Definitive Batman

Gen Xer. Grew up on Denny ‘Neil comics. Loved Batman before became le trendy to. Keaton was good but was Burton movies not Batman. Nolan made Batman boring and James Bond wannabe. This movie felt like it was all about Batman.

Attached: FBB7A72C-2C08-4562-B286-C6809184FD34.jpg (1175x1763, 299.52K)

I hate these kinds of posts. It really looks like somebody gave a TCP/IP socket to a neural network to send a POST to the board.

Attached: 1651201739076.png (151x204, 72.61K)

more like gen xi/xir

Attached: 1643771738761.jpg (473x476, 17.85K)

Fuck you. What do you prefer, if you say BTAS you’re a generic faggot. No shot it’s the best. It’s also a fucking cartoon

>Turns Riddler into some commentary on incels
>The sequel will have le grounded Clayface without shapeshifting abilities and Mr. Freeze without his ice gun
The Batman is nothing like the comics either and Reeves don't give a shit about the source material. It's literally Nolan 2.0

Bruce Timm made the only real Batman adaptation, kill yourself you fucking faggot.

I don't really have a problem with any batman. Each iteration is a product of its time. I'm fond of them all.

Attached: 1651378242390.jpg (602x602, 40.31K)

>Nolan made Batman boring and James Bond wannabe
Dude, this is Nolan again with a different filter. It's all "realistic Batman" again. Even Reeves said he will make all other "supernatural villains" the most "realistic". Even Mr. Freeze.

It amazes me how shallow can zoomers be sometimes. All you need to make them believe something is "comic book accurate" is just use a good filter and that's it. Let's forget the fact Batman is not realistic. Or that he's not a guy in a coat that walks around the city looking for problems, goes to a bathroom, changes, then fights, and changes again. Let's ignore the fact the movie is so obsessed with being realistic they don't even have Batman use his cape properly to fly. No, it has a good filter, a "kino aesthetic", and that's all that matters to comic book "purists". It wouldn't matter, because I don't give a fuck if a story is accurate to the comics, and I think this movie is good, but the problem comes when you got people like OP basically implying the only reason they like the movie is because it's "comic accurate" when it fucking isn't. Even Reeves is saying it. And no, Year One is NOT the "real" Batman. It's one of the "versions" of it. You could argue they're so many version of Batman that any version by default is accurate to the comics, but that's not what you're arguing. You're just plain saying it's a good representation of the character when it isn't. It's a new version of that character.

Hollywood hacks only know 2 Batman stories: Killing Joke and Year One
I will at least give some credit to Snyder for copying the TDKR aestheric.

>"supernatural villains" the most "realistic". Even Mr. Freeze.

But Freeze's strength is that you can do great practical with him! Art Direction should go crazy with him. Is the path to fun. Look what Prime 1 Studio did. A big dome because fuck you.

Attached: mmdc-22_mr_freeze_arkham_origins_17.jpg (3508x2480, 1.24M)

How is Nolan Batman boring when Pattinson doesn't even have a personality.

You’re such a predictable faggot. No shit best BTAS is the best adaption. It’s a fucking cartoon. If you don’t think Tim I’d a pozzed faggot look into the Cape Crusader which ran by fucking Abraham’s you faggot.
And I’ll take Reeves Riddler over flicking Jim Carey bullshit. Look I know your a faggot /tv follower triggered by black Catwamon. Suck your faggots boyfriend dick and thow yourself off a roof already

This was the most boring adaptation of Batman.

Is the definitive Batman the most nonsensical and emo? The Batman killed more people than the main villain the Riddler. The Batman was at times as powerful as Superman and Wonder Woman in their movies, and at other times he was a cartoon like Keaton.

>Turns Riddler into some commentary on incels

HE IS AN ABUSED ORPHAAAAAAN!

