peoples personality is build by their environment. You think that there would be any 'dominant' women in the 50s America?
Even in the West women now are still told on many ways even subliminally that men should be in charge, either through the family patterns of their older parents and grandparents, or that men are normally in charge, or that heroes in movies are men with women supporting them.

I'll guarantee that in the future, as the genders become more and more equal, even on the most basic levels, that more and more 'dominant' women will crop up. People always make the mistake of conflating culture and evolution, when they often have little to do with each other nowadays.

>Don't you fucking@me
You're not on Twitter you fucking summerfag

Did you respond to the correct comment? Very little of what you typed here relates to what I posted.

Holy shit shut the fuck up

the only VAs who can pull it off are old hags and hags are expensive

>I'll guarantee that in the future, as the genders become more and more equal, even on the most basic levels, that more and more 'dominant' women will crop up. People always make the mistake of conflating culture and evolution, when they often have little to do with each other nowadays.
That will not happen as the genders are different, biologically, which then creates social and cultural gender differences. Men will always be stronger and be men, and women will always be weaker and be women. Even if they have equal legal rights (Which they never will, since their legal rights are influenced by biological differences as well), they'll still be different, with men leading simply due to testosterone.

>muh dommes don't exist
When was that ever my claim? Do you even know how to read? It's like you're one of those people who constantly seek validation for their fetish and can't stand when it's scrutinized.

As for the coment about dominant women being insecure, while it's possible that dominant women exist, at some point dominance implies the possibility of a physical confrontation, at which point most women back off. Being dominant backed solely by the possibility od social repercussions is strictly a very recent phenomenon.

Please don't play dumb
You're already retarded no reason to go full on brain dead

Imagine being so insecure that fictional dominant women make you go on an autistic rant

Attached: 1458840105479.jpg (830x1400, 527K)

>That will not happen as the genders are different, biologically, which then creates social and cultural gender differences
This just proves you're retarded
While some things are exclusive to men/women other things are just more likely to one than another
Dominance is one of those "more likely but not exclusive" things
You retarded pseudo-intellectual

Your entire point has been thoroughly disproved by an unintentional nation-wide multinational sociological experiment called Scandinavia. No amount of state-enforced sexual equality has reduced differences among the sexe's behavioral patterns in the slightest.

Attached: 62617121.png (1772x1393, 3.82M)

>Incels seething at the simple mention of femdom
>Keep getting btfo
Based

Physical strength is essentially irrelevant in anywhere not a third world or a construction site. Especially in relationships physical strength should not matter - just because Rounda Rousey could overpower her boyfriend (which she did, he came out and said this) doesn't mean at all she should. And the exact same thing goes for normal relationships.

Regardless you keep making the mistake of linking culture and evolution in modern day. Humanity has surpassed evolution a thousand years ago.
The behavior of men and women in modern day is one that only grows less influenced by 'biology' by the day. The only thing really deciding it is culture, thats why there is such variety in what is considered manly and feminine between different cultures.

>"Physical strength is essentially pointless for the vast majority of jobs and tasks, and men and women are as smart as each other."
this is your mini-brain on egalitarianism
>'Unless you are coming at this from a biased perspective influenced by your fetishes?"
right back at you.

No it doesn't. Dominance and strength are linked to testosterone, as men would need to have those things to be hunter-gatherers. That's just common sense, and I'm sure there are exceptions to this rule but they surely aren't the norm.

Physical strength is not irrelevant. It definitely builds mental strength, which is relevant, as well as being a sign of general good health and the ability to defend yourself against others.

>Humanity has surpassed evolution a thousand years ago.
Kek, no. We've definitely evolved and changed, but nothing "surpasses" evolution. We are in fact as controlled by our biology as we were thousands of years ago (Our brain is a part of our biology).

How long ago would you say this big push for equality in Scandinavia started? I'd say about 30 years ago - thats more generous than I should be, its more likely barely 20 but I'll help you out.

