No, Yuri is Not Queer

>No, Yuri is Not Queer
>I have a second—more personal—interpretation of the term Yuri on Okazu, my blog:
>Yuri is lesbian content without lesbian identity.
>By this definition, if a series recognizes itself as being about queer issues, it is a series about sexual, gender, and romantic minorities, something I put into the “LGBTQ” category on Okazu. Very little of the massive amounts of Yuri being published uses the word—or the concept—of “lesbian.”
>It’s still rare to encounter a character who says even in an internal monologue that they, when they are looking for a sexual or romantic partner, look at their own gender—which makes Bloom Into You’s Saeki Sayaka uncommon. (That series also features a stable adult relationship as role model and confidant for Sayaka, which makes the series highly unique in a positive way for young queer readers.)
>Coming-out narratives, which are very common in western literature, are rare in Japanese literature. Instead, tropes of lesbian behavior are modeled on the heteronormative Takarazuka Revue with its strong butch/femme dynamic, or removed from the real world completely by being set in fantasy scenarios at impossibly rich girl’s schools, such as in Maria Watches Over Us (anime from RightStuf), Strawberry Panic! (anime from Media Blasters; manga from Seven Seas) or, more recently, Revue Starlight (anime from Sentai).
>Even with the current trend in Japan of Yuri anthologies focusing on adults, stories rarely acknowledge the social and political facts of homophobia, family pressure, employment and housing instability, medical care, and other real world issues of being queer, much less address them directly.
>So in that sense: no, Yuri is not at all queer. You might call it “queer-adjacent.”

Well, Yea Forums?

Attached: file.png (563x465, 469K)

...

I bet this was written by (((Erica Friedman))) from the image alone, so I'm not going to even bother reading that garbage

fuck off

>Erica Friedman
Yikes!

No one cares faggot. Fuck off with your westerner rationalisations.

You dumb shitter

kys

Shitty OP.
It's an article where the author takes both positions to look at both arguments for and against yuri being queer. OP's quote is from her taking the second position, where before in the article she took the first position. She caps off what a few mangaka thought on the question and just leaves it up to the reader in the end.

go back to

imagine actually reading posts on a feminist blog lmao

Is this from that shitty anime feminist blog

No one cares

>kys
Kill yourself, redditor.

>Friedman
Just a coincidence I'm sure

I don't care, most other people don't care and neither should you. The fact that you cared enough to post this shows severe mental illness. You should seriously seek help.

Just letting you guys know the article itself isn't taking the position OP makes it look like it is. It's not as if strawmanning is somehow better when it's done to feminists.

DONT SUMMON HIM YOU GODDAMNED IDIOT

Attached: irrefutable proof that ACK lusts for cocks and that is why he searches for his husbando Akemi.jpg (1904x593, 580K)

Fuck off, retard.

I don't disagree

Why not? This thread was started by some redditor who wants to make everything about 3D politics garbage, it deserves it.

Seriously, you are so fucking genuinely mentally ill, !Akemi.

Why does it matter if it's "queer" or not? Who the fuck cares.

it is

Only one of those is me you fucking retard.

>unironically posting a screencap from anifem shit or whatever
wow, fuck off

I think boys should date girls and girls should date boys.

What a repulsive idea.

Nope, they're both yours.

>My thinly veiled shitpost was successful in summoning the most autistic sperglord on the planet
I didn't even have to sacrifice any onaholes

Fuck animefeminist, they said that shots focusing on anime girl's feet were bad

I linked to your post from the gridman thread, yw

It doesn't have to matter, does it? The blog this is from isn't some sort of international publication, it's a niche site for just the niche people who care about this kind of thing (and even then, not all of them). The author obviously wrote it with that audience in mind rather than Yea Forums.