I havent watched anime since Houseki No kuni adaption, manga is just so much superior as an art form. Note...

I havent watched anime since Houseki No kuni adaption, manga is just so much superior as an art form. Note, anime isnt art but hypercommercialized garbage

Attached: 019.png (960x1365, 569K)

i want to get in that state

Same here.

Since most anime are trying to advertise source material instead of trying to be its own thing, most anime is going to be shit.

It's going to stay this way because making an anime for a fanbase that already exists is safer than trying to come up with a new idea.

even though we have eureka 7, code geass, and scryed?

even if you named every original anime in existence that number would pale in comparison to the number of original manga

That's only natural. Anime is more difficult to produce.

imagine tugging on another man's penis

this but 100% unironically, so many of my favorite anime got ruined by a shitty adaptation it's honestly insane
>read better manga
the classic non-argument

>favorite manga*

>even if you named every original anime in existence that number would pale in comparison to the number of original manga
huh? are you talking about the number of the fanbase that like the original anime compared to original manga or people liking original manga more than original anime?
>original manga
what? are you talking about original idea manga or something else

No, what the fuck are you on about?

I never mentioned fans at all, what. I'm obviously talking about the pure number of works.

I agree OP, I don't watch seasonal anime anymore unless it's a good looking original or WN/LN adaptation. Manga is more fulfilling in the long run.

>as an art form
This is wrong. Anime is above manga as an art form since it has way more means of conveying and expressing itself which is what art is about. However the potential of being able to do it doesn't mean that it's done correctly which is the case for most anime adaptation thus making the original manga better than the anime who failed in exploiting the potential of the medium

well then obviously there's going to be more manga than anime? people can self publish, I mean noadays there are twitter manga so of course that numbers going to be high thats like trying to compare seeds from an pineapple to an orange. and
>It's going to stay this way because making an anime for a fanbase that already exists is safer than trying to come up with a new idea.
my point was that we have several examples of succesful original anime that being to make spinoffs, AUs either as anime or manga, and KLK has a game. my point was that yeah its safer but why dont they go for it? I would love to see a studio that specializes in a certain genre to make their own anime becuase they would or should bring the best about what they're capable of

>why dont they go for it?
>Anime is more difficult to produce

>Anime is above manga as an art form since it has way more means of conveying and expressing itself which is what art is about
Confirmed for having read very few manga.

Attached: yokohama kaidashi kikou (ykk) -30.jpg (767x1100, 229K)

I wouldn't say it's above or below manga, there are artistic quirks to manga that make it unique to anime such as paging, paneling and typesetting. Anime gets the benefit of having animation and sound, but I wouldn't say they're above the things manga can offer.

>>Anime is more difficult to produce
isn't it if they use cgi?

If they use CGI they still have to have voice actors come in, have a person directing sound effects, and have music.

For manga you need only one person. You can use a few more to speed up the process, but you really only need one person.

Actually I've read quite a lot, more than I've watched anime.
I'm just being objective here

>For manga you need only one person
In most cases, who does the backgrounds then?

Backgrounds are not essential for manga in the same way voice actors or music are for anime.

Well objectively you're ignoring a shit ton anime cannot capture that manga can.

Like I wouldn't say either is above or below the other, but I would say that given comics have been around longer, have been through more authors and learning/craft, and have easily spread throughout the globe moreso than animation (arguably they have a longer history too if you just count drawings, though I'm pretty sure "comics" are recent historically) there's a high likelihood comic art has a higher number of techniques and methods in its catalogue than animation.

I don't know about most cases. I know that often for serialized manga in magazines, artists have assistants either assist with or make backgrounds, but I also know that a lot of times assistants DON'T do that, and just do finishing touches and busywork. I don't have raw numbers, but most comic artists, if we include independents, probably don't have assistants for backgrounds.

I go back and forth. Overall I think I'm more a manga person than anime person but I've recently been leaning the upsides of anime generally having a set amount of episodes over manga while are more often than not meant to keep being serialized indefinitely. I only watch adaptations of stuff I already really like though, and it isn't very often. I've mostly been watching older anime originals but I follow a decent amount of monthly manga.

I don't remember the last time I seriously watched a lot of anime. I watch a show here and there, but never consistently. The last thing I watched in full was Kemono Friends, and before that I don't even remember what the last thing I watched was.

But boy have I read a metric fuckton of manga.

>anime isnt art but hypercommercialized garbage
Well the concepts aren't mutually exclusive. The definition of something being art doesn't include that it has to be good, for one, and certainly not whether or not it has been commercialised to an arbitrary degree.
Extraneous qualities don't define art and on the whole your claim is completely worthless. If classical paintings and their reproductions suddenly became hyper commercialised that would not affect the definition that they are art. You might claim that quality of a particular artform has gone down because of hyper commercialisation but that's a whole other ballgame (you would also be right).

>all anime are manga adaptations
retard

OP said nothing to that effect. His picture hasn't even been adapted into anime.

This was shit I literally dropped it. I'm glad I have enough in me to not consume garbage

This is true because literature > film

>manga is just so much superior as an art form. Note, anime isnt art but hypercommercialized garbage
Just look at the image you posted.

how hard do you think her zebra pussy got annihilated by those nerds she had to befriend by the end of the chapter?

Attached: 1308040780395.jpg (509x377, 25K)

Is killing bites still going on or is it just abandoned for translations? I never actually watched the anime but I read the manga a few months ago but it seems dead.

The translators can only get raws from the volume releases, so we are waiting on the next volume.

makes sense, thanks

Of course you'd think manga is superior after watching CGshit.

The way I see it either they came together and worked as a team to dominate her pussy ass and throat to make her the groups cum dump or she managed to gain the upper hand on them and placed herself ontop of the nerd hairchy by using her pussy to pit them against one another,