The average age for a woman to pop out a kid in Sweden is ~30, with similar ages in the rest of the area. Now people are known to be slow to change, think about your older coworkers and relatives and computers for example. Most girls that grew up in this great 'push for equality' lived in households were there wasn't that same equality. They never fully absorbed that idea, especially when they were younger and just choosing their career path for life. A kid born in the beginning of that process wouldn't have even had a child yet.
We are essentially still on gen 1 for the Scandinavian Equality Movement (if you want to make it sound more official than it really is). So it is no surprise that there isn't total gender equality.

You gotta think about people on a larger time scale.

>and I'm sure there are exceptions to this rule
Which was my point smoothbrain

All this behaviour science that you're all bringing up is for the most part not even 90/10 split. Leaving many many people who don't fall in with the majority.

>were there wasn't that same equality
*where

>so that means we can generalize everything according to the exceptions!
Genius, absolute genius.

Men and women are as smart as each other. If anything women would be smarter given how they always do better in school. You know a Japanese college in order to keep women out started to deduct 30 points from their exams to keep them out?
What biological reason would their be for a intellectual difference between the sexes anyhow? In the 'Wild' Men ostensibly have the job of hunting and being cannon fodder for all sorts of beasties, while women would act as craftsmen and child carers - neither job is benefited by being stupid.

And for physical strength, when was the last time a stronger man beat you to the ground and stole your supplies for his clan? Or the last time your tribe did a test of strength to choose another chieftain? Don't remember? Wonder why? Its because societies and civilization are built on mental acuity rather than physical ability.

>right back at you
I have almost little interest in sex in general. Nor do I have really any fetishes outside of disliking pain. I have sex occasionally, but it is something I could take or leave to be honest. I am not a very biased person in this situation.

>so that means we can generalize everything according to the exceptions!
Where did I do that you retard

Men and women have different amounts of intelligence and difference types of intelligence, as they are genetically wired to do different things according to their biology.

>Its because societies and civilization are built on mental acuity rather than physical ability.
Not entirely, especially considering the weak minded and willed are also usually the weak bodied. Both a strong mind and body are required to excel in this world.

>Both a strong mind and body are required to excel in this world.
Most billionaires do not have strong bodies

>people are slow to change
>but sex differences are totally the result of social indoctrination that happens over the course of less than a decade though
Jesus Christ, the stupid hurts. There' a fully grown generation of adults that grew up under their happy system where everyone is relatively free to do as they please and has spent far more time being reinforced (read that as indoctrinated) about their ideal of equality than around their parents, and they still exhibit the same if no more pronounced differences in say, occupational choice, than the Arabian chauvinist pigs you decry. Actually, most muslim countries graduate a higher proportion of female Engineers than Sweden, if I remember correctly.

>he values money over all
>atheist spotted
Argument over, no wonder you were so anti-gender. Just a tranny pushing his fetishes on everyone because he hates himself. Take care.

Attached: 5.jpg (555x555, 55K)

Attached: 1451447845881.png (1198x1102, 1.25M)

1)I'm not the guy you're talking to, I just chimed in because you're retarded
2)How does that make me a tranny? I'm not a tranny I just want a woman to spit on me
3)Neither of us said anything "anti-gender"
4)Stay seething

>he doesn't value money
Maybe just crazy, but more likely a shitposter.

People always vastly overstate the differences between male and female brains. You listen to the internet and men can visualize the entire universe at once while women can barely picture a scene, and women could remember the number of blackheads on the grocery clerk's nose from 30 years ago while men can't recall what shoes they are wearing without looking.
People over-exaggerate for their own devices.

Think about the men and women that you know in your day-to-day. They really aren't different at all. Whatever differences that do exist are due to society.
Women being more embarrassed by sex, thats just due to culture.
Men being more stoic, thats just due to culture.
Men caring less about fashion, thats just due to culture.

