Even more Yuasa kino incoming

>lulu was underwhelming
Yeah,but man did it have a lot of SOUL

Lu was a lot of fun, the only real problem was that it felt almost obligated to follow a traditional 3 acts structure. It should have progressed more freely and naturally.

I enjoyed NISWOG.

Attached: night_sAp_0261-700x428.jpg (700x428, 43K)

Considering how mediocre to average his new movie is, I'm definitely not expecting much.

Dumb frogshitter.

The musical was definitely the best part of Walk On Girl, having a full fledged musical movie now is amazing. Hopefully Norio Matsumoto will be heavily involved again.

Attached: night-is-short-2-600x338.jpg (600x338, 32K)

What is this thing?

Attached: inu-oh_key-art1-landscape-crop.jpg (1000x563, 144K)

Based and kinopilled

He's always been inconsistent. Ping pong was as good as it was because ping pong was written by someone else. Yuasa only improved somewhat on an already masterful source material

Crybaby was Kino

>Taiyo Matsumoto
What's he up to nowadays?

That's a start

>Yuasa with Matsumoto again
>it's not a No. 5 adaptation

Fuck

Attached: No. 5 Vol. 1 - VIZ.jpg (504x720, 127K)

Crybaby was garbage.

>new Yuasa movie
>it's not the last part of the Campus Trilogy

Attached: tumblr_owt6lwRtEt1upe1ufo2_500.png (500x281, 123K)

>Lu was a lot of fun, the only real problem was that it felt almost obligated to follow a traditional 3 acts structure. It should have progressed more freely and naturally.
Lu felt like Yuasa's attempt at making a Miyazaki film. I think he did it pretty danged well, but as a result it really didn't feel very Yuasa-esque. Except for the weird dancing.

>Crybaby was garbage
Nah it was fine.

Yeah just yesterday there was a thread shitting on him.
So quickly does Yea Forums changes its mind

>Nah it was fine.
You've never read the actual Devilman, have you?

Oh God, a DM fag right here... Who cares about the source.

CB was fine... Cry baby...

>Who cares about the source.
Everyone with good taste.
But, hey, thanks for demonstrating how shit Yuasafags (the actual "Crybabies") are.

Caring about the source is for brainlets who think adaptations should be 1:1 copies of the original source.

>Caring about the source is for brainlets who think adaptations should be 1:1 copies of the original source.
>Caring about the source is for brainlets
You are just proving how much of a brainlet you are. Go on and dismiss the superior source material all you want. By doing so, you are saying more about yourself than about Devilman, Nagai or his fans.
And you are showing everyone why you and that Crybabyshit are not welcome in the actual Devilman fandom.

Anyone who liked devilman before it became a shitty netflix show.

Imagine getting so riled up about a shitty edgy manga whose only remaining artistic value is as an artifact that influenced better works.
Yuasa did the correct thing, he ignored the retards who are still stuck in the 70s worshiping one of Nagai's most amateurish and forgettable works and used the source as a foundation to create a new and interesting experience.

Attached: 1451881410411.png (400x400, 239K)

Keep on embarrasing yourself, Yuasafag.
May Yuasa one day ruin your favourite franchise.

Pathetic post, user.
Also, Nagai himself has ruined the franchise several times. Remember Akuma Kishi?

Attached: 1486248692994.png (355x541, 179K)

>Pathetic post, user.
Stop abusing Yotsuba for your reddit-tier Yuasashilling, troll.

>purposely evading my question
I bet you haven't even read Akuma Kishi, you fucking faggot. If you did, you'd know that the franchise was in shambles before Crybaby.

Yuasafags can't even defend their "hero" without attacking Nagai. That's how low they stoop.
And, no, the franchise was alright before Crybaby and will be alright once Crybaby is forgotten as the obscurity it is and its teenage fans stop shitting up regular Devilman threads.

Did majority of Yuasafags even like Crybaby? I certainly didn't.

>still evading my arguments
The absolute state of Devilman "fans".

