>Anime promotes Piracy.
Anime promotes Piracy
>bro this isn't stealing, I'm just making a copy of your shields
I want to STEAL the Queen´s opantsu.
>you wouldn't download a shield
so what does this do? just makes his legendary-shield have the same basic attributes as the copied shield?
And unlock skills related to the shields he copies
i thought the skills were what he got from absorbing killed monsters
The skills are gotten by unlocking the shields he gets by using them fot an ammount of time if they're equip bonuses. He can unlock more shields by absorbing materials, or he can copy them. I assume there's weapons you can't get by absorbing materials so having them made is an option.
absorbing stuff makes him unlock shields with skills and attributes related to what he absorbs too.
When record companies make a fuss about the danger of "piracy", they're not talking about violent attacks on shipping. What they complain about is the sharing of copies of music, an activity in which millions of people participate in a spirit of cooperation. The term "piracy" is used by record companies to demonize sharing and cooperation by equating them to kidnaping, murder and theft.
Copyright was set up after the printing press made copying a matter of mass production, typically done commercially. Copyright was acceptable in that technological context because it functioned as an industrial regulation, not restricting readers or (later) music listeners.
In the 1890s, record companies began selling mass-produced musical recordings. These records facilitated the enjoyment of music, and did nothing to interfere with listening to music. Copyright on these musical recordings was mostly uncontroversial as it only restricted record companies and not music listeners.
Today's digital technology enables everyone to make and share copies. Record companies now seek to use copyright law to deny us the use of this technical advance. The law which was acceptable when it restricted only publishers is now an injustice because it forbids cooperation among citizens.
To stop people from sharing goes against human nature, and the Orwellian propaganda that "sharing is theft" usually falls on deaf ears. It appears the only way to stop people from sharing is with a harsh War on Sharing. Thus the record companies, through their legal arms such as the RIAA, sue teenagers for hundreds of thousands of dollars for sharing. Meanwhile, corporate conspiracies to restrict public access to technology have developed systems of Digital Restrictions Management, designed to handcuff users and make copying impossible. Examples include iTunes as well as DVDs and Blueray disks.
what would be the punishment?
you have to adopt a shota and old hag?
>shota
It's a tomboy loli man
Oxford comma, use it.
It's a shota (female)
Hot-take: Intellectual Property is cancer and wouldn't even exist without authoritarians enforcing the monopolies they require.
>t. chinkshit maker
What the fuck, that shota is actually a sexy tomboy??
>Watching from pirated download
ironic
He shouldn't hide his chest.
I know this is just pasta, but it's incorrect. DVD and Bluray as formats are not innately anti-copying. Copy "protection" schemes are often added to them, particularly in a commercial setting, but the formats themselves have no such restriction by default.
Hate the law, not the medium.
Go enjoy your anarchist "paradise" somewhere in bumfuckshithole africa, where the only rules that exist are the ones you can enforce yourself (or can be enforced against you by anyone with more guns).
Like just about everything else in the entire history of everything, the middle ground is the right answer. Neither too far down the "no property ever" nor "everything is property forever" rabbit holes. Fuck your extremism idiocy. It makes things harder for the rest of us.
>t. angry boomer
Go vote for some more protectionist policies to shield your overpriced shithole from the reality that the rest of the world is out-competing you hard.
>anarchist
China's one of the most authoritarian hellholes on earth and it's progressing by leaps compared to the west by neglecting IP. Go take your $80 meds.
By the way attaching the word "property" to something doesn't make it such. There is no other property on earth that functions the way IP does ("Under no circumstances can you arrange your bread and ham into a sandwich or the feds will confiscate your property and fine/jail you")
>middle ground fallacy
keep in mind up until the americans ratified it (against thomas jeffersons objections), the only country in the world that had ever instituted this odious practice was the very country they fought to free themselves from.
Hello comrade! Your social credit score has been increase by two whole points for this post! Keep up the good work at educating these capitalists pigs.
I have never met a """"""centrist"""""" that has ever had any real belief besides "having principles is stupid". How do you even verify this idiotic generalization as being remotely true?
>Like just about everything else in the entire history of everything, the middle ground is the right answer.
Oh wait, this fuckwit can't even define a middle ground because it's a purely relativistic concept. You're a moron making non-statements.
>call china a hellhole
>point out a fact that the current US president campaigned on
>hurr social credit
Neck yourself retard.
Mother fucker didn't return the bracelet
You mean the greatest empire to ever exist? doesn’t help your case now does it.
I wouldn't have it any other way.
>the empire of toast sandwiches and fairy bread
>great
>to ever exist
The only thing that matters is "that will ever exist". Why are you wanking over a dead empire of the past instead of searching for greatness in the future?
Someone make a Shieldbro version of this
>Excuse me sir but what the fuck are you doing?
This will probably always be the funniest line in any MS paint comic.
NO that version is gay
One of the few videogame webcomic that were actually good