I could keep going.

fuck

cool, cold, bully, and tomboy make me diamonds

>Women being more embarrassed by sex, thats just due to culture.
Yes, that unimportant thing called pregnancy totally does not matter.

What's being dominant anyway? Like is the femme fatale type who messes with men and controls them theough their lust but doesn't necessarily do anything dom fetish related in bed dominant?

>Jesus Christ, the stupid hurts.
I know it hurts, one day you can get better.

Kids are more influenced by home life than school life almost every time. What they see at home, especially during their developmental years takes precedence over what they see at school or the like. This is why abusive or broken households do so much damage to a kid regardless of what they see outside.
A kid growing up in a household where the father acts as a sort of patriarch will be more effected by that than they would if every class they went to at school played 'girl power' tapes the entire time. Most people view what they grew up with as 'normal' and the outside world as 'wrong'.

Your next mistake is not thinking on a large enough scale. Societies are slow to change at best, glacial at worst. A hundred thousand Scandinavian women could be 'indoctrinated' as you so objectively put it, but on the large scale that is a blip compared to the whole.
People are not easily broken of previous indoctrination, look at cultists - even after their cult is dissolved they still hold on to those beliefs, a similar thing happens to people that experienced one thing as a child an another as an adult.

>men and women are smart as each other
Highly debateble. While the average intelligence of both sexes tends to be similar, several studies have found that men are over-reprented in both extremes of a bell distribution (i.e. there are more genius and idiots men in relation to women), but those results aren't universally reproduced.

The problem with your entire point about physical strength (which by the way you're discussing with a different user) is that you're assuming very recent changes (in evolutionary terms at least) somehow have more barring in the development of our species than untold millenia of different conditions that directly selected for the differences among the sexes to he preserved in the gene pool in the first place. More simply put, physical strength being important and the possibility of a physical altercation as a way to resolve conflicts and stablishing hierarchies has been around far longer than user-friendly societies where men and women can stand on more or less equal footing.
Lastly, women do better in school grades because of teacher bias. To this day, boys still do better at the highest level of math
bbc.com/news/education-31751672
BBC is shite, but the study they're sourcing did actually take place.

The truth lies somewhere in the middle. For example in chess there are currently like tens of women in top 1000 and one in top 100. Yet when Judit Polgar was taught since childhood in a special way, she managed to become the youngest grandmaster and even became the 8th best player once. So while women are worse at chess in general, focusing on educating them can probably sigificantly reduce the gap.

I started watching it for her then I kept watching it because I thought it was really good.

So, are you just going to regurgitate a whole bunch of nothing that you learned from gender class or are you going to present any evidence?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693622/

>Your entire point has been thoroughly disproved by an unintentional nation-wide multinational sociological experiment called Scandinavia. No amount of state-enforced sexual equality has reduced differences among the sexe's behavioral patterns in the slightest.
Has it turned all the men into pussies except for the hordes of MENA migrants they import in?

Chess isn't necessarily the best way to measure differences in cognitive ability, but the fact alone that she had to be "educated in a special way" doesn't lend much crediv

>but the fact alone that she had to be "educated in a special way" doesn't lend much crediv
Huh? how does that make any sense

Your study is honestly perfect for my point, men and women are about the same intellectually and the main difference is cultural.
I've got nieces and nephews of a young age I think the oldest is ~5. The nephews are able to get away with shit that the girls would never because 'boys will be boys', whereas the girls are expected to be better behaved. Guess what happens, the girls are better behaved and the boys are little hellions.
This is the exact basis of your study there. That the behaviors expected of boys and girls are the main determinator of how they will be rather than any real biological reason. Culture is what makes the genders different rather than biology.

