"Mature" anime

As frequent anime watching faggot, I've discovered I've become disillusioned with it all recently, the seasonal grind is retarded. With a few exceptions, people only watch this garbage to keep up and have something to talk to each other about. Maybe that's projection on my part, but I can tell you from the bottom of my heart that most of the shows I've seen airing in recent years feel tacky and cheap to me. That doesn't mean good stuff isn't out there, it just means it's harder to track down.

What's some anime media of genuine artistic quality? Good themes, fitting music, thoughtful characters and cinematography, without unnecessary sex appeal or rainbow-haired waifu harems. For example, I'm talking stuff like the original Eva, GITS, Jin-Roh, Lain, Akira, Berserk. Give me some anime for adults, doesn't have to be a ~20 year old 'classic', it just has to be thematically and artistically sound.

Attached: 1434236384517.gif (500x225, 498K)

You want .

Its definitely projection normalfag people watch seasonal shows because they enjoy watching lots of anime.

Trigun is the most obvious
it has the most fascinating setting I've ever seen and it doesn't feel squandered.

You’d know the answer to this if you lurked more.

boku no pico

Attached: 1436404513675.jpg (1280x720, 49K)

There are few mature anime but many mature manga. Start reading.

This.

You are absolutely retarded if you think that cute girls anime can't have artistic value.

Chico best boy.

Attached: 1549868784608.jpg (600x449, 81K)

>m talking stuff like the original Eva, GITS, Jin-Roh, Lain, Akira, Berserk.
How did I know this faggot would name this garbage. Please kill yourself and stick to braindead america cinema

...

Kokou no Hito
Vinland Saga
Real (Inoue Takehiko)
Vagabond
Shamo, etc

Those may be entry level but they're also good. It's worse to be a contrarian.

They aren't though especially lain watch more anime because you clearly haven't

Fuck off, newfag.

I'm not even OP. Lain is good. You, like much of Yea Forums, have shit taste.

>anything that appeals to my delicate western sensibilities is “artistically sound”

You got some growing up to do, champ.

>akira
You ever wondered why literary critics don't take most science fiction seriously?

All those manga with copious violence aren't mature. They're for edgy 14 year olds.

Because they are prose autists who don’t understand the worth of conceptual creativity and the way science fiction and fantasy can help expand the mind of anyone with an actual creative bone in their body.

That being said 1988’s Akira is a good technical showcase and not much more.

I've never seen a show with moeblobs reach the level of depth I'm talking about. Some have come pretty close, Steins Gate and Made in Abyss are nearly at that level, but not quite.

It's not about western cinema. Western cinema is pretentious and socially alienating, that's why I watch anime. It's less about culture and more about the complexity of the work, the amount of effort and thought that went into it. LOGH would be another good example of what I'm talking about.

You lack analytical skills, and can only see effort in work that demands more from you.

>logh
>steins gate
>made in abyss
You're one of those plotfags who really can't understand what "depth" and "artistic quality" mean.
Go watch game of thrones or some other shows.

Forget about anime and start watching superior nippon cinema.
Kurosawa is a good but relatively shallow starting point
From there you can jump to real kino like Mizoguchi and Ozu

Go an watch girls last tour

This too. Anime isn’t just a “story delivery system”.

Mushishi.

I suggest starting with Dezaki and the World Masterpiece Theatre shows to get a firm foundation of the anime aesthetic and directorial influence.

...

K-On

Lurk for 2 years before posting.