HE RADICALIZED HIMSELF BECAUSE HE WAS AN ACCOUNTANT IN THE WAYNE CORPORATION AND REALIZED THE MOB AND THE GOTHAM ADMINISTRATION WHERE STEALING THE SOCIAL PROTECTION FUND AND HE MADE RIDDLERCHAN TO BE ABLE TO GROUP TOGETHER ALL THOSE MARGINALIZED BY THE SYSTEMATIC CORRUPTION OF THE CITY IN ORDER TO RADICALIZE THEM AGAINST THE WRONG TARGET

OPEN YOUR EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYEEEES

Attached: green-terror.png (1024x1024, 828.94K)

Pop a blood vessel, nerd.

You’re a narrow minded faggot. Only time Batman wasn’t grounded was in the Silver Age under heavy censorship. Golden Age Batman was just Zorro in 1940s New York. Silver Age after “Seduction of Innocents” made Batman a joke. His comic was almost cancelled. Only TV show saved it

born '95

this and '89 are the best batman movies. fuck joker btw hope he's not in the sequel to an extensive degree.

Attached: a2hzh1kto8i51.jpg (1072x1797, 195.02K)

Pros
>Car
>Brawler Batman
>Gearhead, builds his shit
>Cool contact lenses
>Overall aesthetic, not afraid to be comic booky
>Fucks Catpussy all day son
Cons
>Twitter tier politics
>Batman as edgy anti-hero
>He's like, totally mentally ill
>He needs to do more philanthropy(even though Batman was the og genius billionaire philanthropist superhero)
>Gordon does nothing
>Batman wants vengeance instead of justice
>Fuckin' bat-wing-suit from Batman Vol. 1, #31 instead of going for the cape glider
It's a cool looking flick but it's not a Batman movie until like the last 30 minutes. For all the angst it has less pathos than Batman Forever

Attached: lf.jpg (2164x3000, 1.83M)

Batman originally killed people. Only faggots think he stopped because of some moral reason. Nope. It was censorship

Attached: 9F6EF683-C49F-4B04-A3C1-626F7E66A082.jpg (520x436, 69.78K)

>batman is eighty two years old
Fuck Bob Kane.

Attached: dinosaurs-drop.gif (318x240, 513.71K)

Batman 89 sucks

OP. I agree. Kane was a hack. Bill
Finger is the true creator of Batman. We all know it

Yet he lectures Catwoman about not killing. Shit movie.

you suck

This Batman doesn't build shit.

>nly time Batman wasn’t grounded was in the Silver Age under heavy censorship
Get da fuck outta here with this revisionist bullshit.
He fought fuckin vampires in Tec 31-33. Fought witches in World's Finest
Batman #1 featured an immortal zombie Joker and Hugo Strange deploying mutant giants to attack Gotham
Batman has always been Gothic Horror blended with Pulp oriented Science and Detective Fiction.

Attached: batman001_the_giants_of_hugo_strange.jpg (350x474, 87.81K)

It didn’t suck. Had a lot great scenes. Just faltered because Burton didn’t like Batman and didn’t know shit about the character and just made make a autistic Burton movie

Copium. Nolan himself mostly took inspiration from The Man who falls for BB. In TDK much of the inspiration came from The Long Halloween.

Either way, Faggots everywhere will come to appreciate Nolan more than ever as we see how "realism" can be dogshit when handled by brainlets like Reeves.

Attached: batman burton 1473265489.webm (1920x1080, 2.86M)

built his car and the shit in the batcave.

For someone who hated Batman his aesthetics fit Batman extremely well.

Attached: bdd825d4c3c3e792793625d576ba3b2b.jpg (896x794, 118.32K)

>it's going to get weird
>i'm going to make this weird

Attached: scrnli_5_9_2022_3-07-15 AM.png (1014x802, 1.03M)

>Faggots everywhere will come to appreciate Nolan more than ever as we see how "realism" can be dogshit when handled by brainlets like Reeves.
this board is the only place contrarian enough to not like the new movie lmao

He killed people like this for only the first few issues. The change happened pretty quickly, although his no-kill rule has been bent slightly over the year by some writers.