As for physical strength's importance, while it was important in the past, our society has shifted so much in the last 200 maybe 300 years that anything before that is hardly recognizable. It used to be a huge thing to go out and see a person get shredded in public for stealing gold from a merchant, know people are against the very idea that a Government has the right to sentence a person to death. It used to be an idea that 'logic and reason' was pointless as god was greater than anything that humans could think up - if someone told you that now you'd think they were retarded. It used to be a thing that some people were 'born to rule' now monarchs are tolerated as novelties.
Trying to use classical societies as a part of a discussion on modern societies misses that there are basic differences between the two that make relations between the two nigh impossible while remaining intellectually honest.
Since the 1700s discourse and arguments have taken total precedence over fighting or dueling for any people that actually matter. And society reflects this.

Femdom is worst fetish.
Yes, even worse than scat and guro.

Attached: 015.jpg (1280x1833, 645K)

Every chess grandmaster (or even strong player) is educated "in a special way". Polgar just was a great educator.

Not really. It just shows that even though most Scandinavians will happily parrot thier government's propaganda about equality and even an advocacy for sameness, men and women still exhibit differences in behavioral traits, on average.

The funny part is that while I've argued against a very particular point, I have neither a particular like nor dislike against fendom. It's a fetish like any other, but my initial point can be basically summarized as saying that Japanese fictional dominant women are relatively rare because they're as rare if no more in real life.

I want to be smothered in her love until it mindbreaks me so had guys
That cop is so fucking lucky

Attached: laughs in femdom.jpg (1920x2096, 384K)

Domme's aren't rare at all if you know how to look desu

I didn't get to finish the post, sorry. I Meant to say that Polgar having to get raised in a particular environment doesn't bode well to that particular argument, to the extent that making a singular account proves pretty much nothing one way or another.

>dominant girl who scares others is actually a timid, fragile and shy girl all along
my fetish

Attached: Yukino tries giving Hachiman chocolate.jpg (1100x1600, 494K)

it's worth watching because it's fucking great

>smug
FUCK PLEASE STEP ON ME I WANT IT I WANT IT I WANT IT

Attached: yotsubaheadbangEVENANGRIER.png (367x657, 233K)

Ohh that Gender Studies boogeyman is coming out. Careful he's gonna get you.
I would never waste my time on a gender studies class, I have standards.

I mean what evidence do you really want from me? Proof that what kids see at home is bigger than what they see outside of it? Thats pretty self-demonstrable if you do some reflection of what you were taught outside vs what you learned from your parents and what effected you more.
What next do you want, for me to prove that societies are slow to change? Look around you at the adoption of computers, or the adoption of the automobile, or the steam engine, or the Enlightenment. Need I go on? What about boomers and climate change? Is that good enough for you?
I didn't make any claims that really relied on specific evidence to back them up, they are all general things.

user, if I pay a woman to dress a nurse that doesn't mean she knows how to place an IV drip. Those "dommes" are doing it for the pay while they probably actually enjoy getting roughed by Chad or Tyrone for all we know. Jokes aside, what you just wrote means absolutely nothing and you're giving me no information besides your subjective appreciation of whatever number is bouncing on your head. Finally, we've already discussed how being dominant encompasses far more than a sex routine.

>Those "dommes" are doing it for the pay
I'm not talking about professionals you fucking retard

>I have neither the evidence nor the intention to look for it, but let me make a bunch of claims because I feel like they're right but I don't want my fee fees getting hurt by evidence that contradicts them
For a guy with standards, you're acting exactly as irrational and idiotically self-assured as the gender studies acolytes you disparage.

No wonder you need a woman to change your diapers you sperg, you can't even summon the patience to read through an entire post.

>this thread
so it's true, femdomfags are just weak cucks who believe in gender equality.

Seething

This is too much for you.

Attached: 1540005131235.png (355x436, 69K)

Attached: 1454267034485.jpg (768x1024, 393K)

Ara ara is the real man’s choice.

While it has its benefits, it's too light for my taste.

