Do you like Kino?

I really disliked the reboot, so maybe it's for the best.

Attached: fda11171044fa8c09dec34b70d0932f7.jpg (2080x2973, 1.8M)

I can never take people who say they didn't like the 2017 version seriously because they always just say they hate it because it's not identical to the 2003 adaptation.

i can understand why some people liked the original more. Aside from the animation style differences, the reboot seemed to gloss over some of the plotpoints that the original went into detail with.

>the reboot seemed to gloss over some of the plotpoints that the original went into detail with
Like what? And I always make sure to tell people that the 2017 version isn't a remake and is a readaptation of the source material. The 2003 anime adding and changing shit that wasn't in the books isn't a flaw with the 2017 version for not having those things. Neither is it a flaw that Kino looks more like how she's portrayed in the later volume art.

Does Kino at any point parody or make references to the works of Franz Kafka? I feel like the 2003 series may have done so at one point but it has been ages since I've seen it. Kafka's style and atmosphere would work really well in Kino. Especially something like The Castle.

I HATE KINO!

Attached: 1479018037720.jpg (450x450, 133K)

I wan't her to shit on my dick.

i can't tell if people are joking about this sort of thing or not anymore

Attached: disgusted fox noises.jpg (1920x1080, 620K)

I'm literal. Try to the effort of understand in my English talking.

im not gay so no

>they always just say they hate it because it's not identical to the 2003 adaptation.
This is one of the worst strawmen I have ever seen in my life
>I don't like
>X wasn't in 2003
>Therefor you don't like it because it wasn't in 2003
Fuck off. 2017 lacked any subtlety or mono no aware. It was cheap, it relied on overtly creepy faces as a visual shorthand to (hopefully) unsettle the viewer (it didn't). Its visuals were fucking dogshit too.

Maybe I don't like it because it wasn't like 2003 after all, because 2003 wasn't cheap, poorly executed, shit.

Or maybe it's because Kino is not a commodity and I'm not going to enjoy every anime with her in it regardless of its execution.

Attached: kino_no_tabi_03[h264.vorbis][niizk].mkv_snapshot_10.17_[2015.09.11_14.52.29].jpg (704x480, 36K)

I'm not saying that user or you think that way but I have seen people explaining why they don't like the 2017 version and a lot of it has been "oh it changed things" despite the 2003 version being the one that changed things from the book. Or that they don't like that Kino isn't a potato. I like the 2003 version better too but I think 2017 is shit on way way too much and any time anyone mentions Kino no Tabi they have to qualify it with "oh but the 2017 version is shit". I don't even know what the fuck you mean by "creepy faces" either.

Kino in general doesn't really have any subtlety so I don't know how the 2017 version was less subtle. It just wasn't directed in the same way, which is kind of what I'm talking about in that people don't like it because it's different from the 2003 version that they've gotten accustomed to in the 14 years between it and the 2017 version.

Attached: Kino2017.jpg (1280x720, 321K)

Attached: Kino XXII.jpg (1000x1419, 239K)

yes

Attached: 1557913185571.jpg (1200x1200, 223K)

In ten years, maybe

She'll always hold a special place in my heart.

i dunno, but i can tell she's a very cute girl and not a boy!

Attached: man with good eyes.png (1920x1080, 1.17M)

FPBP

I stopped watching the 2017 version when it adapted an already adapted arc in a worse manner and with god awful bargain bin animation.

the fresh adaption parts were fine

I like Kino in both a lewd way and a non-lewd way.

>one is lain's director
>the other one is literally who

Look at this flaming faggot

To be honest 2003 really relied a bit too much on reminding you that it was an adaptation of a "really made me think" LN as often as possible at a moment in time when that kind of LN had been popularized and had a recognizable post-cyberpunk aesthetic.
2017 is the inferior adaptation but couldn't and shouldn't have gone for the same vibe.

>satan isn't gay

Attached: 8KTtscB.jpg (600x315, 11K)

Kino looks like a boy so Kino should be fucked like a boy. In the ass.

Attached: 1540722388328.jpg (2750x3929, 1.33M)

>Is so cute that I just want to hug her instead of fucking her even though she's half-naked
What's this feeling?
Is this love?

Attached: SexyVirgin.jpg (1280x720, 85K)

Why aren't there any good Kino doujins of her having regular sex with an attractive man and not some thug or fat old fuck? A girl this fine deserves some actual lovemaking, not just some savage meat-slapping.

Attached: 1556793902523.jpg (1013x1013, 80K)

I'd love to explore Kino's own kuni.

>regular sex with an attractive man
>ever good
Nah.

Attached: 1554679428878.jpg (899x1200, 102K)

Now I'm curious as to what your definition of "good" is. Irregular sex with an ugly man? That just sounds stupid.

Attached: 1520552967577.jpg (450x423, 148K)

Kino is exactly my type.

>That tummy in those jeans
>That DFC
"Browing Yea Forums" and "Wanting to masturbate less" are definitely not compatible, huh?

Attached: jjgx53uF.jpg (396x436, 40K)

Hug, then fuck, then repeat.

Not enough artists have good taste.

I don't exactly 'ship' these two but one doujin at least would be perfect. If nothing else because tall muscular guy + petite IMAGINE tier girl is one of the best combos. Fat old fucks and dark skinned rapists takes it a bit too far though, in my opinion.

Attached: 00b815366f071ab5515997bd006066a7.jpg (659x800, 141K)

what about this one?
exhentai.org/g/1208060/dda08e8fdb/

I've already fapped twice today so I'll have to save it for later, but thanks for the heads up. Funny to me how the latest comment is literally "finally a Kino doujin that isn't rape or mindbreak or some shit". Glad to know I wasn't the only one.

Attached: 1456274265414.jpg (496x443, 94K)

i just finished this ep a min ago

>2003 wasn't cheap
2003 was probably cheaper than 2017, if we're talking budgets (at least relative to the average of the period, can't say how they've changed in absolute numbers). It was made on a shoestring budget. The scanlines are basically a genius way to make it look less shit.

And yet it was bloody brilliant, which only goes to show how brilliant Ryuutarou Nakamura, RIP, and the team making it were.

I'd rant about the differences between 2003 and 2017 (which I also didn't like) for a long time, but who needs a rant by some old geezer. I'll just say that at least 2003 tried to do its own thing and it went well for the most part, and 2017 was a dry adaptation of stories chosen in a popularity contest (but the refreshed Kuroboshi character designs were good).

Attached: Movie 1 - Kino no Tabi - In Order to Do Something -Life Goes On- (2005) [Hi10p AAC][kuchikirukia].mk (841x480, 80K)

He has a pp so no

This thread is full of homos, sad

I want to sexuallyse kino.

Attached: 3cf4d7d490b2ac8027ba19dc98cc8e36.jpg (550x650, 108K)