Not even 500 million

>Not even 500 million
Defend this Yea Forums.

Attached: 43.jpg (440x326, 162K)

I enjoyed Edge of Tomorrow. It was a bad adaptation, but still a good movie.

Plus it grossed ~370 million on a budget of ~180, so it probably wasn't a failure.

It got a sequel, so definitely not a failure

Attached: 1530590009503.jpg (900x900, 61K)

EOT was based as on a book, which the manga was also based on.

so smug

>no u!!
>implying you can prove someone wrong by posting smug anime girl pic

Based Tom

it did?

It's currently in development.

>EOT was based
goddamn right it was

Why was Alita the only one with anime eyes? Would she have looked better with slightly smaller eyes?

She's a martian.

Sup

Attached: Spider-Man.Into.the.Spider-Verse.2018.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H264-FGT.mkv_snapshot_01.01.55_[2019.03.17_ (1904x789, 93K)

>It was a bad adaptation
That's one of the things that kills it for me. Shit like Watchmen or V for Vendetta get re-written while staying true enough to the source. Edge of Tomorrow just reads like the SnK live action movies where someone got a 1-sentence premise of the original story and wrote their own thing around that.

Which is what all movies should be. You can't go 1 for 1 when adapting to the big screen. You have to create a film that caters to the audience and fits within the time duration. Watchmen was a really fucking boring movie even though it matches to the source material. How would you fix that?

>>Not even 500 million
It's not capeshit. What did you expect?

Anime influenced > anime adapted

Attached: Black-Swan-movie.jpg (960x640, 37K)

>Which is what all movies should be
No
>You can't go 1 for 1 when adapting to the big screen
True
>You have to create a film that caters to the audience and fits within the time duration
Sure, within reason
>Watchmen was a really fucking boring movie even though it matches to the source material.
No, it just wasn't for you
>How would you fix that?
Watchmen? Nothing because the movie matched the tone and cadence of the comics. I doubt you would like the graphic novel if you thought the movie was boring. So why adapt something to appeal to people who won't care for the source material?

Movies like 'League of Extraordinary Gentlemen' manages to have an original plot while still being enjoyable but diverge wildly from the original stories.
Alita is true to the source material and just ends at a point that either sets it up for a sequel or can just hover there forever.
'Ghost in the Shell' is a weird blender project of 2 movies, and the anime but manages to fuck everything up on every level while trying to appeal to the hollywood audience with stuff like casting a flavor of the year action star to be the main character and drum up view.
Edge of Tomorrow is an original story loosely tied to the source, but it's an average movie at best with a really dumb hollywood "everything fixed itself we won't explain why" ending.
James Cameron in a shocking amount of restraint did the right thing by sticking to the manga as close as he could.

>influenced

Attached: paprika_vs_inception.png (519x507, 522K)

Havent watch it yet, is this a Perfect Blue adaptation?

>can't post 'lol flop' because the movies actually earned some good $$$
>posts some random arbitrary number pulled out of his ass instead
From all the movies ever made there are some ~200 movies that made it above your idiotic threshold.
Guess rest of the cinematography just isn't worth it because it didn't by your logic.
Pretty retarded even for OP post.

Neon Demon surpasses Black Swan in every way

How

Neon Demon is such a wasted title for a such a shit movie.

>Left has no Tom Cruise run
>Right has many Tom Cruise runs
I think we all know why left was a failure.

>It's based Refn (Drive guy)
>Newer and not dated
>Cool neon lights
>Has Keeanu Reeves

>Has Keanu Reeves
You. I like you.