Attached: 1449415798147.png (810x1944, 897K)

>It's due to testosterone vs estrogen.
that's less informative than what he said. why does hormone concentration cause different behaviours? because that's how your brain respond to said hormones. why does your brain respond to specific hormones in a certain way? because it has been structured by natural selection to do so.

Every time I read the Bully part I feel like all the blood rushes away from my head, help

What kind of anime are you watching? Garbage isekai? Because dominant girls are so fucking common in anime.

Attached: 1434210316031.gif (697x400, 621K)

Stop posting Ahmed.

Attached: japanese sexism 1.jpg (705x654, 85K)

>t. Children card game obsessed Kaiba

i want nagatoro to step on me

Most girls in anime/manga (sold to men) are dominant, they're the ones initiating things in the relationship. Most guys in general prefer dominant women in their fantasies just for that reason, since it means they don't run the vulnerable position of rejection/responsibility.

Because femdom is unnatural, unrealistic and is a turn off for most people.

t. femdomfag

It was the standard even in fucking harem anime for women to beat the shit out of men for Christ's sake. OP and other retards in this thread are fucking monkeys who saw maybe 20 anime in their entire life. Or muslims.

Attached: [Coalgirls]_Strike_Witches_12_(1280x720_Blu-Ray_FLAC)_[6348A9F6].mkv_snapshot_05.28_[2017.09.21_16.4 (1280x720, 1.5M)

Well, when the trend is for successful women to be sexually submissive, and unsuccessful women to be dominant, what other conclusions do you draw? The only reasonable conclusion I can draw that successful people aren't as worried that they might be taken advantage of.
This stuff isn't that outlandish. Can you really deny the existence of women dating unsuccessful men because it means they can control them?

They're submissive men who want to believe they're somehow the true alpha Chads. Look at stuff like , they just want to believe they're "secure" because they like to be dominated, and other men are "insecure" because they like to dominate. The reality is that their position is the most common one.

>talking shit about anime-watching manchildren while posting on an imageboard for anime-watching manchildren
???

Auntie was something else.

>unrealistic
Why?

because anime is for incels who want to fantasize about having power over anything

mediocre

Attached: 1552749651622.jpg (3010x1032, 301K)

Its way hotter making dominant girls submit to you

Attached: 1534247494873.jpg (850x1203, 635K)

Attached: dcqb466-9590280b-4c60-408f-9ae7-de280ec49b20.jpg (950x1550, 350K)

>not liking both equally
pleb

Because it doesn't happen in real life. There are quite a few men who like it but there are no women who do so that kind of relationship doesn't happen in real life. At the very best you can pay a hooker to dom you or get a girlfriend that's willing to sacrifice her pleasure to satisfy your fetishes.

>still sticks the smoking pipe in her mouth

Attached: risitasca.jpg (800x800, 76K)

She did kill the last person who took it away from her

Attached: 1454699509324.jpg (1120x1600, 250K)

Is it wierd to feel the urge to fight and kill/be killed by cute dom anime characters? Is it a sexual thing?

imgur.com/a/Z5vAQwk

Attached: commander.png (1022x811, 613K)

femdom is the alpha fetish for men who want their power subverted. betas want submissive meek waifus and maledom because they have tiny penises and are very insecure.

Attached: melon color.png (1034x1500, 637K)

Terror

Attached: 1468364409436.jpg (2000x1357, 682K)

Dominant women are for faggots.
Prove me wrong.

I still want her to prey on me and be eaten whole by her love no matter what

Attached: HorribleSubs_Happy_Sugar_Life_11_720p.mkv_snapshot_09.20.516.jpg (1280x720, 222K)

I still don't understand how thay guy turned from og warrior into that. Is this the power of femdom?

You have absolutely no proof or evidence that success and sexual dominance in women is inversely proportional. Don't think you can get away with spouting shit like that without a proof.

It both does happen in irl, and the only reason that it wouldn't is that it is less acceptable for women to be dominant than men.