Is Lewding/Fanservice With characters who are canon victims of sexual assault/rape wrong?

No, I just don't like the "purity" image; the girls that seem "innocent" or sexually-naive, whether they're virgins or not.

I can't deal with these kinds of girls.

it's ok to hate what you're not. be the roastie you always wanted to be.

>No, I just don't like the "purity" image; the girls that seem "innocent" or sexually-naive, whether they're virgins or not.
>I can't deal with these kinds of girls.

Isn't sex with virgins supposed to be like godawful for people with actual experience with sex anyways?

From what I read, yes and the reasons range. They don't want to be someone's first and therefore remembered. I was told this personally.
They don't want to teach and have to do most of the work.

Apparently the first time for a women can be a handful. If she isn't comfortable and relaxed it can be painful. So it takes lots for foreplay and taking it slow. I guess the guys problem is they will just nut almost immediately.

True.

Attached: soldout.jpg (2048x1536, 604K)

Women really are retards.

>Is Lewding/Fanservice With characters who are canon victims of sexual assault/rape wrong?

Morally? No, they're drawings. They have no feelings and can give consent to literally anything if the author will put a speech bubble next to their head saying it. There's no moral failing in such a fantasy anymore than someone enjoying a female character killing a male one who catcalled her. Both are intrinsically trying to excite a certain subsection of the vast audience in order to get them to buy the product more. The important aspect of either scenario is no matter what is displayed on the page, neither example involved anyone actually suffering. The world of fantasy can be filled with Goblin Slayer getting a time stone and going back in time to stop her rape or that aforementioned female character mauling a male be undone by her magic powers that she just suddenly has. Neither example is particularly good storytelling but both showcase the flaw in attaching certain feelings to things who have no emotions themselves.

However, it is important to remember that if someone does not like them and does not want to read such cases, its perfectly valid as well. Just as much as someone not finding a comedy funny or a horror movie scary, its just not something they care for and will wish to see. The important part is to recognize fantasy, and to recognize when something is mere ink created in a mind of a singular person.

Is killing someone who are murderers wrong?

Should we treat them like lepers or something? Isn't treating them like normal women the best we can do for them?

No. If anything it's the right thing to do because there's a stigma against (ab)used goods