If KyoAni's business model is so succesful why doesn't everyone just copy it?

Dogakobo's pretty much copying KyoAni and they've spiked in popularity ever since they started making anime. Why aren't there more KyoAni knockoffs?

Attached: kyoani.png (1006x472, 737K)

It's too risky.

too risky

You need money first

>kyoani
>a literal garbage factory since 2011
It's not just risky but plainly retarded

Why churn out crap?

How is it too risky when DogaKobo proved it could already be done? Also, Studio Nexus has been doing better in sales when they pivoted from battle school harems, at the end of it's life, into moeblobs.

No other studio has enough animation talent.

Not a single show from the pic is good and above 7/10.

They got lucky and also their owner has money to spare

Release 5 straight years of flops?

There is merit in following the same formula, studios can't just move out of Tokyo and start making animator schools and paying a living wage based on hours and not on cuts. The kyoani mode is great and all but only a handful of studios could be able to copy them without bankrupting themselves.

Attached: 1490297729719.jpg (415x440, 41K)

Take source, rape designs with sameface and plot with CGDCT filler?

You have to finance almost the whole thing to make good profit which is atleast $2-3 million, these studios bitch about how bad the industry pays but don't put up money to invest in a show.

Reminder that the only popular show KyoAni has made since K-On was Free. Everything else has flopped.

Animate CGDCT? That's on the publishers that offer the studios work, not on the studios. Though KyoAni choosing to invest in the blockbusters that were Haruhi and K-On was a windfall for them.

The real KyoAni knockoff is PA Works anyway, down to the animation school they opened up.

Hyouka was great and you have trash taste if you think otherwise.

Didn't Hibike Euphonium do pretty well? On that note, Liz and the Blue Bird did pretty good in the box office, anime wise.

They don't have to finance the whole thing--not even KyoAni does. First financier, but Pony Canyon/Lantis/Rakuonsha/ABC Animation chip in as well.
>these studios bitch about how bad the industry pays but don't put up money to invest in a show.
It's a bit of a trap for studios. If they invest heavily and the anime flops, it could mean the end of the studio and then everyone is out of work. They don't have the benefit of resting on millions of dollars like the big disc publishers. But if you don't invest, it's going to be painful if you do lucky and put out a hit when you won't see extra money from that.

Huh? Their only flop after K-On was Phantom World. (Nichijou was Kadokawa's flop).

We dont need more shit anime

Go back to /r/anime, moe-tard

tbf kyoani lucked out on chu and free being a hit

You're also forgetting Tsurune.

where do you think you are retard

Attached: intellectual.png (361x426, 256K)

because what most of Yea Forums seems to fail to understand , it's that the studio is just the last part of the project, the one doing the job, the production committee is the real important part, producers and people putting their money on the line.
it's not like Hollywood, there is no studio war in japan because they are just contractors so most studios do fine just by doing their job.
Of course if those animation studios do a poor job and keep doing flops, they will get less and less work from publishers and committees. Then close
Kyoani decided that they could do more than being an animation studio and started investing in publishing, which requires way more money that just using someone else money and do your job, so they took a risk in a very saturated market of LN publishing and I'm not really sure it paid out well. Anime division is of course doing fine, but publishing I don't really know otherwise they would have outsourced at least some of their minor projects to other studios