Attached: 1455766841369.gif (1920x1070, 2.26M)

Well, there are many who did and who argue like absolute retards that Nagai was shit and Yuasa "saved" Devilman. Dismissing any criticism, be it Yuasa completely missing what Devilman was about, be it needless meaningless additions, be it the horrible animation.
I don't think all of those are falseflaggers. Crybaby was a big hit among edgy teens and the Netflix crowd in general. And they specifically defend Yuasa and hate Nagai. Just like certain guys in this thread.

I won't pretend to be a fan of Devilman. I'm not, but Yuasa butchered the original source material. I'm still baffled since he captured Ping Pong so perfectly.

That's fair. Good to see that there are still people who have a more nuanced judgement.
As for me, I must say I never really cared for Ping Pong, but I'm not much of a fan of sports manga/anime to begin with. Tatami Galaxy was solid enough, but I have no idea how the source material for that one is.

You're completely missing the point of the argument, retard.
Artworks that are an alternate interpretation of a source material have been a thing since forever. Have you even read Goethe's Faust? The book is only tangentially related to the original myth, but it's still good enough to be considered one of the most important books of all time.
What I'm trying to say is that dismissing something only because it "misses the point" of the original source is not a valid complain and only shows your fanboyism and lack of knowledge about actual art criticism.
I don't even like that faggot Yuasa outside of Ping Pong, Kemonozume and Kaiba, and personally think that Devilman was a bad anime, not because it doesn't follow the manga accurately but because it's a dull, badly directed gimmicky piece of shit.
It's pretty annoying to see faggots like you who hate on certain shows so passionately while having no valid arguments at all.

Attached: 1492781103577.png (276x256, 57K)

>What I'm trying to say is that dismissing something only because it "misses the point" of the original source is not a valid complain and only shows your fanboyism and lack of knowledge about actual art criticism.
Gotta chime in here and agree with this guy, it's a shitty argument.

>What I'm trying to say is that dismissing something only because it "misses the point" of the original source is not a valid complain and only shows your fanboyism and lack of knowledge about actual art criticism.
It's not only missing the point, it's also not contibuting anything of its own. You are basically cutting out one third of the my argument to argue against in isolation. That's highly dishonest.

Your Faust comparison is utter bullshit: Yuasa did not take a basic folk tale and added to it in a meaningful way. He took a complete work, stripped it of its meaning and didn't bother giving it anything. Then he also made it look like shit. And now you come around and say that everybody must prefer it to the original and can't criticize it.

>You are basically cutting out one third of the my argument to argue against in isolation.
Because I'm only arguing about your "it differs from the source, ergo it sucks" argument. You said that it looks like shit and I agree.
>Your Faust comparison is utter bullshit: Yuasa did not take a basic folk tale and added to it in a meaningful way. He took a complete work, stripped it of its meaning and didn't bother giving it anything.
That's what an alternate interpretation means, user. Both works are free adaptations that add and remove stuff while taking advantage of metatextuality to narrate something new.
>And now you come around and say that everybody must prefer it to the original and can't criticize it.
I didn't say that, I just said that the main argument you are using to criticize it is invalid.

Not that guy, but I'm fine with adaptations adding to the story/look forward to what the director can do with said adaptation. I don't like Devilman, but I fail to see what Yuasa added. He just did his own wacky thing and it was just a mess. It was way too try-hard and wannabe edgy. My least favorite thing he's worked on by far.

>Because I'm only arguing about your "it differs from the source, ergo it sucks" argument.
But I've never made that argument in isolation. And I never said that "it sucks" solely because it differed from the source. I have said that:
A) It took the source material and removed practically everything that fans of the source liked.
B) It added nothing of value to it and what it added was a disgrace for the franchise.
C) It also was a poor product on the technical side of things.

And because A+B+C came together, it was highly disappointing and insulting to fans of the franchise.
I could forgive A alone if it was a great work that could stand on its own feet, and have forgiven that kind of thing for many anime in the past.
I could also respect it for being a good direct adaptation even if it added nothing of its own.
And I'd easily overlook C if it was great narratively.

But when all of those come together, we are left with nothing.
Ideally, I'd say having all three aspects work out (resprect for the original, adding in something new and being good on a technical level) is the best outcome. Doesn't mean I argue that it has to be all of that.

>working on 3 projects at once
Yuasa is active as fuck these days.

All Crybabyfags are tumbrl tier