If you don’t know the difference between surreal and campy gay shit I can’t help you. Batman always been surreal. Problem is nobody today likes surreal. Tell a popular surreal movie today! Closes we got is David Lynch who filters general movie going audience. Surreal not the same as campy which you assume

Ask someone in real life what they think and not some crazy comic nerd.

I have no faith in Reeves to do this character (and others like Robin and Poison Ivy) justice. Shit on the DCEU all you want, but that was the only place we could've got a more fantastical Batmanverse. Too bad WB ruined everything.

Keep moving those goal posts faggot
You said, not me, that Batman's platonic state is grounded, I proved that point wrong. Now you're trying to play coy with this "surreal vs camp" bullshite. Batman is not a grounded character.

I never said he hated Batman. He was just never a fan. Burton literally stated this aht8h

It's literally Spider-Man 3 levels of revisionism all over again.

That's an Elseworlds tribute to the golden age Batman by Warren Ellis. Not canon.

Nope. Irl the movies reception is not that different from the standard mcu fare. Decent but forgettable. Many thought it was boring. It's only the Yea Forumsmbler faggots and twitter capeshit fans that overrate this.

I just don't hate it. I know what he is trying. But is hard as fuck to get there.

Attached: 1652033434869.webm (852x480, 1.27M)

delusional

what is canon in a multiverse?

I like Batman 89 but the biggest problem with that movie is Michael Keaton himself, the guy is a total miscast for the role. Val Kilmer did a much better job with a worse script.

capeshitters need to hang

Yeah I didn't really mean to use the word "hated". I remember hearing that, too. BTAS clearly took inspiration from Burton, though. I also like Schumacher's Gotham, even if it is CGI and filled with giant statues of half naked men.

Attached: ca577d5e2e0156b8ba340127f097255c.jpg (736x414, 45.67K)

Nigga, how is it delusional. It's 2022 and The Batman movie isn't grossing more than 780 million. That's middling reception. It had pretty good second weekend drop at the boxoffice but failed to stabilize in the proceeding weeks indicating it wasn't all that well received as we originally thought.

>>The sequel will have le grounded Clayface without shapeshifting abilities and Mr. Freeze without his ice gun

I wish they could actually sit down and think of more realistic explanations for the crazy cartoony shit instead of completely disregarding it.

Not moving goal boast. He was grounded compared to Superman who we must iconic and popular comic at that time. Sure had surreal episodes. But if you think think those stores are same as campy stupid shit Silver Age stories under heavy censorship you’e a retard

>He was grounded compared to Superman
t. haven't read 40s Superman. 40s Superman was fighting corrupt land barons and the odd evil monkey(King Kong). Batman was fighting gothic nightmares

Copium. The Joker movie btfo The Wokeman

The Court is perfect for this iteration. Is THAT simple.

The script and the dialogue doesn't hold up either.

There was some really ugly brown city cgi shots in that film.

>how is it delusional
because you're obviously biased by acting like only "'Yea Forumsmbler faggots and twitter capeshit fans" liked it. it's a reboot that did pretty well considering all the garbage DC pumps out. It did better than batman begins did and we'll see how the sequel performs when it's out. personally everyone I know or have seen liked it a lot and they're all normies.

They already did the corrupt city angle. Maybe for the third movie they will go back to it. I am very curious what they do for the 2nd movie.

Begins did better adjusted for inflation.

Yeah but sometimes it looked pretty good.

Attached: 9d319f909891a2023dc3f6037dc17c91.jpg (1080x1080, 223.29K)

Trust me. I know all about Golden Age Superman. I’ve wanting an adaption all my life. But I know toned Flescher cartoons is all I’m going to get. That said, yes Batmsn was more grounded. He want an alien with super powers

>golden age superman
That would be really something.

>alien with super powers
No, he just fought aliens/monsters with super powers like Hugo Strange's monsters or vampires like the Monk or the proto-vampire of early Joker.

Attached: bmanvsspacealiums.jpg (1637x2278, 1.33M)