Untitled
>UN
If only the UN treated children as human beings and not as fuckholes.
Yea Forums human rights division proposes considering OP as an ANN-shilling faggot.
I feel like this would have a lot of unintended consequences. Imagine being able to claim drawings of children on your taxes.
This would be in the case of drawings being considered real people, which I feel is requires to consider porn of them to be child porn.
Pedophile uprising when?
>ANN
>UN
The UN tried something similar before, Japan said fuck off and basically any sane artist was against it because it limits fiction for the sake of nothing. Also UN guidelines are just guidelines most countries will ignore them since nobody likes that pedophile ring
Don't UN support mudslime child brides, too?
My godforsaken hellhole for a country already went through this farce until the supreme court mitigated the law shaped very much like the UN's. The final prejudice added a requirement that there should be some sort of realism to the drawings. The cops and customs officers were the happiest as they could safely ignore weebs.
Japan requires artists to censor genitals in their art, don’t act like the Japanese government is any less retarded than any other. Possession of real child porn just got banned 5 years ago, unless something changes then banning drawn child porn is only a matter of time.
>The new Guidelines draft also states that the Committee "urges States parties to prohibit, by law, child sexual abuse material in any form ... including when such material represents realistic representations of non-existing children."
>realistic
extremely stylized characters aren't realistic, and this would ban like 70% of drawn R18 anime-styled porn because of how many characters are high-school aged since that's such a common setting. nothing will change probably except maybe if you're into clearly prepubescent 3DCG shit (which personally I find disgusting, but if no real people are being harmed, then...)
haven’t the UN been criticized for ignoring actual child trafficking and child rape crimes?
why do they care about fictional lolis?
Yeah the UN is a joke, specially now with their obsession on erasing nationalism and nation identity on the people. That's nuts
A child protection organization already debunked the UN bullshit.
prostasia.org
The censoring is a stupid thing but it doesn't really stop anyone from doing something you just have to put a filter on those parts, this on the other hand would basically ruin anime and manga. Who gets to decide what set of lines counts as a "kid" and where is the line of "too sexual"? As I said this is not a new thing and not only japanese artists are against it because once you start censoring fiction the line can be easily pushed and if someone doesn't like you you're fucked. The japs already told the UN to fuck off when they wanted to ban games and anime with violence.
Define "realistic" because I've heard politicians call fortnite as real as real life.
Yes the UN is known for raping (also kids) in the places they are "protecting".
Kinda crazy when a organisation that is against child abuse defends lolis isn't it.
Dumb frogposter.
Does this fall under off-topic, begging/advertising or this user is underage?
The sad truth is that in 30 years drawn child porn will be illegal and future normalfags will defend the laws just like you defend real child porn laws now.
>ann
What do you think?
In 30 years time western civilization will have crashed under the weight of its own decadence.
It does worry me a little, especially with regards to how many people I see who are leftists and shit and thus, should be against censorship of art forms on principle, and want "that gross loli/shota shit" banned and then go and sexualize other anime characters who are still minors half the time anyways. Do they seriously not think that LGBT oriented media (especially anime-styled) would not be the first thing that is smeared as "pedophilic and inappropriate" and banned?
No. They rebuked a special council report asking for violence against women to be banned, and a special council report asking for lolicon to be banned. Special council is UN terminology for "A member of the UN and their staff", essentially someone appointed by some country to the UN doesn't like anime. This on the other hand is a draft for general resolution on the floor which is more binding.
Japan's draft for "harmful media" under the proposed harmful books tax law includes BL, bara, oneeshota, and lolicon; any compliance they would for this probably would too.
"Leftist" and "rightist" as terms have become way too muddy to use.
"Leftist" does not mean that you are against censorship. At all.
It originally meant that you oppose social hierarchies (mostly royalty and nobility at the beginning).
Nowadays it has begun to be used to stand for liberalism, defending alternative lifestyles, which is something completely different. It is usually the people at the top who can even afford to bother with alternative live-styles so traditional leftism would be completely against their self-interests.
Censorship is only opposed by real leftism insofar as censorship is usually a tool of the powerful to maintain their power. If the people don't know what's going on, they can't do anything about it.
I'm sure the UN has more pressing human rights issues like stopping their member stats from jailing/killing gays perhaps? I mean Brunei, a member state, is gearing up to stone/amputate gays, real gays and not drawings of gays.
But those are adult gays, not drawn children.
Brunei's penal laws would also apply to children so they have that covered.
Damn it, send them a letter warning them to not throw any stones against depictions of cute minors.
>UN wants to hold their monopoly on child trafficking they would even go after drawings
TPTB are such a disgusting group of fiends, can't wait for all of them to fucking die and for their families to disappear.
Again with this shit? This was a month ago. They’re still accepting comments (except ones in Japanese) until the 31st. Just because ANN’s commenting on it (as they’re always late to the game) doesn’t mean it’s relevant.
It has long now become unfashionable to be seen as being against LGBT and religious minorities, and the US "leftists" have moved to that point as a matter of facade. Only in comparison to the religious right are they at all "left", they've adopted rights as a fashion and have no interest in the free exchange of ideas or rights for other marginalized groups beyond the ones in the spotlight. Both parties in the US are conservative authoritarian ones to the point that traditional liberal and leftist ideas like the maintenance of infrastructure and public works are seen as crazy by all. Only lapdogs of rich aristocrats are seen as legitimate heirs to the levers of power. The organizations that actually represent these values like the ACLU in the US and the AFEE in Japan are decried for applying them universally and not just to factions inside the party line.
The same parties who control the US control the UN and hold all the strings on both "sides" of the debate silencing anything that falls outside of a predetermined median that is not representative of the real issue.
In Japan it is just more obvious in that there is only the one party that has any chance of winning so the bids for power are far less public and far more local in nature. The divisions in the LDP are quite interesting in these matters in that the only unifying policy of the party is the economic sector and much of the debate on social issues is far more expansive than most places.
>hey let's fight CP in the world
>nah
>hey let's ban drawings in the world
>damn right
Not saying is wrong or right but this is very hypocrite.
Real child porn is already illegal everywhere in the fucking world, what more could the UN possibly do? They're ready to move on to the next stupid thing to scapegoat.
>what more could the UN possibly do?
Stop their agents from raping kids?
Notto dissu shitto agen...
everything is "leftist" according to the internet. like "sexual liberation," which is in reality far right authoritarian (high-ranking chad kings get their harems = pre-conservative stance, not liberal), is called "liberal." and it is. but then liberalism isn't left. especially not the anti-social way the west preaches and displays it. and then "communists" are supposedly against religion. but today's "psychosexual" shit that is often blamed on these types is in itself an excellent example of how religion comes to be = you essentially go to an exorcist ("psychosexualist") and he will "prescribe" you "prayer" = masturbation as a way exorcising disorders = possessions. then merged with the state in form of health care and co. and attempted to be enforced onto others by law. but again these types will be called "leftists" or "communists" or whatever by the internet. when really they aren't. of course they then still want to ban fictional escapism material (e.g. cute 2d teens) after encouraging or enforcing fascist and degenerate sexual practices within society under the guise of "liberalism." and the internet will, of course, call them "leftist." truly mindblowing shit.
the west needs to adopt soviet union type of ideals and gulag druggies and sexual degeneracy... only then they can start talking about rationally criminalizing escapism material without being hypocritical.
Feminazism and co are, of course, also "leftist."
>countries that allow actual child marriage
We need to respect other cultures
>countries that allow ledw drawings
STOP RIGHT THERE; CRIMINAL SCUM!